The fifth part of the series based on the Stanley, iron rabbit fillester planes. Predominantly black and review of Stanley weather stripping planes.
Пікірлер: 30
@JulianA-ui8cz9 ай бұрын
A valuable and well thought out series… I know I’ll be watching them again some day to absorb things I missed. I have been inspired to bring a more detailed eye to my humbler small selection of iron planes, although very much enjoyed. The similarities and differences is fascinating, but the true pleasure is in the using! Thank you again Chester, all your videos carry a generous gift of sharing.
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you, kindly. I really appreciate the comment and that my videos may be helpful.
@joycewallace73069 ай бұрын
Please don't stop making these videos. You pass along good information. Some people can't help themselves. Bob
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
I appreciate that greatly.
@rodrigomeza2829 ай бұрын
Really great video and series! Please keep them coming!
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you, I will.
@chdnorm9 ай бұрын
I think your videos are fantastic. I have particularly enjoyed this series.
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you so much. I really appreciate your feedback.
@E-Glide9 ай бұрын
Ignore the trolls, Chester. Your efforts are much appreciated
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
🙏🏼
@nickmastro92874 ай бұрын
I just completed the series and found your information very helpful. I’m trying to build up my plane collection and actually use them as users. I’m retired and I don’t have the budget to hastily purchase a plane only to find out that it doesn’t fit my needs. Your videos have helped me with narrowing down the planes I need or want. Thank you for taking the time to do all of this research and look forward more Tool comparisons including backgrounds/history.
@BrianRooney-qd3my9 ай бұрын
I have always had a shop in the garage and I Guess I am a hybrid woodpecker but I love old tools and since I retired K added a lot of hand tools and enjoy your videos and have added some that I was on your channel and I always enjoy the videos I have built a nice collection of tool over the years but I do love seeing your collection thanks for the videos
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you for your comments. I am gratified that people appreciate the videos. I am also a hybrid woodworker and can appreciate anything that gets the job done.
@boxcarjimmy46719 ай бұрын
Another excellent video please keep them coming, very informative and helpful thanks Chester
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thanks, will do!
@snellscroft9 ай бұрын
Good informative video, I like the Record 778, it has a better depth adjuster than the Stanley 78, and 2 arms for the fence which seems much stronger.
@donaldplagge96759 ай бұрын
Thank you for the videos, good show! I graduated from a 2 year Vo-Tech Cabinet-making school in 1973, after my 4 year military duty, including a year in the SE Asian war. The guys that are so "nuts" about the "exact" name and use of these planes are the collectors that have probably never used them in a real wood shop!!
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you, kindly and appreciated.
@jon_westwood9 ай бұрын
I have a 248. Great tool for cutting grooves for boxes if you're not concerned about the hole you'll have to fill later. Much prefer it to breaking out the router; nice lightweight little plane
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Agreed. 👍🏼
@Fusion_Woodworking9 ай бұрын
We are learning along the way and together.
@johnedwards69399 ай бұрын
Well done Chet. 👍👍
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Thank you very much. I appreciate that.
@stevekelley11793 ай бұрын
Welcome to the human race. Were we make mistakes and we’re not perfect. Just don’t let the arm chair trolls get their way. Great job on the videos.
@transmundanium9 ай бұрын
Does the fence switch sides on that plane with two depth stops? Maybe it was for offside work?
@ChetSpier9 ай бұрын
Since the holes for the rods go all the way through the body the rods can be inserted in either side. I tested it to make sure the threading went all the way through. The reason for the difference in the depth stop shape in the out board side is so when used in the fence side it doesn’t get in the way of the fence’s movement. That why it’s not like the 77 depth stop. I’m not sure what you mean by offside work. Thanks for your attention.