Yur5t9p0hydjf,

Detail is amazing!! How long did this take to build?

???

Or if your single

@@leebarrett9581 yeet

Except for that fat door in the back and the huge air brush

But the lights and overall it's nice!

I wonder why that is.

@@chrise842 whats the matter, jealous?

@@kuzadupa185 nope, just mentioning

❤❤❤😂🎉😢😮😅😮

Exactly, have you ever noticed how those who complain never have a video showing how good they are.

You're right,you have to be into a hobby to understand and appreciate all the work that goes into such a model.

@Geo...Nobody asked for their opinions. If they can do better,let's see otherwise negativity should be kept to themselves.

It's just sad,but that's the way it is I guess.

Who is complaining? I suppose you are thinking about all the dislikes. Who knows what kind of weird people they are and why they press the dislikes button, but the comments seem to be positive.

Iuiuiii

Huglfvh😍🤩😊

Ich auch

I want to see a tiger tank

Germany is prob 1 of the top three countries for engineering & detail ...

What is this, a helicopter for ants?? It has to be...at least three times bigger than this..!

@@thatyoudliketoknow1628 said Derek! Haha

When I was a kid I always wanted one, but now with the technology coming out so fast. I would probably break it .

@@geoffkeith8273 ططططط

Right?

Well, kind of. Yes, the sound is very unique - both the model as well as in real life. But no where near that very low distinct and rhythmic base sound.

@@chrise842 yes what you say has to be true because of the immense size difference between the the real one and the model, we could also expect the rotor wash to be bit heavier. Thanks for the dignified and significant point made!

​@@Ladiesandgentlemen121 I'm an FE and will tell you that your original comment was goofy as hell. AH64, UH60 and CH47's all have somewhat similar drivetrain sounds, with the biggest change being the distinct "wop wop wop" from chinooks that the other two don't carry. Besides the difference in the sound of the rotor systems, the engines and transmissions sound similar enough that you can not tell me that you could distinguish the difference between any of them from a difference without hearing the distinctive sound from the rotor system itself

@@idkbroski815 you assume that I was talking in comparison to the choppers you mentioned, but I was not. I was talking in comparison to the UH1H hueys that I worked on. They do not have the transmission wine As I correctly said because they dont have similar xmissions to the aircraft you mentioned. I was tempted to believe that you didnt know what you were talking about but our hanger was right beside a Chinook hanger and all helicopters had to taxi by our hanger #6 to get to the runway at Campbell airfield including the Black Hawk wich was a new aircraft at the time and was killing people due to the unshielded stabulator, this was 36 yrs ago before your time I'm sure. I find your statement correct about the black hawk and ch47 having the same sound other than the rotor blades but the chinook blades are much quieter than the BH the xmissions much bigger I'm sure so the xmission wine resonate louder and clearer. Ah64 where out there at their own separate airfield. I was a kid back then, talking brashly with no respect when I addressed another man, now I know the difference and respectfully advise you to do the same, life health and all issues will go alot better because you are being watched and rewarded for what you do. Show disrespect, receive disrespect. From somebody it will come. You're right, hell is goofy but it's also real and i'm taking steps not to wind up there. Christian/KJV/Lord Jesus Christ

Thanks for flying thoes beautiful birds, they're my favorite and its funny because my mother worked for the Blackhawk manufacturer.

@@anraegodley-cooper6321 the o

@jeff lee Lame !

I used to 'fly' the blades around camp on my side loader forklift. Happy days. I still get a buzz seeing the Woccas flying around.

Hi Loyd, At any time we’re you assigned to The Wagonmasters at Ft. Hood?

Just a question, doesn't the back side needs to have more lift than the front

@@akashiseijuro5216 No. The real one flies tail low. That is normal.

Wow appriciate that u worked in a army

Thank you for your service my grandpa flew jets, C-130s and also occasionally a UH-60

Thank you for you service👍

9

⚘🌹⚘🌹⚘🌹❤👍

Not exactly. Yes they are rigged not to hit each other but these blades are in the same plane of operation while a real Chinook's blades are not. They cross each other's plane of operation but it is likely for a significant reason they are not operating in the same plane 100% of the time like this model. It's still a killer RC version though.

They cant crash into each other, they are connected via a drive shaft so the rotation speed of each rotor remains the same.

we already all appreciate that dude, you dont need to ask us to..

That's not as hard as you might think, I mean it *is* time consuming but any FBL unit that can set up a custom 4 channel swashplate mix can do tandem. Tandems only need 2 servos per swashplate, fore/aft "cyclic" is actually done by differencing the collective pitch of the front and rear rotor disk. On a 3DIGI for example you'd start with a 4 servo swashplate configuration and set it into an "X" instead of a "+"configuration with the top two legs of the X being the front swashplate servos and the lower two legs the rear. In this way when you move the cyclic forward the top two servos move up and the rear two servos move down while left/right cyclic moves the servos on each side up or down together. To the controller the two separate disks operate as one rotor system. The front and rear swashplates have only left/right cyclic, not fore/aft. Yaw on tandems is by opposing cyclic so on a 3DIGI you'd just mix the rudder channel into the cyclics so it causes the front cyclic to go one way and the rear cyclic to go the other way in response to rudder. The adjustments needed are mechanical servo limits and centering of the pitch at center collective and setting maximum cyclic and collective angle of attack (all of which will all be similar to a single rotor helicopter), and some tweaking of the gyro gains where you start low and gradually bring them up till you have it where you want it.

RENo😰😰😰😰😰🖒🖒✍🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒😰😰😰🙋🖒🖒🖒✍🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒🖒

@@atomicskull6405 to get

Realism would be oil pouring out of both rotors and a nasty crew chief who comes out and screams at you for spilling gatorade all over the floor of his bird, haha. Nice looking RC chopper though.

@@robh3007 I'm sure there is a way to replicate that.

Scale flyers always say that to cover up the fact they can't actually fly a heli well. Whereas people who can fly scale and 3D generally don't bother to fly scale because it's boring to do and watch if you have actual skills. 3D can be flowy and smooth or aggressive and violent, this can only fly left and right for eternity. Hundreds of hours to build a heli that is going to turn left and right and left and right in front of pensioners is a lot more spastic than flying skills and being creative in the air. Awesome build but 30 seconds in to the flight I'd rather be watching a 1s micro heli being flown with skill.

We do get into these kinds of things

How to buy this

@@explorersk39 you buy the time 🕰 and build one 🔨

@@explorersk39 build one out of foam?

@@ryanlemons3255 i think you can build one out of foam too, xD

Not a toy, is a Flying Model

It is a toy for big boys. Lol

It's too dangerous for kids

Not me

Same here for 3 years SN - 82-23386 A Delta model back in 83-85.

I never flew on the Chinook but I did maintain them along with the Blackhawk and Apache as a defense contractor from '99-'08 at Camp Humphreys, ROK. 😎

thank you for your service!

thank you.@@Hemidakota

was crewing in Germany during the day of the MANNHEIM crash, very bad day.@@sealy3

I second that, the attention to details is impeccable... oh and it flies super smooth too. :) With modern LiPo batteries and high efficienry electric motors it's incredible what they can do now, and also makes this hobby more accessible to a lot more people (compared to the more difficult air-fuel motors).

it is really cool the only thing that it needs is a good realistic paint job. It's a bit too shiny and maybe flying a bit fast for a chinook.

@@BillAnt for hi my

Or become an aircraft engineer. I was . Worked on the real thing. Love the Chinook.

What hardware do they use to built the drone Chinook?

No girlz aap aap aap all all L flicks ffhg

@@martinpye549 ষঞ

Привет

Greek Marines?? Are you Spartan?

I've jumped out of them

I would choose 2 like in fast and furious

Fast 6 that shiiii

That would be super cool

@@orenbaker3859 Same here. I love helo jumps and the Chinook jumps were some of my favorites.

YES

:O

More like chameleon

It looks like the dog from Jimmy Neutron

It's called peace walker

Well. . .people are icky.

Was that just for enjoyment? Not for some R&D?

@@anjalishejwalkar3400 confused bro?

i checked as many comments here i dont see any hate

And twice on Friday!

Nice hlycaptar

lol

É verdade

ierodhrodhdkfjhdkdkdgdidodhfokfkdhfohfofhfodhdirohrorhrorjrprjrprhroeuueorhrprhroehrprhrorhrorurorhrprhrprurprjhrkrhforhroeohdotjfurprhtgopthrorhrorphrurofirhjrorjrgplcrfxchfkdlrjgdksidjfkdndvdkrjhr

ㅤ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ

Jerry Hubbard can you really use the word Pilot when talking about RC helicopter and planes? Lmao more like controller. When you go on a blind date do you tell the person sitting across from you, you use to be a pilot? Lol then when they ask what’d you fly KC-130’s, 747’s, F-23’s, what? Do you then go nah, RC’s. LMFAOOO.

True

@@MrBallaD25 No He's not a pilot and he won't get killed if it crashes, His wife will do it for him

@@MrBallaD25 y yes u can

About $3

Lipo. it won't be a huge loss. If it was powered by jetcat turbines; I'd be crying for him in case of an un-commanded landing! Still its good stuff

Excellent a positive comment from someone who knows what they are talking about instead of the usual criticising ;-)

@@kougerat5388 Thanks bud 👍 been flying heli's for nearly 40 years, even before they invented gyro's and it was all mechanical mixing :-)

Flying an R/C heli is horribly difficult compared to fixed-wing. At least a tandem-rotor unit, such as a Chinook, is a LITTLE easier - but it's still a b***h compared to fixed. And cars or boats are a walk in the park, by comparison. I've got cars and trucks (and a tank!) and had helos and a quad drone. I even had a little indoor-only Chinook that I fooled around with.

With practice ..literally anyone can achieve it

Did ya leave it behind

Nobody has ‘flied’

Apache heli’s always fly over mine its the loudest shit

Agree

Hii

Hello ji

Is kam ko sikhane mein kitne time Laga Doge

Who hurt you?

No one...

Ditto,Well said.

Bhdbghdghshzgbdgf

Hdhdhdygfsjsggeub

تبتتبنباتمءتايمؤخابلصخحيتهصتيتهيوؤاايةؤىؤةؤةؤةىؤى ؤتةيؤتيةايخيتثايتتةينينتيتيتيزيزيزيزيويوتيوللايمابتقتر

73هعبتابترترارواراةر روولووبتتباي

Thulasinagaraj ,s

RC helicopters aren't so difficult to control, the larger they are the more stable in fact.

@Chimp Hunter you sure about that? I find the independent throttle control hard to beleive.

@Chimp Hunter thats not true at all

Best military course I took - rigging and slinging loads under a Chinook. Had craft and crew all day on final to practice rigging, slinging and carrying loads. Helluva great time standing underneath this beast hovering just a few feet above your head. Just awesome! Learned how to sling my radio's to remote locations. So cool.

Not a complaint, but the ramp needs to be split showing what is called the tongue retracted. That's how they are flown in the full-size machines. Add the triple hook system and ditch the orange glowing engine LEDs and you would nail it. Awsome model. 27-year CH-47 aircraft commander.

I was thinking the same thing, lol. Little paratroopers with chutes folded up; stuff them in the back, fly up high enough for the chutes to open on the way down, open the back ramp and climb - watch them come tumbling out of the back. Then start trying to dump them all on an LZ.. ..or maybe an RC watercraft that can come out of the back on a pond...

If you can't fly a heli yeah impossible. If you can, a hover and figure 8 is literally the first thing you learn but many people stop there and use scale flying as an excuse not to further their skills.

I want to buy one, where it found.

The Chinook is the fastest rotorcraft in the US Army fleet.

@@Pavia1525 Not, Black Hawk 222, Apache 227 and Chinook 196 mph. All slower than an Osprey at over 350 mph since you said rotocraft.

@james long dont know where you got that info but it is extremely incorrect. Aircraft speed isn't even measured in MPH in the first place

Steven Rhodes how much is this thing?

A similar one i found... www.vario-helicopter.biz/be/Fuselage-Kit/Chinook-1-11-Fuselage-kit::200649.html?language=en

@@spartakdoci3110 that’s what i wanna know

@@jeremy8942 damn they expensive!

Not really.

Me too bro like RC CARS And other RC Cool toys but I can't afford it😔😞

This is not a Toy.Only Killerdrohne.

@@flycatcher4928 what you mean ? Not toy ?

What is the D model about?

D model dick model

@@hackerino9707 I was a Powertrain Mechanic on the CH-47D, or D Model. They have D, E and F Models today. The D or Delta Model was the modern version when I was working on them.

Thommo Thomason ok thanks, so like the continuing letters are the modernized versions

Tommy ex Brit army, this is my favourite chopper of all!🇬🇧🇺🇸😁

Wait until you experience something with nitro engines. My neighbors love me for the kyosho inferno mini. 😅 And I haven't even started my ofna yet

The most painful part is the stuff that makes everything go. Body work on RC aircraft is relatively easy, but my God, engines, rods, servos...

Well with ADHD it's hard not to lose that even if you really want to