Not just you.

Yeah it was really good

I agree but they will NEVER nominate a Saw film for any of those awards

Facts

I always root for the killer once I realize the movie itself is trash 😂

🤣🤣 as you can see Drew is always rooting for John 🤣🤣

The first time ever where Jigsaw was the hero in our eyes

I think everybody was...

😂😂

Character/plot structure wise yes but it wasn’t as scary as a few of the other ones.

Saw 2 will always be my favorite!!

It's not the best Saw movie but it's still really good

​@@dawb86 it was supposed to be scary?

@@makushonjongramiresu1577 Films of the horror genre typically intend to be...

You are not alone lol

He was too happy

💛💚💙❤️

Great comment!

Yeah it's really good

Confirm he's back for Saw 11 which follows on from saw x

Thank you. We love you too 💛💚💙❤️

💛💚💙❤️

💛💚💙❤️

Thank you!

💛💚💙❤️

He's just the best

Thank you!

Oh no smh

It was nice to see that!

😂😂

That is something he would do lol

🤔🤔

We all felt for John

That's a good point about the time

@@SomethingCinema I mean unless people read about it or heard about it. From the people behind the movie saying it took place after the first movie. An before the 2nd movie this movie could of happened at any time. I mean one of the deleted scenes was John talking to the insurance guy. From that movie where he goes into his game so when. A movie is made to show a specific time it needs a scene. That shows it happened before this other movie in it. So people that watch the movie understand where in the time line of events. The movie happens so they fully understand it.

💯

😂😂😂

Like create a game or be in a game!?!

😂😂😂

That's a good question... we may have to answer that one in a video

Woahhh

Facts 💯

😂😂

🔥💯🔥

💛💚💙❤️

💛💚💙❤️

😂😂 Team John

🔥💯🔥

Thank you 💛💚💙❤️

That's a good idea

@@SomethingCinema Thanks.

💯

💯

@@SomethingCinema 👋

👋

@@SomethingCinema 👋

Thank you!

We have to check some of those out still

Drew seen it. He liked it

🤔🤔

@@SomethingCinemamade by the same director of haunting of hill house and bly manor

Ok adding it to the list

That's interesting

And great that Dallas is back

💛💚💙❤️

🤔🤔

@@SomethingCinema 🧐🧐🧐

🔥💯🔥

It's really good

🔥🔥

Really 🤔🤔

We haven't

you guys should@@SomethingCinema

you guys should@@SomethingCinema

💛💚💙❤️

I know lol. It’s still cool when it’s just two of them but they got a good dynamic when all three of of them do the vids together

Thank you!

😂😂😂

We definitely will watch it

John Kramer would have took that into account. Remember it moved after she did her leg. So he would take that into account an have it aimed at the floor. You have to remember John Kramer takes things like that into account with his games.

@@83shadow3 true, but it still would be easier to get out it’s aim on the floor rather than dangling by one arm.

@@sonofmoss John Kramer was thinking 10 steps ahead at all times. You don't think he would take into account here trying to crawl out of the way. He planned for any an a possibilities when designing those traps. Along with planning it all out he made it so that him and Amanda. Could get out of any of those steal restraints so I'm pretty sure. He took her possibly ending on the floor and trying to crawl out of the way. Into account you are acting like he didn't always plan every single possibility out wich he always did. Like for example reeling in the chain pinning her into one spot. It's hard to crawl away when you are stuck in one place.

😂😂

Dude, she’s staying in that room for the rest of her life. Either that or she will be the first victim of Amanda’s un winnable traps. Plus she has to live the realization that had she and Parker taken turns for 10 mins, they could have both made it.

What she did was way worse then the punishment

🤔🤔

Yeah we will watch it

Interesting... we have to watch it

@@SomethingCinema It's definitely worth a watch because he or it doesn't do no slite of hand. Tricks like others where they have things set up to look like it's magic. He or it literally and figuratively does the impossible with no hidden gimmicks helping. It's just real magic basically think what if say David Copperfield. Had real magic an turned evil instead of a elephant disappearing he made people disappeare. For ever just for a random example.

We will definitely check it out

💯

​@@SomethingCinema💯💯💯

😂😂😂

Thank you!

@@SomethingCinema Yw

Good. You?

@@SomethingCinema doing good working at Starbucks now lol 😂 it’s crazy

That is a crazy job, but we know you can do it!

@@SomethingCinema thanks you guys 🙏🏽 😊

💛💚💙❤️

Makes sense

We haven't... we should

She does 😂😂

Facts 💯

Which order do you want us to watch them in?

@@SomethingCinema no order jus watch it if its a 1n2,most of dem r 1n2

🔥💯🔥

💯

But he takes innocent people and puts them in his games and In harm's Way. To the point that some die case in point Saw the first movie. What did the doctors wife and daughter do they did nothing. But he was going to have someone kill them. But the former police Detective saved them. Case number 2 in Saw to he put the detectives son into the game. Just because he was his son he was innocent. Saw 3 he took the guys daughter an looked her in a room she was innocent. Saw 4 with the insurance company he put the elderly secretary in the game she was innocent. Then in the one with the guy who lied about surviving a game. He put the guys wife into the game an she knew nothing about him lying. She was a innocent an died in it. Saw one the nursing attendant or whatever that was told to kill the doctors family. If he fails or he will die he was innocent. So John Kramer is no vigilante or hero or antihero. I have provided the prof above of all the innocent people he put into the games. That never should of been in them in harm's way or nearly killed or killed. Thats something only a true criminal an killer would do. Because he could of easily came up with games to test those. People that didn't involve innocent people in any way shape or form. Saw just tell the doctor he will never see his family again. If he fails his game he gets locked in the room forever never to see his family again. No need to have the family killed. Just for a example John Kramer could of easily came up with games that. Didn't involve innocent people because I mean in one of them a innocent woman got slowly cooked to death. A wife an daughter almost got killed a son almost got killed a elderly woman almost got killed. You can't honestly look at these facts an said that John Kramer is a vigilante or hero. Because they don't do things like that to innocent people. If you have no problem with things like that there's something not right with you. Because putting guilty people in games is fine an one thing. But when you put innocent people in them an they almost die an die. You are a criminal an a murder because they where only in danger or died because. He put them there an told someone to do it or they die. I am as cold blooded as they come an I even understand. That you only punish or test the wrong doers you leave innocent people out of it.

Drew is team jigsaw too lol

I mean I am not aposod to innocent people getting killed if that's what. The person does in general non spoiler like for prime example Art the clown. If you don't know what he does non spoiler but basically he is a sadistic psychopath. Who loves to turter people both physically and mentally then kill them slowly as possible well mucking them at the same time. Just for his own amusement basically people are nothing but toys to him to play with an break. To him he would enjoy slowly lowering someone into a wood chipper like people watch movies. I can't wait for Terrifier 3 it's going to be a ft up Christmas. Because it takes place on Christmas but I have no problem with it. Because that's what Art does he has always done it. Now John Kramer claims to have morals about only helping people. Get over things holding them back or not valuing life an so on. So that means that the only people that should be put into harm's way is those people inquestion. How can you justify killing a innocent wife an daughter just because the husband is cheating. On his wife you can't justify or all of the other innocent people that he. Put in harm's way an in one case killing a innocent person. Just to try to help one person you can't. That goes against his own morals because the innocent people have done nothing. To be in those games or dead now have to deal with the troma from it if they lived.

We see your point

@@SomethingCinema It's never a good thing when you have to compare someone's actions. To that of a stone could sadistic psychopath killer that happily buchers people. Along with mutilating people an turtering people for his own amusement. To show that the other person is just as guilty of killing innocent people or mutilating an turtering innocent people. Under a different reason when it's the same thing. But one does it to entertain themselves an the other has no valid reason.

Adding it to the list