worst thing is that they are the band most likely to be annoyed by their labels giving out strikes

@@joes2525 And the ungratefulness of hitting one of Radiohead's biggest fans, who's spreading their genius far and wide, to promote them. Labels for you. All they care about is the money. "Have a cigar. Now, tell me, which one's Pink?"

It's funny. I only really knew Creep a little while ago, but since watching your videos I have become such a big radiohead fan. Companies spend so much money on advertising, and here you are promoting this music for free. I just don't understand this copyright strike crusade from the record companies.

😡

ugh. i'm sure if the band themselves knew about this they'd be pretty disgusted, but of course they have no say in it :-/

Fair use differs on every country, because Radiohead use the UK based XL Recordings, the law differs, and seems to be up to the copyright owners to decide what is called fair dealings in the UK. These are the two main factors: - Does using the work affect the market for the original work? If a use of a work acts as a substitute for it, causing the owner to lose revenue, then it is not likely to be fair. - Is the amount of the work taken reasonable and appropriate? Was it necessary to use the amount that was taken? Usually only part of a work may be used. The relative factor works on a case-by-case basis and is not always the same with another. If it were me, my answer to the factors stated above would be: - No, David using these songs to teach us Music Theory, does not affect the market for the original work, causing them to lose money. As a matter of fact, I believe using this does the exact opposite and introduces people to new music, or they listen to the whole song to get the sound of - in this case - a Chromatic Mediant. - Yes, the amount taken from the work is reasonable and appropriate. In my opinion anything more than a 10 second clip wouldn't be reasonable for the teaching aspect. However David here used no more than 5 Seconds for each song, and in any of his videos you'd be hard push to find a snippet of any song that's more than 10 seconds long. All in all record labels, no matter where they are, all want to rake in money like it's going out of fashion and until someone stands up to them, it will continue to happen.

Yeah I was gonna say that’s kinda silly. David is not making his money off of that 5 second clip. He’s using it as examples of what he is teaching. You’d think with Radiohead being one of if not his favorite band, that they would be happy to be brought into the spotlight to get new or returning fans.. alas not all as smart as I I guess.

its a known issue that youtube has no regard for fair use whatsoever and just lets automated systems strike videos without considering context

@@nugboy420 Exactly. How could that clip do anything but increase the traffic on Radiohead songs?

@@christ9359 lol honestly I haven’t thought about Radiohead in YEARS until finding David lol. And lol other than the Scott Tennerman episode of southpark with the horse trying to bite the wiener and the pube beard and the whole chili cook of where Scott eats his mom and dad lmao.

You are using their platform, so I guess they can do whatever they like? Don't ge me wrong I absolutely hate this being a thing, but realistically I can't see how anyone but youtube themselves can make a difference. Prove me wrong

there should be an "internet bill of rights" in which all websites like youtube & social media must adhere to. freedom of speech & fair use for everyone, regardless of platform. then, if people say things you don't like, you keep it moving instead of trying to shut them down or "cancel" them, unless they are breaking the law. the main problem is companies don't care about what's right or wrong & will side with whoever has more money. copyright strikes are garbage complaints in most cases, like here with David.

@@AuXDubstep I'm using their platform because there's no viable alternative. If every content creator I followed was on Nebula, I'd happily go over there even though it costs money. But the content available there is too limited. So I'm using it, but that doesn't mean I don't hate this aspect of it. I agree that only KZfaq can change it, but the only way that happens is through external pressure. They're not going to do it out of the kindness of their hearts. When I was growing up, the cigarette industry was 100 times as powerful as they are today. And yet, they were reduced to a shell of themselves through litigation and legislation. Legal pressure can be a powerful thing.

@@rome8180 >no viable alternative petition your local Content Creator to use PeerTube

The term 'copyright strike' is misleading. For the state, there is no such thing. Copyright allows a creator to use the legal system to claim money gained from their work for themselves. It is the job of the copyright holder to file a complaint in the courts and prove damages; no law enforcement agency will do that (for anyone). HOWEVER. On KZfaq. CERTAIN copyrighted works can be 'blocked' by their creators FOR ANY REASON, no matter what the derived work consists of. This is because KZfaq has agreements with large publishers that dictate they will do so. These agreements protect KZfaq from lawsuits from creators who have enough money to lawyer-up. 'Fair Use,' 'Parody,' "News Gathering,' or any other defense against a copyright claim presented in a court-of-law have no efficacy on KZfaq because KZfaq is not the state. This is KZfaq's 'house' and they make the rules. Some of the rules are derived from the contracts they have with publishers. If KZfaq makes a 'copyright strike,' it is because they are following the requirements of a contract, not because they don't understand copyright law.

Nice summary. I tried using Emaj s as chromatic mediant in one of my pieces, but eventually it gravitated towards Amin before returning to Cmaj. From this video i realised what i have been using is secondary dominant.

Beato gets the copyright holder to 'clear' his videos. He is not convincing KZfaq of anything. KZfaq is a publisher with agreements with other publishers. 'Copyright strikes' come from those agreements, not because KZfaq is some kind of copyright police. If David found his original compositions used on some other KZfaq channel, he would have the option to block or allow (if the KZfaq filter caught the copy and informed him, or he just happened to catch it himself). KZfaq isn't making any decisions about fair-use or any other aspects of copyright. KZfaq is not a court of law.

@@b.y.2460 Nowhere in my comment have I even mentioned KZfaq. You're picking a fight with a straw man.

beato is such a boomer

Danny Elfman loves chromatic mediants.

Or any Dany Elfman piece really

That movie is a masterpiece in every way.

What a coincidence!

I know right 😓😓😓

Agreed. Videos like these not only allow people to learn the depth of music but also introduce certain songs and artists/bands to those who may not be familiar with them. I've looked up OFFICIAL VIDEOS of songs because I heard a snippet of it on a video like this. It could be a song I've never heard or or one that I had heard but never knew the name, or maybe one that I had forgotten about. Same with TV shows. Years before, I loved "Star Trek: The Next Generation." Something got me to watch cool compilation videos, "INtake edits," etc. using bits from the show and guess what? It reignited my love for the show once again. It was on Hulu and then Netflix and I ended up watching many episodes that people showed a small segment from. So not only does it help people understand things, remind them of something, or deepens their understanding, those small clips can actually WHET THE APPETITE, sending people to look for a larger chunk, or maybe even buy a bunch of songs. Basically, they are killing free advertising of their products.

This is maybe a case where 4-year-elections-based democracy does not work. Nobody will vote for a political party just because record labels send take-down requests to fair-users. There are more important issues. However on this point a referendum would easily get a majority against these agressive practices of the record labels. Basically big record-labels should get significant fines for sending take-down requests to individuals who practice fair-use. A collective court case could potentially help as well if sufficient examples were collected by a group a YT-ers and brought to court.

John Williams would definitely know plenty of theory, since he’s a Juilliard grad. He’ll very much have known what he was doing when taking inspiration from the likes of Holst and Korngold.

Much of writing comes from a place of unconscious ability. I'm not a composer (just a jazz guitarist who likes to write little tunes), but speaking to my composition friends I've learned that they write what they hear first, and then if they choose to or need to analyze it later then that's when they'll make certain discoveries about what specific techniques may have come out. That said, if you know what kind of feeling you need/want and think "oh well this music theory knowledge I have says this" then you'll probably just do that to shorthand the work. Work smarter, not harder kinda thing.

music theory is descriptive, not prescriptive. if you cant hear something, knowing music theory isnt going to help.

Thank you!

Oh yes!! That would be exactly the video I have been expecting for a long time.

All bond songs have minor major 7th chords

And the intro of octavarium too

Thank you 😊

Thank you!

Always reminds me of the ingenuity in “Things we Said Today.” Modal mixture.

Thanks!

😍