Originally meant to destroy us

@@makssachs8914 that was R7

@@technoglobe1168 Nearly the same rocket, just different payload.

@@makssachs8914 Atlas Agena was same at NASA

@@technoglobe1168 Well it was meant to destroy them.

What's that? The scene when the boosters blow off and look like a cross.

@@gregorymalchuk272 Yeah. It's named after Sergei Korolev. He designed the original version of this rocket back in the 50's. Dude was like a one man NASA.

@@ant4812 I presume he had some help 😉, but yes, he was a genius rocket designer that gave the USSR their initial lead in the Space Race that they otherwise might not have had. Such was his importance that Soviet leaders were always afraid that he would be assassinated, so at the time he worked in secret, and his unfortunate early death (from routine surgery, if I remember correctly, as well as heart disease) dealt a huge blow to the Soviet manned lunar program.

I'd feel the safest in a Soyuz spacecraft, currently, but the Soyuz rocket, while very reliable for a rocket, isn't quite as reliable as some others, such as the Falcon 9 and Atlas V.

Falcon 9 heavy for me.

In the early days of the Soviet space program all launches were conducted in secret. There was a reason for that.

​@@randybaumery5090 and soon starship

@@vergil-__ I hope so.

Не скучай на подходе Союз 5. Don't get bored on the approach of Soyuz 5.

@@user-iv9lh8vu3f Soyuz 5 and 6 won't have the tulip shaped nozzles

Will never retire

@@steren700 I hope so but it will

Well said.

:) much love

from Russia with love )

never tired of seeing that

Are American friend of Russian?

Beautiful rocket. Everyone is friends.

Greetings! Let's do it together, for a bright future 🙌

@@kazungukaviha5796 just for show...

@@Shoorit really? I don't think so , and if it's true friendly then oneday there will be friendship of a hyena and gazzel

Also I think if you referred to the crew as "our space dads" you go gulag right away.

for Roscosmos , this does not exist, for them it is a normal job, and not PR like Elon musk.

@@carlsaischa They will also stop giving vodka and take the bear. I don’t know which is worse.

3 часа Карл

Agreed. SpaceX wont be able to beat this.

@@KD10Conqueror In what way? The Falcon 9 first stage can fly many times, which seems to suggest that it is pretty robust. And its current run of 122 consecutive successful missions (counting both manned and unmanned) is already better than the Soyuz can usually do. The Soyuz's current run is 69 successful missions in a row, and the number is most often lower than that over its history. Its highest reliability was achieved during the 1980s and 1990s, with runs of 133 and 146, so it still holds the record for now, but those two runs are far and away the best it has achieved. Over most of its history, there is usually another failure after less than 50 launches since the last one. Most these days involve the upper stages, but every so often those four boosters attached to the core stage cause failures. Don't get me wrong, the Soyuz rocket is one of the most reliable in history, but it is not unbeatable in this respect, and lately it has been a bit less reliable than it was in the 1990s. The Falcon 9 is not only approaching the Soyuz's records from its heyday, it has done so with first stages that have flown multiple times (two have flown more than 10 times now).

fighting each other brought us the rocket

@@tommylee4135 well that is true

That won't work. Unless GOD brainwashes us. If a God would do that, your request is granted.

@@tommylee4135 No. The modern liquid-fuel rocket was developed by Robert Goddard.

Стыковка Союз МС-17 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nM6Xpdd8t9eyhqM.html

This is Soviet engineering.

And its last time the U.S. is using it also

Soviet Russia's engineering was always Russian and now or in the what can do other Soviet republics in the space nothing if this its are ussr all republics power and engineering why they can't do something in space only Russia can like usa and China , Russia build in Soviet republics institutes and taught engineers like koroliov he was from Ukraine he was ethnic Russian he became scientist in Moscow - now this technology only called old name souz but in reality this is new technology nothing have with old Soviet-Russia's age technology .

@@warleyfdias SpaceX has done over a hundred f9 launches

@@warleyfdias everything is automated the only difference is that there's people inside instead of satellites, same rocket, same tech, same everything

ङ

LMAO

regular work for decades

15 rub

technically it's Kazakstan, but okay

@@yaplakal4088 You respond to the Prigogine bot

@@yaplakal4088 Байконур в аренде у России. Казахстан - партнер России по военно-техническому сотрудничеству, член евразийского экономического союза.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it

It's actually 1950s technology, but if it works, it works. And truth be told, rocket technology hasn't advanced very much since the late 1960s. Many people seem to assume that it would have advanced just as much as, say, computers or televisions, but that is simply not the case, for a variety of reasons.

Yes.

@@SciNewsRo So do they store like couple of rockets prepared to be used anytime or need to produce them once 3 months?

@@rainywizard 11 Soyuz rockets were launched in 2020 kzfaq.info/sun/PLpGTA7wMEDFj6UChGp8ODnk9uh18e3Z5X

3 hours and 3 minutes kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nM6Xpdd8t9eyhqM.html

What is supposedly not "clean" about American rocket takeoffs?

At that altitude, the capsule can detach itself from the rocket and safely descend with the parachute. Just as it happened kzfaq.infosearch?query=Soyuz+MS-10

The fairings have escape motors

So what... USA was first on the Moon!! Why cant they use their technology?... Oh...

@@clopper3753 Because it’s expensive. Duh.

You missed the new part kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nM6Xpdd8t9eyhqM.html

America has not launched anything into orbit for two decades. They rent Russian Soyz Rockets. And ain't that a surprise.... The nation that landed on the moon needs to rent rockets to get to orbit from their enemy nation now... Mhmm... ;)

@@clopper3753 Huh? What are you talking about? Have you just ignored SpaceX and ULA? No NASA payload has launched on a Russian rocket since 2018.

lol i just used translate

Glad I can read it lol liftoff

Analog vs. digital flight control and telemetry systems. wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz-FG wikipedia.org/wiki/Soyuz-2

@@SciNewsRo thanks. I see

@@SciNewsRo is there any different about the outer visual or is just upgraded?

It can be painted differently sometimes. The last Soyuz-FG being assembled kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pq2piJyGtb-tqZs.html The first Soyuz-2.1a to launch a crew kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sMymfaed0bTOnI0.html

I see

It do have boosters 🤣🤣

Soyuz MS-17 hatch opening kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aciIm5mmxL-nqnk.html

Yep. We lost the Space Shuttle but please not Союз!

How did you get to this video? It's from 2020.

Yes. Tradition for luck. Kick to the orbite.

@@alexeikolokolcev3232 nice! Thank you for replying. First noticed last mission, i believe when they aborted, and had to land. People can say whatever they want about Soyuz... yet, i don't believe anyone has ever been killed as a result of the craft. And that system is i believe older than I am. 😁 ☀️😎☀️ 🇺🇸🤝🇷🇺 ☀️😎☀️

If you look at the first spacesuits, you will understand where the tradition came from)

@@user-fr8op9hf7r that's cool , thanks for sharing that. ☀️😎☀️

@@d.cypher2920 Yes, in this way they helped to rise)

@MrWantsoft ну по факту картинка на моём мобильном лучше, но я не сравниваю с ним есть те же gopro, но я часто смотрю трансляции с запуском starlink картинка на порядок выше, если что никого не хотел обидеть

@@user-my4vs5pw5b GoPro в этих условиях откажет на первой минуте.

Soyouz looks way more beautiful

А кто это? маск?..

@@vitaliypolikarpov вот те на , дрэгоны и тэслы , не , не слышали )))

Gary St Ну я про него узнала относительно недавно, например. Доброе утро, что называется, новости люди ныне черпают самостоятельно из интернетов. Соответсвенно живут в своих информационных матрицах, вполне нормально, когда новостная информационная повестка у двух людей может не совпадать практически полностью. Точнее на самом деле оно так и есть, если взять нормальное распределение и посмотреть какие новости потребляют люди, там пересечение будет не сильно большое, а у части людей вообще не будет пересечений, они натурально живут в разных мирах, хотя это могут быть соседние квартиры. Вот например я знаю что этот канал показывает разные новости, я на него не подписана, иностранные космические программы меня не интересуют от слова совсем, поэтому ютуб научился мне рекомендовать видео с данного канала только про российские пуски. Вот как сейчас это он сделал. Я зашла, посмотрела, и так до следующего раза. Для сравнения я не смотрела ни одно видео с ракетами маска, ну какие-то кусочки видела конечно, но как часть новостных сюжетов. Кто такой маск запомнила раза с десятого наверное, ибо в новостях натыкалась конечно, но мозг всегда отсеивал эту информацию как ненужную (аналогично несколько раз читала про китайских ракетоделов, но вот хоть убей ни одного уже не помню, мозг отсеивает ненужное), запомнила его уже когда в комментах у роскосмоса/рогозина (твиттер) его продвигало какое-то невероятное количество ботов и пришлось тратить несколько часов чтобы изучить что стоит за этой пропагандисткой кампанией.

@@vitaliypolikarpov Это певец! Он поёт "Трава у дома"!😆

@@user-qr4ty6th3e , трава у дома... Теперь понятно, почему он все.время улыбается..