She went full Kooba.

ayyyyyy i watch u

Our super talented Estela!!!

Wait, are Jabzy looking for new voice actors? Because I sound like a phone operator!

Kooba Leebray !!

Matheu Roux yea like the east india company, just without the whole mutiny

Matheu Roux Cortez was a true chad

BulletBill110 the original Chad

The virgin "contact and trade" vs the chad "conquer and convert"

Matheu Roux aztecs

It isn't truth, Tlaxcalans was ruled as any other part of the province of New Spain, which means that the previous indegenous held lands were given to spanish officials, who as owner of the lands could freely rule and demand taxes from the said natives. The txlacalan council itself was dissolved by a governador soon after the conquest.

@@Pedrosa2541 Lying rebel.

@@Pedrosa2541 Following the Spanish Conquest, Tlaxcala was divided into four fiefdoms (señoríos) by the Spanish corregidor Gómez de Santillán in 1545 (26 years after the Conquest). These fiefdoms were Ocotelolco, Quiahuiztlan, Tepeticpac, and Tizatlan. At this time, four great houses or lineages emerged and claimed hereditary rights to each fiefdom and created fictitious genealogies extending back into the pre-Columbian era to justify their claims. During the colonial period, the Tlaxcalan people were regarded as being of higher status and received better treatment compared to the other indigenous peoples of New Spain. Source: Catholic encyclopedia

@@derniercaesar5319 The Spanish did not respect their treaty, in fact Tlaxcala was one of the first to rebel because they abandoned most of it in the 1600s.

@@Pedrosa2541 No. And actually, it was frobidden to sell native land to Spaniards, they had what is known as Repubica de Indios.

Yes, this is generally the case overwhelmingly in much of European Colonial history. There weren't (often) grand armies of white men marching through the Americas, Africa, or India conquering vest swaths of territory. Usually the natives hated each other just as much as anyone else, and had their own internal conflicts. The help of the Europeans just allowed the other groups that had previously been suppressed by the dominant one to rise up and conquer them. The idea that the Spanish somehow conquered all of South America and much of North America was small armies of a few hundred or thousand guys is insane. The overwhelming majority of the natives were killed by disease, and most of those killed in combat we're at the hands of their native enemies. The Europeans were often just master managers and leaders. The same strategy has been in place since the time of the Romans.

_That's the part of the story that never seems to find the light of day._ No, that is often taught in schools and what you said about human sacrifices done by the Spanish was untrue. The Spanish hate human sacrifice and they ended human sacrifice throughout the Spanish colonies. You said this just to promote an anti-white narrative while missing the overall historical context. Edit: Disregard the whole comment as I actually misread the OP's comment.

*+Louis XIV (aka 1685Violin)* I think you misread the comments. We were both explaining how the Spanish *stopped the Aztecs* from committing human sacrifice. Not that they were doing it themselves

Oh. Sorry. I must have misinterpreted the OP. I think I should withdraw my comment.

Actually......the Aztec population was way to extensive for Cortez, or the Spanish for that matter, to "enslave and work to death". The Aztec civ was decimated by disease for which they had no defense as far as immunology. The Spanish ,on the other hand were the carriers of the pestilence for which they were immune. Black slaves appeared because they were readily available due to the attacking, murdering and capturing of of black people by other black people. As they had done, if the Egyptian Hieroglyphs are to be believed, for thousands of years before Spain became a nation. Hmmm. so you planned to compare ritual slaughter of as many as hundreds a day with the effects of the Spanish on the collapse of the Aztec Empire??????? Let me guess....the Gate keepers declared you a history professor to match all the college entrants we have that cannot read or write properly.

thats so brave.

and a race change

TripleMpro221 its also exaggerated.

Khadar Knowledge It's what is known to date. Of course, we dont have reliable sources but this is what we know.

The Spanish had the high ground and cannons, but yeah, it was tactics that won the day.

lol pretty sure it was over 1,000 years of technological advantages that won that day XD

DexterzPlace They won because of tactics. They had spears and horses so they hold on and in a run they killed the aztec commander.

you in escuela publica?

A mexicans worst enemy is another mexican

Too bad, they have such rich history of kings and conquests like any european kingdom

@@blasco3245 yes, really :P

@@blasco3245 yes, you can, cause size doesnt matter, but history and complexity does. Besides, the existence was less than 200 years, not 100. Still, all the history surrounding the Anahuac basin is as much important for the mexica before theeir arrival as Rome history to most european kingdoms

Fuck you

@@blasco3245 yet with so little time they build a huge city bigger with tons of history and did great things on astronomy and architecture plus natural medicine and acueductos. Reminds me of usa a few hundred years and so powerful and big. Let's not forget that mexican culture is one of the strongest in the world.

Wrong The Aztec were too brutal against other tribes which is why those tribes allied with the Spanish

Spanish didn't introduced biological warfare because they didn't know what the hell was that. Just like the Vikings didn't discover America because even though it is very possible they arrived to its coast, they didn't know shit about it nor told anyone about it, adn didn't try to know what actually had just happened and where exactly they had arrived to. In both cases, the results were accidental. You can nor make warfare unaware of being making warfare. Their own business were capturing other tribes' citizens and sacrificing them, and later on eating them, yummy. Spanish didn't devided anyone, they took advantage of the already division, or should I say, utter hatred for the mexica desplayed by some tribes.

The Spanish didn’t “divide” them. Many other tribes hated the Aztecs for their brutal human sacrifice so the Spanish were their saviors

Good diplomacy and ability to seize on opportunities allowed the Conquistadores to ally with the enemy of the Aztecs and march on Tenochtitlan.

well, small pox conquered Aztec for us

Disease is a hell of a mother

It is reflective of a barbarian nature not incredible

Soundwave 47 i know but thats the whole point of how a tiny group of people defeated a much larger force

That's our Estela... check her out on some of our other videos.

creeper

It didn't, not even close You don't know shit about history if you are serious about that

Ding dong the wrong bell

You sound like a nazi...

@@pedro_navarro what the heck

@@JeremiahAranez 4:34 "las epidemias demostrarían ser su mayor aliado" "pudiendo matar al 75% de la población indígena". Estos porcentajes están tergiversados. El 75% de la población indígena no murió en epidemias, EMIGRÓ. Los censos que recogen estos descensos de población reflejan que se produjeron despoblamientos probablemente por desarraigo cultural o para huir de las epidemias, pero los notarios no justificaron jamás esos despoblamientos con muertes directas producto de las epidemias. Este vídeo es leyenda negra antiespañola producida por la extrema derecha anglosajona para borrar la lengua española de los EEUU.

she was tawking in Spanglish

Buh-Based and redpilled.

@@trollerjakthetrollinggod-e7761 Do trolls get paid?

@@rockycassiano4756 Only if you work for Biden. Can't say the pay is good though, senile old fart keeps forgetting to pay his employees.

Dumbest thing I read in a while.

Funny, since there were extremelly few Spaniards in Mexico for the first 200 years.

@Jay Kemme it was the anglo académics that called them "Aztecs" for the first time, such term makes reference to the mystical land of "Aztlan" from where the Mexica people supposedly came from

Punished Todd buy skyrim again

excuse me, don't you mean skyrim AND fallout 4?

But Waluigi looks down upon them all

Emmmm, nope. The mexica "nobility" (those who were not macihualtin) was still very alive. So was a good part of the civil population, though they were very decimated. Some of those mexica nobles had actually opposed Spanish rule and fought againt them, but most were still granted titles. Many married Spanairds, and the descendants of Moctezuma and Cuauhtémoc were granted some privilages over any other native noble, including the Tlaxcallans, who were Spaniards' allies and cherished friends. At least 1/4 of Spanish nobility and high class privilaged people are of mexica descendant, particularly of Moctezuma's eldes daughter and youngest son, and most of them settled in my hometown and some live in a friggin castle 15 minutes from town, so don't give me that crap. So.... I really don't know were did you get all that from, but the mexica were not anihilated. Most died due to diseases, many were killed by Spaniards and their allies in the war, some died of hunger during the seige to Tenochtitlan.... but there was not a plan of massive extermination of the mexica, quite the opposite, Spaniards wouldn't stop sending native emissaries to the mexica praying them to please surrender and stop the war. But it was no use, the mexica were a proud people, and they fought till the very end, that's why their population was so decimated. But the survivors were not hunted down at all, on the contrary, they were very high regarded by Spaniards and Spain's king himself, for their bravery, and their skills, and the empire-like rule they had over other tribes, plus the complex city they had built adn their complex and sophisticated system of tributes. So they were not despised by the Spaniards, not at all. Far from that, their nobles got the highest of honours. By the way, Tlaxcallans and Mexica probably looked very similar, not only had they the same culture and society, to the point it is sometimes very difficult to tell appart the nuances of the practices between both nations, but they most probably had very similar genetic origins. They were very very alike, and that's why they clashed so much. Though many other tribes didn't get along with the mexica either XD

You know nothing stop spreading lies

There were many others too.

Just a theory

@@tomassmith1519 What's a theory? The rock throwing or stabbing in the back?🤔

@@doctordef324 both. Most historians say he died just because of the rocks. Others say othrr things

@@tomassmith1519 nope, the Spain conquistadors stabbed him in the back. He fell to his death...

@@doctordef324 that's a posibility

That's because she is Mexican...

Not all mexicans are aztecs. Most are not. Or should I say, none is, since it would be mexica, not aztec.

Mexicans are mexicans, aztec empire doesn't exist anymore. Is like complaining about italians not speaking latin.

@@gannielukks1811 Dude, you’re 4 years too late.

@@Vitalis94 Knowledge is never enough

@@gannielukks1811 You didn’t bring any knowledge here, you’re just complaining about my complaining, really helpful, yeah.

It's no sh sound

She was from a nahuan city-state (related to aztecs but different),but as a child her mother sold her to a mayan city-state ,cortes meet her in tabasco (crossroads of mayan and aztecs cultures)so she spoke both mayan and nahuatl

It's not war crimes if u win.

mecksico

Nmms :v

And then, Reconquista