Just to give you a glimpse Govt had monopoly over everything it did start well in the beginning but when govt started interfering too much in individual's lives the system broke on its own.

@@aftabnaveed sorry I don't agree with that. If all of that were true then more than 70% percent of the soviet population wouldn't have voted to keep the union in the referendum. Their was enough liberty in the workplace for everyone to contest, vote and give their criticism. This is well recorded by neutral historians who had travelled the soviet union. In my knowledge as far as the wage system is concerned, then it was either piece rate system wherein a base salary was given upon completion of the qouta and additional incomes (in a progressive manner) were given based on the extra work/ productivity they gave in. 60-75% of population worked under this. Secondly, the rest mostly were the time workers; they received incomes based on their time in work process individually. Also, people with better education progressed much rapidly than the others. So it is a myth that under socialism everyone would get the same incomes.

@@aftabnaveed this is American propaganda which was used to disenfranchise socialist movements in the the western world and steer away people from belief in a people led and directly involved government. This is well documented in accounts Anna Louise Strong

For many years we were made to believe that food shortages were things that only happened under socialism, and that capitalism was superior in providing plenty and plenty of food.

@@shaharyarsabeeh7666 The same income idea is impossible since skills differ,and consequently,payment.

The Soviets propagated and even enforced atheism, they destroyed many eastern orthodox churches which they thought were backward.

If it helps in the soviet constitution, any anti-semite, anti-religious activity we’re considered grave crimes, specially in the former as any anti-semite activity were met with death penalty

Shah waliullah presented the concept of socialism that he mentioned as "Muaashi Adal" before anyother such concept being prevailed during the Mughal Era. Shah Waliullah's Teachings are according to asian conditions. It is based on Human Nature and Marx's philosphy is based on materialism. They don't condradict each other. They were presented for different conditions.

Communism is the power of the people, whereas anarchism fights against power be it top-down (state to people) and otherwise.

Very laudable leading question!👍

@Waqas Gulzar who'll guarantee that the govt will treat people with equality? If a leader elected in one party dictatorial socialist system discriminates against one minority group or another what will you do? Another revolution?

@Waqas Gulzar In capitalist democracy everyone is equal in the eyes of law. There are laws for anti discrimination and govt cannot treat people differently. Most people who benefit from social welfare programs don't contribute anything towards those programs in terms of taxes, hence your assumption that govt treats people depending upon their financial background is mere nonsense. Have you ever lived in a successful western democracy? I guess, not. You should visit and live in a western democracy for some time and experience first-hand instead of talking from your backside, sitting in a failed corrupt state of Pakistan.

The first reactionary talking point you mentioned can be debunked by pointing out the innovation is USSR and Cuba. And China too. Money often is not only not the motivation for innovation, it is often an excuse to keep the status quo. That is why US keeps sliding more and more into oil and gas consumption. They don't have the motivation to move to renewable energy like, for example, China.. Look at Cuban healthcare innovation. No profit motive involved and they have so much blockade from US but they developed vaccine for cancer, 5 different covid vaccines, etc etc

Socialism is excellent system on Paper but practically it leads to state's dominance in economy which leads to ineffective society, with slow to nil progress in innovation.

@@Suqrat400 I just want you to consider the fact that Russia went from being basically a rural feudal state pre-revolution to competing with the world's largest superpower and winning the space race in the span of a bit over half a century. If that isn't innovation and massive progress I cannot tell you what is. Most of your so called innovation comes from publicly funded technologies that companies then patent. As for being lazy you can see how in the modern era production has gone up but work hours and wages remain stagnant. The goal of innovation isn't to make people work forever but to make our lives easier through technology. You can find extensive discussions on the topics I mentioned above if you want.

@@moazhanif5221 you misunderstood my statement. I mean to say that all of those are knee jerk responses and are very easy to debunk. You'll find those points parroted by the majority of people opposed to criticisms of capitalism.

@@maddoscientist1905 oh my bad. Sorry it's late

Lol. Who is saying this? Communism is a system where everyone works together and shares in the fruits of their labour. There is no exploitation.

@@Taimur_Laal ok Sir main social media may different channels par yeh batein Suni Hain tou Socha AP se share kardo 😊

@@AdnanDurez highly exaggerated. I'd say it is a bit absurd. There is no strong communist movement in Pakistan.

@@Taimur_Laal Ok Sir yes you are right 😊👍

You are just another victim of capitalist propaganda. Communist don't use the word "greedy" To define capitalist. You exposed yourself then and there. And as for the donation, I am 100% sure you don't know that it is just a method to avoid taxation. By creating a subsidiary of their own company and donating to it, their net taxable income is reduced and the money they donated is never used. In 2018 or 2019,it was estimated that bill and melinda Gates Foundation just used 5% of the amount for charity work since 2010,even though the amount allocated was in millions. I can explain dozens of other economic methods and practices, these capitalist pigs 🐷 use to loot the working class and avoid taxation.

The net taxation rate for Jeff Bezos in 2018 was 0.2% . And Elon musk didn't pay any taxes for 2 years straight. Both got huge government contracts, subsidies and bailout. Amazon space program went into a loss and congress brought up 10 billion dollars bailout package for it. You can look that up if you like.

kzfaq.info/love/-uZ14hl2nfZDA75EO_qs4Q

This one is his English channel

Das capital.

Yes. Already created it.

Or aghar aghar ikhteyarat society ke pass hu tu phir ye tu dictatorship ko farogh dete he ?? Ap keya kehte he ??

Sir muje nahi lagtaa ke is duur me ye mumkin be haa ?

​@@abbaskhan7342 yes pakistan me mushkil he.😅

China bhi ek socialist country he waha kia bank band ho geya he . govt bank ki jayda power hota he.

not only china, vietnam,laos.cuba ,present communist countries.😊

Good point bro! This is a major plus for capitalist society. I think a communist state will always lag behind a capitalist state in terms of science, technology, innovation and market because capitalist system's greedy nature of leadership is very powerful than the responsibility oriented work force in communism. A communist state will need to isolate it's population from capitalist state in order to keep them loyal to socialism with the outdated state of science and technology as compared to the capitalist state's.

The professor's concern is building socialist movements in Pakistan. So speaking the language of the Pakistani people is important to that goal. I can understand your frustration I don't speak the language as well. Whenever I find a video of him speaking English it is always a delight.

@@sojourner4726 if you are from UP and know hindi you would be able to understand urdu

don't ask him for marx socialism and Communism are the same think if you read him you will notice that marx uses both words interchangeably Also Marx, never said communism to be an alternative system to Capitalism he saw it as a movement which is beyond Capitalism, like how Capitalism (and the many struggle against monarchism caused it) was beyond Feudalism. For marx Communism would be a fundamentally different by core, it won't even have commodity production or money. Marx never made a blue print on how so called communist society would look like (hence the confusion) he was more interested in the functions of Capitalism (hence his main book is called CAPITAL: critique of the political economy, and was not called COMMUNISM: How to make it) and society in general. while thinking that the fall of Capitalism (mode of production, in which commodities, Free market and private property for expanding capital is the norm) would be caused by the working class movements (note by working class, Marx meant anyone who earns a wage meaning both so called blue and white collar workers). Marx also saw Capitalism to be an important step before communism, as it helps in industrialisation. For Marx communism/socialism (he used them interchangeably) isn't when government does stuff, it isn't even government controls properly and it isn't even government controls commodity import, export and production ie it isn't when government does capitalism. Marx views state property just to be private property of the state. He views that, if the state is the one controlling commodity production then it is state-capitalism not socialism/communism. Marx and his friend Engels, made fun of social democrats who only saw socialism just when government controls stuff. "Marxists" are the people believe in "Marxism" ( Marx theories ), however marx himself was against the word as it glorifies him. Engles his best friend said "Marxism" is the worst thing ever happened to Marx's work. Marx wanted his work to be the the steeping one for a new form of science. A science doesn't the anaylsis the natural but rather the social world basically what we now call social sciences/sociology. Marx's science is different than others as he believes the world and only be seen in connection in one another.

Imagine the scale of corruption when Govt owns every bit of your life. They interfere and tell you what to do and what not to do. Imagine you living with a conscious but not unable to use it to exercise your freedom.

No wonder Soviets collapsed. It cannot exist in this day and age. Sure there should be social equality but you can't stop one working hard and making more compare to someone who is lazy or out of ideas.

@@aftabnaveed yes , people are objecting on these things.

@@nrnewss3723 exactly you are right . Man made system cannot do justice .

Honestly speaking, I think humanity never demand for progress (health care excluded), everyone is happy today unless something new arrives tomorrow today's world will not lose it's charm. World seemed much peaceful place 20 years ago too. But yes, the progress gap between capitalist and communist states will result in people losing interest in communism, because as human we value hustle bustle of technology more than peace of mind. 🙂