Dont let this lens trick you, this lens is quite large for such a limited range lens. Not even a 2x zoom.
@latuba24783 ай бұрын
It’s a 2.8. Yes it’s and the wide end but still 2.8
@frankfeng27014 ай бұрын
Sigma 16-28 just 60g more and covers more range.
@Chris_Lan4 ай бұрын
I think tamron is also longer and wider? I could be wrong
@frankfeng27013 ай бұрын
@@Chris_Lan Whch Tamron, 17-28 or 17-50?
@Chris_Lan3 ай бұрын
Yeah I was wrong. Sigma is the wider one. But tamron can focus much closer. 17-28
@frankfeng27013 ай бұрын
@@Chris_Lan Any zooms under 1.6x ratio is not worth it for me.
@ÁzsiábaSzakadtam4 ай бұрын
Unusually compact for a Sony lens. Compare with Tamron
@Hilde_von_Derp4 ай бұрын
Hate to be that person but the sigma 18-50 2.8 is half the weight of the Sony. Though yes the Sony is a better performer, but the sigma’s a perfect all purpose walking around lens. Just gotta deal with a bit more distortion and vignette at the wide end.