I have a criminology exam this Monday and this was the only thing I could not get straight in my head, the textbook we use does not explain things well or clear and this explanation finally actually told me what his main objective and what he believed anomie was in his perspective. so thank you!

I have never listened to this much clearer explanation before. Thank you soooooo much professor. Kindly please post more clearly discussed topics in criminology. Thank you professor.

Being in the Security Asset Protection business, I can say that these theoretical studies do aid in analysis, providing predictive counter measures to theft, sabotage, and treachery. These concepts should be revisited regularly because they are broad and complex; keeping them in mind keeps us from getting short sighted, it's not about over analysis, its about avoiding anecdote based decisions for derived peer reviewed consensus to direct our efforts, efforts that often collide with US 4th Amendment rights in particular, and civil rights in general. Thank you, Professor.

Thank you! Taking an accelerated criminology course and reading Durkheim & Merton's writing is so time-consuming for me. This really helped condense their ideas and fill in the parts that confused me!

Thankyou for making this theory lucid and easy to understand

So glad I have found you on you tube. Fantastic, thank you xxx

This is clearly explained.

Thank you for the concise and clear explanation.

This is such great explanation. Thank you!

We can also see the foundations of relative deprivation theory in this model,

Hi, my name Khayl from Pakistan, Your Topic is very well and beautiful method. Pleas Keep it up and More videos' Upload.

Which case study does a strain theory reflect too

Thank you 🙏

Ty

Very helpfull I can just say thanku❤

whats the best way i could contact you ?

This is nothing but blaming society for the aberrant behavior of those who hold sociopathic ideals. The American Dream has no contractual obligation, no etched in stone prerequisites. The two kids an a three bedroom house standard was derived long after the American Dream Came into common usage. The American Dream appeared in the late 1700's and was well understood to have its foundation in a frontier mindset which called for a rugged individualism. There was no specified 2.3 children and no 3 bedroom house in the suburbs. Those were all machinations that came out of the Progressive era. No Conservative would ever make such a patently ludicrous promise regarding outcomes far beyond any mortal's capacity. History, reveals it was promises the Left couldn't keep. Why? First, because government shouldn't be determining what rugged individualists want. Second, Because the curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design. Third, We shall not grow wiser before we learn that much that we have already done in the name of improving society was very foolish, and will manifest the polar opposite results of what the central planner claimed as intent.