I wanna have one. How much

@@ancientmonotheism5118 35 million

One of the worst I ever saw. I'd be much more confident on a 50's us plane than on this in a real situation.

3D thrust vectoring

@naxui8683 UABot detected

@@pixelnazgul clown haha

The F22 Raptor sure is!

@@RecklessDezire Raptor fodder for sure .

@@RecklessDezire 'murica buddy? kickin' butt after chick-a-fill and whataburger buddy

all 5ths gens are amazing

Easy to detect

فعلا صدقت

С чего вы решили что у русских нет технологий? Самолеты, Атомные электростанции, Космические спутники по вашему из дерева и гвоздей делаются? Кстати, Россия сейчас единственная страна открывшая технологию замкнутого ядерного цикла - Вечное ядерное топливо.

Russia is 15years in advance on USA.

Imagine if turned these war budget into space exploration. Beautiful Jet though.

The USSR was the first to develop stealth technology! But the technology was very expensive to produce, and it was cheaper to develop missiles that shoot down stealth! After which the technology was planted on American spies. Americans spent a lot of money on stealth aircraft. But when they came to bomb Serbia... an ordinary USSR missile easily shot him down!Since then, Americans have not used stealth aircraft where there are Soviet missiles.😜

Because of maverick and those were Iranian Pilots.

The F-15 couldnt dream these manouvers

yeah and it's living rent-free in your big mac filled cranium

Nyet

fr, they should have made it smaller

@@stuffhappens1966The New Su-75 is actually smaller and is a single engine jet, which has used the Su-57 as its design basis.

@@AJolie009 can’t wait to see it when im 97

@@lukigensfm Had you read my comment and utilized your basic comprehension skills, if they do exist, you’d realize that the Su-75 is literally a smaller version of the Su-57! It’s not designed from scratch and it incorporates most of the Su-57 features with the exception that it’s single-engine, smaller and stealthier. So the assumption that they’d struggle to do that, is unequivocally asinine. I’d understand if you made that argument about their Mig-41 6th generation, sure. But this, is very doable.

@@AJolie009 thats awesome, i cant wait to see it!

That can never be challenged due to mother russia never deploying them lol

@@donkoltz1 Ukraine isn't worth it, they haven't even used their best troops and material there as well. They're probably waiting for bigger things to come

@@webber7117 That's a lot of cope. The reality is this wanna-be F35 would be a pile of charred metal on the front lines, just like all of Russia's supposed wonder weapons.

F22 and YF23 replica.

​​@@MultiJugulatorlos rusos no usan las costumbres de EEUU jajaja

Can I have a pair of them in my socks this Christmas 🎄? 🐻🇷🇺🐻

Да, однажды уже так рассуждали, мол ракет будет достаточно, потом в спешке устанавливали пушки на Фантомы...

У электроники есть такая дурная привычка *Ломаться* . А геометрия крыла и самого планера корпуса СУ-57 позволит выкрутиться из *ЛЮБОЙ СИТУАЦИИ* в Ближнем бою 🤘🏻👀✔️💯🔥

Yeah, this kind of low speed handling and maneuverability are rarely needed, if ever. It's 1950s thinking baked into a modern(ish) design. Also, it's only slightly stealthier than a Super Hornet-- and that's not me saying that, that's on *Sukhoi's* own webpage about the Su-57. Like the majority of the contemporary russian military, it's whole job is to look like it's dangerous. Scratch below the surface, and you'll see it's not, or at least, it would have been dangerous... ...in 1988.

@@PopulismIsForBottomFeeders Why don't you ask Chat GPT "Why does a fighter plane need high maneuverability when long and medium-range air-to-air missiles exist?" and see what it says.

Why? It would just say "If @@0000Duke0000 can't see why it's a terrible idea to design a not-very-stealthy aircraft for close quarters combat in an era of of highly reliable medium and long range range missiles against an opponent (the West) who's *entire combat doctrine* is about engaging at long and medium range with said highly reliable missiles and avoiding dogfights then he should just stick to War Thunder".

A mini Blackbird with unnecessary complexity from all of the western ideas they stole (final stand).

The new generation fighter jet is intended for testing multiple new technologies that can be later used in other models. SU57 is a base model for future unmanned jets. It also getting new engines with new tech that can be used to upgrade existing models like SU-30, SU-34, SU-35

It’s the futuristic looks. The rest of the Suhkoi family looks outdated already

its the camera, not the plane

Значет так надо ,это не для средних умов!

Shaky, let me guess your from the west?

its because we've made aircrafts by dendrofecal method man ))

It's russain made. What do you expect, something of quality? It will fail.

Never been tested in battle so your point is moot.

It is obvious that you don't have a clue what are you talking about! These maneuvers are not meant to "confuse" western air to air missiles, they are meant to provide the first shoot capability because the turn radius and nose pointing capability of the Su-57 is drastically superior to any western fighter plane and provides you possibility to turn inside the opponents circle, where you can point planes nose first and launch the missile under few times more favorable angle, because firing the missile at high of bore sight close to 90° will significantly reduce the missiles Pk. Having the plane that can give you opportunity to turn faster and fire first the HOBS missile is the plane that is going to grant you a win in a dog fight. If you want to learn more about it I will provide you links where you can read all about within visual range dynamics.

@@Semendrija123 yea but I thought the su 57 doesn't even need to be pointed at its target to shoot it anyways.

@@jimiboi87 In a 15 km radius it doesn’t need to point its nose to shoot the target since it has 360 deg. targeting capability and HOBS missiles, but in a close quarters dog fight you definitely need to turn and burn since the missiles don’t have the capability to turn for you in highly dynamic situations at unfavorable angles and the missiles field of view is also limiting factor. 60 deg. of bore sight is as far as you can go with acceptable probability of kill. So, if you have two planes crossing each other at high speed head on, the pilot that can turn faster and tighter will be able to use its helmet mounted sight first to point its missile homing head at opponent. Also, if the turning room is very tight, you can’t launch the missile, and you are left with the gun. In any scenario, the plane with superior turning rate and nose pointing capability is having huge advantage.

Then,explain why are US pilots trying to make similar maneuvers at airshows using F35,F22 and the rest of fighters! I watched many attempts to make exactly same maneuvers and succeeding in looking amateurish comparatively! F35 pointing nose at 75° but not stalling and moving backwards, or F22 doing much better than F35,yet not nearly as well as Sukhois,from SU27-SU57! I bet you were out of your seat when Maverick said, I'm gonna pull the brakes and he's going to fly by! That was a Cobra manuver used in a dog fight!

At least it fly's, not like other 5gen that is only a hangar queen😂

I’m sure. That’s why it’s not used.

@@tman10686 it is, but western media wouldn't tell you that.

@@tman10686 sounds like you need better sources.

Whatever you say 😂 Maybe scary in that they're so rare, that it would be like seeing Sasquatch

@@AggieBand04 sounds like you're talking about you missing brain cells.

Don't be naive, Raptor has nothing on the Su 57.

The Su-57 has sufficient thrust vectoring for post-stall yaw maneuvers (thrust vectoring in the yaw axis). The F-22 lacks this capability and would therefore struggle to perform some of the acrobatics displayed in this video. However, the usefulness of post stall yaw control in combat is questionable at best.

@@donkoltz1 Perhaps you meant to say 'aerobatics'?

LMAOOOOO @@Jackofbladesdude

Lol, junk- Bruce f the fat American 😂💀

The Sukhoi Su-57’s millennium science school education name ‘shrieker’ why? Because of the problems of the plane Also it is not rubbish it is Fast,sleek,Advanced,stealthy, and Manoeuvrable

thats what ure mom said, when she gave birth to u ;)

Literally it's not junk it's still beauty and rough metals.

@@kylietravers3466 nah, its stealth is kinda bad, because the estimated (RCS) size of f22 is about 0.0001m and 0.001, while estimated (RCS) size of the SU-57 has 0.01m and 0.1m. Which means theoretically, the su-57's (RCS) is 100x larger than f22's.

Better than your country which cant created their own stealth Jet fighter.

@@GaionSputro 현실을 이야기 했을뿐 우리나라 얘긴 왜

​@@SRLee-bd5vd l just said it. I dont have to mean any tho.