Guy had a modern engine lab back in 1990's incredible. That kind of technique is only recently more commonplace.

+Tyler Bonenfant they used the all new youtube 80's motel tv filter!

+Tyler Bonenfant I tried 144p, and it looked about the same, but without the constant buffering (thanks, net neutrality).

aint it kool lmao

That's funny 177.

That's true

Didn't look like any type of stick welding I ever saw, was TIG. Stick is way to dirty for any of that. Pro stick welder.

There are no TIG welding "robots", lol.

Chloe Hennessey how is it running so far?

Have to pay to play

It's crazy! 10 years from now think about how cheap it'll be to build a 1200hp+ engine! It's already pretty cheap but we are just getting more efficient and making more power at a crazy rate!

what about 1000 ci with FOUR turbos in a compound turbo arrangement?

yeah noone outside america would make a pushrod engine

nikolaiownz - It's ok, we won't hold that against you.

@@nikolaiownz Dude Out American pushrod engines make 10,000 hp...

A push rod engine is the fastest car on planet earth... a push rod engine holds the record for most power and torque then any other engine on planet earth. Even the forced induction multiple valves multiple turbos engines can't compete. With the old ass push rod engine. Lol tech isn't shit when size doesn't matter.

Sure, that's why they've been in business for over 30+ year. It's because they steal useless junk from customers cars. What did they steal your 1986 FuzzBuster?

We're comparing apples to oranges with your statement

that's gotta be the dumbest statement I've read on the web. 1. stupid for trying to go that fast in an antique chassis. 2. stupid for spending $30k for an engine to do what a $12k big block crate from Jeg's would do.

Autopsy76 Maybe he likes to build his own engines? 1. You're stupid for thinking everyone wants a crate engine. 2. Mind your own business.

6 minutes?

moron

Autopsy76, he just said "all tube chassis". Perhaps it's the dumbest statement you didn't read on the web.

HEY you get what you pay for.. Some great engine builders are using SONNY'S parts!

Can't buy skill

Nitromethane does really really weird things at that stroke length. You'd never be able to put enough fuel in it to keep ut from exploding.

@@SoI_Badguy Well if it was feasible the fuel pumps would be incredible.

***** Chalk is added to the wheelie bar wheels so they can visually see how far they contacted the surface.

SuperDaveVideos Oh. Looks so much as if it were red hot. But it makes much more sense that it's chalk.

cream oh no

***** Nahhh... it would run, but you'll have to Fix Or Repair Daily. ;)

Alot of Fords still on the road these days. But that's only because Dodge and chevy can't build enough tow trucks to get them off the roads.

well it did not work for you!

The whole video looks like it's made in the early 80's...

ummm this is way old but not as old as t he video which says 2005 several times.(still making it 9 years older than your post if you had watched and listened)

As a film maker and photographer......yes, the video quality is absolutely awful. It says published in 2013......did they film it with a flip phone from 2005?

Whiner!

Yes and there wasn't a single one in the video.

IHRA mountain motor is not the same as NHRA top fuel or Pro Stock. You can also run other classes with these monsters that are not determined by displacement.

500 for nhra. 800 for IHRA now gone...

They make big cubic inch street motors now. Check out the website.

carlos velasco why twin. why not quad 102s

Why quad? Make it octa, 1 per cylinder.

Because that plumbing would be hell.

it would break the engine at least.

Ok, you want to play? Let's do the math. 60psi = (Airflow (lb/min) * 639.6 * (460 + 130 (guess at intake manifold temp))) / (.98 (Voumetric efficiency) * (7700 (rpm) / 2) * 1005 (cu in)) Solve for airflow, get 603 lb/min, which is VERY stout...maybe 10x what you would see for a modest street-strip car. 603 = HP * 11.5 (air/fuel ratio) * 0.55 (brake specific fuel consumption) / 60 Solve for HP, get 5720 hp. Whee! Now let's see if we can find a turbo to boost to 60 psi. Assume we lose 4 psi in plumbing losses getting from the turbo to the motor, and assume we lose 1 psi getting the air into the turbo. Pressure ratio = (60 + 4) / (14.7 -1) = 4.67 (pretty high, but you did specify 60 lb of boost). You do know there is no such thing as a turbo with a 120mm inducer, at least not in racing, right? You mean a 120mm exducer? I don't have good data for a 120mm exducer. How about a 94mm inducer and a 133mm exducer? Bigger is better, right? Alas, I can only get about 210 lb/min out of one of those at a pressure ratio of 4.67:1. You'd need at least 3 of them! Although it's usually not good to flow fewer than 3 cylinder into one turbo, it looks like quad turbos it is. 603/4 = about 151 lb/min per turbo. From the Garrett catalog, I would suggest a GTX5533R GEN II, with the 91mm inducer and the 133mm exducer, just about right. And you need 4 of them, one for each corner. Figure out how to hook it up, should smoke a Top Alcohol Dragster. No match for a Funny Car, though.

Ford shits on Chrysler

Ford is shit.. and lots of companies and manufacturers have used the Hemi head design it wasn't exclusive to Chrysler or Dodge and it was not invented by them it has been around since 1902 everyone has used it

France was building it before ford.

$25,000 low end, but just for you they would be willing to offer a 5% discount.

USNVA You mean just for a set of heads... bare! :-)

+Kurtis Lee I have but only know of him using an Allison aircraft engine. Did he custom built his own engine of 1000ci specifically for drag racing?

alvie2 5000 c.i wouldn't fit in a car. You can buy a 70 yr old Spitfire or Mustang(P51 not the car) engine at 1650-ish c.i V12 with superchargers and fit it to a car(3 people already have done that), if you want bigger, but that won't give you more horsepower cause these new drag engines are more efficient. There is an old custom car with a 2563 c.i engine but again, its obsolete and the engine is 70% of the car. This is the largest engine in the world, in reduced form even(not the 14 cylinder one in the pic), it can get longer, but it gives a good indication of size, i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/18ogpou9tup35jpg.jpg (the 14 cyl version is 1.5 mio c.i)

barath4545 Please, that is a ship engine. If we are going overboard on the extreme, and since some of posters here have criticized "American engineering." Let's revisit the Saturn F1 series used in our American Apollo Moon missions for generated power, and make "size" less of an issue. And to those critics declaring that Americans no longer make engines like that; I would reply: Because of the concerted effort of the Soviet Union to continue it's path of deceit since their false collapse and focusing to destroy America with her mole marxist potus fraud.

gm made the small block so that's not original lol

+keegan ferrell 😂

+BigEsGarage chevy

+BigEsGarage chevy

Chevrolet showed up in 63 with the Mark III mystery motor and was asked to park it. Ford copied the Hemi idea and was not allowed to run it in NASCAR. Pontiac came up with tunnel port style heads in RA V but nothing really ever took off. The SD heads did well enough. But Chrysler was allowed to run, and run they did. Ever wonder why that was? I won't deny the Hemi design is the best head for making power, but that was not the original idea behind a hemispherical combustion chamber. Think about what would have become of Chrysler without that innovation?

Yeah, thanks for pointing out the obvious that everyone already knows. No engines at these levels have OEM production parts on them becasue OEM don't make 1000+hp drag racing engines. Shocking, I know. These engines are named for the general design they were originally derived from for the purposes of identification. No one who knows anything about drag racing thinks these are modified OEM engines at this level. You could think of them as evolutions of OEM engines built for drag racing.

"No engines at these levels have OEM production parts on them becasue OEM don't make 1000+hp drag racing engines. Shocking, I know. "Ever heard of Accufab and MMR Racing? Running in the high 5s with factory blocks and heads. Until recently Accufab was using a factory crank.

+Todd Johnson First of all, "citation needed". Secondly, I seriously doubt they are oem spec block and head(s) and not modified production parts. Third, you missed the point.

I love doing this to the GM crowd...Here you go!accufabracing.com/accufab-mustang...and I got your point. Now get mine.

accufabracing.com/accufab-mustang