400 Elo: Brings queen out TOO early. 4000 Elo: Brings out queen early. Big difference

40,000 Elo: Does not being queen out early 400,000 Elo: Brings out queen early

4 000 000 elo: brings out queen very late. 40 000 000 elo: brings out queen on the second move.

But he said it's quite common to bring your Queen out in Fisher Random.

4 000 000 000 Elo: Brings out queen on first move.

😂

When a 400 elo dude gives you a free knight, he has no hope left, when a 4000 fish gives you a free knight, you have no hope left

Lol

😂 😂

@@kristyandesouza5980 isn't alphazero the one who does that?

underrated comment

good comment

Accurately rated comment

Be your own biggest fan

@@AkkiraVH uNdErRaTEd cOmMeNt

428 likes and no comments? Let me change that

​@@Eternal_Void599🤖

Died from laughter Dfl 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Like that one bosnian ape video. *move* stockfish: this is komodo’s first mistake, and the game is already over for them

LOL

I heard that and was like uhhhh YEA??

Technicallythetruth

the floor is the ground

@@indonesianOg And the start is the beginning

First time I can relate to a chess bot

Stockfish Jr.: Huh??? Stockfish: Observe, youngling.

​@@alzhanvoidsansadoUhm ackshually Stockfish 15 is younger than Stockfish 14 🤓

@@Blade.5786 took me a while to get that😂

@@Blade.5786 i think it's fair to say 15 is older, in the sense that comparing 15 to 14 is like having a conversation with yourself from a few years ago (when you were younger)

Houdini is a well known stockfish clone so I'm sure the dev will just copy paste the new stockfish changes very quickly

@@dingo9696 💀💀💀

That actually interesting, it means more work, more money, more funny tasks, and more thinking - elo is not the only measure as well(speed, resource efficiency, complexity/simplicity of paradigm, the way you train it, etc - as an example of some), etc.

I think it’s out of 100, so there were 8 draws

@@MrMoptop2 yeah exactly

Dude be like How do you do fellow black pieces

knight be like how do you do fellow blacks

pony be like how do you do fellow blacks?

Replies be like How do you do fellow gentlemen

Yes any beginner to mid level chess player would have taken that knight, but the 3800 level Berserk chess AI see’s that it cannot be taken and so the knight is just chilling there.

yes! that would be epic!

As fun as it may sound, it would require tons of investment for programmers to find a way to program a stockfish to play a different type of game.

@@SorakaOTP462 who cares make it happen

BuT If YoU dIe YoU wOn'T bE aBlE tO sEe

@@RishabhSharma10225 not if my eyes die last lol

how u notice that hahah

he was just preparing for after the video shoot High elo makes him horny

how u notice that heheh

how u notice that hihih

how u notice that hohoh

Literally bringing new things to the table

Fischer random tends to be less drawish than the traditional starting position, allowing for more violent games

Yes humans follow typical principles, like castling early, protect the king, do not give pawns for free and develop knights and bishop before queen and rock, but Stockfish see’s his own crazy ideas and so is like I will not follow thoese principles.

@@jout738 Humans cannot calculate as far ahead. That seems obvious, but it means a typical Grandmaster will be more prudent. Humans calculate a bit, in their mind see that pawn being pushed all the way to f7, and think "Hmm, that could be dangerous. Best not give my opponent that much counter-play." Stockfish, however, isn't bothered by such notions. Stockfish doesn't guess, he simply knows he's not in any real danger. There's also the meta level Levy mentions, where it seems Stockfish is literally baiting his opponent (Kf7), so he will play Rf3, eventually. I'm not sure this baiting is a real thing or nor, but if it is -- and that is quite possible -- we're looking at an entire different level of understanding of chess here (actually one that is quite more human). Stockfish appears to understand what his opponent 'thinks' will be a dangerous attack, but one he has already refuted, in his own 'head' (in fact, one he uses as a bait tatic to win the game). Fascinating stuff, really.

@@gladosadoree I'd guess that if the opponent didn't take the bait and attacked on the other side of the board, then stockfish's king on F7 would be good as well. So doomed if you take the bait, doomed if you don't.

​@@icycloud6823 I'm a pretty low-level player. I have a solid 2200 ELO, still way, way below Levy, and astrometrically far away from Stockfish. I would have played Kd7 too, and not have thought much of it either. And still don't get the whole Kf7 idea, I must admit. Maybe it's like a Magnus thing, where he kinda does nothing for a while, waiting for his opponent to take a wrong turn? At my level, losing tempi tends to be deadly. At Stockfish level -- and to a degree where Magnus lives -- the rules of the game apear to change, kinda like how standard physics changes at quantum level.😄In those upper echelons, all these puny rules I'm bound by, no longer apply. Stockfish can simply afford to toy with his opponent, and it doesn't matter, because he's better anyway.

@@gladosadoree this is why I'm so fascinated with engines, I imagine in the future new principles of chess could be established by these AI's forming their own "strategies"

What's funny is that the engine stockfish is playing in this video is Houdini. Which is ironic because Houdini is another well known copy paste of stockfish.

By definition of ELO this means you have the same chance of winning vs Magnus as Magnus has vs Stockfish

Ooooh that's interesting

@@patrickwienhoft7987 which is zero :)

@@kentoutcourt according to the standard ELO calculations it's 0.3% However, admiddetly I don't know how draws factor in.

@@patrickwienhoft7987 theres no way I’d win 1/300 games against Magnus

Faxx

Try lasting longer than 5 minutes in all places, it will benefit you.

@@fsexplorer9727 oh yeah, I know, that's one reason I got rid of social media, I only do YT. My comment was rather highlighting Levy's awesome ability to entertain. There are other channels such as How Ridiculous or Mark Rober that I enjoy watching and they do long videos, or philosophical discussions from others, but most channels I watch that release daily videos are not nearly as entertaining as Levy.

@@fsexplorer9727 "in all places" I cannot not tell what you are alluding to 🗿

@@mattburns617 Neat, its incredibly beneficial to focus on increasing one's attention span, as I have suffered from a short one in the past. Being able to focus on one thing and get it done in a single sitting or two feels incredibly satisfying and overall makes me feel much better about myself.

Crimes against humanity!

He said as the first game simulation ended Stockfish won 92.

forfeited because of the illegal use of a human.

Houdini just threw the board off the table in those 2

houdini caught using nieman beads

@@honeypopsicle1461 I'm not surprised if a phone app can beat Hikaru 10-0. I mean it's insane how this Stockfish plays considering it's stronger than the other bots and that other bots can comfortably crush the world's best GMs.

humans are incredibly bad at chess compared to computers most advanced programmers with some research could make a bot which beats Hikaru

which is the only thing we can trust to tell us what’s best. Is this how religions are started?

@@jackfarnsworth791 lmao exactly

@@jackfarnsworth791 woah im offended. how dare u insult jesus

@@parzival9983 wym, jesus apparently is cracked at chess

@@parzival9983 How is this insulting to jesus?

Just a friendly reminder that it's only been 26 years since computers first beat top ranked humans. And 17 years since computers became untouchable by top ranked humans. 7 years since Giraffe used neural networks to play at top levels (trained by example games) 5 years since AlphaZero dominated everyone after learning chess without any human training. This is just the beginning. Our parents remember when computers couldn't play chess. You probably shouldn't be using supernovas as your analogy, because you're not going to have anything left to compare to in 50, 100, or 500 years.

@@tomc.5704 The Big Bang.

@@piotrbugaj5179 literal God couldn’t beat a chess computer at chess at this point.

@@gamingmoyai3950 God would have a 32-piece table base, so unbeatable.

Considering exaxtly what Komodo did, You should throw gloves at Mike in the ring, spit mouthguard and end up stuck in the ropes 🥲

It's weird to see AI actions that replicate human valiance.

@@StrikeWarlock mate in 50 is better than mate in 1

the accusations of other engines like Houdini being clones is pretty fascinating

Pin of inquiry

@@recitationtohear what the fu

@@recitationtohear I had not been waiting so long for this.

he has, he has played the diamond opening Na3, Nb5, Nc3, Nb1

Don't engange with the bots, they are just fishing for your IP adress most likely.

I love that they let them play to the end, in a lot of computer chess tournaments they resign when they find mate but that was awesome

im glad im not the only one who though that. I was looking to see if anyone had also thought the same thing

@@jurygoose1422 Same, was trying to remember his name, just remembered he was Brazilian.

I literally watched that game from 5 shorts ago

Yep, the idea is the same: you take it and then the pawn takes its place that you can't recapture and mate is unavoidable. The only difference is, that in this game you actually can defend against mate. By sacrificing all your pieces, but still. In Magnus-Supi game there was no chance at all.

Growtopia

And us Chessists are mere exercisers of Chessism

When Stockfish lets its wife die you know you're heading to a dark place.

because in stockfishes case theres a reason they lose a queen -🤓

it's fischer random. in normal chess, that is the queenside.

agreed. true art

Give it a bishop and a knight and I believe that would be mate in 40, assuming Stockfish is running on a potato. Edit: To clarify, Martin has no chance in hell here.

Stockfish will probably crash. There's was a big discussion few days ago when someone complained about a crash caused by a buffer overflow with 24 queens on the board, and the Stockfish devs were like "not real chess, GTFO".

@@vinbin423 I see it like NBA2K, where the awareness and efficiency of our movements in the game (due to the top down view allowing superhuman levels of court reading ability IRL) are examples of what people may be able to do in the future.

That shit 10x'd me

Especially considered that elo rating is not linear. Doubling your elo is insanely hard.

It 2,5-ed me

It's worth at least going through a few times to see how the bishop and knight coordinate to force the king to the side of the board and then corner.

Oppenent: *Exists* Stockfish: "You've already lost." (Spoiler: SF is objectively correct.)

white is always better

Put into simple terms, Fat Fritz 2 is Stockfish 13 with a slightly bigger NNUE net that overall plays slightly weaker than SF13 (and therefore much weaker than SF15.1)

Stockfish is still in the upper 3600s in TCEC

AlphaZero still exists, it is what powers Leela

Stockfish slaughters alpha zero now a days

Alpha Zero was a scam. They never showed on which hardware stockfish was using.

@@someone-jl4sj Why does that matter?

@@mathdeep That is not true at all lmao what do you mean "powers Leela" 🤣