No video

Tank Cage vs Javelin and NLAW

  Рет қаралды 534,283

EngineerReact

EngineerReact

2 жыл бұрын

The russian tanks have been seen with metal cages on top of there turret during the invesion of Ukraine. While looking like something home made quick throw on, what benifit are these cages suppose to do?
Please like and subscribe for more! :)

Пікірлер: 840
@logoseven3365
@logoseven3365 2 жыл бұрын
The “cage”, is actually a BBQ grill for when the tank is on fire.
@rich7447
@rich7447 2 жыл бұрын
Best comment of the week!
@nialldoyle8206
@nialldoyle8206 2 жыл бұрын
😂
@bamhamer
@bamhamer 2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@njgrplr2007
@njgrplr2007 2 жыл бұрын
Temporary luggage rack for the comrades bugging out.
@rickconnolly5006
@rickconnolly5006 2 жыл бұрын
Num nums
@zach11241
@zach11241 2 жыл бұрын
I put a cage around my house. My in laws still managed to get in.
@bite-marx
@bite-marx 2 жыл бұрын
wokka wokka wokka
@helterskelter416
@helterskelter416 2 жыл бұрын
you didn't putin enough effort in building it i guess
@bphenry
@bphenry 2 жыл бұрын
@@helterskelter416 OMFG!! This is the most under-appreciated comment stream ever! I'm ded. 🤣🤣
@razminka.7522
@razminka.7522 2 жыл бұрын
Killer comment!
@MrGraywolves
@MrGraywolves 2 жыл бұрын
You need to add the reactive armour system....some people use Rotties, others Pitties...I personally prefer the older Dobies...
@greva2904
@greva2904 2 жыл бұрын
Apparently many experts in the west were worried that the Javelin, which is now quite an old system, would become obsolete in about 2025, so it’s good to see that it’s still up to the task. The Ukrainians seem to prefer the NLAW though as it’s much easier to use, requires much less training and is more suitable for use in urban combat. But if you’re in a Russian tank right now both systems must be scaring the crap out of you.
@KFCLOVERMY
@KFCLOVERMY 2 жыл бұрын
I think they'll squeeze out a countermeasure soon enough, either the ruskies or Chinese, now they seem what they can do.
@SonOfTheDawn515
@SonOfTheDawn515 2 жыл бұрын
Javelins do require more training compared to point and click AT weapons. Such anti-armor weapons are better for issuing en masse. Once fired you just break the sights and leave the tube as trash. However, they shouldn't (and aren't) eschewed for one over the other. Both styles of weapons have their strengths and weaknesses.
@edwinalexis593
@edwinalexis593 2 жыл бұрын
@@KFCLOVERMY yet the offensive technology is easier to create/improve than the defensive ones, so the battle results can also provide valuable info on how to make the Javelin and NLAW systems even more lethal
@sirxavior1583
@sirxavior1583 2 жыл бұрын
It's debatable. Active Protection Systems (APS) and the Trophy system should in theory stop ATGMs. But it also depends on the location of the sensors. If i'm not mistaken the APS on the T-90 is located on the front turret and is only effective in the direction that the Turret is pointing...so a Javelin should still be effective if you target the tank from the rear and out of sight of the APS. A planned Javelin saturation with each operator firing at the tank from diffrent sides may also overwhelm the APS, provided they all fire at exactly the same time.
@neutronalchemist3241
@neutronalchemist3241 2 жыл бұрын
It seems the Panzerfaust 3 is gaining popularity. No guided, no top attack, but it's the handiest of them all, and the penetration is enough to disable a tank from any direction.
@Sparta_121
@Sparta_121 2 жыл бұрын
I was anti tank platoon in the parachute regiment and was trained and fired the javelin. Wicked weapon system. Top attack, fire and forget unlike the milan system it replaced in the british army. The tracking gates in the sight system are easy to use and locks onto the target with ease. The only problem i had with the kit was it wasnt durable enough. We done alot of tank recognition and learned how to recognise nato and russian tanks by just showing us a certain part of the tank and we had to identify them.
@cesaravegah3787
@cesaravegah3787 2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting points and shows that the system though vastly superior to others it still can be improved, hope that the Ukranians get more of them anyways
@coreliousc8915
@coreliousc8915 2 жыл бұрын
This guy is literally copy pasting this every where. really doubt he was in an anti tank platoon. More likely a bot given how many videos I've seen his comment on.
@thamwaikeong5885
@thamwaikeong5885 2 жыл бұрын
MILAN is a SACLOS system. The 2T is still quite potent, rated for one metre of armor or three metres concrete.
@danboyd2725
@danboyd2725 2 жыл бұрын
It's like in the Roadrunner cartoons when While E Coyote pulls out a small umbrella to fend off a bolder.
@danboyd2725
@danboyd2725 2 жыл бұрын
@True South Like the Javelin Missile System, they all worked as designed.
@skinnybub5237
@skinnybub5237 2 жыл бұрын
Omg 😱 🤣 #1 KZfaq comment of the day!!!
@jamesm3471
@jamesm3471 2 жыл бұрын
Screw Wile E Coyote. He was always the aggressor and deserved everything he got…
@bear76009
@bear76009 2 жыл бұрын
I worked for UPS and picked up from an ACME Co in Texas one time. They asked me what I was there for and I said Rocket Boots without missing a beat.
@757Poppy
@757Poppy 2 жыл бұрын
I thought the cages were a means of stopping the crews running away.
@sumitd500
@sumitd500 2 жыл бұрын
🤣
@nicholasmuro1742
@nicholasmuro1742 2 жыл бұрын
In mother Russia, you do not run from tank. Tank runs you
@blackcountryme
@blackcountryme 2 жыл бұрын
Ooooo
@chriswalker7555
@chriswalker7555 2 жыл бұрын
Too soon!
@markjackson7467
@markjackson7467 2 жыл бұрын
Saying "COULD" is not an analysis - try presenting actual energy and timing details with experimental data
@daveholmes5540
@daveholmes5540 2 жыл бұрын
The cage is not for protection, its to keep the soldiers in and stop them running away from ukrainian soldiers. 😂
@taliakron641
@taliakron641 2 жыл бұрын
from what? does this savagers have an army? lol
@tomgreene7942
@tomgreene7942 2 жыл бұрын
Or perhaps it is to make the soldiers feel like they have extra protection, even if it doesn't work.
@edi9892
@edi9892 2 жыл бұрын
This reminds me of that my grandfather claimed that they shot a Soviet tank and it kept moving in circles. They shot it again and then discovered that the hatches were locked from the outside...
@claygamer3657
@claygamer3657 2 жыл бұрын
@@taliakron641 what
@markjackson7467
@markjackson7467 2 жыл бұрын
Saying "COULD" is not an analysis - try presenting actual energy and timing details with experimental data
@bellezayverdad
@bellezayverdad 2 жыл бұрын
It's also called ESA or 'Emotional Support Armour'. It doesn't help much against antitank weapons though.
@classicforreal
@classicforreal 2 жыл бұрын
Alternatively Cope Cage
@Wallyworld30
@Wallyworld30 2 жыл бұрын
@@classicforreal I heard Speak the Truth call it a Cope Cage and that's the best way to describe it.
@markjackson7467
@markjackson7467 2 жыл бұрын
Saying "COULD" is not an analysis - try presenting actual energy and timing details with experimental data
@Wallyworld30
@Wallyworld30 2 жыл бұрын
@@markjackson7467 Nobody in this thread said "Could" wtf are you even talking about?
@markjackson7467
@markjackson7467 2 жыл бұрын
@@Wallyworld30 The idiot making this video did and presented no evidence - there is plenty of video showing Russian tanks with reactive armour being hit multiple times and being repaired on telegrm/twtr.
@ivanstepanovic1327
@ivanstepanovic1327 2 жыл бұрын
Actually, this cage was not meant to protect against Javelin and similar missiles. It just can't do that. It is put there on tanks meant for urban combat. In those conditions, enemy uses RPG-7 and similar systems from tall buildings, shooting downwards on top of the tank (proven very effective in Chechnia). Also, RPG-7 is widely used and there are A LOT of those in former USSR republics. Also, most of its ammo still going around was produced in 1960s and 70s, so it is less effective and with less advanced fuses, so cage armor might have some use. Also, note that under this cage, there are still ERA blocks. So, cage plus ERA (old Kontakt-1 is small enough to fit there) will defeat RPG and other low penetration older ordnance. Also, drone missiles are relatively small and have less penetration compared to Javelin and this might help to some extent against those as well. But against Javelin? Forget it, it will go through no problem! Tandem warhead and massive penetration... There is only a slight chance this cage might fool the seeker about the actual position of the tank's turret and cause the HEAT jet to hit engine compartment. However, the chances of it working every time are slim and the tank will still be out of battle (crew might survive this, though).
@zipz8423
@zipz8423 2 жыл бұрын
To be honest we can only speculate about the reasons, but what you have said does have logic attached to it. I agree on the Javelin, the thinking - if Javelin is a consideration it might be for the umbrella to initiate the warhead fuses - but that isnt going to work all of the time because the javelin fuses arent in the front of the round but a good enough impact will make it go bang early according to the field manuals.
2 жыл бұрын
Cope cage
@knoahbody69
@knoahbody69 2 жыл бұрын
That cage might be able to stop Molotov Cocktails, possibly a grenade. An RPG-7 wouldn't be stopped unless the grenade doesn't go off. The top of the tank is always the weakest point. I mean, how are soldiers going to get into the tank? That cage is pretty much useless and the other thing about tanks in urban fighting is they can be easily trapped and immobilized allowing infantry to overwhelm in close quarters.
@keithjurena9319
@keithjurena9319 2 жыл бұрын
ERA is of limited utility in MOUT. ERA adds fuel, once the molotov cocktails start flying, that means 5 minutes until BBQ communists are ready to serve. The dish is done when the Jiffy Pop tank pops its top.
@georgepalmer5497
@georgepalmer5497 2 жыл бұрын
I'm wondering if they could develop this system into iterations that do make a difference on top down rocket attacks on tanks. While this approach might seem useless now, it can be further developed, and it seems so much more efficient than the Trophy system.
@Kissmyass19
@Kissmyass19 2 жыл бұрын
The cage is more psychological I think, it gives the tank crew a false sense of security. But that will be gone now I would imagine as everyone knows it doesn't work.
@joselimjoco3367
@joselimjoco3367 2 жыл бұрын
It's like putting an umbrella in their tanks.
@FlyboyHelosim
@FlyboyHelosim 2 жыл бұрын
If the cage is able to detonate the second, main charge then it may actually be more effective than you think.
@volairn70
@volairn70 2 жыл бұрын
I heard them jokingly called "cope cages" ;)
@PaperThinArmor
@PaperThinArmor 2 жыл бұрын
They probably were meant to defend against older atgms and things like rpgs being launched from buildings atop of tanks as experienced in Chechnya but these things no way can withstand javelins and nlaws
@DerDop
@DerDop 2 жыл бұрын
Emotional support armour.
@alastairbarkley6572
@alastairbarkley6572 2 жыл бұрын
Ukrainian forces got large numbers of NLAW first - as their primary anti-tank weapon. There weren't any complaints about it, despite it having lower specs (and lower weight and cost). The British Army has both Javelin and NLAW but uses them in a complementary, not competitive, way.
@konfunable
@konfunable 2 жыл бұрын
agree. NLAW is shorter range, so better in norther part of Ukraine with woods and cities. Javelins are much better in south where the steppes and farms are, so you need long distances.
@Weakeyedominant
@Weakeyedominant 2 жыл бұрын
NLAW disappointed in the export market but this was down to militaries not expecting to use them and selected more expensive options with more bells and whistles in much smaller numbers. As terrible as war is, it does tell everyone what works and what is just a shinny expensive waste of money on a defense stand. The Baltic States are all now putting in orders for NLAW. The Ukrainians so far have preferred it to javelin which is heavier, slower to setup and more complex. Great if firing from a remote turret on a light vehicle, but at infantry level they are crying out for NLAW.
@ReadmanJ
@ReadmanJ 2 жыл бұрын
@@Weakeyedominant Oh, and they'll get them.
@sashakyrus6934
@sashakyrus6934 2 жыл бұрын
I'm from Ukraine and I can complain that NLAW has some problems with the battery, so we have to modify it a little bit
@ReadmanJ
@ReadmanJ 2 жыл бұрын
@@sashakyrus6934 Good luck friend I'm pulling for you and everyone over there. Cherers m8
@gregwasserman2635
@gregwasserman2635 2 жыл бұрын
The cage does a great job of increasing the profile of the tank and making it easier for the enemy to locate, defeating the nest asset of the Russian tank- it's low profile.
@zeffy._440
@zeffy._440 2 жыл бұрын
the cage still leaves a smaller tank when compared to it's western counterparts while protecting against standard rockets and drones.
@gregwasserman2635
@gregwasserman2635 2 жыл бұрын
@@zeffy._440, so far it hasn't stopped the early versions of the Javelin while letting the Ukrainian forces let them know where they are. But believe what you wish, this sort of rationalization is why the Russians are bogged down right now.
@Jsynq
@Jsynq 2 жыл бұрын
@@zeffy._440 the cages only use is to just cope that they cant even protect themselves from those javelins
@zeffy._440
@zeffy._440 2 жыл бұрын
@@Jsynq the cages aren't designed against Javeline's. They are great against drones that drop explosives from above and work great as an additional area to store gear. Cope harder out of curiosity how did Mariupol go? Siberia treat you well so far?
@bitterbutter1000
@bitterbutter1000 2 жыл бұрын
The Americans put cages around their vehicles in the last 2 wars they lost. 😃😄😁
@TheGrrson
@TheGrrson 2 жыл бұрын
There is something incredibly satisfying about watching a guy with a rocket take out a tank.
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 2 жыл бұрын
When Russia was fighting in Grozny they lost a number of tanks to RPGs being fired from the upper floors of buildings. That is what the cage is there to stop. It was not designed to stop Javelin or NLAW missiles. As for hitting the side of the tank video footage has shown that the reactive armour of the Russian tanks is in a very poor state or even missing entirely. So a side shot could penetrate without much problem.
@TimKellerLinuxNinja
@TimKellerLinuxNinja 2 жыл бұрын
Now that the Ukranians are being supplied with German PanzerFaust's as well, those are known to defeat skirt ERA as well.
@pulaski1
@pulaski1 2 жыл бұрын
If you hit it with anything that removes a track, the crew will apparently run away and abandon the tank.
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
i think you confusing russian and dnr/ukraine tanks. Russian tanks t72b3 pretty modern with new reactive armor.
@SueMyChin
@SueMyChin 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev No, he's not confused. He's saying that the Russian tanks that have ERA have been poorly maintained and in many cases it's in poor condition or missing.
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
@@SueMyChin t-72b3 has or kontakt-5 or relict armor, both of them placed under armor, how it can be missing or damaged? only way you can lost it is after receiving AT rocket in it.
@trevortrevortsr2
@trevortrevortsr2 2 жыл бұрын
At the start of the Conflict Ukraine had 2,000 NLAW and 47 Javelin launches - Quantity has a quality of its own
@peterkwolek2265
@peterkwolek2265 2 жыл бұрын
When I found out about shape charges I was borderline traumatized just from photos of the people in our IED training course that were in armored HMMWVs and charges punched through like it was a soda can.
@jazztheglass6139
@jazztheglass6139 2 жыл бұрын
South African army strapped full water tanks to sides of their armoured vehicles, helped against rpg's
@timothywilliams1359
@timothywilliams1359 2 жыл бұрын
Way back in the 1980s, when I first went through ROTC at Knox, I realized my chances of survival on a modern battle field would be a lot higher as an infantry soldier than sitting inside a huge metal target. Never regretted that decision.
@SonOfTheDawn515
@SonOfTheDawn515 2 жыл бұрын
Shape charge AT weapons have been used since at least WW2. Panzerfausts come to mind. They didn't have to worry about velocity or trying to penetrate with some sort of dense metal core.
@zipz8423
@zipz8423 2 жыл бұрын
And Strykers.
@zipz8423
@zipz8423 2 жыл бұрын
@@jazztheglass6139 Nice, the water would still transmit the energy hydrodynamically but initiate the fuze early preventing penetration. A bit like water ERA.
@grievetan
@grievetan 10 ай бұрын
Whoever designed Javelin is a genius
@RaedwaldBretwalda
@RaedwaldBretwalda 2 жыл бұрын
[I am not an expert] The purpose of cage armour is to damage the detonator of a contact fused shaped charge. Such as for the ubiquitous RPG. The NLAW, as the video shows, is not contact fused (magnetic or IR, I guess). The front of a Javelin is the IR sensor, so it's detonator can't be damaged by a cage. But, as another poster pointed out, the cage would still be useful against RPGs fired down from buildings in urban areas, and the Russians might reasonably expect THAT to be a problem.
@joeharris4353
@joeharris4353 2 жыл бұрын
The principle is to detonate it at a distance. The shape charge is designed to concentrate the piercing material right in front of the payload. If it's detonated a foot away from the armor, it will defuse the material that's being projected into a wider beam, thus lowering its effectiveness. The beam remains focused by the armor if it enters as intended. Just a basic RPG 7 can defeat 24inches of steel. With a cage 12 imches from the armor. Made of half inch sheet material cut into 2 inch slates can defuse the beam enough for 6 inches of steel to stop it
@juicyj3819
@juicyj3819 2 жыл бұрын
You need a voice guy? I'm available
@Imad_Oofus
@Imad_Oofus 2 жыл бұрын
“My name is Casey Miller, and I’m in the third grade. Ever since I can remember, people have told me I should read the morning announcements. My friends always say to me “dear Casey, your voice is like butter to our ears. Could you please find a way to get that audible chocolate on the airways?”.
@juicyj3819
@juicyj3819 2 жыл бұрын
@@Imad_Oofus you know!
@golong1343
@golong1343 2 жыл бұрын
The cage installed above the tank is for the crews to have a false confidence as their engineers knew that the cage will not do anything to stop the penetration.
@viper29ca
@viper29ca 2 жыл бұрын
Javelin also has a fly over top attack mode, as well as a much longer 4.5km range vs the NLAW, but both are excellent systems
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
but in comparison with for example cornet with 10km or spike with even bigger range range they are pretty outdated as AT weapon.
@viper29ca
@viper29ca 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev the results would prove that statement as false
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev You most likely meant "not quite as advanced"
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
@@getsideways7257 if i remember correctly, cornet are pretty old, if someone worse that old AT system, i think it is pretty outdated. But nlaw is something between rpg-7 and atgm, so it has pretty unique place. This is more like great rpg that bad atgm. Fun fact - all tells aboun javelines but noone see it effect and noone tell about nlaw but many see it effect. Maybe it is rude, but if you need to go in tank firing range to use weapon, then against modern army it is pretty suicidal.
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev Well, I was mostly talking about Spike. That's seems to be a really formidable AT system - and not just because of its range (which also varies).
@cageordie
@cageordie 2 жыл бұрын
NLAW isn't just a shaped charge, it's an EFP, or SFF. The explosive forms a metal dish into a solid slug which it simultaneously accelerates to about 2km/s. The range is not limited to a specific ideal standoff the way a conventional HEAT or shaped charge is, it will work at up to 100m. I don't know how the detonating sensor works, so I don't know the vertical band that it can work in.
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
SFF? Is that another name for EFP? And yes, every overfly AT system uses EFP, including the latest TOWs.
@benthurber5363
@benthurber5363 2 жыл бұрын
From what I've read, it uses a camera with profile recognition and a selectable magnetic sensor.
@davidm.4670
@davidm.4670 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explanation!, 100m out seems like a lot - but possible - like gun-fired from close range ...
@francislaguna9142
@francislaguna9142 6 ай бұрын
Correct
@pirobot668beta
@pirobot668beta 2 жыл бұрын
William Fairbairn taught Cops in Shanghai to hold their off-hand arm up like a shield, covering the heart and throat. Put one fist under you chin, back of your hand facing the Enemy...that's the stuff. It didn't afford that much protection, but anyone shooting at you will sub-consciously be trying for a 'clear shot' around the obstacle. These cages are that same kind of 'protection'.
@usarmyfl1
@usarmyfl1 2 жыл бұрын
Ahh your's is one of the rare videos that actually shows the missile go up, then down and follows the whole thing in top attack mode.
@nanyafahkinbiznes1352
@nanyafahkinbiznes1352 2 жыл бұрын
Cages were meant for single HEAT type ammo but the javelin missile is twice that HEAT, it might block the first explosion but the second one will definitely pen the armor with ease.
@amitkp6957
@amitkp6957 2 жыл бұрын
Having layered sheets of ERA 6 inches apart instead of bar cage can work better. When first layer explodes as missile hits, the 2nd and 3rd layers move in the opposite vertical direction instantaneously and thus hitting the missile like a baseball bat, not only exploding themselves and the tandem charge but also deflecting it somewhat. Also an upward looking radar/sensor that releases HE rounds vertically can kill off missile at much higher distances. Both can be also be cheap like less than $10K to protect $3M tank average price.
@KFCLOVERMY
@KFCLOVERMY 2 жыл бұрын
Adding tonnes of weight and overbearing the engine.
@amitkp6957
@amitkp6957 2 жыл бұрын
@@KFCLOVERMY Maximum 1 tonne of weight added for whole tank but here we are talking only turret surface area for 2 layers so reduce it to around half a tonne at most. " A Kontakt ERA tile with two reactive sandwich plates has a weight of 5.7 kilograms without attachment bolts. About 151 tiles are used for a tank (although the number varies depending on tank type and surface area)."
@knerons
@knerons 2 жыл бұрын
So which tanks are using 2+ layers of ERA armor today? Kind of sounds like a loot of armor and added weight. Not seen any tanks using so many layers at the front.
@supportmalphite8769
@supportmalphite8769 2 жыл бұрын
Russians aren’t smart enough to do this for one and for two they could care less how many of their troops die.
@KFCLOVERMY
@KFCLOVERMY 2 жыл бұрын
@@amitkp6957 sure thing, pal. Don't forget to write about your 'keyboard scientist qualification" when you submit your designs to the kermlin
@Maks-Yarysh
@Maks-Yarysh 2 жыл бұрын
You may also check Ukrainian AT sydtem Stugna P whick is often using by Ukrainian forces at the moment. It is less complicate, less accurate but more cheap and from the footage seems has also powerful detonation and penetration force.
@danmur15
@danmur15 2 жыл бұрын
from what ive heard, the cope cages arent designed for the NLAW or Javelin. They are supposedly designed in response to previous urban warfare instances in the middle east where weaker RPGs were used from buildings above the tanks.
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
javeline work same as rpg from roof so it wotks against it as well.
@someboi4535
@someboi4535 2 жыл бұрын
This is the problem with allowing ignorant kids to say whatever they want on the internet Who told you that the cage was even supposed to protect against Javelin and NLAW systems? It was mainly designed to stop drone attacks and RPGs coming from above and mortar fire
@timothywilliams1359
@timothywilliams1359 2 жыл бұрын
When you are chugging vodka, the cage sounds like a brilliant idea.... R.I.P.
@azpowerhitter
@azpowerhitter 2 жыл бұрын
Oh Man this made me laugh. nice!
@digivagrant
@digivagrant 2 жыл бұрын
chugging all that copium
@slavetool9066
@slavetool9066 2 жыл бұрын
If the cage causes the charge to activate far enough away from the tank it may be effective. The shape charge effectiveness is definitely subject to detonation at a specific distance from the armor; make it detonate further away and penetration will be reduced.
@venox3811
@venox3811 2 жыл бұрын
Each system has its purpose in the battlefield. They can complement each other.
@brianbozo2447
@brianbozo2447 2 жыл бұрын
Russia had 10 -15 years to develop countersystems against Javelin missiles and seemingly did very little to protect their tanks and now they are exposed as weak and incompetent and young Russians are beingburned alive in their armor as a result Russian should never have invaded if their tanks were this vulnerable.
@KekusMagnus
@KekusMagnus 2 жыл бұрын
They developed effective APS systems even in the Soviet Union, they have new and improved versions too. It's not about developing them, it's about actually putting them in the tanks that see combat. They're not even that expensive, Putin is just an idiot and cheaped out on the wrong thing (or rather his corrupt military officials did)
2 жыл бұрын
@@KekusMagnus He is the head of the corruption. How the hell do you think he is worth 200 billion on a President's salary in Russia.
@user-hd4bn8zs7p
@user-hd4bn8zs7p Жыл бұрын
Вместо тысячи слов - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ld9gqsWUu6zSaJs.html - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iM6fp6-TttrNY6c.html
@NIKOinIRL
@NIKOinIRL 2 жыл бұрын
you call it tank cage, i call it BBQ grill😅
@nunyabiznazz2883
@nunyabiznazz2883 2 жыл бұрын
What are we going to BBQ today??
@beamer.electronics
@beamer.electronics 2 жыл бұрын
I know that a lot of these comments are well-meaning, and some analysis is superb, but can we please avoid giving the enemy even a morsel of system weakness information. And I know that a lot of this information is well documented and public, but even if we can save just 1 allied life by being a tad muted - it'll be worth it. All the best folks.
@dalanjackson3753
@dalanjackson3753 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I'm sure Russian tank designers get their information from KZfaq.
@spitfire8790
@spitfire8790 2 жыл бұрын
It's a fucking scrap metal
@whitesquirrel4131
@whitesquirrel4131 2 жыл бұрын
Giving the enemy a morsel........................you understand they know full well how shitty their equipment is? They've been watching it blow up for weeks now. And for a people who watched the GERMANS get stuck in the mud half a century ago they sure didn't learn that lesson... an army meant to go all the way to Europe and beyond, to America!!! Can't make it to Kiev.... What morsels of information could we give them that might help them out? An army of soldiers who SURE the hell do not appreciate being there, crappy gear, and a "president" whose gone mad......... What fucking morsels? You honestly think they come to THIS place, youtube for enlightenment??? HAHAHAHAHA
@holden3808
@holden3808 2 жыл бұрын
I'm sure the Russian forces were the first to find out the hard way that the cage wouldn't stop a Javelin or NLAW. They don't need KZfaq for that.
@SonOfTheDawn515
@SonOfTheDawn515 2 жыл бұрын
The cages are more effective against Soviet designed RPGs since they are more likely to hit and detonate on the cage. Having HEAT almost completely negates it.
@MORDOR7379
@MORDOR7379 2 жыл бұрын
Тандем ные выстрелы забыл, на РПГ!
@KekusMagnus
@KekusMagnus 2 жыл бұрын
only the cheaper RPG rockets, the tandem warheads will go through the cage just like the Javelin does
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
And what do you think the RPGs have? It's exactly HEAT. Look up "slat armor" to understand the idea behind these cages.
@tomaschovan3675
@tomaschovan3675 2 жыл бұрын
So let's say it... Those bars are good for barbecue. ☠️
@stevefitzpatrick4260
@stevefitzpatrick4260 2 жыл бұрын
Good analysis on these systems
@nogod7184
@nogod7184 2 жыл бұрын
Tank cage? It's like wrapping your body in plastic bags to protect from rifle's bullets.
@FlyboyHelosim
@FlyboyHelosim 2 жыл бұрын
Depends on a multitude of factors. It's actually more effective than you may think.
@ligametis
@ligametis 2 жыл бұрын
They don't in particular have to protect from Javelin, they can protect from less advanced tandem missiles or shape charges. US also use cages on their vehicles.
@Minedeployder
@Minedeployder 2 жыл бұрын
No. Dude, USA used wood against japan in ww2. You think modern HEATs are much different?
@JuckFoeBurden
@JuckFoeBurden 2 жыл бұрын
Makes the Rushky's feel better just before going to HELL!
@jonmassey8124
@jonmassey8124 2 жыл бұрын
Love the fact that the worlds MBTs cost millions 💲 and can be blown to pieces with something like the NLAW that costs about $20,000 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@eeiko321
@eeiko321 2 жыл бұрын
No different to a torpedo that can sink a battleship
@AstrusEminus
@AstrusEminus 2 жыл бұрын
@@eeiko321 I get what you mean but not really. You can't launch a torpedo from your shoulder, it gets a lot more expensive since you need to facilitate them.
@colincampbell767
@colincampbell767 2 жыл бұрын
However - the Trophy Active Protection Systems (APS) are currently being fielded (although much too slowly) to US armored fighting vehicles. This system not only shoots down incoming missiles - it also provides an aiming cue towards where the missile came from.
@jonmassey8124
@jonmassey8124 2 жыл бұрын
@@colincampbell767 yeah, tbh I thought that Russia would have reactive armour but going by the destruction rates they obviously don't.. not sure about the latest Armata as I'm sure they do BUT not seen a single one in Ukraine which implies Putin is fearful that they could be destroyed..🤔
@colincampbell767
@colincampbell767 2 жыл бұрын
@@jonmassey8124 They do have reactive armor. It's the brick like material on the tanks. And the plates bolted to the turret at odd angles. The problem is that the NLAW and Javelin are top attack missiles and hit the tank where the armor is thinnest. And reactive armor does not stop a HEAT warhead - it just reduces the amount of armor it can penetrate. Also the Javelin has a small precursor charge to detonate the reactive armor before the actual warhead hits it. The M1 series tank is quite frankly - something that should have been replaced 20 years ago. I suspect that the tank may be at the limits of what it's electrical system can power.
@slavarodu5062
@slavarodu5062 2 жыл бұрын
Looks like everyone here completely misses the point of cage armour. Its made to stop RPGs and other smaller munitions which does not include javelins. Thats because russians got a bloody nose in the chechen wars where chechens fired RPGs down the rooftops and since ukrainian army is equiped mostly with russian and soviet stuff they falsely thought that ukrainians will greet them with RPGs. Javelins were a BIG suprise for them.
@phishy261
@phishy261 2 жыл бұрын
The turret cages did not appear on their tanks in Ukraine until like two weeks into the invasion. xD Long after the whole world knew about thousands upon thousands of NLAWs and Javelins. Soo.. No.
@lex1945
@lex1945 2 жыл бұрын
These cages even don't protect you from rain. And even if it would do anything, the tandem warhead would still penetrate the tank and kill it.
@ligametis
@ligametis 2 жыл бұрын
They don't in particular have to protect from Javelin, they can protect from less advanced tandem missiles or shape charges. US also use cages on their vehicles.
@SonOfTheDawn515
@SonOfTheDawn515 2 жыл бұрын
@@ligametis for RPG protection, not for HEAT weapons which aren't as fielded by non-NATO entities.
@edwindelossantos29
@edwindelossantos29 2 жыл бұрын
Can't even Protect you from Molotov cocktails thrown on top of the building, Maybe tank cages are more applicable in Israel or the IDF Tank from Stone-throwing Palestinians, Lol!
@remydaitch9815
@remydaitch9815 2 жыл бұрын
Funny thing is much of the footage shows tanks without cages knocked out. Would love to see footage of caged tanks knocked out. Lots of heavily edited combat footage hard to draw conclusions.
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
well, maybe if tanks with cajes wasn't knocked out this is means they are worked as intendend.
@remydaitch9815
@remydaitch9815 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev Thank you Master of the Oblivious. Didn't I say that!?!?!?!?!?!
@raylast3873
@raylast3873 2 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Moran has pointed out we don‘t really know that the cages don‘t work and that at least from what evidence we have, all the tanks that got busted didn‘t have them. Though of course this could be due to other factors. Of course it could be just a psychological thing, but we‘ll have to wait and see until the history of this war gets written. Incidentally, it‘s not exactly a new thing for tankers to be DIYing non-standard extra armor for their vehicles.
@ansonang7810
@ansonang7810 2 жыл бұрын
I saw tanks in videos surviving hits. still operational from ambush. 1 tank keep moving trying to escape survive 3 hits 1 miss but burned then exploded on 5th hit. I guess charge they need to hit ammunition , crew or engine to stop the tank.
@alexanderr5682
@alexanderr5682 2 жыл бұрын
Ukrainians call the cage - brazier or barbecue grill
@zzodr
@zzodr 2 жыл бұрын
The only Cage that could stop a Javelin is Nicholas Cage.
@SUNDREDSTAR
@SUNDREDSTAR 2 жыл бұрын
These shopping trolleys they've duct taped on their tanks is no doubt the bleeding edge of Russian technology and ingenuity.
@sumitd500
@sumitd500 2 жыл бұрын
You wish
@wargame2play
@wargame2play 2 жыл бұрын
It’s there to “ improve “ the morale of the crew… doesn’t do a thing to protect them….
@stewartstewartstewart
@stewartstewartstewart 2 жыл бұрын
That is a mad voice over. Great video though!
@AlleNamenSindWeg
@AlleNamenSindWeg 2 жыл бұрын
You should check your terminology. They are called cope cages.
@Rafael-up2hp
@Rafael-up2hp 2 жыл бұрын
Cage is not designed to stop NLAW and Javelins. This kind of armour was made for older anti tank weapons like the old RPG-7 and is fairly effect against it. They were probably expecting enemies at high buildings using rpg's and firing in the top of the turret (just like in the second chechen war). Cages like these are more likely to disarm the heat charge in the rocket than really stop the incoming led jet from it. Good idea, bad application.
@josecolon2717
@josecolon2717 2 жыл бұрын
Ah yes, cage/spaced armor, a cheap way to deal with low tech HEAT and HE charges but does nothing to modern AT weapons. There is a reason modern tanks don’t use this stuff, outside of low tech war zones where the best AT you will face is an RPG or even a Panzerfaust from WW2. While technically you could make it out of stronger material, doing so would defeat the “cheap solution” aspect.
@trololoev
@trololoev 2 жыл бұрын
it worked against Javeline as well. Didn't work against nlaw, but nlaw can't pen turret even without cage.
@josecolon2717
@josecolon2717 2 жыл бұрын
@@trololoev the javelin can in fact bypass the cage regardless, because it’s too thin to set off the próx trigger, and it would take a lot of luck for it to be set off by it. Even when it is, it hits the engine compartment basically taking the tank out. NLAW work very well, what are you talking about, it basically invalidates these things having armor at all Edit: fucking troll… should have read the name
@hihi9674
@hihi9674 2 жыл бұрын
great video!! I have always wondered about those cages on top of the tanks. Subscribed!
@BeardofBeesPool
@BeardofBeesPool 2 жыл бұрын
3:14 that's just awesome
@Zolwiol
@Zolwiol 2 жыл бұрын
I really think we're seeing the Dusk of a tank as a main battle weapon and into the support role.
@viteslavjedlicka7138
@viteslavjedlicka7138 2 жыл бұрын
Hello , can with camera see homing infra laser beam ? thanks
@cesaravegah3787
@cesaravegah3787 2 жыл бұрын
Being an internet troll with no real military experience but able to read the estimated russian looses Idare to say that those makeshift defenses are not working that great. Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦
@DrDLightful
@DrDLightful 2 жыл бұрын
A cage would work ok against and RPG. Problem is even with a NLAW detonating high above the tank, if it penetrates down, the crew is probably dead anyways. Usually what kills the crew is either the oven effect or the blast concussion. Similarly with tank rounds... I've heard that if a Sabot from an M1 tank gets through the enemy armor, you can clean the dead crew out with a hose.
@torlil
@torlil 2 жыл бұрын
I'm only here for the mesmerizing accent of the VO.
@murraydupley9330
@murraydupley9330 2 жыл бұрын
Could the cages make the first charge go off higher above tank making it and 2nd charge alittle less effective?
@erikmansson7087
@erikmansson7087 2 жыл бұрын
Yes a little but the protection on the top is way to weak however
@herbertkeithmiller
@herbertkeithmiller 2 жыл бұрын
The way cage armor operates is not to explode a shaped charge but to deform the charge or short out the electrical current used to initiate it from the nose tip fuse. This causes the explosive to fail. What seems to be the purpose of the cage armor on the top of the tank is to keep RPG 7s from being fired at the top of tanks from buildings. The possibility is that it was installed with the Russians expecting to invade cities like Ukraine and fighters shooting down on them from the upper stories of buildings. It also is useful in defeating improvised explosives such as anti-armor grenades which have a smaller explosive from being dropped on to the week upper armor of the tanks. The ukrainians have a large number of these anti-armor explosives. The cage armor is ineffective against the javelin which isn't a shape charge but a forced formed penetrator. The explosion occurs well above the slat armor and the penetrator passes between or through it.
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
More like it disrupts the forming of a proper shaped-charge jet. And surely, you meant "countries like Ukraine", not "cities like Ukraine"? Or maybe cities *in* Ukraine...
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
And no, as far as I remember, NLAW uses EFP, not Javelin. Javelin has a typical tandem HEAT warhead without EFP.
@markjackson7467
@markjackson7467 2 жыл бұрын
Saying "COULD" is not an analysis - try presenting actual energy and timing details with experimental data
@Aeronaut1975
@Aeronaut1975 2 жыл бұрын
They may as well use cocktail umbrellas.
@graveperil2169
@graveperil2169 2 жыл бұрын
all its doing is putting more wear and tear on the gearbox leading to more disabled tanks
@joselimjoco3367
@joselimjoco3367 2 жыл бұрын
Putin's tanks are sitting ducks for the Javelins and at the rate they are getting destroyed, getting them replaced will be a difficult task for Putin's war machine.
@blackprimeminister
@blackprimeminister 2 жыл бұрын
There's a high sense of delusion amongst Kremlin-haters, about the true power of the Russian war machine. If they wanted to conduct a Shock & Awe campaign, they could wipe out the Ukrainian Army overnight, but also every civilian in the country. They are holding back. Don't be daft.
@thedudeabides2531
@thedudeabides2531 2 жыл бұрын
@@blackprimeminister If they get really pathetic and use nukes, sure. But their military is absolute crap. If they use nukes, they risk wwIII.
@blackprimeminister
@blackprimeminister 2 жыл бұрын
@@thedudeabides2531 When was the last time the Americans fought anybody with a pulse? You have no idea what the Russians are capable of.
@MikeBrown-go1pc
@MikeBrown-go1pc 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, they only have 10,000 tanks laying around for parts and/or ready to be refurbished and upgraded. I'm sure it will be nearly impossible!
@MikeBrown-go1pc
@MikeBrown-go1pc 2 жыл бұрын
@@blackprimeminister Are you saying the Taliban didn't have a fighting pulse? The Russians sure thought they did.
@jamesfox4261
@jamesfox4261 2 жыл бұрын
May I say it? MBT for now is past it’s time. It may come back, but for now it is too expensive and to easily knocked out with man portable weapons.
@MikeBrown-go1pc
@MikeBrown-go1pc 2 жыл бұрын
Couple things. 1. I'M betting tanks can shoot a lot farther than these weapons. 2. What better way do you have to move a 120mm gun around a battle field? I'll take the army with tanks, you take the one with no tanks. I'm going to have drones and recon look at this route with a fine tooth comb and they will see your rocket men sitting in the ditch. I would send some kind of "pre-force." Once you rocket men were located or engaged, I would have the tanks move to a range where they could hit your rocket men, but they couldn't hit the tanks. Certainly wOuld be no blitzkrieg, but that invasion tactic has to get old sometime.
@jamesfox4261
@jamesfox4261 2 жыл бұрын
@@MikeBrown-go1pc I agree with most of what your saying. With that in mind, right now the rocket men are wining and main battle tanks are ineffective. In some environments they are still valuable. That being said, a grunt is safer than an CVC in this fight it seems.
@sanfayyaad
@sanfayyaad 2 жыл бұрын
The infamous cope cage
@eane7238
@eane7238 2 жыл бұрын
HuRr DuRr cOpE CaGe🤓
@jjcoola998
@jjcoola998 2 жыл бұрын
The cope cage is just the funniest shit I’ve seen so far tank meme wise in this conflict. Don’t mind the neck beard above
@413.
@413. 2 жыл бұрын
@@jjcoola998 i saw a meme where someone put a trampoline on a Russian tank and showed how a missile would bounce off of it... Hilarious 😭😭😭😭
@williamlloyd3769
@williamlloyd3769 2 жыл бұрын
Nasty and effective weapons. Also Panzerfaust 3 and other anti amour systems are in the mix.
@EngineerReact.
@EngineerReact. 2 жыл бұрын
500k, Thanks for watching :) check out my other videos also!
@jaredcorser3372
@jaredcorser3372 2 жыл бұрын
U not stopping that hot projectile when it hits that cage is still going threw that turnt
@Ivan.Kovalenko
@Ivan.Kovalenko 2 жыл бұрын
0:38 1000mm?? Really?? 1 meter? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Expert!! 😅😅
@marianchicago4002
@marianchicago4002 2 жыл бұрын
Curious what countermeasures could be used against the 2 anti tank systems besides armor increases which would have to be addressed on the design and production side of things. I am talking soldiers on bases or on the Ukrainian front,
@chillywilly4126
@chillywilly4126 2 жыл бұрын
Does absolutely nothing to protect anyone in that tank.
@ravenmoon5111
@ravenmoon5111 2 жыл бұрын
The cage is a joke: it might as well be an umbrella ☔️
@danemyburgh
@danemyburgh 2 жыл бұрын
Imagine being inside the tank and then you see a NLAW fired at you from a distance... Evacuate now! Go go go!
@SonOfTheDawn515
@SonOfTheDawn515 2 жыл бұрын
Already too late. Just hope it was made on a Friday and doesn't work.
@chrisward4576
@chrisward4576 2 жыл бұрын
If you see it, it's already too late🤣🤣🤣
@duanemarshall1889
@duanemarshall1889 2 жыл бұрын
Thought it was carry the air around out of date rations
@williamthomas2278
@williamthomas2278 2 жыл бұрын
Those metal cages are built to trap the soldiers in the tank so they won't abandon their post when the missiles fly
@JeffBourke
@JeffBourke 2 жыл бұрын
Next they will try mounting beach umbrellas up too 😂
@thunderbear0
@thunderbear0 2 жыл бұрын
Thats a cage armor to protect tanks top side from RPG when in urban combat
@randallsanchez3161
@randallsanchez3161 2 жыл бұрын
NLAW is more effective against this the cage. The cage is called "slat armor" and we used it extensively in Iraq and Afganistan where it worked exceptionally well against regular RPG-7 including those using tandem warheads. The slat armor would often destroy the detonator or cause the explosive material to become segmented/cut making the primary charge either a full dud or much less powerful. The secondary charge would then come at a bad angle or sometimes not detonate at all. The NLAW will detonate above the slat armor and either miss the slats all together or hit one. I've yet to see a video of one hitting a caged tank or one that had ERA on the roof like the T-80. So far it's worked very well against regular T-72's which make up a large portion of the force. The biggest worry is that the NLAW may impact the cage from the side and potentially detonate early away from the roof or become a dud as the it's fuzed for top down not direct attack. Note that you don't get to choose unlike the Javelin. The Javelin is the wildcard here. The top attack mode which is the most common and effective could be affected by this. Tandem warheads are meant to destroy Explosive Reactive Armor (ERA). If the first explosive is detonated by the slat armor then the primary main charge will be effected by ERA and possibly fail. Again, most of the tanks have been T-72s with no top ERA. I would love to see some videos of the slat armor failing.
@getsideways7257
@getsideways7257 2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, not sure how people seem to miss this, but it's just vertical slat armor that mostly meant to disrupt the first shaped charge that hits it or detonate it prematurely (depending on where the slats will come into contact with it). NLAW shoots an explosively formed penetrator - that thing couldn't care less about slats, since it comes down at the speeds of a sabot round, easily mangling any slats, tank wheels, sandbags or whatever additional useless weight there is on the roof. ERA could be effective to fend it off, but the whole geometry of the impact is not sloped enough in such a case, and what's worse - the "thickness" (more like thinness) of the armor behind it doesn't really leave the tank much chance anyway, as the video poster mentioned too. And speaking of Javelin, I'm pretty sure the main shaped charge is powerful enough to take out both the ERA behind the slats and the turret top armor itself after that.
@archibald4222
@archibald4222 2 жыл бұрын
sides of a T-80/T-72/T-90 are not 400mm they are like 80-100mm thick
@EnigmaG
@EnigmaG 2 жыл бұрын
I wonnder what happens if you put a layer of ERA on top of the case and another layer of ERA under the case above the tank, will this be enough to defend against javelin?
@Malsum
@Malsum 2 жыл бұрын
I'd say this is more an attempt to boost the Russian soldiers morale. Either that or the Russian engineers are completely clueless to the workings of NLAW, or Robot 57 as we call it here in Sweden. The shaped charge will blast right through a little cage like that, and today I saw a clip from one of our military strategists where he literally laughed at the idea that this will make a difference.😁 ...on the contrary this will make it worse. Russian tanks have a low profile, and adding a freaking tower on them will only make them easier to spot, as well as make them harder to get out of once they are blown up.
@Wallyworld30
@Wallyworld30 2 жыл бұрын
That "Cope Cage" on the Russian Tanks is less useful than American Shermans tying wooden logs on their tanks for extra protection in WW2. The "Cope Cage" is like giving someone a fake Parachute Pac that's afraid to fly. The Generals are telling their men these will protect you otherwise they will refuse to go into danger zone.
@comentedonakeyboard
@comentedonakeyboard 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if ERA tiles would improve the (under)performance of the cage?
@giulio3758
@giulio3758 2 жыл бұрын
Javelin 🇺🇸🇺🇸 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 👋😎 🇮🇹
@chriswalker7555
@chriswalker7555 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for collecting those films. I've now got a better idea of how those missiles fly :)
@Minedeployder
@Minedeployder 2 жыл бұрын
I like how everyone complains about nlaw and javelin, but it is not weapon used by Ukraine. Whics rockets post soviet country has in actual use? Lots of rpgs or couple of nlaws?
@mm-yt8sf
@mm-yt8sf 2 жыл бұрын
ranier wolfcastle: "the goggles do nothing!"
@leszekalbin4097
@leszekalbin4097 2 жыл бұрын
A great weapon for Russian scrap!👍🏻
@Master-AGN
@Master-AGN 2 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of US tanks in France in ‘45.
@j.i1503
@j.i1503 2 жыл бұрын
Hy bro, which instrumental or music did you use that's in the video? I really like the sound.
@GboiGabe
@GboiGabe 2 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mNyRoZmU3pmpmmg.html
@jerga2002
@jerga2002 Жыл бұрын
The best option for home defense
@sierraecho884
@sierraecho884 2 жыл бұрын
The cage is for older RPG´s and Mortar to apox. 100mm
@MrAnders9000
@MrAnders9000 2 жыл бұрын
Is the commentator having a stroke?
@peters972
@peters972 2 жыл бұрын
Creepy music! Thanks
@willisdaddy6100
@willisdaddy6100 2 жыл бұрын
Might that cage be to catch the turret?
@KekusMagnus
@KekusMagnus 2 жыл бұрын
The cope cage isn't designed to protect against either of these, it's meant for RPG-7s fired from rooftops, which Russian tanks greatly struggled with in the past. The single shaped charge of the NLAW will have its penetration greatly reduced if it hits the cage since it will act as space armour, but probably not enough to stop it from penetrating the thin roof armor. Javelins on the other hand will fuck up any tank, the explosion alone is enough to blow the roof off, and it has a tandem charge on top of that
@someboi4535
@someboi4535 2 жыл бұрын
It was mainly inspired by drone attacks in the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan
NLAW - The birth of a tank killer
7:06
Saab
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
The Clever Way to Count Tanks - Numberphile
16:45
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 901 М.
Kind Waiter's Gesture to Homeless Boy #shorts
00:32
I migliori trucchetti di Fabiosa
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Fast and Furious: New Zealand 🚗
00:29
How Ridiculous
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
SCHOOLBOY. Последняя часть🤓
00:15
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
小宇宙竟然尿裤子!#小丑#家庭#搞笑
00:26
家庭搞笑日记
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
When A Gang Leader Confronted Muhammad Ali
11:43
Boxing After Dark
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Our life in Russia under sanctions | Prices in the shopping mall, Q&A
27:59
Eli from Russia
Рет қаралды 2,8 МЛН
Javelin Missile | How a Javelin Missile works
5:44
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 3 МЛН
Making uranium glass
30:03
NileRed
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Craziest Soviet Machines You Won't Believe Exist - Part 1
26:09
BE AMAZED
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Why are Russian tanks lighter and smaller than the western tanks
3:38
Military TV
Рет қаралды 4,5 МЛН
TAB Episode 43: QF 2pdr Anti-Tank Gun
17:59
The Armourer's Bench
Рет қаралды 36 М.
Why Protecting Tanks is Getting Much More Difficult
12:36
Not What You Think
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Kind Waiter's Gesture to Homeless Boy #shorts
00:32
I migliori trucchetti di Fabiosa
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН