Boobie??

Boom!

Yes Rico, kaboom.

But not everybody is into Michael Bay. 💥

Boom

reminds me of „Flash Gordon“... 1936 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kLqihtGU3d2rcnk.html

the same thing I was thinking!

Because this real life dude not a movie

Fact is always better than fiction

Better than Barbarella?

swear

You can literally watch these in person from south padre island

Christ is king man #zherka

It is a game designers work

@@reagank.2268 Kriss Angel used to fly in front of a live audience, they would even interview them after

exactly where i just came from 🤣

@@jacobfontanez3771 Zherka gunna triple the views on this video 😂

😂😂😂 same here 🖐️

😂😂😂😂

same 😂😂😂

They are saving that for the "How not to land a Starship" compilation in about 3 years or so.

Still receiving the subs notifications email?

aw man they didnt

Wanted to see it as well, but I believe it happened close to 10min after the feed shut down.

@@Sundablakr ah yes i wanna see that so badly

Nice sentiment, but not really accurate. :)

Ohhh, so the rage game youtuber also likes rockets? awesome!

Nice music too!

Grain silo*

Nah not a skyscraper, a sixteen story building. (Edit it's STOREY not STORY my bad!)

So cgi it got me giggling bro 😂

Best, most bestest lines ever

It was Buzz

@@elusha3926 It was both dum dum

Yes exactly the Starships fall with style lol

@@BangersRepost woody said that to Buzz

kgm I think you mean "rapid unscheduled disassembly"

amazing video, definitely wish they'd included the RUD!

You mean her SECOND launch...

Jajaj no sea usted mamón

Thank you for flying SpaceX, you have 8 minutes remaining to disembark.

I'm expecting a "how to not land a Interplanetary rocket" video from elon XD

They didn't include the failed post-landing summersault.

I thought we had the same pfp lol

I thought they should have included the explosion...

I need the recap of RUD

Pretty sure they pitch down all those sounds, otherwise, they would break ours speakers

this one does not have a payload bay. the cameras used probably have microphones.

@@isaquest134 no, you would just hear wind

@@DavidHernandez-kc1el no. do you realize how loud those engines are? just the sound can kill you if you are too close to one. the reason that the engines sound quiet on spacex live streams is because they are using tiny microphones. rocket lab uses good enough microphones that make the engines sound extremely loud, like they should be.

@@isaquest134 Ik, they don't sound loud because it's in the payload bay! its in spacex's website

In Russia you can.

@@evelinamilliones XDDDD

YES! 🚀

@@evelinamilliones north Korea also lmao

@@marco_ramirez23_ North Korea does not have space programme

Hi soyan

It all ready lanched

@@dylanclaesgens8394 no, sn11 hasn’t launched yet

It’s almost ready

Did it espode💥yet?

Please make me rich papi

Me

me hehe

Me

not me

A bit bigger but way heavier at approximately 5000-5500 t vs the Saturn at 2800 t if I remember correctly. And more than twice the thrust at around 70+ MN vs 36 MN.

just this part is not bigger. you need superheavy and starship stacked on top of each other to make it bigger

@@isaquest134 im aware of that man but thanks haha

@@isaquest134 Obviously, the comment literally says "fully stacked" meaning with both Starship and Super heavy

@@fedora997 oh, sorry. thanks for pointing that out.

It is cgi

@@mr.solomos7825 Its not. Witnessed by thousands

I had never considered how BRIGHT they must be. What a tremendous shot.

Yea I keep thinking about that too!!

When was that?

@@volkswagenb9406 I think 1:16 when it flips back up and fires 3 engines to land

@@volkswagenb9406, there are a few frames when the ship is transitioning from horizontal to vertical, where the thrust from the engine is pointing directly into the camera Luna, at about 1:16, that I think they are talking about. I think it is spectacular!

how lucky are we to be alive during this small flash of time where this is happening.

Yeah the shots of the raptors turning on and off for the landing gets me every time.

@@codylewis1349 yeah but if we were alive a lot later when we start doing routine mars flights we could be the ones getting one way space tickets to mars. Imagine repopulating Mars with your seed and all the women flocking to you getting their babies birth certificates saying “citizen of Mars”. Imagine your girlfriend or wife getting breeded for other men to repopulate Mars how awesome would that be.

@@MarcLloydZ that's why I have children :)

@@codylewis1349 your children are lucky are they female or male? I imagine the females are likely to get breeded and the males will have high demand for their seeds to populate Mars. Man what a time to be alive.

It's real tho?

@@jerson9471 NO really??

@@richardlee5412 Yeah it's real there are dozens of people who filmed it

@@jerson9471 Yeah! No kidding? Props to the camera men who were attatched to the rocket during the flight

Wow look at you! You’re a good little npc

@@kevg1060 coming from someone that goes into every comment and defending nonsense like spacex is owned by your dad 😂 Analyzing your subs I kinda know whats going on in your life. Virgin, fat or skinny af, no degree, no job and bad relationship with your parents. Work on that then go and annoy people in the comment section.

Not to remove attention from starship, but you rock too. Thanks to you, I found out about starship and have been following ever since. Thanks for the amazing content Felix!

just watched your ep keep it up felix for us in European side :D

No, you rock felix!

When the wife (German) and I come over again after this Covid Crap..... we are going to have to bring you a Real Stetson Hat! Never miss your Live Episodes!

Haha i knew it would only be a moment before you found this!

Me too, maybe after they land a few starships from orbit.

it looks like its gonna be quite a bit shorter than expected.

@@devindykstra SN11 is gonna stick it, 100%. But he could put together the "how to land ... " video with the "how to reenter from orbit", "how to refuel in orbit", "how to land an orbital class super heavy booster", "how to catch a super heavy booster with an arm", don't worry, there are still plenty of RUDs left before we have a fully functioning Starship.

It's still in the prototype testing phase. Patience required while any bugs in design, build, and implementation are worked out. 👍

Starship is NOT a rocket.

I hope they do post that it will be hilarious.

It'll be epico

lol same... i still watch the Falcon 9 fail montage at least twice a year. Those landings are so routine now by comparison.

But the main reason why we broke out in February was because we had news of Tesla buying $ 1.5 billion worth of Bitcoin, which served as a major catalyst in further creating new all-time highs. Up until that point, we were on a downward trend and eventually trading sideways, like we're seeing now. It wasn't a technical breakout that drove Bitcoin to new highs in February, it was more fundamental news of adoption by major institutions. We need to see more of that if we're going to repeat the growth that we saw last month. Until then, I have a feeling that we're going to be trading down and sideways, looking at the current situation I would suggest tredlnq with Daniel Wright to.make more gains from all this as I have made over 8btc in just 3 waeks of trading with hlm, here are his details on Tel- gram ( @Danielwrightfx) for his assistance on strictly crypto related concerns...

Amen.

Even Jesus has noticed Starship.

Hey there!

hello

Amen

"That's one small step for man, one giant leap for Dogecoin."

Interesting that, they went to the moon more than 50 years ago without GPS, smart phones, plastics, lasers, oodles of satellites and much much more... What do you suppose is the reason for focus on reusability (which isn't saving any money if you look at the books) ahead of achievement?

@@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177 Because we can

@@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177 Reusability is saving money. By 3-4 flights, they have already recouped all costs. If they weren't saving money, you wouldn't see Falcon 9 being the cheapest flight to orbit by far in costs per kg.

​@@anyfriendofkevinbaconisafr177 Their aim is sustainable humans colony on Mars. Seems like achievement. Reusability is to enable that without massive government funding. Whose books are you looking at to determine it isn't saving money? SpaceX's reusable launches are significantly cheaper than comparable expendable launchers. For prices to come down closer to cost the other providers would also need to be reusable. As long as they are not SpaceX will be able to pocket the difference and reinvest the profits in their new system.

Fingers crossed for a Friday flight.

@@nasawormlogo9521 fingers crossed 🤞

@@jordycarvalho8994 in space flight we dont get finger crossed, we are sure that it will works B)

Think about all that money that was dumped into NASA. What a waste.

@@travisl9201 according to mark rober nasa only has 0.5% the us yearly budget and this isn’t even about nasa.

This is CGI.

Is the rocket crashed

@@larryechols8487 Oh no!!! they put cgi into the eyes of people who watched it live in real life!!!

Wow!

@@larryechols8487 no🤦‍♂️

This will be RUD!

There was they just cut it.

Kabum foi de propósito para garantir a segurança da plataforma

there was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom

Username checks out

YES! Survive for mars! 💯 🚀

Most confident person ever

The images are breath taking..... but this sequence........ it looks so unreal...... !!!! i watch it over and over.... it's mind buggling.... hypnotic beauty and event

@@paulmessikommer4027 Same here! I know its real but it's like my brain just can't take it in 🤣

Perioooddddt

Couldn't find the track in youtube

@@ronbonly Try googling it, should find it there

Thanks, I appreciate the information..! 👏🚀

Thank you, our friendly neighbourhood military dictator :D

@@thomas.02 lol, np 👏🏻👏🏻

Yes lol watching right now

no, was it like this: I WANNA FLY AGAINNN

Reminds me of Neir Automata when the machine has achieved everything it can so it ends up killing itself 🤣

I was hoping this video would end with the view of the RUD from that camera angle in the last few seconds

SN9: You were supposed to blow up! SN10: Oh, whoops, let me fix that.

It shoulda ended with that "to be continued" splash screen right at the first couple frames of the explosion

That is cgi

@@hkpkppq its not cgi

@@hkpkppq your brain is cgi lots of people have filmed that exact sequence, and like, there where at least 5 channels live streaming, some of which live stream 24/7 and NEVER TURN OFF the camera but eh, you do you, CGI it is.... during a live stream.... with a GROUND EQUIPMENT CAMERA.... brainless....

@@ivantimofeev2233 is cgi :/

why are people saying it’s cgi? it’s literally just a camera on the ground tracking starship

Is it CGI? I'm really confused. It doesn't even look real but like CGI. What the actual...

@@Manuela_Wagner It looks real, and it is real. I have no idea what happened to people that they are saying its cgi.

That shot looks straight up sci fi, its amazing

Me too. Starship is revolutionary. Can't wait to see 2x the thrust of a Saturn V, the current most powerful rocket ever successfully flown.

do u really want to take a ride on something that blows up everytime it lands? i know i dont. also NASA did this 20 some odd years ago successfully. all musk did it up rockets and wings on a stupid corn silo and tried to make it fly. mush and is fans r very low on the IQ carts.

If you ride on it, just make sure that when the flight attendant says to de-board after landing, you don't dilly-dally!

@@GenBumbleBee This is only a test of the starship. It's still being tested and will be improved enough that it won't blow up upon landing when it is ready to carry humans.

@@GenBumbleBee please take a closer look. This is just a prototype so expect a lot of booms. And please delete your comment.

I wonder how the ship got caught fire its all metal

I hope I hope I hope I hope

@@dlwodnjs2591 Probably methane leak, rockets use flammable substances for propulsion.

Idk I’m kinda hoping it goes boom after landing and 10min has passed. Elon should terminate them after just to keep things interesting LOL

That depends on the amount of lithobraking used in the flip and burn maneuver.

Hahaha. Me!

It's me I just came from the tiktok vid

Facts

Same, isn't it way cooler to grow up seeing how these things are created, rather than liveng and taking these for granted

@Subverted Nations hahaha

@Subverted Nations you're brainwashed kiddo

@Subverted Nations Actually you’re trolling yourself because you don’t exist!

100% agree. well said.

Obvious answer is obvious.. IT'S NOT!!!

@@ErnieDouglas shut

It’s deff not

Earth is flat! JK:))

Oh man... As I saw this comment I instantly thought... Oh shit, rather don't click on the answers, probably a bunch of ignorant flat earthers in there... I INDEED was not disappointed... I saw the launch and landing live... To be fair, it was a stream so the elites could have manipulated all of the everyday astronouts teams cameras..... ... But I did watch 6 Hours of various unofficial live camera angles directed onto the star ship lifting of and exploding after the landing. This happened; It's not CGI... And there is additional footage of the wreck of the star ship one day later shot from the ground about 30 meters away. Would I not live on another continent, I would have watched this with my own eyes.

😂

And not before landing

But that's the best part!

Their newest drone ship should be named that. "Don't Explode After Landing, Thanks." D.E.A.L.T.

you forgot the part that elon musk basically lets it explode for science. that's Nicolas Tesla's level. Elon is probably one of the greatest geniuses there is but people are too brainwashed to see it 😁

Underrated comment!

There was, 7 minutes later!

Big boom. Better hit those escape slides into those safety tunnels before it goes “up” a second time. Seems like propaganda to me

I made the same comment four hours later! We must have both had similar Saturday mornings in our formative years as nerd larvae.

Dammit. I should have known someone else would have already posted this.

Yeah!

3 boosters, Falcon Heavy style is never gonna happen for Starship, and that's a good thing. Starship was designed from the ground up to be easily scalable, which is much more efficient. There is nothing magic about a 9 meter diameter. After they have a solid working rocket, scaling it up and making a 12, 15, 20 meter monster would be relatively trivial. When you add side boosters like Falcon heavy you gain complexity, but you keep the same payload volume and same upper stage size, and your booster fuel capacity grows 3x, as your booster weight grows 3x. Instead, when resizing the rocket diameter, you also enlarge the upper stage and therefore payload volume, and you get to take advantage of the square-cube law, that is, as you apply a multiplier to your diameter, your *surface* grows by the *square*, but your volume grows by the *cube* of the multiplier.

almafuertegmailcom but it needs to save all this fuel for the mars landing, the least we could do is send it to space with those reusable falcon rockets

3 boosters unnecessary, since they plan to refuel in orbit, with a fully fueled starship half the solar system will be accessible they could go to the moon and back, then just refuel again and go again, it could be a constant lunar transport system

@@platinumpineapple9943 Fuel is heavy, and that's why once starship goes to orbit, it will be rufueled in space. It doesn't make sense trying to strap side boosters.

@@platinumpineapple9943 Not sure if you're being serious, but Starship doesn't launch on a Falcon, it'll have its own Super Heavy Booster. Starship is as tall as the Falcon 9, but almost 3 times the diameter, and it's dry mass is about 4 times that of the Falcon. It would be literally impossible. Super Heavy Booster is a REALLY BIG fucking rocket, similar to the Falcon, capable of launching Starship. The first prototype is still being built. And, it doesn't need to save any fuel for Mars, because after being launched into earth orbit, Starship is empty, it only has fuel in the header tanks, barely enough to deorbit and land, certainly not enough to go to mars. After it launched, other Starship or Starships will fly and refuel it, in orbit. It'll take as much as 5 flights to fully refuel a Starship. Then it goes to Mars.

Well it did get airborne again sooooo

@@logion567 true 😆

Musk is building the future.

Soon man, soon.. SN11 static fire complete, it's on the pad... 😎

Look like a metal gildo replace the g to the d. 😬

thank you!

What you see is the culmination of nearly 20 years of work by SpaceX!

They're still hiring, my dude!

Don't worry ULA still thinks rockets cant land

Blue origin: .

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅈ

But it explodes...

@@edhoc2 they needed fireworks for the celebration.

Where's the CGI?

That would be great, like a documentary series.

That would be really cool, and it's a win-win for both of them. Netflix gets more viewers, and SpaceX gets even more recognition.

there is one on Disney+ about Falcon Heavy

It's on Starz check it out it's amazing.

Definitely

Amazing!

...About that...

It did explode

@@ToddMelville that's the joke

@@atoftw4256... Zoom. That went over my head.

It'll never happen.

You bet me too it. As did a number of others!

*Everyone liked that :D

Bh

There will be a special video for it

@@eeehan77 yeah, me too. but I wrote it anyway.

what about tron ride

Hey Kevin, Flight of Passage might be less exhilarating, but at least it RUDs aren't expected

Nerminal

Except, at the End of- "Mr. E£on'$🚀Wild Ride" You Dve💀 🦊🚬~Remakes. Not Worth the FastPASS. Have a Blissfully Magical Day 🏰😀🗽

You a Disney shill now Kevin..?

I agree!

🤣🤣

💯

It was scheduled to be disassembled right after, so to me its not that bad. Plus these are only for flight data.

Agreed, it's more relevant that they prove recovery than anything concerning the material cost of this particular SN.

It's marketing. They don't want to show any weakness

Apparently the goal was to test landing without all engines on ?

@@jimbobbillybob True

You’re absolutely right, it looks surreal. I’m happy we finally get some modern production quality on these insane feats of engineering for the first time since the late 60’s

Everything looked just like that in 1950's sci-fi books, movies, and tv... Turns out they had it right the whole time!

A flying sex icon?

Your son is smart

It indeed is

At which point the Saturn V will be regarded as a hobbyist-grade model rocket.

Moving mass

ah yes, the explosion.

RUD

SpaceX: Shhhhhh!

W2

It just wanted to fly again. it was so excited about the landing.

Huge success with many problems left to work one. But SN11 will fly true and straight fingers crossed

@@user-lv7ph7hs7l uuuuh I hate to disappoint lol

@@chrisboyer2195 Yeahh... I suppose I can be happy this is the first one I didn't get to see live. SN15 it is! We'll considering all odd numbered ships have disappointed and all even numbered ones exceeded expectations it will SN16 that gets to fly twice. I'm hopeful about SN21 making orbit (and disintegrating on reentry...).

YES! 🚀

This is what many failures and hard work looks like. Without failures there is no innovation

Correct best part

@@elonximperator892 never gets old😁

That shot is so surreal

@@E4S65 cause it is not real.....LETS GO>........

Not just "one of" the best. If there's better footage of a rocket I'd love to see it.

I see what you did there

@I WANT ŞĘX !!! SEE MY VÌDEÓ !!! go away

Lol

@I WANT ŞĘX !!! SEE MY VÌDEÓ !!! shut up