What a fairy tale.

Source?

His name was Pyotr Ufimtsev

It's in the book by Ben Rich called "Skunk Works". A VERY good read.

How ironic

The only problem is that only work for PC user... Would Potion of invisibility more fit for that

i can design an ai guided missile that combines sonic, visual, heat, and radar sensors to track down and destroy the b2 bomber. all that for maybe 5 million at most.

@@jarrodyuki7081 reallyyy....

@@jarrodyuki7081 can uou do that only using technology available before the year 2000?

@@averagejoe9040 no.

lol i never thought of that. thats funny

+Gurubashy ha ha, this is hilarious.

the radar removes objects the size smaller that a 10 pound bird, if im correct. Im not sure about military tho

Clockpie i feel like if the military radar did not remove small birds then it would be a listed tactic someplace to release a bunch of birds in someplace you plan on attacking as a radar scrambler of sorts. i could be wrong just seems like word of that would have spread as something silly but works

You don't get it do you? It may be the size of a bird in radar and flies fast but the radar computers will delete any non essential things in the sky like birds whether be it slow or fast. Or other wise they would see everything in the radar including birds and will use weapons a against it. Or the enemy could release tons of tin foil and because of that it will crowd the radar with so much things!

D Destructus: WOW! Great story! Thanks for sharing. Is it, it's not only the design but the coating as well or only coating, which hides a plane from radar? (Gr Britain Thu 28 Nov 2019 1901)

COD 5th gen -Accidental warfare-

Surprised they don't use lenticular lens used on invisibility shields So when they fly the aircraft they can see it on the radar but fighter jets can't see the plane making it nearly useless to even use RADAR if u can't see the plane itself so what's the point of a radar revealing ur position if u can't see what ur fighting I know some aircraft have lenticular lens And they can't be seen on radar nor could fighter jets even dare fight them because how can I fight something u can barely see or lock on to with any missiles It probably be the best stealth bomber that could be hidden from any altitude and not be seen from human eye making it useless to ever dare try to fight a man u can't see

Incorrect. RAM (radar absorbent material) was already discovered during WWII by the Germans. They used ferrite suspended in rubber to coat the snorkel and mast of their most advanced submarine, the Type XXI-class, to prevent it from being detected by radar-equipped aircraft hunting for submarines. Ferrite beads suspended in some type of polymer was also used in the F-117, so the Germans were (once again) 35-40 years ahead of them.

I hope he got paid well for that discovery and the military didn't just steal his invention.

Are you related to Trump😂

@@goblincleaver_mshm.9751 lol

@@goblincleaver_mshm.9751 ?

Lol

me, watching in 144p:

:o

Yeah, It happened to the space shuttle and the soyuz during the re entry in atmosphere. A quick solution of your problem is to not cover the entire surface of the airplane with plasma, and leave some holes so that antennas are able to work. Anyway, the noozle, the cockpit and the arms counters can t be cover by plasma for obvious reasons. This could be the weakness of this future stealth technology, but a total plasma cover, and then a blind aircraft Is not a good tactical choise.

They can get around that with towed array

Maybe it could activate only while over enemy territory and then turn it off?

They could activate plasma cover in bursts

that on vid is bullshit,there is no invisible plane to radars,stealth is onle decreasing detection range,not hiding plane

@@wojszach4443 give them 10 years

@@j.a.3138 yeaaaaaa i doubt, there will be countermeasure anyway

I agree so hardly with you

My fav stealth fighter, the Horten 229

This is probably my 3rd favorite. F22, B2, F117, SR71, F16, F15, C5, C17...

Lol😂

Underrated

hahaha kad pucheee neshto odozdo i razvali mi kvačilouuu pozdrav iz bosne udri kapitalističku bandu.

(Im not American, Im Argentine) The f-117 that was destroyed had Its Bombay broken and Opened, which basicaly took Its Stealth Off.

+Tojetaj Nikolic LOL. That is such a self defeating argument. In all of the history of stealth only one stealth plane has ever been shot down. So if stealth is a lie and you can see it and shoot it down easy then the rest of the world sucks terribly at shooting down the incredibly slow planes like the F-117 and B-2 or stealth does work and the rest of the world can not see our planes on radar. Either way the US has nothing to worry about.

Actually they can now see stealth and radar. They can also shoot it down. But don't worry, stealth tech like everything else is improving also. It's always an arms race.

Tako je srbine

Corn in the feet

Hello from America, I could buy your entire neighborhood

@@josephikrakowski334 Money is a passing thing.

@@josephikrakowski334 me too

@@josephikrakowski334 With all that money in your country and stil a Serb had to lit it up.

Odd then that the Soviets havent fielded any true stealth aircraft if they apparently are the origin of it

The published paper was called Method of Edge Waves. The USSR allowed the mathematician to publish his works because they saw no economic or military value. They just lacked the technology and perhaps imagination.

@@JoeDiGiovanniIV Not really. It just wasn't part of their doctrine and they didn't have the computering power needed to incorporate it into advanced airplanes.

Ive been listening to that as an audiobook. Very interesting stuff.

WalkinOSF Just 1 plane being shotdown is enough.

@@sovietsymp803 might as well end every plane career, because the amount of F-18s, F-16s, B-52s that were shot

Lucas Tekkan it really depends on which keyboard warrior says so

holy shit.. i didnt even think that far..

Yeah, that strange shein found on some of the more believable UFO videos. Explains why the color is always changing and looks gaseous

That kind of defeats the purpose of making your plane stealthy, so it's now invisible to radar but more visible to the human eye.

vctjkhme yes probably test of holographic planes to confuse the enemy

@@rock3tcatU233 Yeah but human witness cant prove anything now a radar recording can ....

I know, I was surprised that Petr Ufimtsev wasn't mentioned.

@@anotherdave5107 They came so close and then handed all the credit to Skunkworks in the following sentence, disappointing.

What is Petr Ufimtsey????

@@soumyadeepmondal9226 The Russian physicist who actually came up with the science and maths behind shaping aircraft to reflect radar away from its source and published it as "Method of Edge Waves in the Physical Theory of Diffraction" in Russia in the 1960s. The US Air Force got a hold of this, translated it, and published it under the exact same title, and that's the document Kelly Johnson and Ben R. Rich, et al, at the Skunkworks use to design Have Blue and Senior Trend - aka the F-117 Nighthawk.

@@hoilst you mean that the American physicists copied the idea of Russian physicist. Damm, the US people are no less than China in terms of copying

Because the f-117 was designed to be stealthy against modern radars not the outdated ones Serbia had..

@@cancelanime1507 ,f-117 cannot survive on old radar...how come it can survive on modern one?

Alzen Balto because the older type works differently

It’s like a week after South Korea purchased a new radar system a North Korean drone came through and released spy pictures. Why? Radar technology is too new to discover such type of drone

@@cancelanime1507 Dude that's even worse

No such thing as free energy...

you mustn't have been paying attention, he said COLD PLASMA CLOAKING...with a Halo effect. Infrared detection will be negated too. I admire Russian SAM efforts, but he who rules the Skies rules everything.

+MEIERSEGGSTRAßE RESEARCH INSTITUTE How to make cold plasma cloaking, pls help me.

+vijay bhatt Sorry not that type of a scientist(s).

MEIERSEGGSTRAßE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Mmm,OK.

radioactive isotopes, just for a hint

But wait you didn’t know they’re supposed to be invisible

@@Ernest-Li yeah something like that, or was it russian radar, nooo waaaay

@WalkinOSF Any civilian target can be destroyed strategic or not. Military targets were around 5% destroyed and we tracked stealth planes regulary, not one was shot just one droped down in Serbia lol

@Chris Jovy You truly believe that myth? 😂

@Chris Jovy Listen bud, I was in command platoon of 4th divizion (batalion) of 12 artilery rocket brigade of Novi Sad cor, and I worked in CVOJ (command center) and believe it or not we shot down 7 planes. We didnt count tomahawks and so on... Our code name was "florida" 😂 and I know what is truth. The truth is that 7 planes were shot down in first few days and later till the end of war only 2 times nato planes droped down under 8000m. Our goal was not to shot down planes but to protect bridge near town Beska over danube river and we did that task... In total nato lost more than 60 planes, and if you search how many nato planes broke down 😂 in that 78 days you will see the truth. Also 3 f117 were hit only one drop down in serbia, and when few years ago our officers started to speak about b2 spirit of misury that was shot down and droped in croatia same year one of b2 planes had malfunction and was lost in US crashing 😂 So I know a lot not from stories but from first hand experience, and biggest proof that tracking of so called stealth planes was nothing special is that after the war when Milosevic was overtrown all our officers got questionere from nato that they needed to answer. 2 main questions were how far and high they were spoting stealth planes. That is fact than any serbian AA unit officer can confirm. The reason why we didnt shot every time when we "locked" was because if radar targeting radar not tracking workes longer than 50sec than antiradar missile is coming, and we were waiting and not using all we could. And btw I was just regular soldier but I will quote my comanding officer after the war when he said "they dissapointed us, we thought they were much better..."

The Germans never designed let alone built a stealth aircraft. The stealth ho-229 myth has been busted countless times

With a few big 20 mm bullets by luck not a manpad

@@reid1283 It's not a myth...

@@guruxara7994 Northrop Grumman literaly tested the ho-229 for stealth characteristics and found nothing

@@reid1283 Sure, the company that stole the tech said that found nothing... A pretty reliable source, maybe as reliable as the Chinese government sources...

CHRISTOPHER CASTIEL that could be it's what I'm going with

Linus Magnus no one said that

No one said that but stealth does how ever mean disappear from radar

@@invertidols1307 you'd be surprised as to how many people think that

Undetectable

Chris Contact haha so true I find that funny

It’s not modern tech tho

I wouldn't call that a win dumb ass when only 1 has been shot down in the last 30 years LOL. 😂🤣😂🖕🖕🖕💪💪💪🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

kind of asinine to fixate on the one and only successful shoot down of a stealth aircraft due to an open bombay door then completely fail to acknowledge the hundreds of successful airspace penetrations and bombing missions completed by stealth bombers before and since. Next gen stealth bombers have bombay doors that open and shut in less than a second.

Not a win just luck. They caught the F-117 with it's bomb bay doors open.

@@yoyoyoyoshua I mean it was a very clever move that exploited American overconfidence. But ya I agree they were still great

The reason radar became an issue was due to the increased prevelance of radar guided missles.

Casey Bowman peregrine falcons do fly at or around that speed, but this plane would be going more like 500 mph

Botbot nimo,

That could work for certain stationary strategic AA emplacements

It already exists, in fact it already existed 30+ years ago. Back then the Czechs had a stealth-defeating radar, I thing it was called Tamara. Nowadays there are much more advanced variants like it which uses ambient radio transmissions from tv, mobile phone and radio towers, making it virtually unstoppable (good luck bombing every single cell tower in a developed country).

@powerone1 still is in military museum (in parts).

Well, thats what happens when doors jam.

The problem is that the LED panel would reflect more radar.

it wasn't murican

It never made it past the prototype stage.

Heat shield. The SR71 had almost a permanent plasma shield because of how fast it went

@@maggsstuckey487 Speed does not ionize gas. You must have misinterpreted your information.

I have been told that the friction of going through the air heats up so much it ionizes. Yeah

+kronos 222 The S-125 was about 35-40 years old at the time. The F-117A about 20 years operationally, 30 years in design.

pametuglavu ? Yet only 1 was shut down out of many that was been bombing Serbia for many times?

They are very good at detecting missiles.