I've heard PatricianTV is making a critique of Starfield soon, you might want to message him and ask if he wants a collab or something lmao

Uncle jokes. 😶

Also the - "Going up to the artefact and seeing a vision" is NOT FINE. It's literally the laziest way to tunnel you into the main quest... and also Mass effect? Literally ripping off one of the best sci-fi games of the last decade? i mean ffs

You know I feel the exact same way, but I was trying to be as nice as I could lmao.@@RazorsharpLT

I'm not angry at them, i'm angry at Bethesda for their gaul. Some people can forget it i'm sure, but i didn't. Honestly out of ALL the games they could have retreaded - they could have took the influence that Mass Effect was taking from - Star Control II, and ripped that game off. Seeing THAT story in a fresh perspective, of you being a freedom fighter in a galaxy controlled by a higher power, gathering allies for the final fight in a covert manner etc. while something even worse lurks behind the veil that justifies the evil empire... So many possibilities, and they literally just... ugh @@evprince

That is absolutely hilarious.

I ran in to a sand storm on a planet with no atmosphere.

It also rained on the moon the first time I visited it... so I'm guessing they had a timed trigger in the early game, that most players hit around a similar time. You'd think they'd have a basic system in place, to flag certain planets based on their atmosphere / environment to not rain. Looking at Bethesda's last few games, and how little they've evolved, its quite clear they have a leadership problem / management problem. Seeing the same canned, robotic NPC animations is laughable, the fact that a canned animations can still sometimes override the NPC instantly ragdolling is game breaking to watch. sometimes you shoot an enemy sitting down and they slump over, cool! Another time I shoot and kill them, but they stand up first... then slump over and die. or calmly eat a face full of bullets while yelling at me, as they first go through their robotic 3 second furniture animation first, before reacting to the bullets i'm shooting into them. At no point during development, did Todd Howard play his own game, other than for marketing, he's failed as a leader. You think if he ever tested the game, flew his ship up with any amount of crew, he would notice all the random NPC dialogue triggers going off together,. I don't need to hear Sam and Cora talk about books, at the exact same time that my Adoring fan starts blurting his canned lines, at the exact same time Andreja tells me she "needs to talk to me", at the exact same time that Barret needs to tell me I had a perfect take off, at the exact same time a UC ship hails me and starts vomiting narration at me. The NPC's around the player character should work as a unit, so if their is randomized conversation that takes place, its done as a unit, so it can only go off once, so the player character doesn't get bombarded with 2-3 sentences that overlap. And even if they do have other NPC's talking amongst themselves at random, apply proper filters so they sound like background convo, and don't overwhelm active dialogue. You add a low pass filter to background dialogue, aggressive stereo imaging / "widening" and viola, you can have background conversation that doesn't overwhelm the mid channel and active dialogue. Its odd they mess up with the dialogue so badly, yet when I'm in a gunfight at a distance, they do proper sound occlusion and delay for sound FX at a distance, or obscured, thats actually quite impressive. Bethesda' clearly has a management problem. Their projects are probably so massively fragmented and working together poorly. Certain areas look amazing graphically, then I watch a braindead NPC star jittering and walking into furniture and it ruins everything. They need to sit down, and have a meeting where they force everyone working at Bethesda to play GTA 5 and Red Dead Remption 2, and then GTA 4, and then GTA 3. And explain, "THIS IS THE BASELINE, work UP form here" If you can't improve upon games from almost 20 years ago, you shouldn't have a job in game development.

You full of shit 🤣

Starfield died for me when they announced 1000 planets. Here I knew that they were, again, giving more importance to quantity over quality and that the game would be heavily using algorithms instead of beeing handcrafted. And after trying it for myself, not only was I right, but it's even worse than I thought. To make a game that big they removed everything that was good in the previous ones.

What do you want, everyone was underage at some point in their life

@@mrpissed Chuck Norris was born as a grown man

Its been years, thanks for taking me back bro. @@EggEnjoyer

Deep Rock Galatic also has you as a miner but. 1. That's the main plot of the game and it's fun 2. You're a space dwarf on a deathworld, you're basically a soldier thats good at mining. Also I had more fun with xeno studies then I did in Starfield, and most of my time was fighting it to the death.

There is this business perspective in game dev studios. You create something great to buy good will from your audience. The problem is that making something great is hard and expensive. So once you have that good will you can cash in on it by making something cheap and terrible. You just need to be cynical and able to lie with a straight face. Todd Howard/Bethesda have done. This 3 or 4 times in a row now. Just laughing at what suckers we are, I bet that they can hardly believe we will give them our money again.

Lol that's fucking hilarious. Bethesda unintentionally turned it into a quest about split personality and way more entertaining than their own script.

that sounds like a hilarious quest idea, shame it was accidental

Another example of lazy greed. Trying invest the bare minimum so as to barely achieve plausible deniability.

It's mostly better written than fallout 4. I'll give em that at the very least

For me it was the UC quest line. When you have your companion saying the predators route is good, and then after the quest, disliking that you went that route... Of course, the stupidity goes beyond that, in that quest, because, well, the smart thing is to use the predators, while keeping the other route as a backup in case of an outbreak. But that isn't a route that is there, because it would mean no Constellation member finger waggling at you. You can't even suggest it, and then have it shot down for some reason.

@@Axterix13 it burns me up that the uc kidnapped me, strongarmed me into being their mole, and then they (and my companion) had the _audacity_ to feel betrayed when I sided with the crimson fleet. They threatened me, on multiple occasions, while the pirates gave me a fair shake. When they captured me, my only mission became sending them home to their families as a red slurry. But when they asked why I was doing this, I was only given the dialog options "I'm not telling" "money (despite them paying me to be a mole)" and "being bad is fun". That was when any plans to finish the game died for me.

@Deathelement53 same writer emil. This was trash writing and the fo4 was trash writing.

@pcraft8785 true. The companions and their writing in FO4 was some of the only good or decent writing and that's nowhere to be seen in Starfield. The same writer can still make good or decent shit while making trash elsewhere

Well said. I started with Morrowind and loved it. Oblivion too but not quite as much. Skyrim bore me and this looks absolute crap.

@@rokzakrajsek9864 Oblivion was the one I started. However I think its aged the most. I remember giving Morrowind a proper go and its like that Danny DeVito meme "I get it". If you put the effort in to get past the jank and the fatigue system then the game is so rewarding. Especially when you basically become a god narratively and mechanically. Skyrim tho, I mean I love it. The mechanical depth isn't there, neither is the narrative depth. Skyrim is a casual game. Which isn't a bad thing its just such a different type of elder scrolls game compared to Morrowind. Sometimes all you want is a classic, uncomplicated adventure. I think I'd actually define Skyrim as a cozy game. Unfortunately After Skyrim they just kept dumbing down their mechanics and writing, down and down and down... Now we have starfield. In my opinion its the worst Bethesda game to date that I've played. Bugs aside it might even be worse than fallout 76 (I never played it so I dunno) Its a fucking shame. I dread the next Bethesda game.

@rokzakrajsek9864 Oblivion has some cool features and I love the dlc, but I always hated the scaling and essential npcs

That moment when you realize Morrowind is actually a really bad game and you have to take off the rose colored glasses.

@@RezaQin It is bad but it was special when it came out. It was the last effort from Bethesda to stay alive and the result were something creative and immersive. The problem is they didn't fixed what is wrong and kept what is good, they went on the casual route and throw out everything what can not be sold to the mindless masses. Non of the Bethesda game is really good. But during Morrowind they still had what need to make good games. They were still a game developer company. Since Oblivion they are just a money making company and nothing more. I have no rose colored glasses on, I stood in front of a Mudcrab in Morrowind and shot an arrow into his face from 1 meter distance and missed, I know how much Bethesda is unable to evolve. But I appreciate Morrowind because it is a game not a product.

Yup. And that colony ship too.

Pure lazy greed.

Yup, and the same robot enemies. Extremely lazy. And this was in development for a decade?

Starware OS is Windows 25, so that's why it is the same from century to century. Compatible with Windows Vista..

@@SteveMacSticky no it's lazy writing

@@Vecha302 Nah it started with morrowind. They definitely simplified and removed things between daggerfall and morrowind.

@@honeybadger6275 The stuff cut for Morrowind was just bloat.

@@jorgizoran4340 That's cope. It doesn't change the fact that since todd took over they have consistently cut more and more from their games until we got to where we are now where there isn't enough left to even call it a game.

deep breath, have a cup of tea

there is a balance to be found. For me morrowind was very close to where it should be. Skyrim improved the combat and visuals but removed too many fun mechanics@@honeybadger6275

it's gameplay style was already 10 years outdated when it came out

@@saber2802 indeed it was...

Starfield is three months old, yet feels so old already.

Even the critics arent entertaining because of the game Falllout 76 was so much more fun to critic, starfield bores without even making you sleepy

Older than fallout 4

Or Numidium and Akulakhan, in certain interpretations

Isn’t that just Skyrim’s dwarves?

I mean to be fair - at least Pelinal was still a subtle "Mech-not-Mech" type of deal. You never really could tell. The ambiguity is the genius of it.

I mean you could argue that tonal architects was just a type of magic, but nobody can recreate it now. So it does kinda fit in.@@samueltitone5683

@@RazorsharpLT A futuristic time traveling space terminator makes perfect sense in a universe where there's a future era where people live on the moons and Nirn has turned into a giant clockwork machine.

"Starborn" epitomizes how creatively bankrupt they are in the writing department.

Yep, this happened to me exactly and I didn’t progress much further in the main story afterwards. I was really interested and excited too! I really hope full mod support make this game worthwhile but I’m doubtful

And... When you find out, like 2 quests later, it literally was just humans with guns. Such a boring universe. What's nice in TES and Fallout is that there are different enemy types that actually have some differences in tactics. Starfield is just animals that will try and melee with an optional "spit" attack and guys with guns who all act basically the exact same. It's like Fallout went "oops all raiders and bloat flies!"

Also, please for the love of god fire Emil Pagliarulo and never let him have a career ever again. The guy has absolutely no talent for being a director of anything, he literally sucks the soul of any universe he gets his grubby little hands on. I hate this guy with a passion.

@@minoxs +1 for team "throw Emil into the shadow realm"

After many, many hours I still had no idea why Barrett gave me his ship apart from a contrived plot device. Bizarre and was probably one of the first things to challenge my immersion before it was broken repeatedly.

@@JerfVREmil and Todd, he’s arguably an even bigger part of the problem. It’s his job to shoot down any potentially good ideas, and every former person at Bethesda attests to the fact he has no clue what he’s doing.

@@DeepTissueExplorer Well said friend, and I especially appreciated that last line. It seems many are noticing that funny little habit of those “people.”

Especially when you have a game mechanic revolving around redoing the game multiple times.

@@LordJaroh This is the biggest thing I want in upcoming RPGs like FABLE, Elder Scrolls VI, Avowed, and maybe even Dragon's Dogma 2. Don't worry about players not being able to do everything on a single character. Let there be good and bad choices, let there be consequences, let there be limitations. If I get locked out of a Mage faction for being a Warrior, that's fine! I'll make another character to try the playstyle some other day! Hidden special dialogue for being a Spellblade that let's me join both but the game never eluded to this feature? Yes please! Let me discover things!

You can find a lot of creativity in the indie market - they're not afraid to let their ideas run wild. Big corps just want to keep shareholders happy. You don't see much deviance from the mean in that space, but occasionally corps hit on something. BG3 probably won't change things, but it should absolutely be held up as the paragon it is.

​@@justinkroboth360my le RPG... Le let me skip content?!

That's if you have quality content though. Starfield looks like a big step towards having most of a games content generated procedurally.

So true

They front load since they know reviewers will play 2 hours then write their slop reviews.

might as well be a post mortem for this game lol

Can you cite where you get that metric from?

@@SiriusSphynx Emotions and random and prolly a sprinkle of quirkiness lol

@@notakirakarakaza2118 'Starfield: An Autopsy'

@@SiriusSphynx “can you cite where you get that metric from” 🤓👆

He doesn't care. Non of them do.

For what? As if a random youtuber can influence him.

@@dutchmilk one random influencer can’t, a random influencer’s community on the other hand…..

​@@dutchmilkI think the backlash against starfield is probably the most vocal of any Bethesda game. This criticism is important. At least it's more important than gassing up this POS game and pretending it deserves a good score

Dude - Todd Howard retired after this game. Why do you think this is so bland? It's literally a cash in "my retirement check" so he can get back to aging. A small tick off the box promise to investors.

I created an explorer character because I love space and my goal was to explore all of it. I was flabbergasted to have ended up as a miner for whatever reason, AND being forced to act surprised when I saw a spaceship and act like I've never seen space before, it actively harms my brain

Great point, it's up to you!

I always interpreted it as you coming in rather than out, so it's interesting to see it the other way

I always played it like this haha makes it more realistic when I don't know how anything works

I always played a nord anyway so in my head I was trying to return home. Usually as some merc for hire wanting to see my homeland after the last bloody campaign

You could be legally entering and just had the misfortune of being close enough to Ulfric's escape team for the Imperials to catch you in the sweep. They don't care because they're trying to end the war and you're collateral damage.

"This could had been an email" as a quest design philosophy is absolute insanity.

@@igrvks The in-universe explanation is that radio signals are too slow to go between star systems so they have to hire couriers. But in that situation there would be a service who loads all the emails into a grav-drive equipped shuttle, jump to a distribution center, and the distribution center would send out shuttles to go to systems and relay the messages. They'd probably do it daily, and charge extra for express messages sent out hourly. Like if they even gave a seconds thought to their worldbuilding it'd be something like that. There's no reason the Chunks guy on that one planet would ask some rando captain to go pick up his sauce.

Are they Bethesda shills?

No, they are very much not Bethesda shills

Private sessions got hospitalised 😂😂 That's a meme right

@@Guitar-Dog no, he had a nervous breakdown and had to go into therapy, look at his community posts

@@picklejarmonsterfanboy9367 oh no, hope he's alright and recovering. Good meme though

Oblivion and Morrowind or classic fallout remaster and in my eyes all is forgiven. Until then, this isn't the company i grew up loving. It's one thing to move away from your original audience. It's another to abandon and forget about them. It was us the consumers that saved bethesda with morrowind. They don't owe us anything but i wish they remembered that with all their micro transactions, media embarrassments and lawsuits.

​@Timoshemperoni for years I said I wanted a trilogy or screen adaptation of the old republic era of star wars. I wanted to see Revan's story told on screen for so long. Until Disney happened. Now every day I hope I don't get that wish. I used to want an Oblivion remaster. I used to want Bethesda to update Morrowind and finish it in the original vision they had. Now I'm hoping they never touch them again, because I have zero hope they'll improve them and every expectation that they'll make it worse. If they return to oblivion or worse, Morrowind, I expect nothing less than a "Reforged" situation

Same. Preserve good things and leave them as they were. Especially when the people working on them have zero respect or care for the things we loved.@@alexanderrahl7034

​@@TimoshemperoniMorrowind had a unique setting and a somewhat interesting story but that's about it. Compared to other, more obscure RPGs of its time such as Gothic it still felt quite lifeless and poorly written. Oblivion is no better than Starfield, you're just nostalgic for it. Bethesda has been putting out the same repackaged slop for two decades. It's fine to admit you enjoy it, I love Oblivion, but see it for what it is. It baffles me how people are shitting on Starfield and then defending the older games.

​@@alexanderrahl7034See my comment above. Bethesda games have never been "good." It's fine to enjoy Morrowind and Oblivion, but they still objectively suck ass in many of the same ways modern Bethesda games do, especially Oblivion. You're just nostalgic for them.

I don't get it... Daggerfall is procedurally generated too. and Starfield clearly has more handcrafted content... and in raw KM² a thousand worlds would ultimately dwarf Daggerfall.

@paulfouquet2646 if only it felt that way though. Starfield feels smaller perceptually for me at least. Yes they both have procedural and crafted dungeons, but Starfield actually feels smaller to me. It feels much less explorable compared to say fallout 4, skyrim, daggerfall, new vegas. Just how it feels to me. I like the game, but it still feels smaller somehow despite that whole universe laid out in front of me.

​@@darrenc2721I'd say it's because your brain can tell that it's functionally just a bunch of disconnected zones you need load screens to get to with content you could see basically anywhere else in the game. Whereas in Daggerfall the dungeons were also procedurally generated and seemed to just sprawl out forever and theoretically you could walk from one to the other even if you'd never want to.

@bat-stranger3067 and get lost in them daggerfall dungeons too. It did happen.

I think he was the head guy, but there are a ton of writers under him. Like character writers, quest writers, etc. And even then, some of the quests and characters will have multiple writers.

Except you're clearly not their audience, considering you describe their games as "bland, empty, soulless,corporate product" while i'm sorry Starfield is nothing like that for a lot of people, and certainly not from the point of vue of Bethesda devs. They will indeed probably not change a lot because their games sell all like crazy, because a shit ton of people, who are not as vocal as the haters, but who buys and play games, actually really love what they do, and i am one of them, even if Starfield has more problems that i would love to and didn't live up to my expectations, it's still an amazing game and of the one i want to keep playing more and more regularly. My god the PC RPG elitists are some of the worst i have seen in the video game community, you don't like the type fo game Bethesda makes, don't play them, they will not change the type of game they love making for you guys, who don't even respect their work.

​@@SuperBallani Ah yes, the game-not-for-gamer argument Is the type of gamer starfield was made for, in the room with us right now?

@@SuperBallani But it clearly *is* bland, soulless and empty for a lot of other people. It's no good saying "well, that's your problem, not the game's". Seriously, what kind of lame response is that? People who BOUGHT THE GAME clearly *are* the audience. I mean, why do you think they bought the game? Because they expected to hate it? Because they knew it would be soulless and bland? Because they don't like Bethesda games? Come on, think logically. They bought the game because they liked what Bethesda has done in the past and hoped to like this too. It's not their fault that they just... didn't.

You're the type of gamer that Bethesda loves, and it's because of people like you that they will continue to shovel out continuous dreck and shit and have you eat it up because you keep fooling yourself into thinking it's chocolate. What a tool of a response. @@SuperBallani

@@johndeighan2495 I don't think anyone who makes an argument like this is really intending on thinking much at all. If anything, they're purposefully saying it in bad faith just to get a reaction. That, or they somehow have such an utterly twisted view of what a target audience is that "people who bought the product" are somehow not the target audience. Which to be frank seems to be a pretty common situation nowadays, so...

Its because Bethesda is soulless. The company isn't purpose-driven, they are money-driven. It makes a massive difference in the quality.

The literal cardboard cutout sprites of Daggerfall have more life to them.

@@sayerslayer1854 Like all companies? I would call it flawed design, if they just wanted to make money, they wouldn’t even think of making a new IP and this type of game in general.

@@flowerthencrranger3854 This. It's actually impressive that they used all this time and money and made something so....*dead* *lifeless* & *uninspired* Bethesda will never attempt creating an IP like this again. Not while Todd Coward is still around, and not without gutting most of the current employees Overall, let Starfield be a cautionary tale to the future game designers who're beginning to like the smell of their own farts

@@queuedjar4578 yes XD

reject classicism, replay wasteland 1988!

Play Daggerfall Unity

You are right.I don’t know way peoples don’t play the og’s they not that difficult and fun if you watch a guide. They don’t know what they’re missing out. This is coming from some body who was born ten years after the second game was released.

It made money, that’s all that matters.

Todd Howard now has so much money, he could easily walk out any time and never have to work another day in his life.

It’s mainly to rebuttal the common reply that we shouldn’t expect better from Bethesda. Even with their downward trend, they have managed to do better.

​@@JwlarI feel a lot of people that defined the magic of Bethesda have slowly left the company and by now it'd just the simpletons left

I agree. The problem is not just that they've lost the talent as writers, but they've actively removed the talented people. Todd he has always been a small, self-centered man and he promoted as writers and main devs the people who acted as yes men to him and couldn't cast a shadow over him. If he was smart, he wouldn't have gotten rid of Michael Kirkbride among older Elder Scrolls writers and devs, and would have opened the door to people involved with old Fallout.

but it's stupid because there is still not the creation kit so modder can't make the real mod only small modification

I dislike Andromeda with an unhealthy passion but even I agree with that.

@@luciusdebeers6176 I was hyped for Andromeda and ignored all the warning signs because I love Mass Effect and thought the concept was great. Despite everything it did wrong I have a bit more respect for it than I used to after starting a new playthrough due to my disappointment in Starfield’s “exploration”.

@@JaelaOrdo i was disappointed with it but the exploration and combat were fun and i liked the companions and little things like Lexi hitting on Drack in a sciency way. i was only pissed when they turned the planned dlc into comics i get it but i wanted more i got into the hopeful drama of it all. its not mass effect trilogy good but i like the saturday morning cartoon show of it all its a nice change of pace with the trilogy's space opera seriousness of it all esp after the stress of mass effect 3.

You know a game messed up when it makes people go " actually, I'd sooner play Andromeda"

I liked Andromeda. Sure, it wasn't great like the original trilogy, but I had a lot of fun with it. I've only done 1 playthrough, though.

Also by the Harvest Element power. Vacuum up every inorganic resource instantly within a spherical radius (that gets bigger for each NG+). It's also usually the quickest way to scan the resources on a planet.

I sort of would disagree on the mining bit. Extractors and outposts are the thing that is pretty meaningless. There are two reasons to do it, pretty much. One is because you want to "decorate"... you want to make a pretty outpost. The second is because you want to power level (which amounts to saying the game isn't really fun, because you're doing a repetitious boring task rather than playing the game). But beyond that, why bother? Why dig through the bad skill tree system, wasting valuable points,when you can do your crafting in your spaceship or at the constellation? Why bother when you can buy most of what you need, and the couple you don't, you just mine? Mind you, you won't mine much, but it is better than outposts.

@Axterix13 extractors: infinite xp, with how hard it is to find decent combat and how long the leveling is this is great. Infinite credits, and huge storage, making it so you never have to let a component go when it might be useful later. Even picking a few bad skills at level 20 can set you back such as starship level, just say fuck bad level design and abuse bad game design to bypass it.

Imo they don’t have the collective competence to compete for the mainstream audience successfully. The core Beth fans overlooked or excused so much that was ‘off’ about their games because of the unique exploration among their other strengths. This shielded them in some way from being compared to other games by becoming a genre unto themselves. However that is a favor the masses have not afforded them rightly opening up the comparisons to the full gamut of other contemporary games. In attempting to appease the masses they have left behind a lot of what their core audience loved but failed to realize that in almost every other area, combat, graphics, writing, traversal mechanics, etc… they are so underdeveloped and lacking vision as to be inadequate at best and near embarrassing at worst.

We should have seen it coming with the gazillon of skyrim edition and all the strange decision about fallout

Starfield is nothing like Daggerfall.

That's called Star Explorers. Literally made by a hardcore Daggerfall fan. Also looks like it came out at the same time as Daggerfall for aesthetics.

*spore* let you fly from space to planet without a menu. in 2008. its inexcusable for a game of this size with this budget to just shrug its shoulders and go 'can't be done!' for such basic gameplay elements.

And it's not even like this would be all that difficult. Trigger boxes have been in the engine since Morrowind, they could've literally just placed a trigger box around the planet object which opens the landing site selection. Same with other planets - they're not actually there, which is fine, but was it really too much to ask for a supercruise-esque system where you fly to another planet, maybe marked on some kind of HUD? I have no idea what they were thinking.

ES6 Will be just as trash they don't have any talent left

It won't be a waste until we see whether or not they've learned from Starfield.

Unless es6 learns what morrowind did right, and oblivion onward did wrong, it will not be good

@@extremechimpout let me cope in peace

They've made 3 bad games in a row please temper expectations accordingly.

Thanks for watching 🙏🏼

Personally I would have prefered if cyrodil was a jungle like it was described in the book.

Trust me dude, I wasn't praising Skyrim's opening because I think it's all that great. It's only great when compared to Starfield and I wanted to compare to a recent Bethesda game.

Personally my hype for TES 6 disapeared with the launch of starfield

I bet TES 6 will be a shit show like we have never seen before

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms I think TES is the only IP they actually care about, so maybe not. But who knows at this point.

@@DACFalloutRanger I really want to believe it but with what they have done recently it's hard to put any trust in this company.

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms yeah I know what you mean

I would add it was the sales success and many awards that made them arrogant and complacent. The modding community was the unwitting and unfortunate vehicle for a good chunk of that revenue. Without mods would they have thought it financially worth it to release Skyrim so many times? Real question and I could be wrong.

I maintain my opinion that bethesda cannot be trusted with their own new ip from scratch. Fallout and elder scrolls have so much lore that you can spend hours falling down wiki rabbitholes. Sure, not everything in those wikis is in the games; they don't need to be. There's worldbuilding beyond just what exists in the games. What does starfield have? Two samey factions that had a war once? Starfield doesn't feel _alive_ like the other worlds. I feel like if you asked someone on the design team a question about the lore that isn't in the game, they'd either have to make something up on the spot or admit to not having any answer

the real fumble is the fact that the creation kit is still not here so the game can't have the big mod that change the game.

All characters are the same height so they can share animations/interactions with objects.

Let’s see if Ted Petersen can pull off a better game with wayward realms

@@SLP0101 He will because if the game is just daggerfall but better it's already a billion time more fun than starfield because at least he is trying to do something.

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms let’s see first if the game will ever actually come out. Daggerfall is a good game but the best thing that happened to tes was Ted and co leaving so morrowind could happen. Oblivion was trash Skyrim picked up the pace again in many aspects. I don’t care about star field I’m not into space games but will have to see when both games are out. Personally tes universe is already massive in terms of lore… people are always so invested in it. It’s like bloodstained ritual of the night was a massive stinker just because it was the guy who made SotN and aria of sorrow does not me his crowd funded game would be any good and it wasn’t. I think he’s being a bit to ambitious and they won’t be able to give us what is promised with wayward realms. I think if it does come out it will be a decent game but will never hold a candle to tes and the lore it has which tedd played a small role in but not enough to be substantial.

@@JustBuyTheWaywardsRealms I also want add your username is extra shilling … unless you are paid by them to promote this is just sad. Also Daggerfall was a broken mess. Daggerfall became a good game when df unity fixed it. Now it’s a good game. Think about that. Either way… shilling ain’t cool.

@@SLP0101 What do you mean by shilling? And I choose this username because I want to spread the good word nothing official. I'm closely following the game and my expectation is just daggerfall but with modern graphic which isn't really hard to make, and the bit of lore we got from the game interest me more than the TES lore personally.

No idea. I was taught it for design too, where it makes sense. For writing it seems like the last thing you want to do, unless you writing children’s novels perhaps. But for a huge sprawling game like this, the less simple the better tbh.

No idea. I was taught it for design too, where it makes sense. For writing it seems like the last thing you want to do, unless you writing children’s novels perhaps. But for a huge sprawling game like this, the less simple the better tbh.

@@Jwlar There is also heavy use of negative space in every aspect of the game, from what it seems, not much going on in there.

Same. Was a sad day when many of them didn't react. I cannot believe that not a single person on the QA team wanted to try that. BGS must've just ignored their notes.