Chris pushing out lens reviews like a machine gun

Oh wow, I've dreamed about a lens with this focal range and aperture for ages now. It covers every prime I use in one lens and f2.8 is plenty fast. I could condense so much of my kit into a single lens. Exciting to see a lens like this exist at all even if it is for Sony. Here's hoping other manufacturers make more in their respective mounts so I can actually own one eventually lol

Chris, you're on fire today. Thank you so much for your amazing reviews!

This makes more sense than a 28-75 for me, if looking for something more compact than a 24-70. I'd rather lose a bit on the tele end and keep the 24mm at the wide end. Especially if paired with a high MP camera, then one can 'zoom' in APS-C mode.

For almost have the price, I prefer my Tamron 20-40mm. I like the wider range. One can always use the APSC mode to get closer to 50 or 60, but no way to make it wider, if you're shooting a 24mm lens.

Finally a not overexcited review. Thanks for being honest with pros and cons

You are one of the first I go to when it comes to lenses. Thank you sir!

I was excited for a second. I use 28mm and 50mm 2.8 very often. Not having to switch lenses is nice. But that price... 😶🥺 I'll just keep switching lenses for now 😅

Liked the cool ‘gallery’ music at the end!

That Sims song in the outro is an excellent pick!!

Check out the Tamron 20-40 f2.8 if you’re liking this lens but not the price … I’ve had it glued to my A7C since it came out last year

Great pictures of Cardiff bay and castle.

We really need a new 24-105 f4 for Sony!!

You are the best lens reviewer

Hey guys if you're reading this, Chris's Patreon is criminally under-funded. If you have a few bucks to spare, why not send him a couple? If you're willing to spend $1,100 on a piece of glass it's worth a couple dollars to get a good review from someone you can trust.

THE review I come to YT to see. Thank you.

When you launch a lens review on your YT at the same time (sort of) the lens is launched this means your channel is doing very well 😂❤

thanks for your review. i am undecided if i should get this 24-50 lens or is it worth it to go for the g master 24-70 ii lens in consideration that i meanly do videos on a a7s iii? whats your recommendation?

I'm shocked this lense isn't sharper on the edges: it's not that cheap *to me". Fantastic review!😊

best review ❤

Oof - this lens relies heavily on in-camera corrections. Since I adapt my Sony lenses to Nikon Zf which does not perform in-camera corrections on non-native lenses, this lens is a no-go for me. Excellent review as usual Chris!

Any chance comparing this to the Tamron 20-40mm f2.8? Thanks in advance

Interesting that it extends toward the wide angle when most zooms extend toward the tall angle.

Whoa! Slow down Chris! There's so many lens tests in one day lmao

After seeing this review. I can see there is value in my 24-70mm F2.8 GM mkii. Still I think this is a lovely option for the price for some street photography if you want a small package

$1098 is half the price of 2470gmII. I think it is resoanble. No way Sony will price it under $1000.

One question. Is this lens sharp at 24mm f2.8 and 35mm f2.8 compare to sony compact 24mm f2.8 G and 35mm f2.8 Zeiss?

Nice reviews x 4 an exotic / exciting serie 10 mm f2.8, 15mm f1.4 24-50mm f2.8 , 500mm f5.6 ...

In one day, post 3 Video.....Really hard work.....💓

At first I thought that price was crazy, but then I realized my 40mm F2.8 G + 24mm F2.5 G were $1100 on sale, and this lens is basically both of those smashed together. I mean all of it definitely costs too much, but at least it puts some perspective on everything.

Focal range and sharpness good, that's a lot of vignette and distortion tho for a £1200 new lens, it will show up in video

Thanks for this video. I did end up buying this lens. To get other lenses as small and light and cover this range with equivalent image quality I really did not find anything less expensive. A 24mm + 50mm cost as much and don’t travel as a pair at any real weight savings or lower cost if you want to take advantage of Sony features like breathing correction. At least that is what I found. I am pairing this with an A7CR so size/weight do matter. If there is an alternative could you take the time and share that with us. The Sigma 28-70/2.8 DG DN to me comes closest but lacks the field of view at 24mm if you want or need that. Look forward hearing back from you. Take care.

how is image quality and af performance compared to sony mini primes like fe 24mm f2,8 and fe 40/50mm f2.5? If we buy two of those lens, it would have same price like this lens

Sims music!? Perfect! 🫶🏾

Id probably stick with the 24 f2.8 and 50 f2.5 G lenses, although this lens could be good for indoor events where everyone's close to one another in a small space

how this looks compared to 20-70 f4?

just bought the kit lens 28 60 for its compact size (good len) and then this thing came out bruhhh. This len remind me of Zeiss 24 70 f4, it almost feel like it is impossible to make a good 24 70 range compact size len (regardless of aperture range). This len is cool but i would love to see a well rounded compact size 24 70 (no need f2.8) in the future

I think a comparison with the APS-C Sony 16-55/2.8 G is quite favourable, this 24-50/2.8 on a 61MP camera offers the same 26MP APS-C crop at 50mm (where it is sharpest) as that 16-55/2.8 does on an a6700, sacrificing only the extra 5mm, while also providing the benefits of the 61MP full-frame sensor quality when not cropping for reach. Add to this comparison the fact that this 24-50/2.8 weighs 54g less, is 8mm shorter, and is actually cheaper too, and it looks like quite a good option.

If they bring out the rumoured 16-25mm, combined with this lens and the 50-400mm that could be tempting. Although just a 16-35 is also tempting.

I love the aperture ring. Don‘t like the price and the focal range. I will keep my 24-105 f4 G lens. I find the focal range better than 24-50. And as a landscape photographer f4 is good enough. I only miss an aperture ring on my24-105. But maybe a MII will get it. If i can afford it. Prices for lenses are getting higher these days. Edit: Thank you for the very good review. Always top notch.

I can get this for £900. I already have the 24mm & 40mm. Should I sell those and get this at that price or just keep the two I've got? The things I don't like about this zoom are the extension of its physical size during zooming and the lens breathing.

Hmm, I tend to agree with Chris on this lens. I personally find it hard to recommend it. Perhaps if you are a budding photographer dabbling in someone's wedding, you can't afford the 24-70mm f/2.8, you hate a heavy lens and you must go for a Sony, then yes, maybe this one might be a good start. You will miss some tightly cropped, solo candid portraits though. I can't over-emphasize how important the 60-70mm end is. I travelled last year to the US and it was a pain using my Sony compact camera that could only zoom up to 50mm. I was constantly yearning for just that bit more reach. My composition felt "loose" at 50mm. I also can't recommend the 24-50mm for travel. When you travel, the focal length range should take a higher priority than the aperture size. You will want a longer focal length range than only a one stop increase from say an f/4 lens. The advantage of f/2.8 over f/4 is not significant. (At this point, if you read between the lines, you could guess which Sony zoom lens I would recommend over this 24-50mm! 😃) The "G" label instead of a "GM" is quite telling at 24mm. I don't really like the somewhat blurry rendering at f/2.8-f/5.6. In such a small lens with large aperture, something's got to give. I think Sony sacrificed the image quality at the corners when using the lens at 24mm.

Worth it for the compactness

That's an interesting one. The size is nice, but for the price, I'd much rather have the utility of the only slightly larger 20-70, even if it's only F/4.

Jeez I gotta agree. This is not a $1000+ lens. I really don't like how Sony continues to "cheat" with their in-camera corrections to make massively expensive lenses ok. I'd understand it on budget lenses, but if you're asking me to dump half the price of my vehicle on a lens, that glass better be fantastic. This feels like a budget lens with an arbitrary G slapped on it. As always, thanks for your reviews. They're almost certainly the best on KZfaq.

Hi I am a beginner in photography. May i ask why in the test of shooting the clock's digit 6, although it is at center of the photo, F4 or slower is still clearer than F2.8? It seems to happen in every test of lenses. Humbly asking. Thanks.

Love your review, as always! I'm not sure I quite follow your logic about the price, though. If a 24-70 2.8 is worth $2300, how is a 24-50 2.8 overpriced at $1100? The 24-70 is certainly a class above, being a GM vs a G, but I'm not sure I agree that this is so overpriced.

Hoping the price comes down over time, it’s $1999 in Australia on pre order.🙁

Good stuff. BTW, are you still active in Church?

Was wondering if the lens hood could be stored backwards aaaaaaaand YES IT CAN lol.

I expected better optical performance, unfortunately distortion on wide angle is crazy

Why not do a comparison with the 28-60mm kit lens on a hi rez camera? This feels like the next level up kit lens for the C range. Could lend you one.

I might be the odd one out, but I would rather have this as a kit lens, verses the slow glass normally included. Camera companies need to differentiate their products from cell phones right out of the gate.

You punched me like a boxer with 3 consecutive reasons of switching to sony. Laowa 10mm, Sigma 500mm and now this, sony 24-50 2.8

Sony has been selling A7C camera's like hotcakes. This is for the smaller body camera's as big full frame lenses on a small body is just not good.

Great design, but i prefer 20-50 compact ie 24

This is perfect - the 24-70 GM is way to heavy for street photography!

A zoom lens with a good range for street photography, for those who want a faster, fancier lens than the 28-60 f/5.6 kit lens.

not sure why 16-25 was recommended but 24-50 wasn't? Seems like a similar zoom range and price

Panasonic 28-200 pls Chris.

If someday in the future a lightweight FE 20-50mm f2 lens is made I’d pay good money to get it. A lightweight wide to medium zoom with a bright aperture for full frame paired with a C lens would be perfect for my use, nighttime street photography. In big cities with tight dart alley ways and a vibrant night life like Tokyo, Hong Kong, New York, London this is the perfect lens imo.

So whats a good alternative to this lense? A Sigma?😮

I dont like this style of moving focus front element. Id rather a bigger lens without moving parts.

Advantage compared to Tamron's 20-40: sharpness at the long end is a lot better and you get your conventional 50mm. However, for nearly half the price, you can get their 28-75 G2 which I would rank higher than this Sony.

I suppose with Sony's vested interest in Tamron, this is a good companion with their 50-400. Need wide, slap on the Sony; anything else from short tele portraits to espionage, the Tamron has your back.

great lense 👏👏😍😍

28-75 g2 is unbeatable

If they could at least have made it internal zoom

I don't see the point for my use case. What I would save on weight, I would lose on the extra lens I would need to add to my kit to cover the 50-70 range .

This lens is making me consider switching to sony from fuji. Having a full frame superb image quality in such a small package....

Very odd lens parameters indeed, especially when it competes in price with the excellent Sony G 20-70 F4. 🤔

For portraits... please. Use a portrait lense. 24-50 2.8 is perfectly fine for events and documentation which is the average purpose of photography in general. Not for big emotions, just for getting the work done. Ok the price is meh.

For half the price I'm getting the Tamron 20-40 2.8 that has a more unique focal length..

I just moved to Sony and would buy this lens tomorrow if it was cheaper.

a direct competitor to tamron 20-40 2.8

has the same serious design flaw as the rest of the G line.... but of course sponsored lens reviewers will never "notice" ;)

not even a mention of the tamron 20-40mm f2.8 ..........

I found you a little severe on this lens, on its "odity" and price. It isn't that far priced from Sigma's and Tamron's 28-70/2.8. In Sony's range it is (in France) 1000€ cheaper than their own 24-70/2.8, as well as a little cheaper than their 20-70/4. All the above make for quite a choice to go for "more tele" or "more wide angle", brighter or not so bright, cheap or not so cheap, lighter or heavier. And as always, very pleasant and complete review. 'like your style 🙂

If the barrel extends out at the shortest focal length, it’s an instant no from me.

Wonder who's bright idea at Sony this was at f2.8 I will stick with my Tamron 28-75 a better reach..

The only way this makes sense is sold as a kit substantially discounted.

Come on Canon! lets have some lens like this stop making 2870F2 and stuff

i 40% understand the potential need for this lens and 60% see it as a not needed product. sure for a sony 2.8 lens it kind of makes sense and for the price its not THAT bad, but cmon sony, make it a 20-50 or give it f2.5 atleast.

I would rather they had made a 28-70 2.8 G.

If it was 20-50 2.8 I'd understand, but I don't. Really don't get it

24-50mm F 2 could have been the better Option.

I don't get it, 24-50 is perfect for gimbal shooting videographers.... Why not make it internal zoom, add a few notches in the focus, zoom and apeture rings for focus pulling and add power zoom. Of course then I'd want it to bee par-focal too. At that price, this misses a big potential market. Not that the lens I've justt suggested is in any way thee same at the one Chris justt reviewed 😂

😁Díky!

20-50 f2.8 would be great

Sims 1 music

We do not need this lens. Absolutely not for video. But parfocal 20-70 f2.8 or 20-100 f2.8 lenses would actually be very useful.

Hi Chris i am a canon shooter, now i want to shift to fujifilm, i have seen all your fuji lens reviews. but there is no fuji 8-16 f2.8 lens review, i need tele lens as well as a wide angle lens. so please do review on fuji 8-16. Thank you.

optically speaking how would you compare it with a sigma 24-70mm 2.8mm?

This is a perfect gimbal and travel lens IMO.

How on earth could you say "not recommended" when it's sharp, lightweight, fast, with silent super quick autofocus?! Weird

This lens for FF is kinda the legendary sigma 18-35 f1.8 for apsc dslr cameras. First, check the zoom range: 24-50 FF and 29-56 FF (or 18-35mm in apsc), And alsoooo 1.8 in apsc is like f2.8 in FF (in terms of bokeh of course, in the amount of light it's a little bit complicated) But here's the thing, Sigma doesn't have that awful distortion in raw, and doesn't have that high price. Ok, that sigma is not for FF, and don't have that aperture ring, but that doesn't justify the price of this weird quality in GMaster Lens.

Keep in mind, this lens is intended for young people who think that 28mm (smartphone 1X lens) is the standard/normal focal length.

The distortion at 24mm is terrible.

Was ready to order as it was rumoured to be internal zoom…. nope. Also Toners copy got fogging inside the lens! Pass!

A just above kit lens for over a grand... No thanks