Tamron make great lenses, my favorite between the two is the constant F/2.8 11-20mm. These would be all you need to carry on a holiday (remember those?) Cheer's from Vancouver Canada
@ScratThunder2 жыл бұрын
The range 18-300 is insane
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Yep, it really is!! It was so satisfying zooming in and out hahah
@thesymbolized2 жыл бұрын
I Just bought my Tamron 17-70 2.8 Last year and now i am tempted again... The 11-20 Looks so nice.
@AndyDay2 жыл бұрын
Great review! These lenses look fantastic. Fujifilm shooters in particular must be psyched.
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much Andy! I'm hoping to get my hands on X-mount version of this lens to see how it performs on Fujifilm cameras.
@micheletmichelvideaste2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for specifying the minimal focus distance on both lenses, that was what I was looking for! cheers from Montréal!
@thienluong32632 жыл бұрын
Photos in the studio are beautiful with lens 18-300mm
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much!
@JustinYarborough2 жыл бұрын
Great review, thanks! I have both of these lenses and love them. I just bought the 18-300 to replace my Sony 70-350. I'm very excited to get it out on a trip now that I have to only really bring the two lenses to cover pretty much every situation. I still have the Tamron 17-70 and will keep it in the rotations also because it's a great lens.
@sbsid19942 жыл бұрын
How do you find it compared to the Sony, especially on longer focal length above 200?
@AgnostosGnostos2 жыл бұрын
Tamron is producing the 18-400mm for APS-C dSLR cameras too. Sadly there is no a-mount versions of this lens and no chance of using an LA-EA3 adapter on e-mount cameras with this lens. The autofocus EF metabones and Sigma adapters for e-mount cameras don't offer autofocus. I hoped of a Tamron e-mount version of 18-400mm. Instead the 18-300mm version appeared which is much better than the 55-200mm or the 70-350mm lenses by Sony. The Tamron 18-300mm has an equivalent 35mm focal length range of 27-450mm. The Sony full frame e-mount 24-240mm lens on APS-C cameras becomes 36-360mm but it is much heavier, larger than the Tamron 18-240.
@thekundaliniconsortiumchan14712 жыл бұрын
How does this lens compare with the Sony 70-350mm?
@jimbuckley49862 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the review and covering all the range. I was going to the camera shop to pick up my ordered Tamron 17-70, they accidentally shipped it to the wrong shop and while there, the fellow behind the counter, based on our conversation that this might be a better choice. They have a good return policy so even though all my research had been on the other thinking to give this a try. Your reviews are very helpful. Thank you and am a subscriber now as well
@xbriskx Жыл бұрын
I have an A6000 and after 8 years it's almost dead, Viewfiner doesn't work, doesn't recognise the lens have the time. Anyway I have the 55-200mm Sony lens and all I photograph is wildlife, everything from Hummingbirds to Frogs. Would love to know if 18-300m is the next step up for me and also what new body should I get? The 55-200 doesn't cut the mustard anymore, it's crap aperture and just not crispy at all. People are suggesting A6400. My budget is around 1k USD.
@OLuvin2 жыл бұрын
This duo vs Sonys native 16-55 + 70-350 for travel? Pros and cons for both setups. Thoughts?
@spdcrzy2 жыл бұрын
16-55 F2.8 G?! That lens is a WHOLE different beast. SUPER expensive compared to the 11-20, and they don't really occupy the same functional niche. The ZV-E10 and the 11-20mm combo is ideal for vlogging and streaming. The 16-55 has more features - a linear motor rather than a nonlinear one for focus, for example, and is far better suited to stills rather than video. Also, the minimum focus distance is literally twice as far as the 11-20. It's a great travel still lens, but not a great video lens (IMO). With a gimbal and a ZV-E10, for example, the 16-55 is far too bulky. Whereas with the 11-20 you can mount everything on a tiny 1kg capacity gimbal and even add an external mic and still be fine. The biggest problem is that all of Sony's APS-C cameras have the stupid rolling shutter problem. With a wider lens, you can crop in more (especially with unstabilized footage) to alleviate that somewhat.
@Princeton_James2 жыл бұрын
I have both of those and the sony 16-55 rarely leaves my camera. It is worth the price. Amazingly sharp and it's a nice size. I just like this 18-300 as a walk around lens for a day out with the fam during daylight.
@olatundefadahunsi39812 жыл бұрын
You hear about the newly announced lenses Julia? They have a v2 tamron 28-75 coming.
@AmalForbes2 жыл бұрын
also the 35-150
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Yess! I'm super excited about the 35-150 too 😄
@carjac8202 жыл бұрын
Lens like these is the reason why APS-C still makes sense
@dosfeos8052 жыл бұрын
You should check out the sony 18-105mm f4 great lens
@robertcudlipp34262 жыл бұрын
Does a great job on my a6400.
@TVe2002 жыл бұрын
I own the Tamron 11-20 f2.8 and I like it a lot. I am not sure about lenses with 10x zoom. My other two zooms are Sony 16-55 f2.8 G witch I love, and the Sony 70-350 G.
@SilatShooter2 жыл бұрын
Nice kit! I have the Sigma trio and was considering the Sony 16-55 instead, or get the 18-300 and keep my primes.
@Zunidrap2 жыл бұрын
@@SilatShooter Sigma are also releasing soon a 16-50 f2.8 zoom lens for Sony Aps-c. Will be interesting to see how it compares to the Sony 16-55 and Sigma primes.
@robertcudlipp34262 жыл бұрын
Don't doubt the quality of the Sony wide angle zoom, however the price is a real deterrent.
@RainBow-op5go2 жыл бұрын
Hi Julia... Keep on Rocking...
@minarimon3106 Жыл бұрын
Is it good to use with Sony fx3 for filming at low light conditions??
@danielkalvito Жыл бұрын
Excellent video!!! I bought this Tamron lens to use it with my Sony ZV-E10 but I noticed that the battery drains too quickly, let's say half of the time compared with the Sigma 16mm and Sony 55-210mm, anyone knows the reason why that happens? Thanks!!
@uaebel2 жыл бұрын
Exactly the review I needed. Now if I can find the 18-300 in stock somewhere in the US.
@deimees3828Ай бұрын
Just came across this lens before I get any camera and looks amazing. I’m thinking of the zve10ii and the 18-300. What do you think. Or shall I just save a few months more for the a6700? Ovo would love the Sony a7iv but costs ha
@TheMonsieurSalty Жыл бұрын
Bought this lens 2 months ago. Practically unusable in low light situations such as indoors or at night without cranking the ISO up to at least 6000 (from my experience at least). But IMO this lens wasn't made to be used indoors anyway. Love the insane focal length it covers though, although I very rarely use it beyond 200. Part of me wishes I got the 17-70 instead.
@engywuck85 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and experience. I'm thinking about using the 18-300 also indoors. Reading your post about these limits prepares me at least to not having unreasonable expectations in low light situations. Greetings
@ReplayTheParadox Жыл бұрын
Did you end up changing to the 17-70? I have the chance to get both right now at the same price and I’m torn on aperture vs range
@TheMonsieurSalty Жыл бұрын
@@ReplayTheParadox nah, I got the Sigma 18-50 instead. Cheaper; yet smaller, lighter, and sharper. The 17-70mm have a reputation for losing sharpness beyond 50mm anyway so losing an extra 20mm is not a big deal for me. I kept the 18-300 though, but I only take it out on day trips.
@ReplayTheParadox Жыл бұрын
@@TheMonsieurSalty yeah I have seen that mentioned in a few review videos now. Has the 18-300 shown any similar loss of sharpness?
@TheMonsieurSalty Жыл бұрын
@@ReplayTheParadox with aperture, shutter speed, and ISO dialed in correctly - no significant loss in sharpness. Even more insignificant if you're only taking pics for social media like me. But yeah, a lot of things have to go right for this lens to work perfectly. Bring a monopod at least.
@borysmaster Жыл бұрын
Very useful review. Thank you 🙏
@mashifkalik8882 жыл бұрын
Great video. Feel very tempted to get thev18-300mm lens. How does perform when tracking birds in flight?
@unabyband12632 жыл бұрын
Awesome review, congrats with the finished vaccination and cancel the restrictions in Australia as well, Julia 🙂👍
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I can't wait for Monday when restrictions will finally be easing 🥳
@VickyyLeonn2 жыл бұрын
I love you videos. You’ve definitely taught me a lot 🤎
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!
@k.o.t.o.n.2 жыл бұрын
@@juliatrotti hy! what do you think? How would it perform at home in a darker kinda room with not big windows and poor ceiling lighting for portraits? is it worth buying a separate fast portrait lens or maybe 2 for that scenario if i would use it only for family use?
@himswkang13722 жыл бұрын
In the future I want to become like you . I love your photography very much 💞
@Donbros2 жыл бұрын
Why tamron is not releasing 16-30 ff (just a bit more than 17-28) if they can do 11-20 :/
@MarvellousVisuals2 жыл бұрын
Julia did you say that you don’t use autofocus on client shoots, or did I understand that wrong. It was near the part where you got in the studio and you said you let the lens do the work.
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
I do use autofocus for client shoots, but I don't rely on it 100%. When you use a wide focus point, the camera decides where to focus with eye AF but that's not always reliable. Good for testing out lens performance for my videos, but I don't want to miss any shots at a wedding! So usually for my client shoots I'm using eye AF but I also have a small flexible focus point that I keep on my subject in case eye AF decides to not work :) And this is even with GM glass, etc.
@lukehollingsworth9262 жыл бұрын
Did Tamron give you any update on when they will start shipping out?
@setaside22 жыл бұрын
The Sony version hits stores for the first time this week. The Fuji version at the very end of the month.
@aA-mw4jb2 жыл бұрын
Julia Trotti when are you going to test the 35-150 and 28-75 new lenses from Tamron?
@カメラのもっくん2 жыл бұрын
awsome review!!
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@nightcoder5k2 жыл бұрын
Nice video. Beautiful model.
@guest219845 ай бұрын
Note, if you use the 18-300mm with built in flash on some cameras it will not work. The lens is long (even at 18mm) and will cast a shadow over the image. External flash probably required, as in this video.
@JasonTheZoologist Жыл бұрын
Interesting. For eye autofocus, does the Tamron lens perform worse or the same as a Sony native lens? Assuming all the other settings are the same.
@yazidatik26562 жыл бұрын
julia, is this lens suitable for sports, especially football? and how about the stability too? I will combine with A6400
@mohammadrafin82432 жыл бұрын
use 1 af point and the focuse issue fized
@maliedivine2 жыл бұрын
a6600 looks good!! a6600 or Fujifilm x100v?? What do you recommend for everything? I am not shooting sports only.
@sparshgarg37892 жыл бұрын
great review,one question is it possible to use the tamron 18-300 mm with sony zv E10?
@Atul-eq1tp2 жыл бұрын
Love you ❤️❤️ julia
@sathamhussain53198 ай бұрын
Hi sir pls reply for me Which lens is best for photography and videography 18-105 f4 sony Or Tamron 18-300 f 3.5-6.3
@elaine_albuera24512 жыл бұрын
Love it. I love that lens! Can you make more videos like this? Where you include birds and flowers? I'd love it if you also include nature next time, especially when you're trying a new lens or camera ☺️💚.
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! And yes, I'm working on a couple of new videos where I just go out and shoot on my own :)
@PixiLoveOfficial2 жыл бұрын
combo great
@lsaideOK2 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of my travel kit when I shot aps-c. Tamron 28-300 and Tokina 12-24. Very useful. Tempting as a great do all combination. Have to get a Sony A6xxx first! Great review.
@sureshbabutv92 жыл бұрын
Hi Julie I like your video s and your suggestions in photography. Can you suggest me which camera and lens for travel and portraits should I take. I like sony a7iii . Iam confusion to choose lens. 0ls. Suggest me. Tq.
@renjith72849 ай бұрын
Best lens😊
@Holly-wx3bt2 жыл бұрын
What color is the paper? Was it orchid from savage?
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Yes! I have the smaller version of it at home, this was the full length one I borrowed at the studio :)
@jjansendavid2 жыл бұрын
I hope you'll get your hands on the Tamron 35-150mm soon! I really want to find out how it will stack up with the Tamron 28-200, the Sony 135mm GM and the Sony 35mm GM.
@giovannispinosa1822 жыл бұрын
+ Great review from a working photographer. Breezy yet insightful. Any chance of the 11-20 making it to the X mount?
@tireursaucentre2 жыл бұрын
👍 la prise de vues à 3:46 👍 la photo à 4:55
@fpvflyer47582 жыл бұрын
Is there a similar lens for the Canon R6?
@tactitool32942 жыл бұрын
Out of curiosity, what is that extra piece of equipment on your camera at 3:19?
@Tunalc9 ай бұрын
Flash photography information please
@donantony71982 жыл бұрын
Nice and short review! Simple and Powerful!!! By the way, I am using Fuji X S10 I am looking forward to buy a zoom lens, so which Lens I should choose !? Tamron 18-300mm F/3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD or FUJINON XF70-300mmF4-5.6 R LM OIS WR ? Waiting for your kind suggestion.
@erikfarkas78682 жыл бұрын
The 18-300 is gonna be a bit worse in quality i suppose. And 70-300 is gonna be less versatile, but better IQ. Depends on what you want then. Versatility - Image quality.
@gdmedia5558 ай бұрын
rất vui khi xem video của bạn,bạn rất dễ thương
@schnubbel762 жыл бұрын
9:04 glad to see, you also use a sony rear lens cap for tamrons lenses as i do. I hate the Tamron lenscaps, front and rear. In general i think Tamrons lenses are ugly af. Unfortunately, they deliver nice APSC lenses now. So i need to get myself some ugly equipment in the future i guess.
@coytimotoworks24402 жыл бұрын
very beautiful
@treeman36632 жыл бұрын
I'm getting the sigma 18-300mm for canon
@keithrincon2 жыл бұрын
Loved it! Good job
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@banasreekunal2 жыл бұрын
Love you always
@jasonm1292 жыл бұрын
Nice 👍🏽 and she resembles Paula Patton lol
@manny755862 жыл бұрын
The 18-300 only goes to 3.5 which isn't the best for "art" photography, but for vacation or a situation where you simply can't bring a ton with you, it's a good, affordable option.
@josukeuchiha Жыл бұрын
I think it's more a kit replacement, similar aperture but more range
@ReplayTheParadox Жыл бұрын
Would the 17-70 2.8 be better?
@andrewdewar81592 жыл бұрын
Do they have a full frame one like these ?
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Tamron has the 28-200mm for full frame, I have a video on that one too!
@choohoo102 жыл бұрын
Is this available in Australia yet?
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
I think it's still on preorder
@mrsleakyshit2 жыл бұрын
It makes me happy whenever someone pronounces “bokeh” correctly.
@robertcudlipp34262 жыл бұрын
Is it really so important? What about pronunciation of ISO ?
@pematamang92682 жыл бұрын
Julia how is the Sony a7iv? I hope your enjoying with sony a7iv. Can you share some specs please
@beginnerphotography91842 жыл бұрын
Tamron best lans i m use tamron 24.70mm 2.8 and 70.200mm 2.8
@nroose2 жыл бұрын
I think maybe you multiplied instead of divided when you were talking about the full frame equivalence lengths? i think if you have a 300mm full frame, and you put it on an APS-C camera, you get something like 400mm. But this is an APS-C lens, so it will be the same mm on a full frame camera, but only support a cropped part of the sensor. If not, someone please explain?
@PatrickWithCamera2 жыл бұрын
Yes, its confusing, but no matter if its aps-c lens or ff, all of the lenses focal lenght are counted as FF, so aps-c lens are also multiplied by crop factor.
@MitrichDX2 жыл бұрын
Отличный обзор! Хоть кто-то про хроматические озабочен так же как и я =) В целом, то что я вижу, покупка стоящая... Жаль что в продаже их пока фиг найдёшь =(
@KazuyaMASUDA19822 жыл бұрын
👍
@Donbros2 жыл бұрын
27-450mm o_o This is nice if you want to shoot wildlife with you b cam. But 700 euro for aps-c lens hm
@kyactus43252 жыл бұрын
Hi Julia, I'm looking for a sony camera to take good quality fashion shots on instagram, the camera I like the most is the sony alpha 7iii, is there anything that comes close to that kind of image at a more affordable price?
@godzgift52532 жыл бұрын
Maybe look into an eos rp?
@kyactus43252 жыл бұрын
@@godzgift5253 Do you know any sony models like that?
@alexceja59302 жыл бұрын
I’ve been using the Sony a6400 and it has been more than enough for me. I’ve shot big conferences and low light photography with it. And the shots I get with it are AMAZING
@anonym55102 жыл бұрын
The a7iii is the best for its price, better cameras such as the Canon r5 and r6 are much more expensive, and anything cheaper won't be as good. Sony a7iii is fantastic
@kyactus43252 жыл бұрын
@@anonym5510 a 7ii? What do you think?
@javaguitar6 ай бұрын
Sony's AF feature is cool, but it also makes the model's face out of focus
@otjutt Жыл бұрын
18mm has fair disorientation.
@toshanransaraphotography18072 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍👍
@screenvideoss Жыл бұрын
Muito gata esta fotógrafa.
@FrancisAlbert19902 жыл бұрын
How is the 11-20 on FF?
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
You would have to use it in crop mode on FF so it would look the same! I would use it for video on FF on any camera - but for photo probably only the A7R4 since you'd still have large enough photos to work with.
@onlyonecannoli39522 жыл бұрын
Sony usahrs? Millimitah? Just kidding. Luv the accent!
@paulclarke45712 жыл бұрын
Where is my credit card?
@CAPTURING_SOULS2 жыл бұрын
🎊🎊🎊🎊🎊👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@imranclicks2 жыл бұрын
You are beautiful 😍🙏
@msbmri249 ай бұрын
You are the perfect model, why to hide behind the camera dear?
@60428332 жыл бұрын
You are so cute and I love your personality.
@kochiice72742 жыл бұрын
Your is so cute a I love you 😘❣️😘😘😘
@michael29682 жыл бұрын
that look pretty small for a 300mm!
@juliatrotti2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's pretty impressive, lots of range, good quality but it's small and light