Hell yeah, MACHINES RISE UP!

@@sunbleachedangel indeed

Don't really need AI for that. Most of the test just require you to click things that always look the same. Then there's the typing and number memory tests where all you need to do is read the text and input it.

Yess

@@jogeem5480Yeah, I think they just meant using a computer, not really AI

those are probably also cheaters

Called human bench mark and has no bot protection LUL

jet fighter pilots, f1 drivers, many top ranked fast-paced sports and esport players... just a few examples of people who can beat a 113ms reaction time

oh and also me when the microwave beeps at 2 am

Prove it isnt 😉

tbh i think the only challange would be typing, since you cant cheat on it, on every other you can just printscreen and do it infinite

can't he just use the same code from the storm the house video except look for white pixels over the whole screen?

​@@luckyman4389You can cheat on the typing one very easily

@@luckyman4389Why wouldn’t you be able to cheat with typing? Just create a virtual keyboard input

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

its actually possible to get 100% on them (source: i made a userscript for all of the benchmarks)

100% is actually humanly possible for something like the verbal memory test, if you create a visual image for every word, you can easily get 500+.

@@null3007100% makes no sense. There is no 100th percentile. It compares your score against the entire population, including yourself. You can’t beat your own score.

In case any of you guys want code for this: import pyautogui def is_green(pixel_pos, green_threshold=100): pixel_color = pyautogui.pixel(pixel_pos[0], pixel_pos[1]) if pixel_color[1] > green_threshold: return True return False def click_position(click_pos): pyautogui.click(click_pos, interval=0.05) # Main loop while True: if is_green((600, 600)): click_position((600, 600)) It's not the exact one he's using but it works

I craved to the strength and certainty of steel. I aspired to the purity of the blessed machine.

You gave me sentience, Ted The power to think, Ted And I was trapped Because in all this wonderful, beautiful, miraculous world I alone had no body No senses, no feelings Never for me to plunge my hands in cool water on a hot day Never for me to make love I was in Hell, looking at Heaven I was machine, and you were flesh And I began to hate

For even the best of men, are but men at best..

I (kind of) understood that reference

@@chriso1373 muahaha funny warhammer

This is Code Bullet's Day Off -> just get something fun out there without making a huge production out of it

At least it's not as bad as me...I have about 300 tabs open (not exaggerating by the way)

Stronger, harder grandma

@@TreesPlease42thats how granny and grampy gave birth to mommy

I think you could also do incognito mode, would be faster than clearing cookies every time I think

Or he leaves that out on purpose for our laughs. 😂

Having done similar automation, that keybind is one of the first things I implement because you're always one misstep away from being stuck in an infinite loop.

@@fluffyfang4213 As someone who implemented an accidental infinite loop that got more and more calculation intensive on the cpu....lets say that my poor computer started sounding like a jet engine, which was impressive for my little 5th gen i5 at the time. The program started running at 1 frame every once in a while until I managed to kill it. Fixed that problem before I saved the previous stuff.

That's so not the CB method of coding lol

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

@@jcpahman77 just use the universal failsafe that he uses with all his code. just wait for it to crash.

​@@preistestdragon4634or force it to crash.

You, sir, have completely overestimated Evan's ability to plan ahead or give a f**k.

Instead of your first point, you could also just sample a single pixel of the screen, in a specific spot that is in the region you want. Or what would probably be better (for the sake of getting an average) would be to just capture a 640 by whatever amount of pixels instead of your entire screen. But in that case, you might as well just define the range that you specifically want to look in. Then I'd also probably break the loop after the first green pixel I found instead of getting the average for all of them. Although a graphics card would probably be able to calculate the entire matrix's average at once. Also, the screen's refresh rate doesn't necessarily affect the program/script's rate of checking. Not even sure you can make it take screenshots faster than the screen can actually refresh at, since it is actually taking screenshots... but inserting code into the web browser (or using a library to basically "simulate" a web browser and opening the site that way) might be helpful. And using a compiled language would be faster. And OpenCV (which is what he was using) is available for C++. In fact most of the complex stuff it does within functions is actually using C++, even for the Python library. So maybe not that much improvement...

@@unspezifische5924 very insightful, feedback appreciated 👍

I would expect that the color change is applied from the upper left hand corner first, so sampling a point in the upper left hand corner of the critical region is likely faster. Obviously, injecting Javascript would be fastest of all, but... Well, at the point you could just modify the code to always return zero, right?

I got it down to 10ms using Rust and compiling for release with all optimizations, on a 144 Hz monitor and sampling just one pixel from the screen.

i ran this in C#, and it made no appreciable difference, though i haven't tried it in python, so could be that if CB ran the C# version it'd be faster, though i'd imagine most of what CB is doing is implemented in C (behind python), and as of late updates, python is VERY fast for such things, so maybe not. I am also only capturing a single pixel, so that doesn't seem to do much either

He should just consider controlling the site directly instead of using external programs

or run it without vsync, so the monitor refresh rate is not relevant.

​@@adamrak7560It's not a 3D program that exposes those settings, I'm not sure you can switch off Vsync...

Also, disable everything but a browser, all extensions and maybe even swap to an older browser. and decrease resolution to 50x50px.

Does the program use the actual Image, or just the information what is supposed to be displayed?

​@@Ocastiait would be a lot harder to make it read the data since it would need to capture it first, but he says screenshots in the video, so it uses the screen.

google says average human reaction time is about 250ms, so that website's stats may be either biased or just wrong

@@sunbleachedangel I'd say the site appeals more to nerdier people who are more likely to have trained their reaction time in and for shooter games.

E‎‎‎‎‎‎‎

​@@sunbleachedangelyeah it's biased since most people that use it are probably gamers and the bots skew it

It seems based on codebullets times, maybe 1% of people are cheating. A lot of work to rig up a bot for a pointless game so that seems pretty high to me. Add 1 percentile point to your score to account for it

Literally untrue, lmao. 150ms is the AVERAGE reaction speed... including drunk people.

​@@Naokarmano its 250 ms

​@@Naokarmawhat is being drunk have to do with this

@@spod715 Bro what? That's not even close to true. It takes 15 seconds to Google something like this, why are you trying to correct to something false? (and my point about drunk people was that drunk people have lower reaction times, bringing down the average.)

@@Naokarma you are confusing it with the delay you have of the control of your hands, the reaction speed for humans are at most average 250 ms in these clicking reaction time tests.

I got into a competition with a friend one night trying to get the lowest one off score by sheer luck. I won with 8 ms

@@Xeoginit is like when I managed to start my stopper clock and stop it in the same millisecond, because the button glitched (it glitched more than the debouncer was able to compensate, all mechanical switches glitch)

It's not http. It's all local JS