I wish she would have had anything to say earlier in the video. Her sitting silently while Bradley explains everything was just awkard

@@namshaw7515 I know, they could have given her more lines or didn’t show her until time

@@rusprice my thoughts exactly

I thought she was a deepfake for a second

I never saw her stand.

true lol

lol jeez dude

Best answer yet

Why are you talking about my date?!

My crush knew that but her parents want to point me as one...

@AJ The point of the game is to get a vague location, then find the exact location searching Google Maps.

google dorks #same

wow am getting watch dog game vibes ✨🔥😅

(The FBI/NSA/CIA would like to hire you)

It has both tbh

Yeah it has both

They are also backed by an IT company named Sumsub

@Not Convinced its for educational purposes, and can actually be useful in some situations, for example if you want to background check someone without paying someone else to do it. You can also get paid for OSINT on people, because sometimes people want to test how private their lives are. Also it can be useful for private investigators to know some OSINT.

@Not Convinced your nickname says it all

if this is the first time youve seen an un-biased educational video on tech then youre looking in the wrong places

​@@killabite620 no, not really. Even channels I like clearly biased, Naomi Brockwell for instance I think explains things excellently and is more or less factually correct, but she also does show her bias in a lot of places. I personally agree with that message behind that bias, but there have been a few times where she has said something or pushed something that had some factual inaccuracies, then defended them even though they were factual deficiencies. Of course, on the times where she was corrected on something PRO-privacy, such as the legal state of self-incrimination for biometrics not being set in stone, there was no challenge. You can tell in a few interviews as well but I cant remember those clearly enough to make an example. Now, for her case and a few others, even in spite of this bias I think what they say is more or less accurate, but it does mean whatever they say you really have to examine. A recent video from another privacy advocate whose name I can't quite remember was saying something disastrous about privacy in the title, but it was actually about private companies not being forced to uphold your right to freedom of speech, which is not only an entirely different topic, but he also self-contradicted in the video. See his video was about how bad this was that private companies wouldn't be held to the same restrictions as the government and this needed to be fixed (a sentiment which I disagree with but, hey, he hasn't presented his evidence yet) but towards the end of the video he said something along the lines of "if companies aren't restricted in what they do with my data, I won't let them have it" which, yes, just don't let them have it, how is this an issue? I'd call it fear mongering, but I genuinely think some privacy advocates are just too invested in the cause and end up losing the bigger picture. As I said before though, someone simply having bias isn't fatal, both of the people I referenced still get information right most of the time, they just tend to be dismissive towards alternate interpretations or facts. This CAN be dangerous, but by and large isn't a fatal flaw so long as you look at what they say skeptically. In contrast however, this video never appeared to take a clear stance on the issue, and just described it in detail. While this does mean some people might walk away wanting more legislation, it also means that those people came to that conclusion on their own, and many others might simply realize they need to take steps to protect their own online privacy. It's used as a derogatory now due to just how biased many news sources are, but the word bias itself isn't some damning thing, it just means that the information presented always has a tilt. So long as enough of the board is presented that you, as a viewer, can identify that tilt, it's not really fatal. A bit annoying, but not fatal. It's really only an issue for people who click on the video passively and don't really think much about the issue before taking a stance, because those people are far more vulnerable to whatever tilt may be present.

@@robonator2945 word

Really, this is the only video you found? I've found plenty from Network Chuch, David Bombal, ITPro TV, Hack The Box, I can keep going on and on...

@@0Ciju0 all of those listed are for extreme techies and do have somewhat of a bias in favour of the technology, this explains it clearly to the mainstream in a way which is indepth, shows how easy it can be, and exists without bias.

Yall homosapiens weird. Just stalking and following native Americans. Like that's yall nature

i like that seoul choco milk pfp lol 😂

Why did the format trigger people who don't know her, so badly? Watching you all be offended on her behalf is hilarious.

@@darthlogicus Haha! Well, she does look all awkward during most of the video, and I can't help but think it was a bit amateurish to portray her like that. (Why keep her in frame when she aren't getting any questions, and aren't expected to say anything?) - She's just there because a pretty girl is a selling point, and that's is pretty lazy on the video creator's part.

@@zrajm I mean I'm a straight man and even I can tell that the good looking young bloke in a nice suit is going to pull in the gay and female demographics just as effectively if not more so. No idea why people are so upset, as if literally every product ever made doesn't use attractive people as part of its marketing.

@@j4y167 Well, the good looking bloke wasn't made to look all awkward, was he?

good idea

So he's either a genius wth a side hustle or he's reading a script. still fun to watch tho

Don’t many websites sell data of their clients and could it be slightly related to his job?

how did u do this? how can i??

imagine comparing something to this ideological crap for 3rd worlders called BBC

"You dare use my own spells against me, stalker?" "Finally a worthy opponent. our battle will be LEGENDARY!"

@@affyne best comment

The government knows - KNOWER

Omg

Doesn't sound like its a burner email if you've been using them for years buddy.

Surely they will hit the algo sometime

@@account-yi2cn in hope so

pxdohunting time uwu

Emily's?

@@Mutantcy1992 yes

Quality content for quality people

He's a pro. That's for sure.

I figured that was doing something for somebody. 👍

I'm not really impressed, most of the informations he found were publicly available on facebook, her profile is public. Now try to do the same with just a name of a person you don't know, and with a private facebook profile, good luck. Well, I already tried and found nothing that could help me, just friends in common, no job (although that person worked as a phone operator in 2018, they're most likely doing the same job nowadays) no emails, no phone numbers and no other socials. The nickname was used once and only on facebook, so it lead nowhere. The last option is phishing to her friends, but today's culture make it weird to use emails or cellphone numbers (especially asking a friend about it...).

Almost 200k in under a year is pretty good. What exactly is your standard?

@@jeffbrownstain 50,000 deficit is not to be deemed irrelevant. -.25 is not to be omitted if substance is standard.

She's not standing she's sitting

@@trestres236 the point still stands. (No pun intended) I also found it incredibly awkward how she hadn't said a single word several minutes into the video and Bradley was talking about her childhood photos!

I like disinformation. Michael Bazzell talks a lot about it. He has a podcast and books on privacy and osint.

@@Kas_Styles he also made Buscador VM, god rest it’s soul. What a legend. To this day nobody knows what he looks like or what his real name is.

@@MisterK-YT yes. Its great.

I've heard this referred to as "salting ones data"

you got anything more extensive on this topic that I can read about? I've never heard of SEO Poisoning but would like to begin researching it

i'm only 4 minutes in and i thought it was some kind of joke that she didn't talk at all

A guy in a suit stalks a woman who sits silently and watches him do it. Then he explains how you can stalk women in your life. What's there to talk about?

I liked the content of the video, but ye, it was really awkward, sometimes she seems uncomfortable

@@cj00785 I didn't say I didn't like it(because I did), but I couldn't help but cringe at her silence

@@fireskorpion396 I didn't mean to say you didn't like it, the way I wrote it was misleading, sorry for that

Thanks Raj!

Kimochine

People who live on the net are not as easy to find. Its people who *play on the net that expose themselves.

Whilst you are entirely correct, it doesn't matter all that much. This was a video about how one may do it, not suggesting the viewers attempt to. This is of course irregular behaviour which ought not be repeated.

@@conradrobinson7941 😂😂😂 ... "not suggesting the viewers attempt to." .... Common mate ... Every single person that ever had this thought is now googling how to do this properly 😂😂😂

@@ohfuku why?? Under what circumstances is this useful. This is creepy bordering on stalkerish behaviour. You really shouldn't be doing this in daily life.

@@conradrobinson7941 The circumstances of stalking a pedophile who lives in South Carolina. My circumstances, mate.

@@conradrobinson7941 "This was a video about how one may do it, not suggesting the viewers attempt to. " lol, really dude?

And an inmate 😂

Only for people like you

Hear me out... how about have some digital consciousness by only letting people know what you want them to know?

Inspiration to live a blameless life. 😁

Inspiration to live a blameless life. 😁

Inspiration to live a blameless life. 😁

She speaks eventually? I'm only 4 mins in and I think she's AI because she's not moving or speaking.

Quite fitting indeed

Don't download files or click links, before verifying them

@@jan_Kapije yeah it can! There is a virus that can infect your computer just by downloading the file

ah, now I know how that bully on discord doxxes and scares people. Counter dork!

yes this is really scary

It is, by someone else

old comment.. but you missed the obvious analogy. It's like walking around trying door knobs to see which ones are unlocked.. minus the threat of anyone seeing you doing it. The lesson is indeed obviously don't leave your door open. But it's probably just as true in real life as online that too many people don't bother.

@@craigslist6988exactly, it’s more like saying “who needs a lockpick when people just leave their doors unlocked”

My opinion is different. Literally, all apps and websites have "doors that are open." The degree that it is open is different. A really hard to unlock website for one person may be easy to unlock for someone else. But, it's just my opinion. People have different opinions and that's okay. Your point of thinking is also nice 😊

…and both are true!