Bear with us! It's coming

More to come! Just bear with us.

Coming soon!

Thank you Caleb! We had a lot of fun with it!

Nice! Coyotes are great fun also.

Thanks!

Glad to help

Soon! We've been jammed up this summer and we should have time to get back to the SVO as the season winds down

The numbers you list are factory flywheel numbers. A chassis dyno measures rear wheel horsepower. Rear wheel horsepower is what your car puts down to the road, after drivetrain losses, not what goes in the brochure. You may have noticed our SVO is in less than pristine condition. Our car was rated at 175 flywheel horsepower. However, baseline 2 was 156 wheel horsepower which is (approximately) 195 flywheel horsepower. With the Holley it made 182, which is approximately 227 flywheel horsepower.

Do you have a recommendation? We are always looking for suggestions!

@@Scramspeed look into the comp cams 280h or maybe 268h

@@Scramspeed look into a boport camshaft. hes the go to guy for 2300 turbo stuff!!

The Holley install on this particular vehicle is not particular easy. It does necessitate the use of a crank trigger to get the timing functionality and we had to make a harness out of a cast off LS1 harness. Its definitely something we made happen because we really wanted to do it.

@@Scramspeed Yeah, I kind of figured that. My car has an older SDS EM3 system, which when it was put in the car was the only plug and play system available. It is rather primitive, uses a handheld tuning interface, and does not do any self-tuning (aside from closed loop cruise on a narrowband) nor does it datalog. I can upgrade the PCM to the current version, which is 3 generations down the road, and get 8 channels of datalogging and better closed loop, but nothing like a Holley. I can go to Pimp X and I am familiar with tuning MS systems, but I know from being in the LS turbo world just how much easier Holley is. The car is pretty heavily modified, but just so hard to tune with the SDS since I don't have a dyno like you. If I did, I could certainly use this system as I would not really need to log it as all the needed data would be on the dyno. I am not very good with electrical wiring, so the Holley is probably beyond my wheelhouse. LOL.

Unfortunately, there isn't a drop-on solution. We (heavily) customized an LS1 engine harness we had lying around. We will be installing a crank trigger setup shortly.

@Brett Yarborough Stinger Performance carries a version of the Megasquirt 3 called the PIMP, that has a large following/forum based, or you could just let Scram Speed install the Holley if close enough.

Message or call Scram Speed and I will walk you through what we used. Thank you!

Swap out the LA3, toss the brown tops out for some siemans deka 80lb low imp batch fire injectors, toss in a stinger performance PimpX and upgrade your fuel pressure regulator, get rid of the VAM for GM style IAT and run speed density. You’ll have a literal new car.

You damn near quoted my exact setup lol, only extras are a ported E6 and t3/4

Sure thing. We charge by the hour, haha.

@@Scramspeed This was an awesome video! I got the 363 done and the t trim on last week. It would be so cool to have a video like this of it!

We are working on a kit for the 2.3 turbo stuff. We still have a few bugs to sort with the SVO system working perfectly. More content coming soon.

@@Scramspeed thats great news!! Be sure to update that on video ill be looking to buy a few kits!!

Yes, stock injectors.

@@Scramspeed whens the next svo episode coming out

That is for sure on our to-do list!

You don't need a fan for an intercooler game at all.

Yes, those are the only mods. Please note that we were able to remove the restrictive VAM and replace it with a cone filter, it has a 2011+ V6 Mustang drive by wire throttle body, and has "aftermarket" muffler shop stock diameter exhaust. Exhaust manifold, intake manifold, turbo, cam, longblock, etc are all stock.

We are in central Illinois, in the lovely little town of Mahomet. We're right off the interstate.

LOL. Ackchoooally...., 205 hp is the Ford number for the 1985.5 and 86 models. Our 1984 model was rated at 175 hp from the factory. However, the factory rating is based on a *flywheel* number. As you can see in the video, our chassis dynamometer measures horsepower *at the rear wheels*. Due to parasitic losses through the driveline, the rear wheel number is always lower than the flywheel number. For example, the V8 mustangs of the late 80s were rated at 225hp, and the strongest stock one ever makes 195 rear wheel hp.

Custom exhaust for the SVO is in the cards! Thansk for watching

That was the baseline pull with 20* of total ignition timing. The car picked up almost another 20 rwhp from there with a couple of degrees of ignition timing, and by the time it had all the timing in it, it was making more horsepower than the car was rated at from the factory. See my response to your other post which discusses the difference between factory rated flywheel horsepower and rear wheel horsepower.

We did not. Upgraded intercooler is one of the next things on our list. Updates on the SVO coming soon!

@@Scramspeed So when you did this Dyno, no one thought about laying a fan on the Intercooler to have a more accurate ##?

@@bluesky-ud9wg Part of the beauty of systems like Dominator is you can monitor IATs in real time. The IATs weren't high, so there was no need for additional cooling of the intercooler. Perhaps it was because the hood was open, perhaps it is because the runs weren't done back to back. In any case, looking at the logs, we don't believe that adding a fan to the intercooler would have benefitted the power output.