bruhhhh i came here to study and this guy be putting me to sleep with that soothing voice..... but why ?????

A precise, clear and easily understandable explanation

who's here cramming for business law

Why not turn the music up even more so I can hear even less of what is being said...

When after years of stare decisis is observed and upheld multiple times by several seperate courts, only to have an activist minded, dark money funded group of justices who are appointed under somewhat questionable means the legitimacy of the court must be questioned and a remedy found to offset the capture.

So the overturning of Roe violates this principle, then.

each case is separate and independent. precedents back people into corners and generalize their case to something that had nothing to do with them. its an easy way for judges to duck out of their job.

thank you so much

I have always been told that courts don't make law, but interpret it. "Precedents" of other court decisions should have no bearing on a court's rulings. Only laws passed by state or federal legislatures should be all that available to base their rulings on. I agree lower court should be bound to higher courts rulings, but anything else is a 2nd branch of legislators found in court houses.

Ty I need this for vocab test

Did I really just hear a teacher of the law actually argue that business need to understand the law more than individuals do? Really? If a business violates the law it will be fined, if I violate the law I go to the clink.

Since when did joe Biden do audio books

What if the precedents of the past are wrong? Must Stare Decisis be the end all?

Natural Law over Common Law, thanks.

Both stare decisis and common law refer to Judge Made Law. The Kings of England appointed Judges who created Law that have now become "doctrines" in our stare decisis. Example is Sovereign Immunity. It was used by King (Dictator) appointed Judges to circumvent the Common Law of England known as the Magna Carta. Judges in our land have used the same to circumvent the Common Law of our Land, our Supreme Law of the Land, known as our Constitution for our United States, and the Common Law for semi-autonomous jurisdictions governed by a Common Law known as a State Constitution. With it they have put government on our Land ABOVE THE LAW. Thus depriving us of the protection of the law. Because the King Appointed Judges destroyed the Common Law of England with the Judge Made Law for the King our Constitution did not give any law making power to the Judiciary. Over time the Judiciary has assumed that power to usurp the power of Congress and the Legislatures of our States. Properly was is taught in law schools as a "power to interpret" is a "duty to understand". Too many Attorneys and too many Judges do not understand that THE PEOPLE ARE THE SOVEREIGN and PEOPLE have immunity - NOT governments nor the public servants employed therein!

❤

This law should be used as much as possible!

Roe & Casey will not be overturned…

Do precedents never change in the American system?

Dd