Ok.

T32 vs is3 please

russian bias wins ofc, murica is not that great after all xD

KV-2VSIS-2 ✌️

Bf-109 vs Spitfire

I noticed this too but I think this applies to most tanks

that's like basic knowledge even a 9yearold realizes after playing the game for 5 minutes but thanks for the useless and overly obvious tip.

Yea! True

And didaniym

I do this with all my Shermans, and all my other American tanks as well

In Korean war however...

@@darnit1944 Uh oh...

How about in 1947

All bros against the Panzer 4 F2

@@darnit1944 and Cuba

Imagine being a German main

@@tilengtr5747 Imagine making an opinion when no one asked mate.

Shermans except for tge m4a2 also has 4km reverse

@@polearm9341 really? in wiki it say it has 5km in RB and 6km in AB Edit: so i tested it in game and it dose say 4km but by using xray i find out its 4.9km

I know, I know, Im too a german player, the suspension breaks really often

Aka this show russian bias

Like for t-34/85 🗿

Can we truly appreciate that ALL Soviet tanks up to T-72 had no other reverse than service type 3km/h. This is made for the "not a step back" policy, mechanical, and weight savings. But this is still a Type 58 tank, not a T-34/85.

@@HanSolo__ trashreverse in issue of transmission, boi, not of any politics

@@raketny_hvost Who do you call "boi"? Its an effect of the offensive character of the Soviet Armored Forces. it's doctrinal for such an army. Not political as you said. The issue is that the reverse in speed costs a lot of mechanical and engineering effort, even more in production, waaaay more in this scale of manufacturing, adds to the tank weight so further costs and as a side effect allows the crews to pull back. And this side effect is the MOST important out of mentioned when it comes to the Soviet General Command. As well as Syrian, Egyptian, Chinese, Iraq and many, many more. And no it is not a simple transmission issue.

Dima (commander) lines: What the complete blyat? Why we moving slow?? Shift cyka, shift! Xaxaxa very easy win debil.

put some glorious vodka to that god damn transmission grease

You both if failed I'll send you all to gulag

With every second M4 gathers momentum, the pull for the T-34 becomes harder and harder. I wonder what would let loose first a tarmac ripped with nasty T-34 tracks or M4's rubber pads burned. Apart from this being full legit Type 58, we have to separate WW2 time T-34/85 from post-war T-34/85 because these two are thoroughly different machines.

@@HanSolo__ seriously, don't be that guy. It's just a game...

@@Rahayu.76 honestly a mobility buff would fix the problems with the m4a3

The sherman is slow? I tought the curchill was decent.

@@Rahayu.76 I'm joking

One of the fastest unit of WW2. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7ynebFiucfUZ58.html&t

They would be super cracked if their mobility was buffed and you would see more crying from German mains. I've still doing decently well in 76 Shermans in most of my matches. Stabilizer is just way too powerful on them.

а у т-34-85 дедовский вертухан

@@nevduplenko это не WoT, тут у всех орудий нет разброса

@@iansysoev9462 дедовский вертухан везде работает

Every american When time to talk about Ww2 tanks

И у Шермана лоб крепче

Thats true btw

Except it was the US that was slowing down for the Russians.

@СССР General Patton remarked that he could have taken Berlin long before the soviets got there if he wasn’t forced to wait. We waited so that the communists could take the East of Germany and rape and murder German civilians the entire way to Berlin in typical communist fashion

@@benr.9628 yes, i heard about that too, but the soviet also stop at warsaw too, and they have a longer path to run

@@vivelarevolution2835 yeah I know I’m just making fun of the communists lol

I wish it was actually OP like that, it gets 1 tapped by anything, anywhere...

@@pauntum It's because the t-34 has a weird bounce armour, but yeah mostly die in one hit as it should

Well remember that there is 90mm of armour in the turret and that the hull was far away from the point of impact.

Yep... like Russian steel slick tracks outpulling a heavier Sherman with rubber pad tracks on dry tarmac. Lol.

@@cuhurun well a lighter tank can pull a heavier one if it's weight is distributed more with the ground right. If you got more surface area with the floor then it will be able better turn that engine power into motion. And the T 34 85 has thicker tracks plus a beefly engine. Does war thunder model Rubber tracks? I don't think so. Could be wrong, this is purely a guess. I am just begging a question. Do Rubber tracks even help with traction on asphalt? I don't think so, and I legitimately don't think so. Rubber tracks reduce the amount of sound the tracks make when hitting the asphalt as well as reduce the damage to the asphalt but doesn't improve the performance. It apparently does off-road but the T 34 85s has significantly thicker tracks. If you have evidence for rubber tracks performing better than steel on asphalt then I would appreciate a source.

У нас его называют Деданиум.

I wonder how the Jumbo 76 got the privilege to face Jagdpanthers, and Tiger II P’s instead of Panthers and Tiger E’s

Germany suffers, that's why.

@@friedyzostas9998 you're right, but oh wait, Not one german main complain about it and whines germany suffers. But nice coping method, sure it works quite well for you

@@bro3217 Except they do, in the forums. Can't expect much from a guy that unironicaly uses the term "cope" on intermet.

@@friedyzostas9998 better than using cope unironically in real life

Hitting the hull is also an easier shot to make.

I mean the strongest part of the M4A3's front is its turret mantlet, same with the T-34. Driver's hatch doesnt count

@@milesperhour9256 however against HE you shouldn’t be aiming at a specific weak spot on one and then at the worst possible spot on another

@@Constance_tinople As a guy who plays HE lobbing vehicles a lot, this did irk me a fair bit, ngl.

@@ryantcm187 yeah I was kind of just like “????? What’s the point of that?”

t34 is a American heavy then, when t-34 is our tank.

Stop switching them

The sherman has hollywood plot armor tho

@@tugalord Not only that, the T-34-85 in real life was a absolute failure and was basically a metal shitbox that would be massacred by any tank it faced.. Sherman's were much more mass-produced, better mobility, better gun, etc.

@@ghostman7817 yea...wait a minute *loads M1 garand

@@ghostman7817 ? wth T-34 is the most produced tank during WW2, and pretty much all tank in WW2 is shitbox and wtf lol T-34-85 have better mobility then sherman which is probably the reason why they are able to fend off the germans at a pretty fast pace

@@ghostman7817 hang on a second "much more mass produced" my bollix. The Russians had produced more t34s than the Americans did shermans. From what I have been reading the Americans produced about 50,000 shermans next to (Brace yourself) 84,070 t 34s.

objectively false, the T-34 throughout it's life was cramped and reduced crew efficiency. It's also less reliable, has worse gun handling, and only marginally better mobility to make up for it.

@@bones-fe3gy You only prove my point lmao

@@friedyzostas9998 how is me describing how the Sherman was both a better design and a better vehicle prove your point

@@bones-fe3gy T-34 is the better tank in tank trinity: armour, firepower and mobility. But if you would know something about tanks in the slightest, you would agree with me that the trinity isn't enough to make well performing vehicles. The flaws that you just enumerated prove my point.

@@friedyzostas9998 it *doesn't have better firepower.* The Soviet 85mm gun and it's derivations have worse accuracy and equal penetration to the M1 76mm, and the T-34-85 suffered from such an increase in weight that it's mobility is essentially a match for the Sherman's. I'm autistic as shit so I've studied this for years.

Stabilizer is also important. Accurate shot after moving too fast.

@@darnit1944 the stabilazer wasnt that good

@@oleg4057 for reaction shots it saves your ass, in war thunder.

@@oleg4057 I wouldn't say that. The stabilizer really works when braking.

50 cal

Zzz

However in actual battle, tank duels are too rare.

And fragile

Much cheaper though

And designed by an American.

*советская

Шерман в реалиях тундры лучше будет

@@yukifukuda1835 сможешь подписаться?

@@yukifukuda1835 Но не по скорости или по броне.

Russian bias in a nutshell

Korean war showed 100% opposite. While the US and South used WWII M4s the T-34/85 were post-war apart from the initial first batch of trashy T-34 Soviets delivered for the training of the North Korean crews.

@@HanSolo__ They did use m4's as *INFANTRY SUPPORT* but the M26 Pershing was used more often going up against harder targets such as field artillery emplacement's which usually had hull down t-34-85's which would get annihilated.

And gun depression

Stabilizers are one of the best things I've experienced,although I'm a Soviet main but I've tried a couple STAB vehicles and my god they are fun

The Sherman were always pretty tall tanks

​@@Rio-tl1hw lo eran si los comparamos con por ejemplo un panzer IV, ahí eran donde se veían como gigantes

Lol, stalin decided to push them

Actually they both have 500hp engines,but Sherman has better acceleration because it uses a gasoline engine while T-34 uses a diesel engine.

Panther feels like a heavy tank if you’d ignore it’s mobility.

Russian bias

Nope. Needs a couple more I'd say

Dude look at the fkin turret placement, the gun mantlet is 90mm and there is nothing directly below it except for the slope plate and the optics on the driver hatch

And sherman STABILIZER

@@tugalord which is over rated. t34 is still better overall

@@frosty848 you'd be surprised how good that stabilizer actually is, allows you to shoot on the move and often get the first shot off in an engagement when you run across someone, as with the shermans you can do a lot of stuff with it, it just depends on you adjusting your playstyle for it, i personally followed the advice of another youtuber and went with the tip of the spear approach or even flanking

@@frosty848 in war thunder is mostly who ever have a shot first is the winner & I can tell you didn't really have experience with the gyroscope

@@keeganfox1864 Only good against weak targets. The sherman only tickles tigers and panthers. Doesnt matter if you get the shot first if the shot doesnt do shit

IMO Reliability = T-34 wins however Sherman is easier to repair and the american troops had more access to repair parts. Quality of components = Depends on the model but i would say the Americans have an edge. Stuck in mud = T-34 wins. Overall i would say the T-34 wins in a 1v1.

@@AnonyMous-ql9nj How tf T-34 wins in reliability imo???

@@AnonyMous-ql9nj reliability is 100x better on the Sherman bruh

T35 belike : Uno reverse card

@@erlanggagatuhnoviar137 he he

u want to compare Soviet M4 with a foreign one, comrade?