I can't wait to have Bravia 9 in my room!

No, like a lot of europeans, as they dont offer 55/65 size despite housing/apartment are a lot smaller than in US. Its a real bummer by Sony…

nope, no 65" version in UK / EU, I will be moving to LG.

B9 or G4 is the Q

@@Acconda I live in the UK and would love the 85 inch

Kicking those nits up!

Pretty much sums up the whole market😂

20 years ago the TV were all good . Nowadays , they say , black not so black , or white not so white , color not so accurate , or screen is reflective , or motion not the best, 65 inch too small , etc etc etc no matter what. We didn't hv these problems 30 years ago , are these reviewers saying we should go back to tube 32 inch . I hope reviewers just review the TV with his own eyes , not reviewing it using a software it our eyes that watch TV , not the technical software .

The A95L actually is priced higher than the new bravia 9 (and its larger) 77” vs 75”.

@Picklgreen I have the A95L and want to see these comparisons videos to see if this new mini LED backlighing is the game changer Sony is claiming it to be.

@@joshuamoore2563 Me too Bro🙂

@@joshuamoore2563 Are you happy with your a95l ?

@@joshuamoore2563 mini LED can't compare to OLED!

hard to say before we run tests but the in-house drivers certainly seem convincing! but also important to differentiate between Sony OLED and Sony QD-OLED like the A95L.

@@katekozuch6957 Thanks. I'm looking to buy on Black Friday. Will keep an eye out for your future reviews!

Superior in what way

​@@bustercolin7507 brightness and apl

Nothing beats oled

Don’t buy the scamsung The tv is horrible I had one already die on me Faulty defective power board. Less than 1 month.

@@toorop111 I've had a Samsung 55 inch that's 13 years old and still looks great. Your mileage may vary. To denigrate the entire brand based on your own experience is dumb.

@@KonaLife i work in the industry and the most tvs that i service are Samsung and LG

This still remains to be seen. I don't think it's going to beat oled until micro led comes out which could be a few years yet.

@@Kenny.1979 it never gonna best oled i agree but i am happy they come closer and closer to oled with black level✌️

Just a preview of Bravia 9 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rruKhrqGnNW4YZc.html

I'm sure it looks better in person. It also depends what you are watching this video on. Are you on a phone or monitor? I'm currently using a quantum dot 1440p monitor and the colors look great.

It's Wifi 7!

Nah indonesian doesnt have enough money to buy this tv, only few people, that is lose for sony

@@wendydivine3235 i want to buy bravia 8 55”

@@RERAZE1986 bravia 8 i think indo will have this version but with high price

Not having to worry about burn-in? QD-OLED is still a very young technology. We know little about it’s longevity.

You know normal LEDs last way longer than organic LEDs aka OLEDs

@@evronetwork ois

@@miketsai75 Optic Image Stabilization?

@evronetwork 🤣OH I see ! Don't be dead serious in your life

In all models or just the Bravia 9?

There would be 65 in Europe, what u are talking about?

@@evronetworknot for Bravia 9

@@jofmar7914 yes that's true previous model was available in 65, 75, 85 ..bravia 9 would be 75 and 85 only

@@evronetwork no, check the shops, ur wrong, maybe only UK

World renowned film restoration specialist Robert A Harris (also an expert on how movies should look in their best presentations) wrote on the Home Theater Forum site that 8k TVs offer no useful visual improvement at home compared to top quality 4k TVs. But after I mentioned to Mr Harris that a Best Buy salesman had told me that an 85" Samsung 8k TV would make the best 4k Blu-rays in our movie collection, such as "Oppenheimer", look sharper and more detailed than a top performing 85" 4k TV could make them look, Robert A Harris had quite an interesting (and even slightly amusing) rebuttal to that claim. As the response that Mr Harris wrote to me was that an 85" 8k TV could make a high quality 4k Blu-ray of a movie "look slightly more resolved than a high quality 85" 4k TV may make that 4k disc look, IF I placed my face 18 inches from the screen of the 85" 8k TV, which might also offer an added benefit of the screen warming my face a bit." So a basic point Mr Harris was making is that people simply won't tolerate sitting at the extremely close seating distance from an 8k TV that's required for even viewers with vision considerably better than 20/20 to be capable of seeing just a slight improvement with 8k over 4k. And since testing Warner Brothers conducted to determine the ability of moviegoers to notice a significant visual improvement in viewing native 8k scenes vs. 4k versions of the same scenes, revealed that even folks with vision considerably better than 20/20 would be needing to sit in row #1 or row #2 of today's stadium seating theaters, to notice ANY improvement with 8k vs 4k, Hollywood's studios have NO plans to push for the development & installation of extremely expensive 8k movie projectors for commercial movie theaters, since 99% of audience members just wouldn't see ANY difference between 8k & 4k. And that's ALSO why Hollywood studios simply WON'T go to the tremendous added expense of finishing movies in 8k resolution. Which explains why all of those electronics companies that make UHD 4k Blu-ray players have stated that they WON'T develop, manufacture, or market, any type of 8k disc player. PLUS, the streaming services like NETFLIX & Amazon Prime just won't do ANY streaming of 8k programs since folks will never sit close enough to their TVs to see even a tiny improvement with 8k compared to genuine 4k! So executives at streaming companies are smart enough to know that using the extra bandwidth needed to stream 8k programming, plus the huge expense of shooting & finishing shows in 8k, are futile ideas which would offer ZERO gain for the companies!

Having a lot of light in reserve does not mean burning your eyes like the reflection of snow in the sun. It is a power reserve that allows power to be sent where it is needed, to have a luminous result that is close to natural as in real life in terms of uniformity, contrast, etc. I have had an Oled (Sony A8H) for 4 years, before that an Oled Philips ambilight, it's a technology that I like, but I have a TV that does not go beyond 6-700 nits in a window from White to 10%, and that's not enough to open the image correctly. Films are mastered in 1000 nits, or even 3000 for some, when I find myself watching my film at times it's too dark. another problem with this is that to have its 6-700 I have to push my brightness all the way up, and the television ends up having a backlight that flickers a little, lacks uniformity because you push the machine thoroughly to get an approximately correct result, this also has an impact on the colors. It's not because my car does 3 Sec. from 0 to 100 I have to drive at full speed lol If manufacturers want more brightness on their Oleds and QD OLEDs, it's not for nothing. Samsung with its S95D (which I recommend) has managed to go up to around 1600 nits, that's already a huge number, but when we see TCL which goes up to 3000 nits on its next model, here Sony is going above 2000 it seems to me seems, OLED will always have a big delay.

OLED is actually on its way out. The best MiniLEDs as good or better as the best OLEDs for the majority of things. Only times OLED still has an advantage is with starry night skies and watching dark movies in a dark room, that's it. That said, the big flaw of OLED is just the tech itself. Pushing brightness on them is hard and burn in is still a major issue for people who don't like to baby their TV's. If you have it on all day, brightness at full blast and keep it up for a few years, it will burn in. Meanwhile, tech is on the rise that has all of OLEDs benefits and none of its downsides. This why several major brands have slowly started moving away from OLED. I suspect that a decade from now almost no on will still be making them.

@@Outkaz745 fair points all. I still think for much content in a light controlled room, I’d take the precision of OLED over absolute brightness (fair point about headroom to direct brightness where needed). I’ll reserve judgement until I see the Bravia 9 in action.

@@thenonexistinghero perhaps. But dark content in a dark room pretty much describes the ideal viewing environment and a large percentage of content.

​​@@thenonexistingheroOled has other advantages too. The Bravia 9 is still an LCD TV. That means its pixel response time is not as good as Oled. Same with Viewing Angle.

It’s not an oled lol

Nice open mind on this topic

They’re awesome but not bright enough for alot of consumers.

@@toorop111 Modern OLED tvs are more than bright enough for basically everyone