Max Hastings "Inferno: The World at War, 1939-1945"

  Рет қаралды 51,849

Strand Book Store

Strand Book Store

12 жыл бұрын

From one of our finest military historians, Inferno: The World at War, 1939-1945 is a monumental work that shows us at once the truly global reach of World War II and its deeply personal consequences.
For thirty-five years, Max Hastings has researched and written about different aspects of the war. Now, for the first time, he gives us a magnificent, single-volume history of the entire war.
Through his strikingly detailed stories of everyday people, Hastings provides a singularly intimate portrait of the world at war. He simultaneously traces the major developments - Hitler's refusal to retreat from the Soviet Union until it was too late; Stalin's ruthlessness in using his greater population to wear down the German army; Churchill's leadership in the dark days of 1940 and 1941; Roosevelt's steady hand before and after the United States entered the war - and puts them in real human context.
Max Hastings is the author of more than twenty books, most recently Retribution. He has served as a foreign correspondent and as the editor of Britain's Evening Standard and Daily Telegraph and has received numerous British Press awards, including Journalist of the Year in 1982 and Editor of the Year in 1988.

Пікірлер: 89
@MSM4U2POM
@MSM4U2POM 2 ай бұрын
Wonderful author. I don't agree with him on everything, but he brings history alive in a way few others can.
@tonykeith76
@tonykeith76 4 жыл бұрын
The greatest author I ever read in over 50 years of readings
@thomassweeney1258
@thomassweeney1258 3 жыл бұрын
That covers a lot of territory, but in many ways I agree with you.
@leew1598
@leew1598 2 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to reading it.
@ojthesimpson35
@ojthesimpson35 9 жыл бұрын
I clicked "I like" because there was no button for "I LOVE!!"
@lw3646
@lw3646 Жыл бұрын
I read his book and it does not disappoint. He's got a very engaging writing style and his commitment to the truth no matter how unflattering is really commendable. The section on the Arctic Conveys was my favourite part. The range of sources is really impressive too and helps ground the narrative. I think its better than his Vietnam book which I found very dense.
@stanstanislav1471
@stanstanislav1471 5 жыл бұрын
Simply Marvelous Writer!!! Thank you!
@lw3646
@lw3646 2 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to reading this.
@robrees8382
@robrees8382 11 жыл бұрын
outstanding author..I read anything that he writes with pleasure
@williamfong5427
@williamfong5427 3 жыл бұрын
Hastings gives us something very precious that lesser writers and commentators on war fail to give: PERSPECTIVE AND PROPORTION. P&P in turn give rise to greater understanding and insight into the World Wars, and war in general. They also blow away myths, cliches, misperceptions and misinterpretations. I'm much richer for this.
@geoffarsenal
@geoffarsenal 11 жыл бұрын
brilliant book from a brilliant author!
@elghunk
@elghunk 11 жыл бұрын
what a good lecture!
@Pookleberry
@Pookleberry 3 жыл бұрын
One of the best lectures about WWII Is this wonderful lecture available in text form? I would read it often.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
At a similar USO type function, Groucho Marx was introduced to President Roosevelt, after the immediate pleasentries, Groucho said "Oh Somebody Important just came in and walked off leaving the president.
@alleycat4437
@alleycat4437 12 жыл бұрын
This is an excellent book.
@hoalex5329
@hoalex5329 7 жыл бұрын
In China, we need like him as professor in war history at all universities.
@sundberg39
@sundberg39 10 жыл бұрын
I'm listening to an Audio Book of Inferno after listening to his speech on the book at Pritzker. It's chronological basically from Poland on I'm up to the Battle of Britain and it's been very good so far. I've read a lot of WWII books and there is new info in this one. Not the same ole story.
@hugosowder4474
@hugosowder4474 11 жыл бұрын
Great historian and author. Just got Overlord for christmas
@TheScholar04
@TheScholar04 11 жыл бұрын
Yes he wields a facile pen and a very good lecture indeed.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
The Fall of Berlin -another great new book with insights on the 1945 siege
@roscomeon3965
@roscomeon3965 Жыл бұрын
Sir Max Hastings a brilliant writer, historian and lecturer.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
KZfaq Orson schmoozes about Churchill-if you're reading Hastings and WW2 I recommend. David
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
FINEST HOURS-Hastings manages to bring fresh material about Churchill-bolstering his reputation but, also, providing great insights into Churchill's character (Brooke Chief of Staff hated war and loathed the fact the P.M. loved it. I think Churchill could be a 19th upper class twit but, he was the perfect person at the perfect time. The Churchill book is more uplifting then Armageddon or Nemesis.. wonder why? I'll give Hastings a chance-I've never seen his lectures read 2.5 of his books-best WW2 Historian alive (On his writing alone, he's right up there) Keegan, has past on "Gone But Not Forgotten"
@rayward3630
@rayward3630 3 жыл бұрын
Maybe the best war historian ever.
@tomscott2373
@tomscott2373 2 жыл бұрын
What an intelligent man.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
I hope youtube has cleaned its (our?). The author's name escapes me, but Persian Fire was a superb new work-as Hastings' work is. When the film the 300 came out-I made one tiny criticism (in the provided video-they showed the actors working out in a 21st century manner. I offered ' Why don't the actors train instead like the Spartans did." It was the scariest thing-be careful Love David
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 жыл бұрын
Great apart from the giant hornet in the background
@davidworsley7969
@davidworsley7969 8 жыл бұрын
Is someone using an electric razor? certainly sounds like it.
@ramospk
@ramospk 5 жыл бұрын
Yes. Sorry, big beard and mustache. Then I did my head as well.
@dannyfardell5271
@dannyfardell5271 5 жыл бұрын
(not-so) rampant rabbit.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
Is the naval officer 'Hitchens' the dad of the late author? If Hitchens reads this-love you. The Marshall quote, Orson Welles talks about Cornelia Hunt (Stories from his war experiences)-I believe the Marshall bit to.
@drgeorgek
@drgeorgek 3 жыл бұрын
No not his Dad - I thought the same too. Good thought because his dad was in the navy as you would know from Chris’s talks on KZfaq. Chris’s dad actually died from the same disease as Chris - oesophageal cancer - a rare coincidence.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
Orson Welles said "George Marshall was the greatest human being who was also a great man he'd ever met"
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
Over the last couple of months my dad me theses books in succession after he had read them Armageddon (Fall of Nazi Germany), Nemisis the Fall of Imperial Japan and now, I'm reading FINEST HOURS CHURCHILL'S WAR I've never seen a lecturer who spoke so poorly but writes so well. A great story teller-but, more then that a fluid writer-and he somehow discovered new stuff (well trodden territory). Great sense of humour. Hastings- early, in 1940-1941, Harry Hopkins is FDR'S eyes and ears-Churchill is desperate to ingratiate himself with the Americans. Two british civil servants-"Well, the P.M. seems to getting along swmmingley with the American-A more cynical bureaucrat replied 'I've Roosevelt had sent a bubonic plague carrier, Winston would spend as much as possible with him.
@Quinefan
@Quinefan 9 ай бұрын
Why do you say he speaks poorly?
@hugosowder4474
@hugosowder4474 11 жыл бұрын
..................................... he is...
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
Read Hastings-please check-Orson Welles talks about Cornelia Hunt- Orson Welles explains Marshall better then myself-shocking yes.
@matshagglund3550
@matshagglund3550 6 жыл бұрын
Military personal losses of combat deaths compared to size of population reveals that per 10 000 citizens when USA lost 22 their soldiers (death) in combat, UK lost 52, Romania 168, Hungary 195, Finland 224 (Japanese combat deaths were lower than those of Finland but only little bit higher if taking non-combat deaths). Then there were of course appalling losses of Germany 450 and Soviet Union 620.
@MallowReload
@MallowReload 12 жыл бұрын
For exactly what reason? What he says is perfectly reasonable.
@danieldestree3235
@danieldestree3235 2 жыл бұрын
its so interesting how people talk about things like stalingrad or D-day or the blitzkreig of europe. no one ever talks about how the worst defeat happened after D-day in operation market garden. ignorance is such an interesting thing.
@leonid7209
@leonid7209 4 жыл бұрын
,Al hell let loose, never read something better about 2WW ,even L.Hart went in shadow.
@thomasgilson6206
@thomasgilson6206 2 жыл бұрын
There must be somebody in back using an electric razor.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
I'll leave with an anecdote from history, in 1944, Orson Welles, no introduction needed told a story of something he'd never seen all his life. He was in the Pentagon"? (half finished-somewhere) a private came to the door, the main meeting room was busy. The General listened and spoke to the young man for 12-15 minutes-know one around, just the general and a young private-Welles saws the whole thing without the general knowing. That man was George Marshall-Brooke was great but, FDR was fortunate to have Marshall-Marshall never spoke to FDR as nothing but Mr.
@oddballsok
@oddballsok 7 жыл бұрын
I don't get it? there is O welles, he was private, but he saw another private talking to a general, one of both was G Marshall but who was Brooke? and where comes FDR in ? so confusing...
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 7 жыл бұрын
FDR I think was still alive. According to Welles, Truman who was the new VP (the last VP had been dropped. Rupert Brooke was the British armies Commander-in-Chief. Didn't mean to confuse. My point was that General Marshall was a great human being-he had empathy for the human race, one on one or a whole continent (the Marshall Plan helped a shitload of starving Europeans. The Dutch, for example, suffered during the winter of 1944-45. People were eating tulips to survive.
@bobtaylor170
@bobtaylor170 5 жыл бұрын
@@davidberger2069 , it's possible, but Welles was a great, b.s.ing tale spinner.
@McIntyreBible
@McIntyreBible 2 жыл бұрын
<a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="248">4:08</a>, statistic of the World War II.
@davidberger2069
@davidberger2069 10 жыл бұрын
Stalin and Hitler are a contrast but, they never allowed a Marshall or a Brooke to survive- Zhukov was the best field commander of the war-I 2nd Hastings on that one
@davidcoleman2463
@davidcoleman2463 4 жыл бұрын
Jesus , ok we get it . WW2 was no fun ! I am a amateur historian . Even I could not take this . Thank the gods my family always lived in Canada .
@elrjames7799
@elrjames7799 3 жыл бұрын
One of the few 'faux pas' Max makes in this lecture is mentioning counter factual (contrary to the facts) as if it were synonymous with alternative history, which is something quite different.
@macforme
@macforme Жыл бұрын
So is counter factual the same as false logic? And alternative history deliberate misinformation. Thanks for your comment... I had not caught that in his talk.
@elrjames7799
@elrjames7799 Жыл бұрын
@@macforme Alternative History is simply that which would logically follow from a realistic historical variation. That's to say a random rather than a deterministic variable: in other words spur of the moment actions or events as opposed to a series of thought through decisions. For example, the 1944 'Bomb Plot' briefcase staying put next to AH, rather than being moved (on the whim of the moment) around the other side of a huge wooden table leg that protected him.
@macforme
@macforme Жыл бұрын
@@elrjames7799 Damn... ( the moving of the briefcase) I would have called that misfortune.🤢
@elrjames7799
@elrjames7799 Жыл бұрын
@@macformeNothing to disagree with.
@macforme
@macforme Жыл бұрын
@@elrjames7799 👍😂
@adielstephenson2929
@adielstephenson2929 3 жыл бұрын
That buzzing is so annoying.
@pelontorjunta
@pelontorjunta 6 жыл бұрын
Most of military historians have very narrow battle centric perspective and especially focusing mainly just those slow and quite meaningless land battles. The fact that even Germany gave 55-58% of its munition production to air war is remarkable poorly understood by these apostles of WW2. That USA was in warfare 20 times more combat effective than Stalin's backward armed forces led by incompetent mostly WW1 like commanders is also poorly recognized.
@jimbobjimjim6500
@jimbobjimjim6500 5 жыл бұрын
T34 tanks and katyusha rockets of this "backward army". They won the war more than anybody.
@RouGeZH
@RouGeZH 5 жыл бұрын
A very large part of these "55-58%" was dedicated to the support of the supposedly "meaningless land battles". O'Brien book is interesting but his conclusions are mostly way off.
@Jenjenilou
@Jenjenilou 12 жыл бұрын
Yeah .. so laughable that the Americans have just given him one of their most prestigious awards for his work - the Pritzker Military Library's Literature Award - plus $100,000 dollars. Not bad for a 'degenerate'.
@BK-uf6qr
@BK-uf6qr 2 жыл бұрын
A strange view point meant to be divisive. I guess if one country didn’t have enough of its own soldiers killed as compared to another, that country should execute their own soldiers to gain a moral parity? Looking back at statistics is blindingly ignorant. As each day passes of the war, no country looks to gain parity in any hardship category. This sense of inequity in hardship or death as a barometer of a countries righteousness speaks only to this speakers distorted view of the world(and likely himself).
@colmcmillan173
@colmcmillan173 Жыл бұрын
Wrong. A country that has received fewer losses and less participation in the extermination of the enemy should not take the main credit for the victory.
@lw3646
@lw3646 Жыл бұрын
He simply points out the view that the UK held out for 6 years before finally defeating the Nazis with just a little help from our Empire, America and the USSR is a myth. You see on his book the truth is that the British army struggled in WWII, losing most of the battles it fought agaisnt Germany and Japan until the end of 1944. The RAF performed very well though in the war and so did the Royal Navy winning the battle of the Atlantic opening up supply routes to Russia and winning key battles in the Mediterranean. It does matter because the British were saved from the kind of mass slaughter battles like Stalingard. So many brits assume UK casualties were much lower in WWII than WWI because we had better leaders and tactics. But the reality is most of the fighting and dying happened in the USSR in WWII. Unlike in WWII In WWI the British actually played the key role in winning victory in 1918 because the French army was so beaten and the US army was green and smaller at the time. Its not just about loses either, otherwise you'd have to rate China's contribution as high, its about the number of loses the enemy suffered, which were largely on the Eastern front.
@ralphbernhard1757
@ralphbernhard1757 8 жыл бұрын
Starts off badly. At <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="25">0:25</a> secs "...the stunning incompetence of German leadership..." The only "stunning incompetence" I can agree with, is that the Nazis bit off more than the German soldiers could chew. Simply said, there was just no way a single nation (with a few 2nd world allies) can take it up with the rest of the world. Hitler picked a fight with everybody at the same time. Rather stupid. Nothing that brilliant results on the front lines ("winning the battles") could have balanced out....
@ralphbernhard1757
@ralphbernhard1757 8 жыл бұрын
akgeronimo501 I'm not sure what your point is. Could you describe in more detail?
@akgeronimo501
@akgeronimo501 8 жыл бұрын
Ralph Bernhard You make the assertion that German Leadership was vastly superior to allied leadership. I will grant you at the tactical level, division and below, they were amazing. However you can't discount the fact that their strategic leadership was horrible. You can't separate the two, they are both "German Leadership".
@ralphbernhard1757
@ralphbernhard1757 8 жыл бұрын
akgeronimo501​​​​ OK, thanks for the reply. I completely agree with your comment. I reread my initial comment, but I can't see how one can read support for the Nazi German government ( quote, '...you make the assertion that the German leadership was vastly superior to the Allied leadership...) into it. In fact, I clearly state the opposite. The Nazis were stupid, because they took on almost the entire world. Strategic planning had nothing to do with it, and the example Hastings gives ( they could have attacked GB in the ME) does not stand the scrutiny of a cross examination. The Axis lost because they were simply crushed by superior numbers, economies, production, manpower, etc.
@akgeronimo501
@akgeronimo501 8 жыл бұрын
Ralph Bernhard Not support so much. I did mean to imply that. They were crushed under the weight of production no doubt. The Arsenal of Democracy.
@Xiphias52
@Xiphias52 12 жыл бұрын
...Or, as Hastings originally titled it (with rather more panache) "All Hell Let Loose: The World at War, 1939-1945" Why does the American market ceaselessly demand name-changing of perfectly serviceable - indeed, elegant - titles? Hastings' 'Nemesis' became 'Retribution'; JK Rowling's 'Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone' became the rather less meaningful 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'; and Philip Pullman's evocative 'Northern Lights' became the inaccurate 'The Golden Compass'.
@rosesprog1722
@rosesprog1722 2 жыл бұрын
Great author but so hopelessly British, the Bengal famine was caused by the Japanese and a drought while the Germans starved the whole world, so much for objectivity.
@lw3646
@lw3646 Жыл бұрын
Yes, he points out though that Churchill refused to divert proper relief to India once the famine started. In 1944-45 though the RAF and others flew in large amounts of aid to prevent widespread starvation in Holland. Hastings is no self-flagellatiting leftie. He's reported on wars for a long time and is pretty clear eyed that they are messy and brutal by nature. He also writes for the Times, hardly a woke publication. Its just as he says, knowing the allied cause was so just and right, it does us no harm to acknowledge any small mistakes.
@bryancharlebois
@bryancharlebois Жыл бұрын
zzzzzzzz
@TheDavidlloydjones
@TheDavidlloydjones Жыл бұрын
Well, microphone man, you tried. You failed, and the annoying, indeed painful, humming and buzzing continues throughout. You can, if you have friends in the business, filter your recording and re-post it in a way that we can stand to listen to. Since you probably don't and won't, could you at least take this as an urgent lesson, that you have to do better next time? Strand's fans deserve better than this.
@hey_joe7069
@hey_joe7069 4 жыл бұрын
The old Tory appeasers, really ? lol Tell that to Chamberlain.
@hey_joe7069
@hey_joe7069 4 жыл бұрын
The Americans hardly suffered at all, he says. as if we should feel guilty for providing enough food for our people and half the world. leftist revisionary twat!
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676 4 жыл бұрын
@@hey_joe7069 Im afraid you completely misunderstood. He is saying the USA barely suffered casualties or rationing because thats true. There is no judgment here. Calm down on the persecution narrative.
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676 4 жыл бұрын
@@hey_joe7069 Also the fact that you use the term "revisionist" instead of "negationist" proves you are not well-versed in History. Also Chamberlain was a Tory appeaser.
@hey_joe7069
@hey_joe7069 4 жыл бұрын
@@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676 Chamberlain was a "Tory sympathizer" like John McCain or Mitt Romney are Conservatives in America. They're loyalties were or are, to their opposition.
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676
@napoleonbonaparteempereurd4676 4 жыл бұрын
@@hey_joe7069 Chamberlain was more then a sympathizer he was an active member of the Conservative Party
Catastrophe: Max Hastings
58:57
Charleston Trust
Рет қаралды 19 М.
The 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis with Sir Max Hastings
58:28
Cold War Conversations
Рет қаралды 3,3 М.
The day of the sea 🌊 🤣❤️ #demariki
00:22
Demariki
Рет қаралды 84 МЛН
Khóa ly biệt
01:00
Đào Nguyễn Ánh - Hữu Hưng
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
Tom & Jerry !! 😂😂
00:59
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН
Which one is the best? #katebrush #shorts
00:12
Kate Brush
Рет қаралды 27 МЛН
Antony James Beevor- The Eastern Front and the Military Context, 1941-1942
40:06
CLF 2022: Russia: Revolution and Civil War with Antony Beevor and Margaret MacMillan
53:02
Vietnam: An Epic Tragedy by Sir Max Hastings
1:15:17
The USAHEC
Рет қаралды 81 М.
Andrew Roberts, “The State of Churchill’s Reputation Today”
44:59
The International Churchill Society
Рет қаралды 25 М.
SIR MICHAEL HOWARD - MAX HASTINGS
1:02:09
War Studies KCL
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Antony Beevor: History and Hubris
1:01:42
WheelerCentre
Рет қаралды 56 М.
"Fighting a Lost War: The German Army in 1943" by Dr. Robert Citino
1:03:25
Забота от брата 😂 #shorts
0:31
Julia Fun
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Вор в законе заступился за официантку  ...
0:59
Vivaan  Tanya once again pranked Papa 🤣😇🤣
0:10
seema lamba
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН