Yeah you pretty much are... HEYOOOO

Yep, i was gonna comment this too. I wouldnt commit this missplay. I dont know, but i ve already seen so many mistakes by professional players like that, how dont they see it?

@@nadademais8820 keep playing, enter some tournaments, I wanna see you go pro

@@will1603 I am graduating, i do what i want the best. You are nothing to say what i have to do. Just saying the thuth about missplays, if you aren't glad about that, just go screw yourself.

Nada deMais you pretty toxic there buddy.

But it actually doesn't change anything, if the opponent doesn't make mistakes, and even if he did, it was down to rng. If he could have weapon projected, he would be at 11 health. But the opponent can then attack and hero power, bringing him down to 7 health, setting up the lethal for the following turn with beast kill command hero power, and we had already seen double shield block and double emerald drake at that point. The mistake would be to get the damage from kill command with a beast right away, leaving the rng out, at least for a turn, of delivery drone which could give zilliax, scraphound or recycler. But that's straight up a mistake, same way it was to play something against rexxar with lethal in hand, giving a rush lifesteal out. So technically yes, you guys are right, it was a mistake, but saying you wouldn't have made it as if it would have changed anything is pretty stupid, as the outcome is the same, a loss. Now you can argue you never said you would have won, but then why not even mention even though it didn't change anything there. Assess the situation in its entirerity before making a comment about part of it, it's too short sighted.

that's how you can tell it's a video where he loses. if he wins it's called "___ win streak with ____ deck"

@@IEatYourSandwiches thanks for the spoiler

It's Trump. Just accept it. It's much more entertaining to watch when you go in knowing he's going to play like a dummy.

@@lMarcusl Trump a dummy ? He's like the smartest streamer out there, just super greedy

Comments like these are some of the most retarded I see on Hearthstone videos. Backseaters watching outside of the match after the fact making retrospective callouts like they're hot shit for seeing a better play in that game's future when they just watched the outcome. Zero self awareness.

FayrTheCat he did play terribly this game tho

how about the severe brain damage that his opponent has for using the dire frenzy on the lynx instead of the highmane

@@Yashin184 it because his opponent know for sure that he will never beat trump for a long value game, so he take every chance to possibly deal face damage on that turn, the turn after, and some more explosive turn after zuljin.. And that forcing damage with highmane to face win him the game too..

Tbh weapons project would’ve given 1 turn, not stabilize him. With it, he was at 11, and opponent had 9 damage next turn

Trump was sick I believe. And the expansion was dropping so making the video wouldnt have really been worth the effort. Once the meta has settled he will surely do a review

@@ab_c4429 That sucks, we don't have enough material to laugh at 2 months from now

1 star There you go

All the bad cards were 5 star and all the good cards were 1 star.

@@ab_c4429 thx. I was just a bit confused when there were no neutral card review but the most important thing is that hes healthy now.

Lars? You mean Jens?

Jamick98Geass I tried that the bomb deck with dragons mixed In. Decided bomb is just better with pure mech the dragons just didn’t really pay off in my opinion

@@dragonlogos1 Good to know. Thanks for the feedback.

zeophen I was going to do the same but the preorder got me the golden elysiana first. Value value

wrecked.

mechathun can often be discovered by boom/assembly, no need to craft him. There is never really any other win condition with control warrior than outvaluing your opponent, try playing more greedy. Also, wait for the meta to settle before you make big changes to your deck. I'm personally rank 9 and climbing slowly atm with a control warrior (no bombs and only half of the epic cards). Most of my losses are due to me using a brawl too early/too late, like 80%. Hope you can reflect on your brawls a bit, it's not an easy deck to begin with and the meta also requires a lot of planning and thinking ahead.

He woulda died anyways

TheQoogle control shaman is so good

TheQoogle shudder?

Explain the fun away that makes sense. I’d forgotten about it because I haven’t seen it played though.

Hinter still had 8 cards, trump only 2. Fatigue wasnt an option

He'd still be at 2 HP. Opponent would've done the same play, hit with hero power and weapon [weapon (2), Hero power (2), Kill Command (5) = 9 to Trump's 5+6 armor (11)], and trump then still has no way to survive with what's in his hand. He has no survivability left in his deck, and next turn's hero power is discover a mech. He has to get a mech that gains armor off that hero power, or he's dead to the hunter's hero power.

@@panwp123 Trump had the archivist, he should have the time to play it and won't take too much fatigue damage, as long as he survives.

@@mrluchtverfrisser Play to win rather than play to not lose. His opponent draws Kill Command around 20% of the time in that situation (incorporating the chance to Tracking into it). Trump has a VERY low chance to win any game in which he goes to 2 without having guaranteed armor gain, so playing around that isn't as useful as hoping that the opponent misses the Kill Command and that Trump's Twilight Drake impacts the board enough to help him win.

@@panwp123 bruh, archivist.

Don't know how you are playing, but bomb warrior is wildly inconsistant and a lot of decks counter it. It's a sub par deck

Just aggro them out. Druid and warlock have excellent low dust aggressive decks to bully bomb warrior’s low tempo plays out.

Bomb warrior is a meme deck, will die out soon. Trust me. Either play heavy control or aggro. Ez matchup tbh

@@ThatDutchIdiot Maybe so but it's everywhere now and much like many decks counter it, it also counters tons of decks in a way that the decks have 0 chance to win. What I mean by "playing against a deck no one enjoys playing against" is that now everyone has to play a deck that can manage against bomb warrior or you'll lose often as the deck is everywhere now, it's not fun. And the problem is actually with Warrior's sustain right now, that's what should be nerfed. I go 10-12 wins with my fatigue warrior deck all the time and surely that's not okay. In other words bomb warrior's existence defies the meta atm and not in a fun way.

you would have won more if you played the new cards lul

@@IEatYourSandwiches I'm testing the power level mostly, and looks like its very low right now as meta is not settled just yet.

Hunter deck?

Is it the hunter deck?

Kin Long Wong Fuck off, who do you think you are? ‘Trump, please make better free content on a regular and reliable basis for me, some chump on the internet who’s never given you a thing’ That’s what you sound like.

@@beanie7965 yeah and you sound butthurt

FOOLISH SAMURAI I’m irritated yeah, I don’t see your point? I feel it’s a valid thing to be angry about.

Kin Long Wong trump is a great player but your critique is actually exactly right, he’d even be left with a 4/2 in your scenario. Good catch.

@@beanie7965 Well everyone have the right to say whatever they want to say including you swearing here. I don't have to give trump anything in order to have the right to say those things. He played very badly in this video and i am just giving some friendly positive criticism and not even hating him.

Its for him to get weapon dude

LotGolein it basically destroyed his opponent’s weapon. Seemed like good value to me

@@OahuKanaka replacing a 2/2 with a 2/3 is a good idea to you?

Simon Eklundh yea it destroyed the 2/2 when else is it a good time to play weapons project? When he doesn’t have a weapon? Then it’s like giving his opponent a free weapon

@@OahuKanaka how about when he has a stronger weapon? Giving your opponent one more charge of a 2 attack weapon isn't really the best play

you mean meta?

You mean at any point in a cardgame, some decks are more powerful than others? *GASP*

@@JsnVrhs46 You missed the *so early* part of the sentence, child.

@@Mitia_k And you missed the 'at any point' part of the sentence, moron.

ikr

Hilarious that he managed to pull victory out of the jaws of defeat, and then decided to throw it right back in.