No problem 👍

Glad I could help!

Thanks! 👍

Thank you kindly!

Thanks, dude!

I appreciate that. 🙂

IMD is created (in part) by playing low frequencies at the same time you play high frequencies. The more the cone moves, the more potential for IMD there is. Here's a good link that discusses what it is and how it can be measured. www.klippel.de/know-how/measurements/nonlinear-distortion/intermodulation-distortion.html

It's been so long since I've looked at the data of the 10f, I couldn't honestly say. I will say that the 10f is one of the most recommended drive units for good reason.

Depends on the car and the install. A lower crossover will help keep from having issues and mid range or separated more than a wave length. However if they’re not, you can push the mid range at MrBeast Crossing region a little bit higher and take some of the load off of the mid range. As far as the tweeter goes I’ll probably would not cross in higher than 4k because the mid is too directional by then. I recommended 300 Hz to 3kHz in the review but your install and your listening conditions will change that.

@@ErinsAudioCorner Do you leave a gap in the Xovers? Like say 300hz for the M3, but 250hz for the midbass? 3000kHz for the M3 and 3500kHz on the M25? Or do you set them equal as far as the cutoff #?

@@46HarvesterOfSorrow the electrical crossover and the acoustical crossover are different. If I find a need where a gap in electrical crossovers is needed then I would. But, like anything else, it really depends on the exact install conditions. If you don't own a microphone you might want to consider investing in one. It will help a lot (once you get through the learning curve).

We have that same setup in our Passat. Just for a frame of reference here are our crossover points. All are 24 dB/octave: 70 Hz, 300 Hz, and 5,000 Hz. TM65's cover from 70 Hz to 300 Hz. M3's cover 300 Hz to 5,000 Hz. M25's cover from 5,000 Hz to 20,000 Hz.

I hid it in my underpants. Target the source directly. 😂

Subjectivity I preferred the M3 over the GB25 in my installation firing up into the windshield dash corners. Just my personal preference. Both are great drivers, just depends on installation and personal preference.

FWIW, I tested the GB25 here: www.erinsaudiocorner.com/driveunits/audiofrog_gb25/ Both are good in their own right. Sensitivity: Both are around 85dB @ 2.83v/1m. Frequency Response linearity: both are fairly linear below their beaming point. The GB25 is ±1.5dB from ~160Hz - 3.5kHz. The M3 Carbon is ±1.5dB from ~110Hz - 3.0kHz. Both are below 1% THD above 300Hz at ~96/97dB output @ 1 meter. The GB25 is a bit smaller. So if space is limited it seems like the better choice. If you can fit the M3 then the value seems to be a bit better there (MSRP of $400/pair on the SI website vs the GB25 MSRP of $450/pair).

I thought I edited all that out! 😂 😜

@@ErinsAudioCorner Just one little squeaker around the 3:15 mark. Lol Good thing Nick sends out those air fresheners.😂

I hear it every which way.

I have only heard CHAM-fer - the ch is pronounced like change or chance. Camphor is something else entirely.

@@ErinsAudioCorner you probably also heard people say "eCspecially"..but they are ignorant or speach challenged ..I am a 30 year finish carpenter..i can promise you..its CHamfer...not camfer. However, if you wish to avoid the whole controversy, you could say beveled instead...Great review btw.

@@herbyverstink the camfer was routered out

!!!!!!!!!!!

Such as?

What drivers do you think are better than Stereo Integrity for the cost?