Sign up for the Armed Scholar Newsletter: www.armedscholar.com/contact Support the channel by liking the video and subscribing!

If the government tells you that you don't need it, immediately go out and buy two.

The civilians ownership of firearms, also used by the Military, has been a part of America's history since the Pilgrims.

Justice delayed is justice denied.

Upholding these rights protects not only our freedoms but also ensures responsible gun ownership prevails over knee-jerk legislation.

I live in South Louisiana. Our government just said that we have the right to Concealed Carry, starting on July the 4th. Meanwhile, the mayor of New Orleans and the City Council are busily making rules and regulations and new "gun free zones" to infringe on these very rights.

SCOTUS needs to get with and stick to a purist interp of the Consitution, CITIZENS have the Rights, NOT STATES or Feds.

The 2A is the American permit to keep and bear arms, without restrictions.

Good Job Justice Thomas for putting swamp on notice.

Respect for the cool and thoughtful head of S.C. Justice Thomas.

Still trying to understand how my privilege to drive in any state outweighs my right to carry in any state.

SO sick of the DELAY, DELAY, DELAY!!!

'Military use' is a complete pile of 💩 The Constitution does NOT include any reference to anything regarding 'military use'. Shall NOT BE INFRINGED couldn't be any clearer.

An armed society is a polite society.

Our history has always allowed citizens to possess the same general firearms as our military, from flintlocks, to leverage action rifles, single and then double action revolvers, semi auto rifles and pistols, bolt rifles and AR-15 semi auto rifle platforms since they were invented; so how can these states argue that it has changed today?

Would be nice if the SCOTUS would put a time frame on how soon all the other courts had to complete theses cases

Bless Justice Thomas. thumbs up at the Justice that actually recognizes the Bill of Rights is a living breathing part of this Countries true rights.

Justice Thomas' statement was pure fire!

I’m happy with Thomas’ remarks. It is necessary for SCOTUS to clear up the definition of “arms” and what weapons are “bearable”. The “dangerous” and “unusual” terms definitely need to be clarified. These terms need to be addressed fully and clearly, ensuring the language being used can clearly withstand the changes to language over time.

...shall not be infringed.

I’m not even sure why we need a CC permit. That’s an infringement.

SCOTUS needs to grow a pair of balls and uphold the constitution as written

Thanks for the status update… you’re keeping the 2A masses informed… you’re a patriot

The statement by justice Thomas was very promising. I live in RI and we need this win.

Sue em all Anthony

Kicked the can down the road.

Every weapon ever invented are arms period, Shall Not Be Infringed.

The second ammendment says we should have a well armed militia! How could the a r 15 not be good for militia??

The chevron deference decision is where everyone needs to be looking. Here's why: If federal agencies cannot interpret federal laws and rights then there is definitely no room for a state or local government, much less a state or local government bureau to interpret federal laws and rights. They cannot argue that federal laws have supremacy if they pick and choose which rights and laws have supremacy over state and federal laws. At the heart of the chevron deference case is the scotus affirming that all interpretations of federal laws and federally enumerated rights are the sole jurisdiction of the federal courts. It says so directly in the ruling. Now we just need cease and desist orders based on that ruling...but i'm gonna tell you, GOA, NRA, FPC, SAF and the rest will not do this because if they did, they would all be out of very lucrative jobs. This is going to have to come from private individuals and their private attorneys. I have been posting the following comment on every gun law channel i watch for months and will continue to do so: States and local governments explicitly do not have the right or jurisdiction to enforce anything having to do with weapons or the use or carry of weapons. That all falls under federal jurisdiction because that is a federally enumerated right and federal law. Allowing state and local governments to change and modify our rights and forcing citizens to assert their rights in court costing 10's or 100's of thousands of dollars, jail time or even costing their lives to do so is not legal. It is criminal. In order for the Constitution to be law and for the bill of rights to be law, they must be congruent on every square inch of US owned territory. PERIOD.

"Shall not infringe" is pretty clear.

They just GVRed them to kick it further down the road. These district courts will just sit on everything like the 9th circuit is doing. 10 years to get a decision should bring an immediate SCOTUS decision.

SCOTUS is not interested in taking up an AWB and mag ban case. Period.

This results in not slowing down the various PICA cases as they go through their processes in the courts. SCOTUS extremely rarely takes up a case in an interlocutory status. I also think SCOTUS is "gently" stating to the lower courts, via Justice Thomas's statement, that they should start being more careful in how they rule as SCOTUS knows what's percolating in the lower courts.

This is getting aggravating if we stand together they all will fall

All current cases that are having identity problems, assault weapon, high capacity magazine, common use, etc., should have a definition hearing.

We appreciate everything you do, stay with it. We support you and the US Constitution 🇺🇸

Currently, there are no countries whose primary service rifle is exclusively semi-automatic. Most modern militaries use select-fire rifles, which can switch between semi-automatic and fully automatic or burst fire modes. This versatility is crucial for adapting to various combat situations. Historically, the United States was unique in adopting the M1 Garand, a semi-automatic rifle, as its primary service rifle during World War II. However, this is no longer the case, as the U.S. military now uses select-fire rifles like the M4 and M16.

We are the most oppressed community in America at the moment.

I'm from Illinois this has been going on for a year. The SC left us hanging on our Rights

So if "arms" issued for military use are are for military use only, not covered by 2nd Amendment protections, what about handguns? Glocks, Sig P320's Berettas, all have been issued and used in our military. Does that then mean, because they had military use, they are not given 2A protection for us, the responsible and law-abiding gun owners? And if THEY are protected under the 2A, what difference should it make if the firearm is a handgun or rifle? Notwithstanding the fact that an M16 issued in the military, is NOT THE SAME as an AR15 we can buy here! I would love these people to show me proof that an AR15, semi-auto only, was ever issued to our military!

So we are looking at a minimum of two more years on an AWB case getting a SCOTUS decision. Hope the “make-up” of SCOTUS doesn’t change before then.

God bless Judge Thomas🙏

I don't think I ever read the term "Lawful Purpose" in the 2nd or any other amendment.

Thank you for the clear and concise update.

Question: What "Military usage" does the AR-15 have? F J B

Still can’t buy an AR in CA 15,000 videos later.

My question is how much longer will this delay the whole process? Or more specifically how much more time have we given anti-Gun politicians and courts

Once they take away your ability to defend yourself then they can implement all kinds of crazy laws.

GLAD THAT YOU EXSPLAIN THE CASES!!!

Rather be Judge by 12 , than Carry by Six. Bang Bang!!!

the second ammendment defines arms as all weapons, even military weapons. the founders confirmed this when discussing canons

Thank you for your reports!

They punted, but Lucy was holding the football.

TY A.S for all your 2A News💯💪🏽

“Weapons that would be reserved for military use should be banned” I guess by that logic knives should be illegal then. And also trucks I guess

It's always the same game of this court to that court then states refuse to follow the rulings then remanded and vacated...on and on and on. Will this ever end?

Can't imagine getting my information anywhere else! Thanks Anthony!

What is the latest on the kalifornia ban on internet sales of ammo??

Keep up the good work, Anthony.

BREAKING NEWS! BREAKING NEWS! ALWAYS BREAKING NEWS! EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO NEWS WHATSOEVER!

It is wonderful to hear that the Supreme is ready to take on these cases on final merits reviews.

Protect our 2A and all constitutions

The tail is wagging the dog. The military shouldn't be allowed any weapon civilians can't own.

I just want to say thank you. You have had the best and informative udpates on all this. I live in Illinois and purchased something during freedom week. By the time the BC Cleared the injunction was overturned and they wouldn't give it to me even though every part of the process was done. I am so excited to hear the note left on the denial because it offers a lot of hope that at some point someday our rights will be restored here in Illinois. It's been difficult to deal with all this time. Thank you again for making these videos and keeping us all informed.

At what point do you think us here in Washington state Will start to see our “assault weapons” ban be more challenged by people like the Supreme Court? “Assault Weapon Ban. In 2023, Washington became the 10th state to generally ban the sale and manufacture of assault weapons. Unlike most other states with assault weapon bans, however, Washington does not ban or regulate the possession of assault weapons, only their sale, manufacture, import, and distribution.”

Hello Al

Thank you for all of your updates on 2A.

What makes a weapon an arm? Military use or not arms are arms... period. 2A restricts nothing on the bases of it being for military use or otherwise. This is all BS.

I find scotus to be very spineless right now

So one thing you can bet on, is you can’t bet on SCOTUS.

"THE GREAT OBJECT IS THAT EVERY MAN BE ARMED," Patrick Henry

Why does Cali have a ban on ar 15. That would also be unconstitutional?

God please let them look into the SAFE act in NY

THANK YOU, you're a specific commentary, straight forward.

These are all great, if the states will follow the rulings. There needs to be harsh penalties for those states that refuse.

I have to disagree with justice Thomas on a couple things: "We have never squarely addressed what type of weapons are arms" , all of them. "We noted the second amendment does not protect those weapons typically not possessed by law abiding citizens", Wrong! The second amendment protects our right to all weapons. Case in point- during the revolutionary war we used privately owned warships (privateers) to help us gain our independence.

Any law that restricts private ownership, use, carry, etc of ANY weapon is a violation of the Constitution and a basic human Right.

concise and direct breakdown of this information.

Anything designed to be used as a weapon or anything designed to be used with a weapon can be considered arms. Anything someone decides to use as a weapon is also considered arms at that moment. The 2nd amendment doesn't just cover firearms it covers any weapon and weapon accessorie. As well as any component to them, including ammunition and explosives. Private citizen should be free to own and carry any weapon they want and carry them wherever they want that the public is allowed to go. Which must include court houses, state and federal offices, schools, banks, and parks. It shouldn't matter if I want to buy or make even a nuclear bomb as long as I don't use it in an illegal manner.

Thank you for valuable info❤

So now everyone that did not adhere to the pica law in IL is a felon?

Excellent episode! Thanks!

Just discovered your channel. Thank you for clarifying all the BS from Illinois and other backward state's laws.

Excellent commentary! Thank you!

Thank you for your report!

Thanks again for the info 👍👍

Boy, they create a hell of a lot of legal framework and jargon to overcomplicate the idea that people are militia and arms shall not be infringed.

Its very interesting that the supreme court is finally starting to take action on these things right before a very significant election cycle. Hopefully this isnt their version of foreshadowing...

Thanks for the update.

Hey SCOTUS! Do Your Fkn Job!!!

Good information. We know what to look forward to next year

Thank you.

What's to stop the 4th and 7th from dragging their feet since they (now) know that they are going to lose? A year is too long of a delay but as seen by the CCIA that it's been 2 yrs of nose thumbing.

Anything challenging the Bill of Rights should be taken up by the Supreme Court. This is a cowardice move.

Thank you for this 2A update.

It is our right period. Whatever the military have we the People must have in arms.

Hi there Counselor, Good day here... Thanks for the exciting content, very much appreciated. We value the hardwork and effort in putting this placate. Kind regards here in Miramar, CA. Fightertown USA.

Our 2 amendment should not be infringed... When they say Americans don't need them it tells me every America should have 2

American citizens have the right to bare arms, not none citizens.

Why aren’t they going after criminals with stricter laws for them? Makes you wonder why, doesn’t it?? It should. Since they don’t, they just want to disarm YOU. What else would be their reason???