He should team up with the “Free Real Estate!” guy

Are you implying he *isn't* a legit supervillain?

*ElectroBoom sweating*

@@rapier992 LOL

When does Styropyro not sound like a supervillain...

I'm fine with that cause that bit is great

Wouldn't you?

I can't blame him in ANY way

I think he’s really just looking for excuses to reuse the “attacking a battery with a sword” clip in as many videos as possible at this point.

@@Nathan-kk6lb it’s a good clip XD It’s got that nice Swing swoosh

this man is a menace

A battery would work if you charged it with separate current but still low amp. Us less battery. I make batteries all the time just by experimenting. If love to meet styro. I bet I could show him some things. As well as he's shown me

Thank god for KZfaq's new "most replayed" feature confirming to Styro that we all like to watch batteries get abused.

@Abdullah bruh your name is abdullah you should know what it means

in terms of meaning it's almost a direct translation as well xD

@Abdullah styropyro

@@farheenafroz1028 no

In original coin it is written 'in God we trust, liberty 2020' And in his drawing he wrote 'Allah hu Akbar, liberty 2022 '.

Further notes: The penny actually stopped being fully copper in 1837. From 1837-1857, it was actually a brass alloy of 95% copper and 5% tin and zinc. In 1857 they switched back to copper with a 12% nickel core, and then switched to the now-standard zinc core in 1962, starting with only 5% zinc

In the UK it's similar, except it took us until 1992 to make the change and we chose steel as opposed to zinc for the bulk of the coin. That means you can easily separate old and new copper coins by using a magnet. Same applies to the 2 pence coin and they were both changed as the value of copper in the coin exceeded the value of the coin.

@@drunkenhobo5039 I worked in a lab with a small MRI magnet and would sometimes stack pennies in a pyramid on their edges sideways (if you can visualize that) when I was bored.

Well if you are a chemist, what did he say before zinc dust? I’m trying to re do this experiment but I don’t know what he said

@@UltimateBread48 I'm not a chemist but he said "Lye".

@@thesweeney80 ok thanks

@@UltimateBread48 also known a NaOH, or sodium hydroxide

2:36 for the context

It says "SEll" before settling at "hEll"

Yes

Take my upvote

For sure

that's exactly what it looks like, xD

@@cpu_1292 reddit moment

missed opportunity for “literal coin batteries”

Allah akbar

Same here lol. I just love it whenever he does sudden and random things like that for absolutely no reason.

That's from the video where he was harvesting carbon rods out of batteries lol.

It’s made me realize how much I need a machete.

he and nilered do this so often

@@xthee_0nly_1x11 they are pretty great tools and come in an amazing variety of practical, specialized, and not so practical designs

real

Check out his main channel if you like his longer videos, he’s got lots of stuff

Ahhh, mixing chemistry with RC projects.... that's always a good day.

wouldn't brass also react with the nitro, since it still have copper in there? The zinc in the copper will still turn to brass over time. The heating only make it faster. A better option would be to nickel plate the final copper set up. just a battery and nickel solution would be enough and have as much chemical resistance as stainless steel.

@@TheCuteZombie That is also really good option that I have considered. I use electroless nickel plating solution as it is better at getting into tubes and plating the insides. One reason I haven't done this is I was never really sure how well it coats the insides. That said though, I do have a Mill so I can easily enough plate it in Nickel and then mill it in half and check. I just saw this and it immediately made me think I the issue I had at the time with using copper tubes. I could actually go out and just buy Brass tube. But this can still split when I'm swaging it to flare the ends. Copper is ideal because its nice and soft and flares really well. Long story short, I'm going to try both zinc-ing them and I'll try your suggestion and Nickel plating them then opening them up to check the insides.

@@aSpyIntheHaus the question really is if zinc will protect against nitro. It will inevitable turn to brass due to zin dissolving into copper. The heating, like I said, only make it faster. I have done this experiment in the past using zinc from batteries, and after a day or two the silver turn to the gold color of brass. That is why i sugest nickel, since it also stick very well to copper (chromated pieces are copper, nickel and chrome plated) and nickel is basically inert to most substances.

@@TheCuteZombie So brass works fine with Nitro fuels. The issue is only with copper and only occurs in really particular situations like if the fuel is left to dry over a long period of time creating a compound which can decompose violently if subjected to shock. So brass doesn't have this issue and its not the zinc coating that I'm chasing it is it converting to brass that I want. I still think I nickel plate them but it was just that I hadn't thought of it at the time. I'm still waiting for my zinc powder to arrive.

It would be pretty expensive to get so many tungsten coins

@@anaveragegigachad39 Still not nearly as expensive as gold, though, only about $300/kg for finished products, vs. $60000/kg for good.

Considering that Tungsten metal is basically always in high demand. You'd have to order Ammonium Paratungstate by the ton overseas, set up a Molybdenum Disilicide heating element vacuum muffle furnace, and develop a method for making the coins from scratch. All just to commit one of the dumbest forms of fraud imaginable.

I'm no expert and I may be overthinking this so correct me if I'm wrong, but I can forsee a few minor teething issues in your scheme; in this fun demonstration the zinc does wander into the surface of the copper/bronze layer of the coin but it doesn't go very deep and it's not exactly a thick layer of brass formed, you can scratch it off fairly easily. Even if you place a tungsten disc inside a thicker body of brass there's also the issue that destructive testing, things like touchstones/abrasive surfaces are used to test for gold, it's alloys and other precious metals by abrading small quantities of powder from the surface of the soft metal/alloy then applying acid of several known concentrations and seeing which react with the powder formed and the brass isn't nearly as soft as gold and the tungsten definately isn't and is gonna resist that abrasion without breaking a sweat, and chemical separation/purification procedures are going to dissolve the zinc alloy and leave behind a few naked pellets of tungsten swimming in the bottom of the container. Also if the mark decides to do the old fashioned test of biting it to deform it they're going to break their teeth which is going to indicate that something isn't quite right. Even past all that if you can't get pre-made tungsten pellets in the correct dimensions then I don't even want to think about how you'd go about getting the plant to do so and procure the materials without telling the world you're working with tungsten. I dunno man it's a lot of startup capital and effort to commit fraud in a manner that wouldn't be very well hidden.

tungsten is nowhere near dense enough.

Same but college/university chem

While babbling an incoherent incantation.

styropyro and ex&f would scare me more

so the driving force is the formation of brass! okay now i think i might got it.