Same, i even rationalized it being a balance feature.

The way my mouth dropped when he said that was a bug I was convinced it was a feature too

bruh. I told my ftls that it was a feature too because they were confused. im dead

Yeah but unfortunately Russia doesn't get any kind of indirect fire SPGs. If they're giving airburst mortars to the US they should give the grad to the Russians

@@jacobantaya7423 They should get Smerch/Uragan to be a bit more fancy

@@jacobantaya7423 I think anytime they add major stuff, the opposing sides should get something to compensate. I know that's a tall order, but it would make the game less annoying to play.

@@wero892 yeah that's true but I said Grad because it's already in the game so they just need to add it to a couple battalions instead of designing a new vehicle

It's gonna get messy

We all have throughout the years

AGS time!

Yeah they've been fun, but I wish you could zero them further. 300m is pathetic, we should be able to zero up to 1000m at least, that would turn them into indirect fire beasts.

lmao

My pc runs fine, just upgrade it

download more ram fam

@@steezusyeezus8674 I have a 2060, i7, 16gb ram, 2t ssd. I get 75-110fps in battlefield, and other games. I get 50 tops on some sqd maps and 25-35 on others. Sad thing is this used to be my favorite game couple years ago I was rocking 60-80 fps, this is the devs going all in on the wrong priorities.

I had major FPS issues but after rolling back my Graphics drivers to an older version I gained 20fps - and thats on a 4070ti

When the SPG truck takes steroids

Absolutely!

If only they'd put it on offer!! I've been waiting months

You mean "anemic"?

@@TheJubiter yes never bothered looking up the correct spelling since I don't really use that word

Actually the standard 30x29mm VOG-17M HE-frag grenade (projectile) weighs 280 grams, whereas 40x53mm HEDP weighs 245 grams. This is because the 30 mm grenade is rather long when compared to the 40 mm grenade. So the 30 mm grenade is heavier and thus produces more or heavier fragments. It is not anemic in comparison to 40 mm. 30 mm AGS-17/30 has 180 m/s muzzle velocity and 40 mm AGL has 240 m/s muzzle velocity. However, the 30 mm grenade has better ballistic coefficient, so in practice their effective range is rather similar.

@@argy007 you should compare the 40mm HE not HEDP, as that is a HEAT warhead. But I get your point.

@@gerfand HEDP is the main round used by vehicle mounted 40 mm AGLs. All 40x53mm grenades weigh about the same in order to maintain the same recoil impulse, pressure and velocity. From the information I gathered from websites of THREE ammunition manufacturers, the 40 mm HEF weighs exactly the same as the HEDP.

Appreciate you!

@@A_Honcho Thanks man!

Glad you enjoyed it !

No problems dude 👍

Nah Czech army is better

Ukraine could be neat. It's in the Global escalation mod already but basically functions as a mismatch of Russian and NATO equipment which is cool. Be neat to get a t64bm or a t80u fighting next to a Bradley

Be really funny if the make it a territory defence unit though instead of one of the elite units so you're all basically 50y/o with Aks and 2 magazines

Agreed, especially because most Vehicles and guns are already in the game. I so want a G36 and a Wiesel :D

@@ochinchin1048 damn me too

China should also get the QLU-11, basically a sniper grenade launcher lol

Ahh yes. Very balanced

Scout vehicles will get thermals in the future

maybe we get target designation with the bfist? hmhm

The devs know that I guess the elcan is literally too shit to properly represented in a video game

@@metalfusion1319 😂😂⚔️ you're so right about that

Issue is bullets drop more in game than in real life, the not so noticeable arc of 556 in real life is much more pronounced in game so it's just easier for the C79 to be the same as literally every other non Marksman scope

Thank you !

I'm partnered with Squad so I get early access to updates and new content

ну у пистона там обзор вышел, ток хреновый довольно, лучше патчноут просто прочитать

@@melzyy пистон лox

​@@A_Honchoit will be great to have Russian subtittles

New toys are always fun!

i hate armor and play HAT/LAT out of spite, see you on the field.

@@smarterthanthou1953Armor main here. See you there bb >:3

​@@smarterthanthou1953 I don't hate armour main, but I hate not annoying from 🌲🌲🌲🌲🌲🌴🌴🌴🌴

It would be cooler to get armor overhaul, so vehicles don't feel like Gmod

I think this is coming soon

When I first read your comment I my immediate thought was that there's no way an IR dazzler could possibly work on a wire guided missile and was about to correct you, but just to be sure I googled it and as it turns out, they actually do work, since they confuse the computer that keeps track of where the missile is, rather than confusing the missile itself like one might first assume. You learn more every day. The question is of course which variant of the tow we actually have in the game. The Shtora-1 dazzlers have been demonstrated to work on all variants before the BGM-71D, but not on subsequent variants, as the D variant came with an upgraded guidance system that was hardened against IR interference. The in game name simply says "BGM-71 TOW" which might suggest it's a variant before the D, since those variants are usually referred to as "TOW 2" but the penetration value disputes this, as 900mm of pen was only achieved with the warhead upgrade that also came with the D variant. All this is to say, the Tows we have in the game are probably a version with the hardened guidance system, which the Shtora is not able to defeat, but I can't be 100% sure of that.

You can do that in vanilla though

If I had to guess they want to keep the Grad a unique feature of Militia, and they certainly aren't adding the TOS 1, mortar carriers are the approach that imo works best anyways. Admittedly the problem there is that Russia does not use motar carriers like most of the world/the US one, though the VDV could very well get the Nona. All they have is the Tyulpan, and I mean, lol. My personal suggestion would be to give Russian support unit a buildable 120mm mortar. But to be honest I would prefer all conventional support units getting 120 mm mortars instead of the standard ones, since they are very common. Russia getting it first though would be reasonable.

@@evangelosvasiliades1204 it strikes me more that the devs don't value how effective it is or don't wish to allow for a realistic battle

Why not a vasilek mounted on BMP ? That would be really cool.

I'm not thrilled about the US getting a mobile mortar. At least if they get it, Russia/China should probably get the grad or something so both factions have mobile artillery

No, for now its just an up-armoured T72, but they said it will receive changes in the future. Admittedly the shtora is very obsolete at actually jamming atgms so them adding that as a feature would rightfully upset people. But knowing as soon as an atgm is looking at you from the laser warning, and having the turret be able to auto face where it's coming from (both additional features of the T90) would be great.

Gotta think more about what you vote for now. The tradeoffs are starting to set in

I play a lot of armor as well... Faster resetting is nice for sure, but I would prefer it if the Leo didn't front flip while driving down a straight road with no obstacles (happened to me, I think an ant was crossing the street)

@@jacobantaya7423 oh dude tell me about it. I’ve complained many times about driving an Abram’s, hitting a pebble then flipping 100 feet in the air lol or having no torque to drive up a hill in vehicles made to do so coming from experience.

@@mrcreami of yeah the torque issue is another one I hate

T90a has thicker frontal and side armor in update

T90A has better turret armour in real life, also driver`s hatch area is protected by Kontakt-5 ERA, so frontal armour of T90 is not the same

@@mongoliannomad9284 Right but squad wise it is as the shells cant penetrate the t72's turret face anyways and the drivers port is still a weakspot its just smaller

@@ra9788 I see, is it thicker overall or just in the turret and hull?

update haven't been out yet man , tomorrow

You might want to check your graphics drivers! I had similar issues after it was fixed, turned out to be bad Nvidea drivers and I had to roll back

@@A_Honcho Interesting, thanks, will try to do that. So you just installed an older driver and it was fixed?

@@eliasguzman1647I had to go in to steam and change my game version to the beta version due to horrible performance on my 3070 gpu. Owi said to change to the beta version so I did it and it runs great

40mm does no damage against armor though

I'm pretty sure the AGL is used for indirect fire more than as a backup for the 30mm. Not that you can't use it as a backup, but dumping grenades from 800m away onto an objective would be devastating.

What do you mean? Talil has like, 10 trees on it. Tons of maps in the mountains of Afghanistan (or similar terrain). Narva and Fallujah for entirely urban maps or Al Bashra for a mix of urban and desert. Even the forests are varried. Harju plays nothing like Yerovikha. I do really like PR maps though, it be neat if the devs add some (like the Gaza map) directly into the game.

Not to mention the turret looks off, it seems too high for what it should be, and this isnt the first instance of botched vehicles in squad, ie look at the squad MGS compared to an IRL one

I think they're in the works, but that's all I can say 🫢

Thanks dude!

Thank you !

And I thought the Russians were the only ones who played turret toss

Yea even I was surprised by that one

Armor feels like gmod assets. It lacks so many basic functions.

We dont want squad to be like war thunder with all these thermals and counter measures.

Hmmmm.... I'm not sure a helmet would help. Imagine if the helmet could actually resist being crushed but then you still gotta hold it up so you turn into a pancake inside your helmet.

Seeing people in general and where you are being shot from is the Squad equivalent of getting your 'sea legs'. It'll start to come to you.

you cant see it b ut you can hear it,thats basically the whole combat dynamic of squad

It states that its just a T72 with more armour, but will receive more features in the future.

​​@@evangelosvasiliades1204Some EW features on those vehicles would be cool. I imagine they will roll out the T-90s dazzler feature along with other vics like the M1's IED Jammer. Edit: Oh yeah, also LWR.

In real life it only confuses laser guided atgm’s so when it’s added and the dazzlers are functional it can only really defeat its own atgm the kornet because the tow is wire guided

​@@chebb3699this is incorrect. The wire is for guidance, but the fire control needs to see the IR light on the back of the missile in order to know where the missile is. The IRCM block the firing control system from knowing where the missile is, so it can't accurately give the correct targeting info through the wire.

TOW is wire-guided, not much way to jam it

Why would they disable suppression?

@@mbpaintballa Suppression BLUR

@@shanty5653 why would the remove it?

Frankly, you need that HAT in the armor battalions. The Turkish tank is hot garbage and will lose in a fair fight (it is still a tank so using it like t62 is effective of course). But most of the time when I play turkey our armor is taken out in the first 10-20 minutes and the enemy tanks basically have free reign.

Soon!