😁😁😁👍👍👍 snifs is the only thing that this poor creature is good at 😉

It always does

Thats a clear sign of a people who spout stupefying verbiage bullshit most of the time.

@@chaiyamahaiya2830 yep

@@chaiyamahaiya2830 No, not at all. He made his point very clear. He was using "so on and so on" at the end as a placeholder for all movements associated with progressivism, because the audience knew that was the topic, it was unnecessary for him to list them all.

bro fascist like you are so fucking dumb. No wonder why you love hitler

People have trouble with nuance.

I agree with you that traditional family values are not modern, nuclear family values. But how is pushing for LGBT rights not against traditional values? I’m a Catholic integralist but I’d also consider myself a Marxist, I follow Catholic liberation theology which heavily emphasizes Marxism and anti colonialism

​@@GG.Sanchoocatholic and marxist? What a retard.

wanting to fk men in the ass with the blessing of the church is an anti traditional family value ass fkn does not lead to a family

But donald duck is a capitalist

@@ToxicTurtleIsMad Donald duck is a sailor

Lmao

Lol

I would say daffy

It’s in the description.

Did you remove it?

What is called "cultural marxism" is liberalism. But neoliberalism have taken such a hold on everything, so liberals fight other liberals about defitionens, "not real capitalism" vs "not real socialism". Read about Marxism-Leninism and see that it has nothing to do with this liberal crap which is defined as "cultural marxism".

@@The80sWolf_ you're right that traditional marxism has nothing to do with cultural marxism. cultural marxism is all about manifesting the revolution through culture and institutions at the hands of the intellectuals in opposed to the proletariat.

@@The80sWolf_ cultural marxism was not propounded by Marx. It's an extension of Marxism made by Marx's followers.

@@mangaman6833 But if they are Marx followers, wouldn't they be actual communists, and not "cultural-marxists" with sjw shit?

@@The80sWolf_ actual communist is a mass murdering cult. They know people love their family, country, race and heritage. Cultural marxists want to break down all this and relegate the people to animals. This is the only way they will accept communism.

Can you name a prominent thinker to combine psychoanalysis with marxism? I am genuinely curious, because they seem very much incompatible to me.

@@Kumaryoku eric fromm has an essay called "Marxism, Psychoanalysis and Reality" where he talks about how dialectical materialism and psychoanalysis are the only scientific approaches to sociology and psychology, respectively. Here is the opening paragraph: "During the last 35 years, I have written many works, in which - under different aspects - I tried to explain that there are not only points where Marxism and psychoanalysis overlap but that there is also an intrinsic interdependency between the two. This means, I do not only believe that a synthesis is possible but also an existential necessity." I thought it was pretty well known that psychoanalysis and Marxism are linked. They genuinely have similar starting points, especially a belief in the elasticity of human psychology and sociology (now disproven by empirical science). Freudo-Marxism is the whole tendency of the New Left, along with abandoning revolutionary activity in favor of gradually influencing society thru what amounts to infiltration and subversion (Fabian Socialists admit this).

@@yerusalem4832 Huh, that was a big knowledge gap for me, thanks for the info and quick reply. I've mainly been exposed to phenomenological and existential psychoanalysis, which I have (in accordance with Zizek in this clip) associated as the representant of psychoanalysis, which is of course incorrect. Do you mean by Marxism being empirically disproven that it has been shown that human psyche and its development is less dependent on societal influences than postulated?

@@Kumaryoku well, i think leftists would have to get rid of their idea of the human mind as a blank slate, which Marx seemed to take for granted. By disproven, i mean the debate over "nature vs nurture" does not skew to nurture nearly as much as most leftists would like to believe. Steve Pinker has talked about this in his Blank Slate book, how the social sciences have underestimated "evolutionary psychology." So maybe leftism itself isnt scientifically disproven but i dont see many of them discarding the outdated blank slate theory.

@@yerusalem4832 Leftists don't believe in blank slate theory. Or, if they do, they're kidding themselves. But it doesn't make a difference. Much of evolutionary psychology IS still subject to nurture, and many experts in the field dispute this very strongly. You'll find some saying that nature is the most predominent and others saying nurture. But to be quite honest, it doesn't make a difference. Morally speaking, we leftists want a society where we can help people live well and do the work they want regardless of their IQ or whatever. And honestly, unless you're a full blown nazi who wants to euthanize disabled people or something, I think you'd have trouble disagreeing with that.

His point, it seems, which many others have already made, is that 'cultural marxism' is a myth-such a thing was never promoted by the Frankfurt School

What good fringe thinkers or anonymous texts would you recommend?

​@@Bigplatts Start with Pierre L. van den Berghe and Kevin MacDonald.

@@Mr.X__777 lol, why the Fuck did you recommend a white supremacist. Jeez at least go for the relevant ones like Moldbug

I don't know who told you that political correctness was an idea by the Frankfurt school and the fact that you seem to believe that (as well as apparently you think Marcuse is still alive?) makes me wonder if you have read a single text by any Frankfurt school theorist.

​@@PoetOfNoiseThey only have read Tweets about Cultural Marxism by Pseudo-Intellectuals like Shen Babipo the other big philosopher whose name i forgot.

@@PoetOfNoiseweren’t early Frankfurt school intellectuals like Marcuse and Horkheimer opposed to Jazz and homosexuality anyway? So I don’t get how PC culture came from them directly, but I could be wrong I’m not sure

​@@GG.Sanchoo Adorno infamously wrote a hitpiece against Jazz - his biographer Detlev Claussen connects this to the fact that he was an exiled neo-classical composer who tried to fend off the pressure to economically survive by composing more popular stuff and that made him project his fears of humiliation onto Jazz. Homosexuality is a more complicated topic. They viewed the militarized, masculine group-spirit typical for fascism or fraternities as fueled by a certain homosexual libido, but that doesn't directly translate into a rejection of actual homosexual relationships. But nothing, by all means, supports the idea that PC-culture has anything to do with their ideas. Much to the contrary, in fact. They wrote a lot of stuff that can be viewed as a critique of PC avant la lettre, but not from the usual right-wing angle, of course.

You’re epitomizing exactly what the Frankfurt school wanted... to label and call anyone with any opposing viewpoints and seeing through the obscured fraud ness of Marxist ideology to respond and degrade their argument by calling them “Nazis.” Enjoy the slaughterhouse sheep.

@@justinkerrigan5863 I oppose both nazis and the idpol leftist. That makes me a sheep? Hahahaha! What a fkn clown!

@@justinkerrigan5863 Muh Frankfurt school. Bitch i only follow Marxist line of thought.

Probably because of cultural Marxism in the title, and they genuinely believe that there are cultural marxists in the US government trying to destroy western society. Nazis are retarded

@@acc314 pretty much haha

What point exactly do you mean that anecdote to serve...?

@@PoetOfNoise 0% anecdote/ 100% fact. Next time B4U post an empty response, try looking up what you're responding to. "LGBTQ Institute in Germany Was Burned Down by Nazis" 👈 CCP that & look it up.

Mr Pro Marxist sniffel dribble will be remembered long after your useless existence has ceased 😉. The man has tics get over it normie.

sad that you weren't there to show everyone what a fool you are

@@moreno4821 what about nazbol here?

I can't decide if he's just lying to the students he's recruting or also to himself... Either way he's very convincing in his Marxist standup act.

always has been

he's not

Ironically this post gives the appearance of deriding Zizek for having nothing important to say, while at the same time saying nothing of any importance. Zero examples given to support your claim that Zizek gives zero examples to support his claims. Lots of "creative talk that only fragmentary resembles philosophical reasoning" used to accuse Zizek of creative talk that only fragmentarily resembles philosophical reasoning. Trivialities leveled against Zizek for speaking trivially. Use your brain before using your words, my friend.

I think Slavoj would appreciate this critique of him

Since you apparently see right through him, I'm sure you won't have a problem pointing out the trivialities, tautologies and pseudo-philosophemes in his cross-interpretation of Lacan and German idealism, right?

@@matthewbean395 So, you basically admit that it is trivial to say that Zizek is trivial? I couldn't agree more! It is well known fact that Zizek is a clown. Thanks for proving my point you fckn imbecile!🤣

Read at least one of his books before typing this out 😂

read his books then

How so.

It's just this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_Bolshevism but with another name. Created to use as a slander and a great way to define enemies.

@@The80sWolf_ - no it is not this. You are wrong. On the contrary - what you are doing here is slander. Trying to tie Marxism with discredited Nazis as their invention, as a form of stygma. Nazis were socialists, another straing of far left anti-civilization racist movement. Targeting culture for destruction was invented and declared much earlier - by Karl Marx in 1844 and by Rousseau as an even earlier precursor. The Frankfurt School developed this idea to the modern mutation as neomarxism and it is obviously apparent, especially nowadays.