Thanks for clarifying :D I did get a bit confused there. Umm.. What does unincorporated mean?

@@MrRohailbootwala Honestly I've spent like two hours trying to find the exact mechanism for this process that explains it in simple english. So far everything I've found is more or less "protons and electrons fuse to form neutrons and release neutrinos". My guess is that the weak interaction causes the electrons wave function (a lepton) to stimulate the creation of a neutrino (a lepton) and as a result the electrons wave function ceases. It's perhaps something that's explained mathematically somewhere and not in simple english hence why I haven't found it. "protons and electrons fuse to form neutrons and release neutrinos" is more or less good enough, but I always like to ask Why? or How? Disappearing particles are more mysterious than appearing ones so I'm curious where exactly the electron went.

Might forgive you this one time :)

@@ButWhySci I DISLIKE YOUR VIDEOS!!!!!

this channel is severely underrated, and most of the reason is because your thumbnail/titles are not compelling enough even if your content is top notch. I highly suggest watching this video, you are leaving so many subs and views on the table by having dull thumbnails. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iZioe72BrZu3nps.html

This is how you educate millennials too stupid to go to college but too smart to sit around and be stupid.

@@EllyTaliesinBingleexcuse me I don’t follow, since when not attending college became equal to being stupid?

@@EllyTaliesinBingle I study physics at uni and I've been watching online explanation of complicated physics such as this for years. This is by far the single best channel I've found regarding explanations, as a matter of fact he does it so well it leaves me wondering if they could possibly be correct because of how easy he makes understanding this stuff, especially a lot of the relativity shenanigans going on, but they seems to be indeed.

@@EllyTaliesinBingle it is sad you seem to equate interagency with college attendance

@@MCMasters4ever exactly, the explanations found on this channel are really intuitive and easy to digest

Yeah super practical information...?

channels like these are gold

You should shop around! There are many decent channels on KZfaq that are on par with this one.

@@gracefool is anything we’re taught at school (past primary at least) practical at all? Not really yet it’s vital and governments are willing to spend billions on it because just the act of learning is really good for the brain, it doesn’t really matter what exactly your learning.

Educational channels are never prioritized by the algorithm. Kurzgestat and a very few others being the exception. Often times i don't even get notification when a new video is uploaded by these channels despite subscribing to it. Now if this is a make up channel or a family drama crap it would be an entirely different story

The subs quantum-teleported to YT Kids

cuz people are dumb

10 million science lovers??? We could be Type III civilization now!!

@@sicfxmusic true

same

Sure is

Yeah commenting is great

Finally found you

Likewise

He should monetize his videos, YT will put an ad on his video regardless

There should be some ads man, to keep up the quality of the channel!

I appreciate the kind words.

@@ButWhySci Like you, I have been interested in such topics since I was a child and have watched many videos about them and read text accordingly. Nevertheless, I received new information for me in your videos. It is probably just as the commentator wrote. Other science explainers just leave out these interesting aspects. By the way, there would be a very extensive set of topics that many science people don't talk about, but where I would be interested in your opinion, research and assessment. It would also be great if we could write about it in more detail in a private chat. Roughly speaking, it is about three different reality models, which are similar to each other and which I consider very promising, developed by rather unknown scientists independently of each other. These three people could not be more different. One is an American IT engineer. One is a German civil engineer. One is an American physicist. The explanatory models of Jim Elvidge, Axel Klitzke and Thomas Campbell have in common that they assume that the (human) mind is the basis of our universe. Campbell cites as one of the indicators that in the double-slit experiment it is not the measurement itself that makes the difference between particle and wave, but it is whether a consciousness can take note of the measurement result or not.

@@ButWhySci you have made like 6 videos and there all banger don’t quit there’s only $$ from here on get the bag w the banger content

@@ButWhySci do a video on the BIGGEST WHY? ever. Why is there something rather than nothing? It's more philosophical than science. Using reasoning and logic we can go beyond science, and beyond the big bang. Is matter eternal the necessary being/foundation, is infinite regress possible? I love to see your take on these Thanks, subscribed

I totally agree 👍 except the love you part 🤣

So true!

may i suggest a good read? Astrophysics: A new approach author: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kundt now to maybe get you interested in reading this specific book on the topic, a quote on black holes based in decades of studying astrophysical jets and other astrophysical phenomena Dr Kundt states: black holes are a scientific error, if they existed, they would have swallowed us a long time ago.. this quote might turn you off due to the popularity of the subject matter, (black holes and super massive black holes at the center of galaxies) but i would advice the younger generations to keep an open mind on these kind of things, astrophysics is full of tricky concepts based in contemporary incomplete insights which might even be completely wrong..

@Kelvin yeah! But the fact that he adds the details makes it better. The math is too complicated for most of his audience, so sadly he cannot show the math :(

He's amazing💗

L I T E R A L L Y S A M E

...Coochy