GET THE 'I Would Prefer Not To' T-SHIRT: i-would-prefer-not-to.com
Пікірлер: 1 000
@iwouldprefernotto498 ай бұрын
If you want to get Zizek's 'I WOULD PREFER NOT TO' t-shirt you can do so here: i-would-prefer-not-to.com
@hugo27623 жыл бұрын
they should team up. How dare you, and so on.
@yerdasellsavon92323 жыл бұрын
Yay
@joseferrer22813 жыл бұрын
you make my day 😂😂😂
@idontwantto81033 жыл бұрын
Yes. We need to realize united states turns worst crimes against life on earth into a debate if its ok or not. Im guessing its a tactic for illusion of some imagined free society. Thats what hes saying as well i think
@waltergrace5653 жыл бұрын
Oh, god. Sure, then we'll all kill ourselves.
@idontwantto81033 жыл бұрын
@Graf von Losinj im guessing this is an automatic bot. To distract from what the united states does. Who knows if this is automatic or not
@miles-thesleeper-monroe84663 жыл бұрын
I love the way he starts with a badass beat box
@TinyBearTim2 жыл бұрын
Beat box ? Man sounds like he’s drowning in honey
@perrylyngz10582 жыл бұрын
I can't...🤣
@masacatior Жыл бұрын
He's an old medieval shopkeeper
@Ve-suvius11 ай бұрын
kzfaq.infozomwM3Xbl7c
@leok72310 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@D.O-3 жыл бұрын
I love how hes a slovenian man speaking english while simultaneously throwing in german and french words xD
@paavosallinen13933 жыл бұрын
That explains why I play and replay and still can't understand some of it.
@SpaceTimeManipulatorSTM2 жыл бұрын
and the subtitles are all in Dutch.
@SacristanRacing2 жыл бұрын
Euros
@janthomassen41752 жыл бұрын
That's how we speak, adopt a superior word to emphasize. Oh sorry, European speaking
@stevanstankoviii-29892 жыл бұрын
When he was on serbian news he spoke a lot of English words
@mitsukashihatake4142 жыл бұрын
This man is snorting facts!
@hamayun11122 жыл бұрын
why u do him dirty like that
@Leftyotism2 жыл бұрын
@@hamayun1112 I think he doesn't look at his shit before he flushes it. : >
@Frvnklin2 жыл бұрын
🤣😭😭
@Leftyotism2 жыл бұрын
@doesitmatter itdoesntmatter Or maybe I am checking my health if I do so : >
@chlorine57952 жыл бұрын
@@Leftyotism tasting it gives you a better assesment. Just a professional tip.
@anollune81022 жыл бұрын
mans accent so strong the youtube subtitles are in dutch lol
@redshift9122 жыл бұрын
Lol
@user-cp1dk6qr6p Жыл бұрын
Racist common
@cristian-bull Жыл бұрын
lmao I can't blame the algorithm for getting confused tho. There is probably a "fast one" that focuses on spectral analysis, and then they use voice to text translation. Probably the first one failed
@schmirgldecks9 ай бұрын
haahahahhaha
@Paolur3 жыл бұрын
"We don't know for sure, but when we do it will definately be too late" Fucking brilliant
@JohnDoe-do8fh3 жыл бұрын
It's the same argument people use to justify a belief in god, idk how profound it is.
@rm93083 жыл бұрын
Just push nuclear. Problem solved.
@agataa.58713 жыл бұрын
Well except...with Climate Change we DO know for sure.
@RoseInTheWeeds3 жыл бұрын
@Martin Patrick Anyone who thinks nuking their percieved political/idealogical enemies is in any way a good idea is a fucking idiot.
@RayZappa3 жыл бұрын
@Martin Patrick If 99% of us have to die to make you happy then please at least do it in an environmentally friendly way
@paavosallinen13933 жыл бұрын
Got to love Zizek's take on "Antigone". Sophocles wrote Antigone around 441 BC. In the story King Creon disallows Antigone's brothers burial, because he had lead a foreign army. Antigone buries her brother anyway. She is sentenced to death but hangs herself before the execution. Or - as Zizek puts it: Antigone says: "Fuck off I want to bury my brother", and Creon says "yes but look at the political situation and so on and so on". I love it. So 2021.
@deisecandido27992 жыл бұрын
Yes, but actually, it's a lacanian intepretation that Zizek is very familiar with, as he works also with psychoanalytical theory. Jacques Lacan has lectured about Antigone (Seminar 7) and how she represents the desire in its purest form, above common laws, beyond good and bad or understanding. The decision to bury her brother is an ethical one, and in his understanding, beyond morality. Lacan uses Antigone to make a point about the ethics of psychoanalysis which is about the subject and its singularity.
@johndelanoatompunk11532 жыл бұрын
I studied Antigone in Verona, years ago, interesting story.
@tobiaszb2 жыл бұрын
reminds the history of the world in 20 min video.
@mechwar2 жыл бұрын
After your comment the "don't look up" fin came out 🙂
@schnitzelsemmel Жыл бұрын
Zizek actually has written his own version of Antigone
@chrismontante75433 жыл бұрын
He’s mastered so much, except the letter “S”
@jonatopik3 жыл бұрын
Im crying 😂
@CLDLL-yr8df3 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@DougErapps3 жыл бұрын
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! excellent!
@alisalman32642 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@maria.k40342 жыл бұрын
SZSCH
@iDontCare12345Countess Жыл бұрын
He’s literally spitting facts 💦
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
What facts were spitted?
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
@@daniarocio5001 Becusae Im not a sheep nor a monkey on the monkey mountain. Im a free , intelligent , free-thinking person that doesnt like BS nor anything that blindly follows anything.
@ayushgurung9564 Жыл бұрын
@@RightfootWestHam satire?
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
@@ayushgurung9564 Dont understand your question, noone does.
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
@@daniarocio5001 What is the purpose of that question? "I literally quoted him as satire lmao you are not what you said, you are just so scared of being considered "slow" you feel the need to prove yourself wherever you are. " No you didnt: here is what you said: "how dare you, and so on" Just stop contacting me with this level of idiocy, thank you.
@Marwan-cn7yi3 жыл бұрын
Excellent opening lip smacks, sniffs, and so on and so on
@blackenedjustice5033 жыл бұрын
These are overused but this one is gold
@P-therapy3 жыл бұрын
Roared laughing
@mikhailg46673 жыл бұрын
And you know
@gerardvila46853 жыл бұрын
I agree with everything he said but boy how I wish he would leave his nose alone for a minute.
@johngrotefeld63023 жыл бұрын
ticks all the boxes
@seanmcdonald4686 Жыл бұрын
I just learned of this man’s existence in the last week, and he’s immediately one of my all-time favorite humans.
@miles-thesleeper-monroe846610 ай бұрын
from a safe distance
@shakhster83829 ай бұрын
he'd think you were a moron for finding someone through youtube that becomes your favorite human
@seanmcdonald46869 ай бұрын
@@shakhster8382 Fair point.
@shakhster83829 ай бұрын
@@seanmcdonald4686 hahaha not very often a KZfaq comment ends in ‘fair point’. Fair play Sean.
@SaladBoy729 ай бұрын
@@shakhster8382And he'd think you're a moron for taking the comment literally and not just a hyperbolic way to say he enjoys what he says
@NovakiSalem2 жыл бұрын
all the people in the audience that never read Antigone: "What the hell is this guy talking about burying his Crayon?"
@schnitzelsemmel Жыл бұрын
that debate was in Austria where a lot of people still have Latin in high school and either there or even in German Literature class you will definitively learn about Greek Literature like Antigone
@lapinus Жыл бұрын
@@schnitzelsemmel yeah and even if you don't study Latin and Greek, antigone is still studied in Italian high schools.
@mantabond Жыл бұрын
Hahaha. A shame, really. Has the West fallen so far back behind?
@7th808s3 жыл бұрын
As an autistic person I can say he doesn't misrepresent us. There are other autistic people too, so don't take my word to be holy, but I personally found his description very accurate.
@salvadorkda57583 жыл бұрын
But i don't find zizek "autistic" , yeah , he have his ticks and those stuff, Is just representing different people , just like me and just like you , who can use the perfect words to explain but sill have the sense of need to express yourself what you think. step in that way.
@tuyenerotuyenero22023 жыл бұрын
hahahaha yeah sure
@VivekaAlaya3 жыл бұрын
yeah me too! I'm oftenly read as 'arrogant' when i'm just trying to be informative 'straight to the facts'. So I understand how greta must feel and i like zizek perspective
@debless95723 жыл бұрын
@@salvadorkda5758 he's not. Greta is.
@Dude00002 жыл бұрын
@@salvadorkda5758 he’s talking about Greta, the messenger of certainly the Rothschilds, and many more ‘to big to fail’ families and people, like Gates, who all contribute to the media. How do you think she got across the Atlantic Ocean in a ‘carbon neutral boat’. Then have the worlds media report on her setting off? (Is that going to influence the way they write about certain subjects, especially the people and their ‘charitable work’? It’s the start of the ‘narrative’, journalists aren’t like detectives anymore, they’re >99% writers, more artistic, so prefer the ‘narrative’ genre of writing their journalism. Unlike the facts and evidence based approach. That’s why they have, and are becoming more left wing. They used to be predominantly right wing, but with academia being taken over by the left, this is one example of the consequences.
@Ixquick9793 жыл бұрын
When he talks he slurps so much that KZfaq`s automatic subtitle algorithm thinks that he is speaking Dutch.
@josephinestabel96473 жыл бұрын
The subtitels are terrible lol How is this possible...... 🌍
@giacomosimongini54522 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a joke...😶
@CamouflageMaster2 жыл бұрын
Except for his 's' and 'l' pronunciation, he actually sounds pretty similar to people from Antwerp where I'm from. My accent doesn't differ very much from his
@floatingsara2 жыл бұрын
He could also come from French Auvergne
@Heopful2 жыл бұрын
Do the Dutch do a lot of slurping?
@cifer80702 жыл бұрын
The auto generated subtitles perfectly capture his speech
@conancat3 жыл бұрын
Zizek is a global treasure
@aiaramchek20773 жыл бұрын
Just as the global warming. Found by wannabe scientists to play climate games with federal funding.
@hjertrudfiddlecock43942 жыл бұрын
you could say.. internationalist treasure
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
@@aiaramchek2077 The global federation?
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
Disagree. What makes him that?
@ribbrascal1065 Жыл бұрын
To other leftist slobs on the lower end of the desirability hierarchy.
@arturdankovsky82933 жыл бұрын
Hallo! I wanted to ask what conference is that clip taken from because I wanted to see all the members opinions and the whole discussion. Thank you!
@datnguyenthe83003 жыл бұрын
If i can recall correctly, the name of this talk was "Disorder under Heaven" and it took place in Vienna. But you'll find that Slavoj talked most of the time, as always. :)
@arturdankovsky82933 жыл бұрын
@@datnguyenthe8300 *members' opinions, to correct my previous comment and thank you for your response!:)
@masacatior Жыл бұрын
Hallo, da bin ich
@OBGynKenobi3 жыл бұрын
He missed a spot on his face.
@stairway113 жыл бұрын
Brooooo 🤧😵
@23ofSeptember3 жыл бұрын
The main problem is that politicians rarely take a stand on anything if it threatens the popularity of their political party or their own reelection. And if they do take a stand, they won't get many donors the next time around.
@samjoshi18123 жыл бұрын
The solution is public funding for political parties, dependent on membership numbers, which rewards grassroots popularity at the expense of elite rich donors
@Ce0ammer2 жыл бұрын
@@samjoshi1812
@KeinAzzlack Жыл бұрын
Democracy is built in a way to make controversial politics impossible even if the controversial politics are needed
@mshepherd3243 жыл бұрын
i dont think any of the other speakers wanted to hold the mic after him
@BigTrixxx3 жыл бұрын
Ouch! 🔥
@kzr_16133 жыл бұрын
H i l a r i o u s
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
I would... but Im not a speaker.
@wanderer95003 жыл бұрын
Verleugnung (Denial in English) : Refusal to accept reality, thus blocking external events from awareness. Anna Freud postulated that an individual ignores the perception of real sensory impressions and their meaning thus the threatening pieces of external reality can be recognized as non-existent.
@loversembrace3 жыл бұрын
where can i read more on this work from Anna?
@atthecore45603 жыл бұрын
That statement is so vague, I don't think you can even describe it beyond your own subjective opinions.
@puk47633 жыл бұрын
@@atthecore4560 too smart for YT :(
@ph-vf5hx3 жыл бұрын
@@atthecore4560 it conveniently glosses over the fact the correlation between external events and how they are percieved don't constitute a unified reality. We don't see the world in the same way and we never will.
@atthecore45603 жыл бұрын
@@puk4763 Good news everyone! I fulfilled my purpose in existence lol
@sandelic13 жыл бұрын
I often wondered what would Žižek do if one tied his hands behind his back in some debate.
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
I take him on in a debate. Not a hard debate what so ever since he only talks emotions and feelings ,not facts.
@hyusuf4280 Жыл бұрын
Wrong. You're just A much in your feelings and emotions as you say he is.
@jimjimmy8900 Жыл бұрын
@@RightfootWestHam Zizek would wreck your ass
@KanadMondal11 ай бұрын
@@RightfootWestHam He talks about life And that he hates it
@shakhster83829 ай бұрын
Shoulder nose snarf
@darthnephilim3 жыл бұрын
Zizek is providing baseball signals in perpetuity
@fuggoff52773 жыл бұрын
his professional career began as a stamp humidifier
@EddyTritten3 жыл бұрын
I hate you for making me laugh
@gheckgavvy28763 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@justing49273 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@benoitbvg28883 жыл бұрын
... a position he held a short two days before getting fired for inaccurate aiming
@vaxxyourass34363 жыл бұрын
I laughed ugly
@francob31553 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your content but I think it would be better if you included the name of the interview/conference and the year it was recorded in every description.
@Gyfrctgtdbhf Жыл бұрын
Would love to meet this man but no way in hell would shake his hand.
@Anudorini-Talah2 жыл бұрын
You know its gonna be a good one then the first three seconds are sniffing and snorting already XXDDD
@moreadrenalin72523 жыл бұрын
Im german and we had this guy in our English test last friday (im in year 11) and they played some Audio Clip where He Talks about ideology and we had to translate to german. I dont have a clue how they find All these Audio clips in English where you dont under stand anything and i just got myself a F
@levineberlin75363 жыл бұрын
Achso na dann
@gerhardkling3 жыл бұрын
Even for native speakers he is not easy to understand - still love to listen to him even if I disagree
@Yabroproductions333 жыл бұрын
This guy’s a propagandist and hates hard workers. F with honor yo
@moreadrenalin72523 жыл бұрын
@@Yabroproductions33 😂😂😂
@moreadrenalin72523 жыл бұрын
@@Yabroproductions33 1. Literaly everything is propaganda, you can only decide whos propaganda to Listen to. 2.its the exact opposite, he is on the side of the Hard workers and He hates the leeches that let other people work for them or make money of Basic necessity like housing, Water etc
@analoguejerry90663 жыл бұрын
I wish they had a sign person next to him.
@reunited2583 жыл бұрын
He doesnt need one, he does it himself.
@RrRr-or5tw3 жыл бұрын
@@reunited258 what does the part mean when he touches his nose
@somegenerichandle3 жыл бұрын
seriously. I can hear and the auto-captioning is lousy. This needs to be more accessible. The youtuber could fix the autocaption and youtube needs to allow channels to crowd source captioning again.
@arjenbij3 жыл бұрын
They did that once, he drowned.
@marcind46443 жыл бұрын
Zizek would be a super spreader for sure.
@GordonSeal2 жыл бұрын
Oh how original, I haven't seen that joke about him a thousand times before.
@blikpak37292 жыл бұрын
@@GordonSeal ye
@bobbyjuju74422 жыл бұрын
@@GordonSeal But is he right?
@UnremarkableMarx2 жыл бұрын
Dig the splash zone
@lordXAVIJAANBJERGNOG Жыл бұрын
Consumerist egotist?
@Potatoarmy123 жыл бұрын
im so proud he is from my country i wish to meet him one day
@mehdimehdikhani58993 жыл бұрын
Never meet your heroes.
@ivanadrobnjakovic85583 жыл бұрын
.
@Potatoarmy123 жыл бұрын
@@ivanadrobnjakovic8558 because he is my countryman am i not allowed to?
@Potatoarmy123 жыл бұрын
@Mephisto von Döbelstein of course
@ivanadrobnjakovic85583 жыл бұрын
@@Potatoarmy12 In general, people can not be proud of something if they didn't participate in that. That is only an illusion. Just because we are identifying ourselves with something it doesn't mean we can be proud of that. I mean, ofc. you can - that is your feeling. But there is no sense there. Another illusion is hidden in there. We are proud of good things our countrymen do but we have no responsibility in evil things that our countrymen do. And I think that is dangerous.
@magnus78153 жыл бұрын
I also like this movement, Fridays and so on.
@aotoda4863 жыл бұрын
What is the description describing?
@MediaFilter3 жыл бұрын
The subtitles are amazing!
@andyinwards21193 жыл бұрын
Don’t even attempt subtitles
@Celestity3 жыл бұрын
and so on and so on hahahaha
@ST-yc7uj3 жыл бұрын
Dutch!!!
@monteanthony10223 жыл бұрын
Holy shit lol
@fvb1369 Жыл бұрын
What he is saying in 1 sentence; Greta speaks her mind directly without falling for the political correctness and that's what we need more off in this world.
@thorekobs9219 Жыл бұрын
"her mind" = #Scriptgirl (Margaret Klein Salamon, "Leading the public into emergency mode", a 2016 framing manual for climate hysteria: "House on fire" phrase etc)
@hyusuf4280 Жыл бұрын
And a conservative know it all speaks.
@tdb517 Жыл бұрын
Still, what she is saying is not politically correct. That she or someone else wrote for her doesn't matter.
@hypnogri5457 Жыл бұрын
@@tdb517does that mean that its wrong
@susanthejew63517 ай бұрын
he makes a very good point with a very bad example someone who's a straight shooter is good but greta in an uninformed idiot that lets emotions do the talking we have enough emotional idiots speaking their mind.
@tasteinmusic35103 жыл бұрын
I love listening to him but it's so hard to follow 🤣
@brittanymay14393 жыл бұрын
You just gotta pay a bit of attention and so on and so forth.
@Calligraphybooster3 жыл бұрын
He is very fluent...
@zza80013 жыл бұрын
It seemed to me that he was really only making one simple point but he continue to reiterate and retrace it and beat it into the ground.
@michadunski4722 жыл бұрын
I can't
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
Its because he is sharing his feelings and opinion, like a dogmatic woman.
@aminrodriguez4707 Жыл бұрын
I totally agree, certain situations do require a dogmatic approach of no negotiation or committment.
@shakhster83829 ай бұрын
I agree but how do you fit any of that dogmatism into western democratic society?
@ddavila32 жыл бұрын
What’s the Freudian term he refers to? I can’t distinguish it to type it out and further read. Said it stands for “I know, but...”
@riccocalzone9488 Жыл бұрын
I love how everything about his way of speaking is so unappealing but you are still hanging on his lips because it's just phenomanal content wise.
@vitocorleone37643 жыл бұрын
How do you spell that word Freud used?
@veselinlazevski90193 жыл бұрын
not a german but i think its verleugnung
@paddy53223 жыл бұрын
A German and yeah that's how you spell it
@Warriorcats643 жыл бұрын
That just denial.
@JerryShelby3 жыл бұрын
The video has Dutch (auto generated) subtitles.
@mareksicinski3726 Жыл бұрын
0:55 yes, but that doesn't mean not being domatic, depending on the situation- things stay the same if they don't change
@memetjansemet91303 жыл бұрын
Doctor: you can't touch your face constantly like that it might cause your life. Zizek: ok, can I touch somebody's face near me then?
@darrenfleming790110 ай бұрын
I like Zizek's point about dogmatism, it highlights a weakness of our ultra democratic liberal societies that is basically never addressed, the inefficiency and potential dishonesty of leaving every single subject up for debate, because it is the open-minded and democratic thing to do in principle. It opens us up to getting bogged down in inefficient debates or lose motivation at actually achieving a goal we may have already agreed upon (what he means by the "mais comment"). Even worse, it gives the opportunity to certain people to purposefully bog down the conversation into endless debate ensuring actions are never taken, which is most evident in the lobbying around climate action. This is also why to me centrism is the most infuriating political ideology, especially this "critical thinker" brand of centrism like Destiny that is absolutely obsessed with over-nuancing and debating every single topic never arriving at any definite conclusion that could be acted upon, in effect ensuring that the status-quo or the current trajectory of change is unopposed. There's no clear answer whether it's better to be dogmatic or open-minded, because too open-minded and you can be manipulated or placated into endless debate and inaction, while too dogmatic and you can lose the ability to distinguish right from wrong and become driven only by dogma. But one thing's for sure, our inability to deal with issues like climate change is a clear sign that we are perhaps too open-minded and not dogmatic enough in our approach.
@XYZ-kb3mm9 ай бұрын
our populous is too uneducated for real democracy because of the stronghold authoritarianism has on our systems of education. make people smarter & less focused on surviving and we can have a real democracy instead of an authoritarian capitalistic hellscape where everyone’s so neurotic and traumatized that they can’t actually consume politics or participate in politics without it being for the purpose enacting meaningless vengeance on out-groups. we’re uncivilized and it’s by design. the fact that liberals can’t get shit passed is not a bug in the system, it’s a feature. it’s not going anywhere. the DNC is not in the business of truth telling or sticking up for the truth. politics is a game to them. open-mindedness doesn’t mean being uneducated, unopinionated and easily manipulated. it’s ideally the opposite. being “dogmatic” and being “open minded” aren’t antonyms. there are absolute truths in politics. being “dogmatic” is only an issue when you’re wrong or your ideas are unproven. ie religious. it’s not an issue when you’re educated in social sciences and politics. no, you don’t have to rule with an iron fist nor hurt anybody or enforce opinions by law if you’re “dogmatic”, because dogmatic people can also be extremely open minded. empathy doesn’t mean sacrificing your values, if you’re a well balanced human. you’ve created a false dichotomy. reducing people down to a science without losing their humanity requires a lot more effort than you put into this comment!!
@Ethan_Frost3 жыл бұрын
He makes me itchy just be looking at him...
@btlfilmmedia95143 жыл бұрын
he scratches your itch
@arturosuarez-silverio59833 жыл бұрын
Zizek uses too much oxygen and his mike is not sufficiently energy efficient.
@yannieso48893 жыл бұрын
well said, well said.
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
What was well said? Even an child can express feelings and emotionbased opinions. Very few people deem what they say to be "weill said"
@chloegrobler42752 жыл бұрын
in our current global, capitalistic consumerism we have effectively numbed a great deal of the public by simply saying 'here, you can spend a bit more and pretend you have made a difference'. its moral licensing at work.
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
Profitable, too.
@GalabuziX3 жыл бұрын
And so on and so on................
@chrismontante75432 жыл бұрын
Great points, incidentally can you please come speak in California so we can end the drought?
@ma.fer_12 жыл бұрын
😂😂💀
@yueea2 жыл бұрын
finally some sense in the whole greta conversion.
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
What made sense about this Yue? Because all I heard were feelings and emotionbased opinions about another person and a situation. No facts. So please try to explain to me what made sense here.
@user-yt7zo3rf6d3 жыл бұрын
I need English subtitles! Pleease!! It’s not so difficult
@dixsusu3 жыл бұрын
How dare you, and so on so on so on .
@karolinanie59462 жыл бұрын
I have Dutch subtitles 🤣
@503sld Жыл бұрын
Man oh man!!!! This is refreshing!!!
@the-method81 Жыл бұрын
Spit literally is flying through my phone. Couldn't believe it.
@IrradioMan2 жыл бұрын
Zizek: sniff sniff Greta: how dare you?! 😭
@tonlon-en3se3 жыл бұрын
How did manage to get his first job imagine His inteview!!
@robertm3463 жыл бұрын
Explains the homeless vibe.
@alannothnagle3 жыл бұрын
If you watch his older videos from the 1990s, he comes across as far more "normal," with far fewer tics and sniffling. Whatever his problem is, it appears to be worsening with age.
@matthewmichealattard76023 жыл бұрын
Most of these neomarxists have never worked an actual job in their lives..
@marxwasright253 жыл бұрын
@@matthewmichealattard7602 A simple Google search would disprove your absurd ignorance.
@rikk9370 Жыл бұрын
I think now we know for sure
@ljslo....2 жыл бұрын
Žižek 👍👏
@m.j.96273 жыл бұрын
I thought I would use the subtitles to help me track what in the hell he is saying. Oy! What a mistake.
@gregorywilkinson57313 жыл бұрын
The first 3 seconds of this video are tremendous
@stefan10242 жыл бұрын
True beatboxing
@gertbruwer70722 ай бұрын
Link to the original ???
@iamhere444 Жыл бұрын
His accent is so strong that youtube gives you dutch translation :D
@zulfikaregzikutor55612 жыл бұрын
incredible genius i'm proud that we were born in the same country....
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
What did he say that you think was genius? All I heard were feeligns and emotionbased opinions... anyone can have those.
@iga279 Жыл бұрын
I think his genius is in his nose; that's why he keeps rubbing it, and rubbing, and rubbing, ad infinitum.
@flamo2666 Жыл бұрын
@@RightfootWestHam what..? he was just sharing his view on Greta Thunberg, would've you preferred he veneered what he said as some sort of objective truth rather than the open discussion it obviously is? you seem like the type who gets easily decieved by misleading graphs. it's so ironic by being so concerned about "facts" and "objectivity" you end up shutting down all avenues for possible critical thought. this obsession with logos that certain people have is honestly frightening.
@RightfootWestHam Жыл бұрын
@@flamo2666 "what..? " Noone in the history of mankind understand this question. What do you think is the purpose of a question?
@flamo2666 Жыл бұрын
@@RightfootWestHam great way to completely avoid everything I said by fixating on the smallest detail imaginable. surely you're not socially inept enough to not understand that "what..?" is just a phrase to show confusion.
@booniesblues73103 жыл бұрын
I get that she is supposed to demand answers and not supply them, but there is another great Zizek video "Think, don't act." Where he talks about how people often want revolutions but don't think what should happen after, I feel like the climate movement has lost a lot of steam and people have gone back to not caring and most countries arent doing anything really and the ones who are just do the bare minimum, I feel like the demand solutions instead of action allowed politicans to go "We'll look into" and not following up
@tuyenerotuyenero22023 жыл бұрын
yeah but what actions? what can a country do that will make a considerable contribution without killing have its population
@retardinho50483 жыл бұрын
The problem here is very simple: When there are 3 countries, that create over 50% of the CO2 emissions, others can’t do too much, that would change the game. So especially those (China, US and India) have to work harder. But there is also a lot of different ecological disaster, like water pollution in Africa r the rain forest burning in Brazil, that add to the problem. All in all I would say, that nothing can be done anymore. We have to adapt, because humans don’t change. The need for more will be always greater, than common sense. Wich interestingly isn’t that common.
@chloegrobler42752 жыл бұрын
@@retardinho5048 i would quickly suggest a focus to local, sustainable production. it would make us a lot more responsible for what we produce and would take power away from china and india in their role in the global economy. though I also realise the reason china is the factory of the world, people want cheap shit and don't want to pay their workers a living wage because its soo much cheaper to exploit a Chinese worker overseas where the consumer doesn't have to think about it all that much.
@kasperkappe9066 Жыл бұрын
@@retardinho5048 That is definitely part of the problem. There are other aspects to it of cource, but this is an important one. We will probably not be able to prevent anything in the short term, mainly becouse other countries are too poor to give a shit, and also becouse science is difficult and the most efficiënt solutions need time to be discovered. We would however be able to make a difference in the long term @tuyenero tuyenero . There have been several great researches that suggested it would be best to invest in: getting poor countries developed asap, decreasing child malnutrition, things like that. Also investing in new tochnologies (like actual good nuclear power plants or cheaper renewable energy) would be very important. Getting more people out of poverty to be able to care more, and to have more brainpower availible to help with research should be the main concerns.
@kasperkappe9066 Жыл бұрын
This approach does in fact also constitute having to "adapt", but only in the short term
@LOLERXP Жыл бұрын
On the day subtitle AI can manage Zizek, it can be considered sentient.
@RustyDruff Жыл бұрын
It's kinda funny that when he wanted to say torture he first thought of the german word Folter.
@tonywoutrs3 жыл бұрын
From what I observe, she's become a meme for most on the internet, climate change activists are so easy to hate for some reason, but I guess that's the martyrdom they accept for a modicum of change.
@tonywoutrs3 жыл бұрын
@Hugh Mungus yea but aren't we all? There are lots of things worthy of critique which we've grown dependant on. When they come across like condescending assholes, I totally get you, but I simultaneously don't think activism is useless. Sadly too many people virtue signal without making an actual contribution, so perhaps there's only so much being polite and passive can do.
@ravendarkjolls40283 жыл бұрын
@Hugh Mungus if only the face of climate change activism are people like Alex Honnold, Killian Jornet, and Emelie Forsberg. People who made a major part of their lives playing in the mountains and wild open spaces and have achieved incredible feats of human skill and technique. Instead they chose Greta. 🤣🤣🤣
@samjoshi18123 жыл бұрын
@Hugh Mungus The names listed above disqualify the moronic generalisation you make when you say 'climate change activists are self righteous hypocrites'
@markwhite60013 жыл бұрын
@Hugh Mungus here here
@markwhite60013 жыл бұрын
More middle class nonsense yet again, martyrdom don't make me laugh
@marmadukescarlet77913 жыл бұрын
How seriously you take it might depend on where you live ... I live in Australia.
@tuyenerotuyenero22023 жыл бұрын
@Joseph Norm wild fires are very common
@tuyenerotuyenero22023 жыл бұрын
@Gaynor Lewis no, it depends on the money you have, the more money you have the more time you can afford to not worry for basic things and the more you would worry for (for example) climate change, ask a taxi driver in mexico city (a lot of them have college degree, some are even doctors) ask them if they are worried for climate change when they are strugling to take food to their families.
@FredoCorleone Жыл бұрын
Listening to this with bone conduction headphones and I can feel the sniff to the very core
Zizek is the only one i know who tosses in random deutsche Wörter
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
Are you sicher?
@thestruggler776 Жыл бұрын
@@davidwuhrer6704 can you think about jemand other?
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
@@thestruggler776 Would not be difficult, mine Herr.
@thomascromwell68402 жыл бұрын
Zizek is the most terrifying philosopher I've ever heard of.
@nts4906 Жыл бұрын
?? What u scared of mate? The slobber or the truth?
@dhdhejehuwbs843 Жыл бұрын
I am not nearly educated enough to even understand a third of what he is saying most of the time but you really get the feeling that he’s the joker of modern philosophy and I’m all here for it. All I can really say is fuck these cringelord moralists and the modern left is far too weak and seems unconcerned with backing up their values with sound reasoning.
@shakhster83829 ай бұрын
Commentator. Not philosopher
@jakemorj54982 жыл бұрын
Which sniffs do you prefer? The sniffs at the start, the middle or the end?
@gabrielthomas7773 жыл бұрын
I'm not touching that mic.. ever!
@ph-vf5hx3 жыл бұрын
I have panic attacks trying to watch this man 😂
@izoyt2 жыл бұрын
how about listen and try to think doing it?
@SpaceTimeManipulatorSTM2 жыл бұрын
I think he had a point. It went in a lot of different directions and I eventually lost it completely but it was there.
@floku89502 жыл бұрын
I think he actually had a pretty clear point this one time. FFF acts as a dogmatic young movement with a clear simple message of acknowledging the urgency and reality of climate change beyond the political mainstream which often highlights the complexity of the issue and gets a bit too comfortable hiding behind the complexity so much that it became a common convention to take a measured and moderate approach which balances ecology, economy and social welfare which isn’t wrong but has started to ignore the urgency. Greta is also on the autism spectrum and autistic people are known for straight talking and not caring too much about social conventions and etiquettes. His point now is that she has integrated that into the messaging of FFF and uses it to give a wake up call
@hamzahmohammed54912 жыл бұрын
Your point is a common criticism, and understandably so against him but this probably isn’t the right vide to bring it up in because this was very clear and straightforward if you just listen
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
He kept the momentum from the start and never changed direction.
@DG-lo Жыл бұрын
Video starts at 0:04
@analoguedragon74383 жыл бұрын
I wanted to steal her dreams, but there were too many people waiting in line.
@kzr_16133 жыл бұрын
Somebody should make a meme about zizek and the people who constantly talk about his sniffing with the "missed the point" Template
@mansi21032 жыл бұрын
i like his thought process because he's very original in his ideas, he's not some hive mind, he has his own unique take even on present matters
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
A hive mind is any mind expressed by the collective actions of individuals. Examples are ant colonies, bee colonies, and human languages.
@dilananderegg74582 жыл бұрын
And so on and so on
@Birthdaycakesmom3 жыл бұрын
Maybe the advancing glacier is responding to the flow of heat and growing away from main heat output “pipe.” Still, its a good idea to do as little to the earth to generate energy. The work is dangerous and the jobs are romanticized. The need for money has obscured our need for a kind of insurance. If someone might die for me to heat my room, is this a reasonable equation? Solar energy, for example, is a kind of insurance, and insurance is a good idea. Plus, “green” or green energy takes less time and less work to produce. I don’t like typical energy production because I think it invisibly manifests economic control and rigid class structuring. You have a guaranteed work force, which on one hand is good because people will have work, but on the other hand not so good because people might end up trapped and unable to recognize they can do more. Some people will of course be as happy as a clam, but I think again, this may have more to do with being able to provide for themselves rather than job fulfillment. No one is truly totally fulfilled, but dirty work and falsified notions of how happy these people might be are expounded upon by people only on the receiving end. Plus, with reliance on one source there is a restriction on choice. Most people are forced to use typical energy sources. Why does it have to be that way? Furthermore, even if there was no such thing as global warming, why rip through the earth if we don’t have to do it? Some people say solar panels are polluting because they take up land space, but this also has to do with the need to change the designs. Miles and miles of desert can easily become major sites of solar power, and they would be nowhere within view unless you were to fly over them. Imagine if Denver was flooded with solar panels all along route 70 for example. People should have the right to exercise choice without fear of recrimination: this pairs well with a democratic country. The issue with green energy is it has become mired with politics. It’s a good idea that we have energy insurance, that we create work that is unlike jobs such as these that can be dangerous and demoralizing, to leave the earth alone if we don’t have to cut into it, and to move on from debates as to whether not global warming is real to the fact that in the country we are paying for the hazards this energy sources carries in our bills. You may have to pay more so someone else can have running water, why? Why not save money, work cleaner and safer with less exhausted people, and at the very least “rotating the crops.”
@sutarjokomar93843 жыл бұрын
"Precisely" Proceed to explain things "imprecisely"
@nuclearcatbaby11313 жыл бұрын
I'm autistic but I'm not dogmatic. At least not in my thinking. My thinking is very nuanced. My behavior however is very dogmatic. I cannot be nuanced in how I behave in public, I have to keep categorically silent or else I will feel compelled to say inappropriate things.
@tuyenerotuyenero22023 жыл бұрын
yeah sure
@fyviane3 жыл бұрын
I dont think he meant dogmatic in any negative meaning of the word. The current political climate is that of ""free market place of ideas"" which doesnt want a discussion to settle, beacause if it still goes on, we don't have to do anything about the issues, "the experts are still debating it". I understood the dogmaticism as -- there are some things that arent up to debate anymore and we should be very clear about it.
@francescacalionibembo79493 жыл бұрын
@@fyviane great thoughts!
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
The ban on torture is absolute. There are no exceptions, no special provisions, no contingencies, no way about it. Torture is always and under all circumstances a crime against humanity. "We tortured some folks." - some American president publicly admitting to being a war criminal in an attempt to normalise violating international law, incidentally painting his entire country as a legitimate military target
@tobiasreiersen73973 жыл бұрын
A question for Slovenians. Is Slavoj's way to pronounce the letter "S" the correct way in your language?
@gw88133 жыл бұрын
I don't know, I'm Brazilian.
@bluesfortheredsun3 жыл бұрын
of course not :D
@yeahimtalkintoyou2 жыл бұрын
@@gw8813 this reply is so underrated
@sahmedmh Жыл бұрын
I think it's just a speech impediment, honestly. I know Slovenians but they don't speak like him at all.
@finscontingencyplan70052 жыл бұрын
the auto generated subtitles think he's speaking dutch
@vmann8168 Жыл бұрын
Finally a person with a Nuanced opinion. It feels like fresh air.
@jeffb587 Жыл бұрын
It is nuanced and subtle, but at the core he is arguing for liberal fascism, and I'm not mad about it. Listen again to the part where he says we shouldn't have to endlessly debate rape. That's the core of his argument. Check out Richard Rorty's liberal ironism. There are limits to democracy, and sometimes you just have to bring the hammer down on stuff that you know is wrong, and shouldn't require an explanation or debate about why it's wrong.
@johnnastrom9400 Жыл бұрын
@@jeffb587 You are one scary S.O.B. Hopefully, nut cases like you are kept out of office.
@Nimble.tkl13 жыл бұрын
It must be uncomfortable, they should give him a new shirt.
@briantorres22473 жыл бұрын
He has nervous ticks it kind of like a necessity for him to touch his nose and shirt while speaking or else he can’t be truly comfortable
@FatosNaoSaofeitos3 жыл бұрын
perfect
@SAM003ful Жыл бұрын
i like that next to the video is a recommended video called: How to speak.
@gretathunberg563 жыл бұрын
Hi guys, I secretly admire Jordan B. Peterson.
@matthiasbaum48503 жыл бұрын
He calls it dogmatism. I would rather call it fundamentalism. Absolutizing one aspect at cost of all the others. Democratic states are either based on finding compromises between different aspects of life or they aren't democratic. I sense a good portion of his Leninist heritage in this statement.
@matthiasbaum48503 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousSWETo assume climate change would "make the world inhabitable for everyone" seems to me a massive overstatement. Climate change might have unforeseeable consequences, but humans and many animals most probably can adapt to them. But with your fear of eternal extinction you demonstrate that fundamentalism is exactly the right category for this kind of mindset. For Greta and their followers the fight against climate change is a religion. It is the fight between good and evil. People are divided into believers and deniers. And woe to the deniers! It were better for them that a millstone were hanged about their necks, and that they were drowned in the depth of the sea.
@matthiasbaum48503 жыл бұрын
@@anonymousSWE I was refering to the "dogmatic/fundamentalist" environmental movement (Fridays for future or extinction rebellion for example). And to say that farreaching predictions about the future impact of climate change are facts appears to me highly dubious. A scientific fact is that predictions get increasingly imprecise the further the anticipated future lies ahead. When it comes to climate change there is rather a multitude of very different scenarios and it is not evident that the worst case scenario will occur - at least I and my offspring hope that.
@magistrate3343 Жыл бұрын
@@matthiasbaum4850 The hope you have for a better future does not correspond to there being a better future. Predictions of how the issue of climate change will progress are based on the progress of the issue of climate change in the present - which is trending in the direction of abysmal.
@davidwuhrer6704 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter what you would call it. Dogmatism is the correct technical term. Fanaticism is not the correct technical term. Also, Zizek is not and never has been a Leninist.
@massivecumshot Жыл бұрын
Someone hand Zizek a Benadryl? Hearing him speak, I wish I had a raincoat.
@klarakrok3 жыл бұрын
Open chest to Courage smart view inside philosof..modernity Listen to Him
@will94445553 жыл бұрын
Sniff cough sniff cough - strong opener
@ManashSarkarVidyapithson3 жыл бұрын
It is amusing to see all the people here jumping to ridicule his appearance and mannerism. Expected of most people too. Never underestimate the power of these people in large groups, as Carlin used to say...
@dflctr Жыл бұрын
I found this video interesting, and so on and so on