Tank Chats #47 King Tiger | The Tank Museum

  Рет қаралды 2,826,468

The Tank Museum

The Tank Museum

6 жыл бұрын

Tank Chats playlist • Tank Chats from The Ta... *Buy Tiger Day Premium tickets and see the Tiger up close* tankmuseum.org/whats-on/event... Known variously as the Tiger Ausf. B, Tiger II or Königstiger (the British also referred to it as the `Royal Tiger’), 489 Tiger IIs, were produced at the Henschel assembly plant, between January 1944 and March 1945. However, despite lacking in numbers, and being prone to mechanical and mobility issues based on its size and weight, the Tiger IIs combination of devastating firepower, and thick sloped armour plate, made it a formidable adversary.
SUBSCRIBE to The Tank Museum KZfaq channel: ► / @thetankmuseum
Support the work of The Tank Museum on Patreon: ► / tankmuseum
Or donate tankmuseum.org/support-us/donate
Visit The Tank Museum SHOP: ►tankmuseumshop.org/
Press the little bell above to enable NOTIFICATIONS so you don’t miss the latest Tank Museum videos.
Follow The Tank Museum on FACEBOOK: ► / tankmuseum
Follow The TIGER Tank Collection on FACEBOOK
: ► / tigertankcollection
Twitter: ► / tankmuseum
Tiger Tank Blog: ► blog.tiger-tank.com/
Tank 100 First World War Centenary Blog: ► tank100.com/ #tankmuseum #tanks #tigertank tiger tanks #tankchats The Tank Museum E-Newsletter sign-up: mailchi.mp/e6fae2ac8bee/newsl...

Пікірлер: 3 800
@kyle857
@kyle857 6 жыл бұрын
They say on a moonless night in Germany, when it gets real quiet... You can still hear Porsche asking if anyone wants to use his petrol-electric drive.
@PanzerBuyer
@PanzerBuyer 6 жыл бұрын
Looking forward to the Maus chat.
@miskakopperoinen8408
@miskakopperoinen8408 6 жыл бұрын
That one you'll be waiting for a long time. The only surviving Maus (Of a grand total of 2 hulls and 1 turret built), is not at Bovington. It's sitting in Kubinka tank museum a while away from Moscow in Russia. As the Maus is not in driving condition, moving it would be quite bothersome.
@VRichardsn
@VRichardsn 6 жыл бұрын
Jokes aside, many buses in Europe use the system.
@larascasse9264
@larascasse9264 6 жыл бұрын
F1 cars use hybrid technology with the ERS (Energy Recovery System). Porsche is concidering a role as engine supplier to F1 in 2021.
@kyle857
@kyle857 6 жыл бұрын
Richardsen No copper shortage these days.
@cmkwan59
@cmkwan59 5 жыл бұрын
Can't deny it, siting there dead still for years, the King Tiger still looks like a solid mighty deadly beast!
@dwightehowell8179
@dwightehowell8179 4 жыл бұрын
@@insomniacbritgaming1632 The Pershing was about as good with many of the same faults. The Russians were building a heavy tank as well.
@johnmcdonald9304
@johnmcdonald9304 4 жыл бұрын
cmkwan59. Yeah. The bloody thing looks like it wants to kill you.
@Bobobo-bo-bo-bobobo
@Bobobo-bo-bo-bobobo 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, until the transmission breaks
@ChrisCorson
@ChrisCorson 4 жыл бұрын
@@Bobobo-bo-bo-bobobo just like their cars nowadays. Nothing has changed.
@longinusc
@longinusc 4 жыл бұрын
@@dwightehowell8179 Although the Tiger II was more heavily armored, both tanks were quite similar in performance.
@toontech
@toontech Жыл бұрын
My father was a motarman, landed in France right after The Battle of the Bulge. Fought all the way to Austria. One time, as a kid (in the 70s) I built a model of the King Tiger. I was very proud of it (with a small diorama). When my dad came home from work, he took a look at it and groaned. Said, "King Tiger". I asked if he came across any. He answered, "Yes. But I wasn't enjoying the encounter at the moment.". What our fathers went through.....
@dinkelheit88
@dinkelheit88 4 ай бұрын
He probably thought it was a king tiger. Most gi saw a tractor and thought it was a tiger lmao
@memorimusic420
@memorimusic420 3 ай бұрын
Bruh absolutely not​@@dinkelheit88
@adamw4245
@adamw4245 3 күн бұрын
@@dinkelheit88yeah definitely a tank that doesn’t move
@duanesmith5074
@duanesmith5074 Жыл бұрын
My Uncle Bill was a Hellcat tank destroyer Commander. He landed D-Day + 1 and spent 259 days in combat. Imagine what it was like to face one of those incredible German tanks. I know he did it and apparently he did it pretty damn well because he live to his 90s. Thanks Uncle Bill
@MrZenzio
@MrZenzio 6 жыл бұрын
They may have been overly expensive, but dear lord were they beautiful.
@FilipGereg
@FilipGereg 6 жыл бұрын
And deadly. Don't forget what they are actually made to do. To kill other humans as effectively as possible, which is kinda retarded of us.
@GeorgiaBoy1961
@GeorgiaBoy1961 6 жыл бұрын
Even today, almost seventy-five years after they were first produced, the King Tiger is still a fearsome sight and impressive tank. I've seen one up close in person - and they are awe-inspiring.
@FilipGereg
@FilipGereg 6 жыл бұрын
I would really like to see one in person.
@GeorgiaBoy1961
@GeorgiaBoy1961 6 жыл бұрын
Filip, where do you live? If Europe is closer, Bovington Tank Museum in the U.K. has one. If the U.S. is closer, the Patton Museum at Ft. Knox, Kentucky is probably your best bet - or possibly the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland. Maybe some other readers can help with other museum sites to recommend as well. Good luck.
@FilipGereg
@FilipGereg 6 жыл бұрын
I'm from Serbia. Southeastern Europe. There is also one in Belgium. I guess that's the closest one to me. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lZ-Bg9uBqZ2XZ6s.html this is it in case you haven't seen it.
@Hammern28
@Hammern28 4 жыл бұрын
German tanks, Tiger II, Panther and such, had their issues, but by the gods, they still put fear into ones mind. Not to mention the sexy looks.
@Hammern28
@Hammern28 3 жыл бұрын
@Bres Do you mean... the King Tiger, or are you here to spread the word of religion? And I think you mean... knee, not knew.
@Hammern28
@Hammern28 3 жыл бұрын
@Bres :)
@hubsi5263
@hubsi5263 3 жыл бұрын
right and about 1200 Tigers and 400 Kingtigers fought nearly 2,5 years with success against 80.000 enemy Tanks.
@Hammern28
@Hammern28 3 жыл бұрын
@@hubsi5263 Yep!
@ConcordDown
@ConcordDown 3 жыл бұрын
I wish it faced is-2 or is-3.
@riseld4
@riseld4 5 жыл бұрын
For those that are curious, taking into account inflation, the Königstiger tank would cost the equivalent of $4.5 million in 2019
@paskovalokki6589
@paskovalokki6589 4 жыл бұрын
Suprisingly enough thats less than a leopard 2a6 or m1a2 which cost 5.74 million (2a6) and 6.21 million dollars (m1a2). All those electronics must be pretty expensive.
@riseld4
@riseld4 4 жыл бұрын
@@paskovalokki6589 True, but you do get a lot more bang for your buck with these modern tanks
@rachmandikalucky2775
@rachmandikalucky2775 4 жыл бұрын
geez that's really damn expensive even for the germans
@mathewkanapilly796
@mathewkanapilly796 4 жыл бұрын
Paskova Lokki it’s mostly the depleted uranium shells and armor that are very costly in the m1a2
@ant-onemusic444
@ant-onemusic444 4 жыл бұрын
@@riseld4 if you take into account the efficiency gained, I don't know, can a "cheap" t54 take out an Abrams if used properly?
@thisdoesnotsuck5540
@thisdoesnotsuck5540 3 жыл бұрын
I love how they completely re-designed the gun and made two turrets, also debating on two types of hulls, and no one bothered to put the time and energy to make a more powerful engine, lol.
@T1mbrW0lf
@T1mbrW0lf 3 жыл бұрын
The problem wasn't "design a better engine" - the issue was the needed materials, manpower, and production capacity simply weren't available without negative impact on production of existing engines already in short supply. Same problem for the DB601 and Jumo 004 aircraft power.
@psychohist
@psychohist 3 жыл бұрын
@@T1mbrW0lf Most of the weight of the King Tiger was armor, not engine; I doubt materials for a bigger engine were limiting with regard to heavy tanks.
@Howdy762
@Howdy762 2 жыл бұрын
@@psychohist r/woosh
@acceptablecasualty5319
@acceptablecasualty5319 2 жыл бұрын
An engine is a complex beast. One can always add more armor, but you can't add "more engine".
@thisdoesnotsuck5540
@thisdoesnotsuck5540 2 жыл бұрын
@@acceptablecasualty5319 And I do understand that caveat. But my point here is that years of effort went into this vehicle with multiple prototypes of various sizes and complexity with hundreds of engineers and researches and laborer's, with most of that effort seemingly going into what are essentially un-important design details such as turret shape and bickering over the length of gun, track width etc. When it should have been obvious, especially given previous vehicle design failures over the course of the war that the transmission and engine were obvious fail points of their inventory at the time, and that maybe instead of spending time improving parts that are already overly sufficient for the type of war they are fighting, they should focus on engine development if they really wanted to go through with these massive tanks. But this I think highlights the seemingly obvious problem. Germany understands that they don't have the resources to fight an attritional war with several super powers, so they focus on larger more qualitative types of vehicles to offset the numbers of vehicles the allies have, but in doing so means they need large amounts of resources to fund these types of programs and stay ahead of their enemy. Leading to a lack of infrastructure for very important development in things like engines/transmission/differentials etc. and making a huge mess of the supply chain, hence why the allies avoided this type of production in the first place ultimately winning the war.
@Sturminfantrist
@Sturminfantrist 4 жыл бұрын
"you can make 9 sherman Tanks for the Price of one Tiger II" or 8 late war Bf 109s or 16 early Modell 109s, the times when planes were cheaper then Tanks are long gone now
@sleepyrasta14820
@sleepyrasta14820 4 жыл бұрын
ghgg no different from what the USA does right now
@Sturminfantrist
@Sturminfantrist 4 жыл бұрын
@Andy Blue Under good conditions like a long Range engagement in open Terrain yes
@romainandrieux5948
@romainandrieux5948 3 жыл бұрын
@ghgg not really, since you can compare the price of a Mauser rifle, Stug III, King Tiger etc. So Yes, a King Tiger was worth 8 late 109, 2 Tiger I etc.
@anfruitwhocantx
@anfruitwhocantx 3 жыл бұрын
Andy Blue not really, if each say every 4th sherman was a 76, then thats 7 75’s and 2 76’s, they could easily ambush and destroy the tiger by barraging with HE or even AP on the aides.
@alchemist6819
@alchemist6819 3 жыл бұрын
@Andy Blue you are so wrong bud, 3 Sherman tanks with limited experienced crews can take out a king tiger with experienced crew.
@VirginiaRican
@VirginiaRican 6 жыл бұрын
How to take out a King Tiger: step 1, take out the fuel trucks, step 2, wait.
@skullofhell1662
@skullofhell1662 6 жыл бұрын
Vincent Loparo III I acree because the tiger 2 drinks just to much fuel
@tiedeman39
@tiedeman39 6 жыл бұрын
Yes, that's the joke.
@skullofhell1662
@skullofhell1662 6 жыл бұрын
It's clear to me that you don't know much the tiger 2 did drink the fuel tanks of in totaal 860 liters (227 gallons ) give it max range of 110-120 km (68-75miles ) on road an 80 km (50 miles) cross-country so hire,s your answer
@tiedeman39
@tiedeman39 6 жыл бұрын
skull of HELL there's
@skullofhell1662
@skullofhell1662 6 жыл бұрын
Jawul wats los
@duggiebader1798
@duggiebader1798 5 жыл бұрын
Imagine the moment when a Sherman crew saw one of these appearing round a corner or through a building.
@drachenoger7635
@drachenoger7635 4 жыл бұрын
according to teeboos nowadays, no german tank realy ever moved because breakdown. Also Shermans are the best tanks at least some teeboos say that...allied vets,who called their trashca....ahm tanks coffins for 5, got an other opinion back then it seems, but hey lets rewrite the history right?
@william3791
@william3791 4 жыл бұрын
imagine being a foot soldier seeing that thing waltzing through the city...and you don't have any anti tank gun...
@TheIfifi
@TheIfifi 4 жыл бұрын
@@drachenoger7635 its only right to rewrite history when its revealed that the initial understanding was flawed. Damn wehrboo....
@bubbasbigblast8563
@bubbasbigblast8563 4 жыл бұрын
@@drachenoger7635 The same tank crews kept insisting the tanks they came across were Tigers, when they were almost always Panthers (Shermans were confirmed to have fought a Tiger I once in all of the European theater, and the Shermans won.) They also could have used the 1000 upgunned, uparmored Shermans waiting in Britain for Normandy, but the tankers didn't want them because it made the supply lines tricker and hey, the basic Sherman worked fine right? Then they got there and whined about not having the better tank. Just because they were there doesn't mean their opinions are right.
@poisonousteapot2394
@poisonousteapot2394 4 жыл бұрын
@@bubbasbigblast8563 the reason why we didn't hear any horror stories about allies tank from surviving German crew is because there isn't any, German tank has a habit of trapping it's crew when the armour gets penetrated and the tank start burning, German tank is even more of a death trap than Sherman is.
@baz6128
@baz6128 4 жыл бұрын
Visisted the Tank Museum yesterday and these monsters did not disappoint. They are massive.
@GermanyTrainSpotting
@GermanyTrainSpotting Жыл бұрын
And the jagdtiger
@drsnugglezwtf550
@drsnugglezwtf550 5 жыл бұрын
the look of german stuff in ww2 was just amazing ... everyting looked good . tanks plans weapons uniforms pistols Granades optics troop carryers helmets . just epic
@davidstarr3566
@davidstarr3566 3 жыл бұрын
Yeah they had Hugo Boss design the Uniforms...
@drsnugglezwtf550
@drsnugglezwtf550 3 жыл бұрын
@@davidstarr3566 yes
@sotis1756
@sotis1756 3 жыл бұрын
@@davidstarr3566 and some 1000++ other brands lol
@ralfraths3619
@ralfraths3619 3 жыл бұрын
@@davidstarr3566 No, they did not: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/edFxitaTyZuamWg.html
@sotis1756
@sotis1756 2 жыл бұрын
@@okayboomer3292 gonna have to strongly disagree with that Statement
@jacobs.9797
@jacobs.9797 3 жыл бұрын
"You could've made 9 Sherman tanks for the price of 1 King Tiger tank." *Well there's your problem.*
@emancoy
@emancoy 3 жыл бұрын
The cost of Adolf Hitler's vanity project
@themollusc
@themollusc 3 жыл бұрын
That's why Shermans were crap 😄
@emancoy
@emancoy 3 жыл бұрын
@@themollusc i read somewhere where a single tiger took out a 10 Sherman tanks.
@haraldhimmel5687
@haraldhimmel5687 3 жыл бұрын
@@emancoy A single Tiger once also took out close to 30 T-34. Problem probably wasn't so much the Tiger itself but continuing to produce bigger and pricier tanks.
@majungasaurusaaaa
@majungasaurusaaaa 3 жыл бұрын
@@emancoy But you can't be everywhere. They'd just bypass, wreak havoc on softer targets and destroy you with other weapon systems which they had plenty of.
@josharnold3450
@josharnold3450 2 жыл бұрын
You’re an excellent presenter. I have to do a lot of presentations for work and I’m really impressed at how clearly you manage to communicate a lot of interesting information
@TheBob3759
@TheBob3759 Жыл бұрын
He is.
@Trupp42
@Trupp42 4 ай бұрын
I'm in agreement as well.
@Assassine0606
@Assassine0606 3 жыл бұрын
I´ve been to the museum several times, and the King Tiger is always awe inspiring. Even me, beeing a little larger at 1,85m, feel so small next to it. Wether or not it was a good or practical tank, it is a massive beast.
@trycoldman2358
@trycoldman2358 6 жыл бұрын
4 words that'll make you cry *HANS THE TRANSMISSION BROKE*
@spamuraigranatabru1149
@spamuraigranatabru1149 6 жыл бұрын
I'm holding back tears, this comment is so powerful!
@lucasart328
@lucasart328 6 жыл бұрын
amen
@soundofeighthooves
@soundofeighthooves 6 жыл бұрын
the german tank crews spoke english ?
@rurushu8094
@rurushu8094 6 жыл бұрын
trycoldman23 *ze
@mushroomcloud1
@mushroomcloud1 6 жыл бұрын
Better than Hans, wir stehen in Flammen.
@darson100
@darson100 6 жыл бұрын
The economics angle was just getting interesting when it was cut off. Please have more of this as it's a fascinating area to look at,
@RaeSyngKane
@RaeSyngKane 6 жыл бұрын
While it's not necessarily exclusive to economics, the_chieftain (Nicholas Moran) makes a pretty compelling argument that the Sherman was the best war winning vehicle by using economics, reliability, and versatility. His talk lasts a while but here it is if you want to check it out: www.c-span.org/video/?433629-2/design-history-m4-sherman-tank-world-war-ii
@colinkelly5420
@colinkelly5420 6 жыл бұрын
This is probably one of the better economic lecture on WWII. About 30 minutes but worth it to watch to see why different countries had different production numbers and what their production philosophy was. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hJyof7CGzszGqIU.htmlm20s
@Shelmerdine745
@Shelmerdine745 6 жыл бұрын
Good luck trying to stop the Allies on both fronts with Sherman tanks.
@RaeSyngKane
@RaeSyngKane 6 жыл бұрын
Well it didn't work with any of the German tanks so I feel like they would've been willing to give it a try
@andy4an
@andy4an 6 жыл бұрын
how much did a T-34 cost to make?
@Shepard_AU
@Shepard_AU 5 жыл бұрын
Looking at the ''damage'' done to the Tiger at 11:46, the soldiers that took the shot were lucky that the tank was abandon.
@masterapeman8986
@masterapeman8986 5 жыл бұрын
I'm a cat person and that big beautiful cat is gorgeous!
@notalemon2899
@notalemon2899 2 жыл бұрын
Sir there are tigers in the French museum of war, you gonna rob it or what?
@sirbachelorboredmen1314
@sirbachelorboredmen1314 2 жыл бұрын
@@notalemon2899 you applying all cat person is that obsessed with cat?
@jasbaklinski
@jasbaklinski 6 жыл бұрын
I don't think he moves his feet once.
@alexanderneumann6587
@alexanderneumann6587 4 жыл бұрын
or those hips
@JohnSmith-qv6hp
@JohnSmith-qv6hp 4 жыл бұрын
@@alexanderneumann6587 yes typical Venutian behaviour watching and waiting.for the right time to make his move
@topwargear
@topwargear 3 жыл бұрын
The tank has him scared to move! :)
@Alex-xd9gw
@Alex-xd9gw 3 жыл бұрын
he doesn't walk, HE LEVITATES
@jasonscott8844
@jasonscott8844 3 жыл бұрын
It is a little known fact that he has tracks for feet. So he pulled up beside the big cat and put his parking break on.
@BullshitMan
@BullshitMan 6 жыл бұрын
Can't get enough of these tank chats. I love the detail involved, but always hungry for more. Might be be nice to have all your experts involved in an extended round-table chat/panel or lecture going into all the nitty-gritty details in far too much detail? Just a thought/suggestion!
@abramsatwo2515
@abramsatwo2515 6 жыл бұрын
Hands down thee best "Tank Chat" yet !! WELL DONE !
@lavrentivs9891
@lavrentivs9891 6 жыл бұрын
Check out "Think Tank" on The Chieftain's channel =)
@Hybris51129
@Hybris51129 6 жыл бұрын
That said the masses wouldn't say no to another "Think Tank" session with or without WoT backing.
@freddie1444
@freddie1444 6 жыл бұрын
yes yes yes :)
@marshja56
@marshja56 4 жыл бұрын
In the old board game Panzer Blitz we loved this tank. They were represented by a counter that had a very powerful gun and thick armor. We were always excited to use Tiger 2's in a game. But somehow they were usually a bit disappointing. Their slow speed meant it was difficult to get them involved in a maneuvering fight. They were often late to the party or simply left behind. And you never had very many of the things. (Actually in most scenarios you didn't have any of them.) Those two aspects, slow and few, meant that this powerful tank rarely dominated. Although the game wasn't very realistic you did get a sense of how "slow and few" were fundamental limitations for the Tiger 2.
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle 11 ай бұрын
Avalon Hill ruled the 70s !
@alexanderfox-robinson4910
@alexanderfox-robinson4910 7 ай бұрын
It might seem strange but I found exactly the same problem in Company of Heroes 2. The Tiger 2 is so slow and often gets ganged up on quite effectively by more maneuverable enemies. But it is a very cool tank.
@yevrahhipstar3902
@yevrahhipstar3902 3 жыл бұрын
The most tanky tank that ever tanked. Aesthetically the best tank ever made.
@dustyroads834
@dustyroads834 5 жыл бұрын
I just learned more about this tank in ten minutes than I have in the last ten years. I could listen to this man all day.
@neocortex2157
@neocortex2157 6 жыл бұрын
This tank is beautiful. A true masterpiece of engineering.
@johnbrinsmead3316
@johnbrinsmead3316 4 жыл бұрын
until something broke.
@gingerbaker1785
@gingerbaker1785 4 жыл бұрын
@@johnbrinsmead3316 That doesn't mean for a second it was a bad tank they had such a deadline to create a "better" tank and they did it the engines were very underpowered for the weight of the tank they had upgraded transmissions and engine parts but only the best tank commanders could have access to them. This tank was scary it could knock a Sherman out with one shell from 2000 yards and it usually wasn't that far. So it could easily destroy anything the allies had. I don't glorify natzis but the Germans made such an impressive machine for the time too big maybe, but powerful and effective non the less in the right situations.
@sulate1
@sulate1 4 жыл бұрын
@@gingerbaker1785 It was a good tank if you were a Captain, it was a bad tank if you were a General. Too unreliable and expensive to maintain, too difficult to move strategically, too much fuel to consume. Overall too expensive.
@drachenoger7635
@drachenoger7635 4 жыл бұрын
@@johnbrinsmead3316 jealous teeboo ?
@johnbrinsmead3316
@johnbrinsmead3316 4 жыл бұрын
@@gingerbaker1785 look, you'll totally rule the lesser allied tanks in world of tanks with one of these bad boys, but as others have mentioned these tanks are logistics nightmare. the common fate seems to have been either breaking down or running out of fuel. they certainly didn't stem the tide on either front.
@garrisonnichols807
@garrisonnichols807 2 жыл бұрын
Such a beautiful beast of a tank. Definitely something I would feel confident fighting in.
@hsf3644
@hsf3644 5 жыл бұрын
Man, this is good looking tank, I love tanks that have angularity. This has to be my all time favorite tank.
@ricardosoto5770
@ricardosoto5770 5 жыл бұрын
A sexy beast.
@NeyoSteel
@NeyoSteel 6 жыл бұрын
I'll never get tired of tank chats and my favourite beard guy David Willey!
@blue2sco
@blue2sco 6 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher?
@NeyoSteel
@NeyoSteel 6 жыл бұрын
Ian Davidson Nope, David is the other guy
@nerdzy8454
@nerdzy8454 6 жыл бұрын
He is David Willey. It's underneath Tank Chats in the intro.
@Escylon
@Escylon 6 жыл бұрын
@Ian Davidson: David Fletcher MBE
@builder396
@builder396 6 жыл бұрын
Cant find his name? Jesus, his name was put up in the video in the first minute or so.
@ibizenco
@ibizenco 5 жыл бұрын
At the village of La Gleize (in Belgium) is an original King Tiger that the Germans abandoned, when their Ardennes offensive failed. It has a few big, impressive "dents" at the front. I visited it earlier in the summer. A monster.
@HellStr82
@HellStr82 Жыл бұрын
Yes...saw it. There is also a small museum there. Amazing experience
@johnreed3638
@johnreed3638 3 жыл бұрын
My Dad drove Sherman’s during the war and he always said it was like shooting peas at a Tiger. Despite the Tigers shortcomings it and the Panther was by far the best Tanks of the war.
@emilbt7588
@emilbt7588 3 жыл бұрын
Tigerphobia
@qwerty30013
@qwerty30013 3 жыл бұрын
There’s more to a tank than 1v1
@EnigmaEnginseer
@EnigmaEnginseer 3 жыл бұрын
The Panther and Tiger series broke down all the time, what’s the point of a tank if it can’t get to where it needs to be most of the time
@uni4rm
@uni4rm 2 жыл бұрын
Weird because Shermans with the longer 76 could and did knock out the first Tigers, although they were extremely rare and most people never saw one. The offensive during the Bulge effectively ended when they all ran out of gas. Shermans completely wiped the floor with Panthers as they were so poorly crewed.
@michaeltroster9059
@michaeltroster9059 2 жыл бұрын
They were engineering disasters. The interleaved wheel system was a disaster in snow and mud. They were very difficult to service in the field. Breakdowns were frequent and in the winter the mice and rats got into the works and ate the coveting off the wiring rendering them useless.and they consumed massive amounts of fuel which the Krauts were short on.
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs
@TheIronArmenianakaGIHaigs 6 жыл бұрын
Thicc Kitty cat
@maciek19882
@maciek19882 6 жыл бұрын
Yeeeeeess
@maxsrbczv
@maxsrbczv 6 жыл бұрын
Best kind of kitty cat
@Uncle_Spam
@Uncle_Spam 6 жыл бұрын
An absolute unit
@ScipionLaurentiend
@ScipionLaurentiend 6 жыл бұрын
thiccc with 3 c's
@l.a.xgunner
@l.a.xgunner 6 жыл бұрын
*THICC*
@danam2584
@danam2584 6 жыл бұрын
I just discovered these tank chats this week. I can't stop watching!! I love Both Dave Fletcher and David Willey!!
@beasheerhan4482
@beasheerhan4482 5 жыл бұрын
"5 words that'll make any Allied tanker cry..." 'Jimmie, there's a Kingtiger comin'...'
@TheSaturnV
@TheSaturnV 4 жыл бұрын
5 more terror-inducing words: "Hans, ist das ein Thunderbolt?"
@jinglejangle3287
@jinglejangle3287 4 жыл бұрын
@@TheSaturnV allied tank didn't scare anyone
@ElectableDane
@ElectableDane 4 жыл бұрын
Jingle Jangle lol who cares? Allied air superiority would’ve taken care of these tanks with ease
@jinglejangle3287
@jinglejangle3287 4 жыл бұрын
@@ElectableDane not everything it seems...
@Tamburahk
@Tamburahk 3 жыл бұрын
@@TheSaturnV kill claims from Typhon and Thunderbolts are overexagurated by pilots them self.............. 1.st no accuracy 2. it would have to be DIRECT hit to ROOF of turret 3. pilot barely knew difference between Tiger to Panzer IV ............ 4. Pilots claming tank kill even when the tank was not even hit, they just saw smoke, or something and they claimed kill, german tank crews were taught to stay inside the tank during air strike because there was only a little chance that rocket would destroy tank
@KMac329
@KMac329 Жыл бұрын
I watch these Tank Chats again and again. This is one of my favorites.
@francishung6935
@francishung6935 6 жыл бұрын
The long awaited king tiger. thank you for the video!
@ingaz6565
@ingaz6565 6 жыл бұрын
The most feared tank of WW2, so much so that the allies estimated there where 300+ king tigers on the western front when in fact German records show about 130-140 King tigers on the western front. One German general remarked how just the sight of a single King Tiger could lift the moral of an entire German infantry division, as these tanks had an aurora of invincibility around them. Thankfully the Germans, late in the war could not produce enough of them and even when a respectable number of them where put together, fuel shortages forced many of them to be abandoned by their crew. A little fact, Kurt Knispel was a German tank ace during World War II, notable for his 168 confirmed tank kills, making him the most successful fighter in armored warfare. In one engagement against Russian armored forces he counted over 30 hits on his King Tiger tank, none of which penetrated.
@ohmyshou1der
@ohmyshou1der 6 жыл бұрын
invisibility mhmm
@ingaz6565
@ingaz6565 6 жыл бұрын
Lol, thanks for pointing it out.
@GeorgiaBoy1961
@GeorgiaBoy1961 6 жыл бұрын
Re: "In one engagement against Russian armored forces he counted over 30 hits on his King Tiger tank, none of which penetrated." If memory serves, Otto Carius, another one of Germany's greatest panzer aces, had a similar experience in a Tiger I - in one engagement against the Soviet army, more than one-hundred hits from various caliber/type of guns were scored on his tank, without any of them penetrating or otherwise severely damaging his tank or harming his crew. Carius remarked on what a feeling of security and safety such a tough tank gave them.
@drott150
@drott150 6 жыл бұрын
Not sure I'm buying the claim that he really experienced 30 hits from bonafide anti-tank weapons. Maybe small arms fire, sure. And even if none of them penetrated, there's still the concussive effects inside to the crew. At the very least, Knispel and his crew would have been stone cold deaf. And I believe they'd have bigger problems than mere deafness.
@ingaz6565
@ingaz6565 6 жыл бұрын
No, he counted 30 tank round hitting his tank. There are actually several of these stories, specially those who faced shermans as the sherman could not penetrate a tiger 2 head on.
@StuSaville
@StuSaville 5 жыл бұрын
Never noticed before that the gun is offset, now I can't un-notice it...
@ZETH_27
@ZETH_27 3 жыл бұрын
Just to bug you, the turret of the Panther is off-set too, and not only that, the gun is off-set relative to the turret to put it on the centre-line of the hull.
@psychohist
@psychohist 3 жыл бұрын
@@ZETH_27 I built scale models of both these as a kid and never noticed. Now I hate you because I can't go back and check my long lost models.
@ericamborsky3230
@ericamborsky3230 3 жыл бұрын
The turret on either the Panzer III or Panzer IV (I can't remember which one) is also slightly offset.
@ZETH_27
@ZETH_27 3 жыл бұрын
@@ericamborsky3230 Think it's the Pz.IV. It's so that the engine and the drive shaft can function properly.
@donfrandsen7778
@donfrandsen7778 4 жыл бұрын
What a beast, fascinating machine!! Thank you , looking forward to more videos . Cheers !!
@donfelipe7510
@donfelipe7510 6 жыл бұрын
It cost as much to build as nine Sherman tanks but under the right conditions with a skilled crew this thing might have knocked out nine Shermans before they ever got near enough to cause it harm. Fortunately German tanks in 1944-45 rarely got that chance due to allied air supremacy, lack of fuel, spare parts and capable crews. I've been to the Tank Museum Bovington and stood next to this thing, I really wouldn't want to see an angry one coming at me!
@crplsteve
@crplsteve 5 жыл бұрын
But then you got the caveat that most of the crew from those nine Shermans would still be alive where as the tiger 2 had a far lower crew survival rate. meaning that when that tiger is brought to unfavourable combat your probably gonna loose most of your experienced tankers.
@patricklewis9662
@patricklewis9662 5 жыл бұрын
While i agree the tiger 2 can probably take out 9 Shermans, especially if they are armed with the 75mm gun. However you can’t support an infantry company with one Tiger 2; you can however with 9 Shermans.
@Iberny3
@Iberny3 5 жыл бұрын
Hell, the Tiger 2 where never meant to support infantry. On the contrary, it was meant to support the tanks supporting the infantry from long range.
@davidbriggs6218
@davidbriggs6218 5 жыл бұрын
I'm sure the Koingstiger is intended as a breakthrough vehicle. It's gun may be effective at longer range than contempories of it's day - But the intension of the Tiger series is a breakthrough vehicle much like the Panzer IV was in the initial blitzkrieg doctrine. So I do agree with Patrick above, a single Koingstiger is limited in it's ability to support an entire infantry unit moving, a squad perhaps is effective - like in the footage of the Ardennes offensive however ironic that the Koingstiger's main flaw was tied to that of the entire Ardennes failure: *fuel*. That being said, the concept of having a vehicle with superior firepower, more than necessary protection to defeat incoming rounds - though the mobility lacking - That's something all the allies took after the war into the MBT concept. The King Tiger is effectively the modern MBT but without mobility or fuel supply reliability, and as mentioned - the air superiority and *Artillery* superiority of the enemy (More guns than the Wehrmacht - not whether individual howitzer models were superior to another) - The King Tiger was successful at localised offensives/defences - nothing more than delaying the enemy - they could not change the inevitable - collapsing front lines, with lost vehicles abandoned or destroyed by own crews. Of course I'm an armchair enthusiast like others - I'll happily step back to recognised historians whom can confidently reference material to reinforce their statements as I have provided none. :)
@Iberny3
@Iberny3 5 жыл бұрын
David Briggs i dont think so man, you can look at german doctrine. Tigers where really adamant on providing fire support from range.
@matthiasm9591
@matthiasm9591 6 жыл бұрын
As a german I didn't even know that it is incorrect to call it Porsche turret and Henschel turret. I learned something new. And all native english speakers say Porsch instead of Porsche, dont be bothered by it.
@ElvenMans
@ElvenMans 6 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't be so bothered about it, if it wasn't in an educational style of video.
@PaulZink
@PaulZink 6 жыл бұрын
Except owners of Porsche cars, who are usually very finicky about saying "Porsch-uh" as two syllables.
@thof8287
@thof8287 5 жыл бұрын
It's annoying that English speakers cannot learn how to or intelligent enough to pronounce other language words correctly! I grew up in the USA but from a German community and it's annoying listening to them mispronounce German names my family names etc. Einfach idioten!
@wolf222555
@wolf222555 5 жыл бұрын
@@thof8287 then u can IMAGINE how annoying it is to hear ( some) Americans mangle the English language! And as my brother in law is German i can assure you( as a teacher of English) that HE also makes many mistakes! However i respect ANYONE attempting to learn another language and English is not easy for them. Perhaps you might consider adopting this same attitude? PS: he HAS however greatly improved my ability to swear in German! :-)
@IronMan-qi3yg
@IronMan-qi3yg 5 жыл бұрын
@@thof8287 I wouldn't worry mate Americans butchered the English language. E.g. aluminum...
@leonzakharyan9220
@leonzakharyan9220 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for providing great videos! It is really interesting to watch and listen about the good, old tank's. History shall be learned, not changed.
@sebuteo
@sebuteo 5 жыл бұрын
What a superb tank chat. Loved it. And learned a lot. Brilliant!
@gunner678
@gunner678 5 жыл бұрын
I remember visiting the museum as a young gunner officer on attachment to Bovington BGT many years ago...it was amazing even then!
@sdcoinshooter
@sdcoinshooter 3 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine, being a US Tanker in your Sherman, and around the corner appears this 70-Ton Monster. It would be like trying to stand and fight man versus Godzilla.
@siko9799
@siko9799 3 жыл бұрын
good thing there were like 400 of them, and alot suffered mechanical issues too
@kenoliver8913
@kenoliver8913 3 жыл бұрын
You would know, though, that you had at least 20 or 30 Shermans floating around nearby for every Tiger2 at the front (just getting the Tiger2 to the front was a major problem - it broke bridges). Plus you could quickly call in some CAS from the taxi rank to take it out. Plus your stabilised gun could aim and fire far quicker than the Tiger. Plus if needed you could run away quicker than it could follow. And if all else failed you could count on the beast breaking down before you did.
@sotis1756
@sotis1756 3 жыл бұрын
@@kenoliver8913 well all that, but if the tiger would’ve landed that one shot the other options wouldn’t be a thing
@nickdanger3802
@nickdanger3802 2 жыл бұрын
489 built according to Wackipedia. 49,000 M4's built.
@siko9799
@siko9799 2 жыл бұрын
@@nickdanger3802king tigers were in the eastern and western front, so what ken oliver said isn’t too far fetched
@kampfgruppepeiper501
@kampfgruppepeiper501 3 жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the great lighting on the Konigstiger, perfect for screen shots!!
@damuses1452
@damuses1452 3 жыл бұрын
This was well done. Thank you "The Tank Museum".
@TheFreaker86
@TheFreaker86 6 жыл бұрын
Thank you David Willey for this greatly informative and enjoyable lesson! :-)
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 6 жыл бұрын
A really gripping tank chat - lots of information and keeps being interesting. :)
@mikesmith-wk7vy
@mikesmith-wk7vy 4 жыл бұрын
I love thier deep research into that tank that’s what makes history so interesting is unraveling the facts that surround the stories great vid
@pleasestopalready
@pleasestopalready Жыл бұрын
I can only imagine how loud it would be inside the turret when that gun fired.
@Acid4Blood
@Acid4Blood 5 жыл бұрын
I love the non biased presentation
@thefantasyreview8709
@thefantasyreview8709 3 жыл бұрын
No King Tiger was ever penetrated through the front armour, for the entire war. Not one. That's pretty incredible. Used in the right way, with support, they were seriously formidable
@MyName-pc7bk
@MyName-pc7bk 3 жыл бұрын
They were unstoppable and thank god these came out a day late and a dollar short because it could have changed history without a doubt.
@ryanj610
@ryanj610 3 жыл бұрын
They barely saw combat. Heck, even the Tiger I barely saw combat on the Western Front. They would have been devastating in the right battles with better crews and air cover. As was, they were essentially thrown away in desperation.
@thefantasyreview8709
@thefantasyreview8709 3 жыл бұрын
@@ryanj610 Tiger 1 saw lots of combat, even in North Africa, just not against the allied forces after D Day. Tiger IIs did see a fair bit of combat (though they suffered from breakdowns) - its detailed here: tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/panzer-vi_konigstiger.php
@sulate1
@sulate1 3 жыл бұрын
You don’t necessarily need to penetrate the armor to take it out. The Kinetic shock of a large round can cause havoc in the crew compartment. And tracks etc can be vulnerable to smaller caliber rounds. They were formidable defensive weapons but strategically they were disastrous.
@sulate1
@sulate1 3 жыл бұрын
@@MyName-pc7bk They would never have changed history because Germany did not have oil to fuel them and use them strategically in a war of manoeuvre.
@danilosiragusa63
@danilosiragusa63 3 жыл бұрын
I could listen at you for hours Sir 👍 looking forward to visit the museum
@mikaelandersson1288
@mikaelandersson1288 Жыл бұрын
If this tank had been produced in england it would be herald as the best tank ever.
@axelmilan4292
@axelmilan4292 6 жыл бұрын
Love this tank. It just radiates raw power.
@alstokesveteranfilmmaker913
@alstokesveteranfilmmaker913 5 жыл бұрын
And killed people - which is what gets conviniently forgotten, of course, in these 'history' conversations. Meanwhile banging on about British mispronounciation of overseas trade names. How dare we?! Easily, we're just not very good at it. I worked in Germany in the 1970s, knew very little of the language and discovered if I listened carefully it was possible to pick up local pronounciation of common trade names (our industries used the same equipment). I don't remember people being so uptight about whether we knew their language perfectly or not, just that we got on with the job. And had fun. Modern Europeans I notice these days get so worked up about accurate use of language now. The only thing I got upset about in the 70s were young Germans who insisted on using English so they could improve their language skills. Of well, back to the elegant lethal tanks.
@ricardosoto5770
@ricardosoto5770 5 жыл бұрын
Yes it does.
@chepa1767
@chepa1767 4 жыл бұрын
It's RAW
@HellStr82
@HellStr82 Жыл бұрын
@@alstokesveteranfilmmaker913 "and killed people" Oh you mean like that Crime against humanity the British did at Dresden?
@outdoorexploration4854
@outdoorexploration4854 5 жыл бұрын
What an absolute UNIT
@Lore_Thunder
@Lore_Thunder Жыл бұрын
I have seen the Tiger II V2 and i was stunned by the size of it, Truly amazing!
@cavdragoon
@cavdragoon 3 жыл бұрын
Greatest tank museum in the world. Thank you for the outstanding information
@crownprincesebastianjohano7069
@crownprincesebastianjohano7069 3 жыл бұрын
Saw a King Tiger at the Patton Museum when I was stationed there for Armor Officer Basic Course. It makes our modern takes look small. And it has some serious frontal armor. That Tiger had the minor pock marks that the Shermans managed, slight depressions in the armor and nothing more.
@ChaosPootato
@ChaosPootato 6 жыл бұрын
Screw the production turret, the original one had angry eyebrows over the optics, which made it objectively better
@spud4ever290
@spud4ever290 5 жыл бұрын
Thank you , sir ! Very nice breakdown of the King Tigers !
@KMac329
@KMac329 Жыл бұрын
Always one of my favorite Tank Chats. I learn something new every time I view and listen to it (and this applies to all of them). (There is a lot to absorb.) I recently saw a collection of photos of WWII Fallschirmjaeger. One identified them as on and behind the rear (stern?) of a King Tiger in the Ardennes during the Rundstadt Offensive. How to know it was a King Tiger? The most obvious feature of the vehicle was the exhaust pipes. (I suppose an intelligence analysis could identify the tank using much less.) I went to the Tank Chats video and sure enough there was a photo of the rear (stern?) of a King Tiger. You guys at Bovington are so helpful for us piker WWII "historians" in this regard. Thank you very much, all of you!
@rurushu8094
@rurushu8094 6 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see a tank chats on the StuG III and T-34
@user-pr3iy7no5v
@user-pr3iy7no5v 6 жыл бұрын
Indeed
@Adagamante
@Adagamante 6 жыл бұрын
YES! I'm a sucker for turretless assault guns/tank destroyers.
@cesjuggler9322
@cesjuggler9322 6 жыл бұрын
Cheek The Breek qAQi1@Qqa1ŷggny55
@killerkoala1918
@killerkoala1918 6 жыл бұрын
Please the t34!! One of my favorite tanks!
@PaulZink
@PaulZink 6 жыл бұрын
I'm sure such chats may be in the works.
@HellStr82
@HellStr82 Жыл бұрын
I saw one ... there is a Village in Belgium called La Gleize where one of these monsters was left there by the Germans. It's still there to this day. I have pictures standing next to this monster and could not believe how huge it was. And beautyfull at the same time
@dougscrivens4002
@dougscrivens4002 2 жыл бұрын
My Dad drove Churchill in WW2.Regiment Cap badge says "fear nought", he often said "you see a Tiger or Panzer coming your way you fear for your life".
@heymanchan9007
@heymanchan9007 5 жыл бұрын
The design concept in these WWII Tank is good to look at and review
@BulletsandButtons
@BulletsandButtons 3 жыл бұрын
I just found this channel. Thank you for clarifying the turret misnomer. Very informative and well presented. Thanks again!
@Paciat
@Paciat 6 жыл бұрын
- Does it even run? - Its just a small design flaw. :D
@peervermeiren8902
@peervermeiren8902 3 жыл бұрын
A very good tank chat with good conclusions and lessons learnt to modern days.
@liamnotleum170
@liamnotleum170 Жыл бұрын
I seen the tiger II today at your museum, I honestly couldn’t believe how huge this tank was in person.
@darbz2k
@darbz2k 3 жыл бұрын
Loving these chats, please keep them coming
@StewartNicolasBILLYCONNOLLY
@StewartNicolasBILLYCONNOLLY 4 жыл бұрын
Imagine an experienced crew being told that this is your new tank....
@notalemon2899
@notalemon2899 2 жыл бұрын
“Wait how do I work this new tank?”
@sirbachelorboredmen1314
@sirbachelorboredmen1314 2 жыл бұрын
I rather being in Panther for practical purposes
@ocharni
@ocharni 2 жыл бұрын
i'd imagine given the rarity of these things they wouldnt assign a green crew to them but rather put the few experienced ones they have left in there.
@nitroexpress2438
@nitroexpress2438 6 жыл бұрын
Wow! this guy talks with no notes and no pauses on and on. impressive.
@LesWalker2023
@LesWalker2023 5 ай бұрын
Still my favorite tank! Learned some interesting stuff from this video! Thanks for the concise and informative program! What a tank!
@clanmcwoodgaming5083
@clanmcwoodgaming5083 2 жыл бұрын
This is literally the only channel i never skip ads for haha
@wannahuckaloogy5
@wannahuckaloogy5 2 жыл бұрын
I would take a flight across the Atlantic just to go visit this tank museum
@multipl3
@multipl3 Жыл бұрын
Just been for the first time and I only live 2 hours down the road!
@infantryattacks
@infantryattacks 2 ай бұрын
Brilliant presentation. I enjoyed how you integrated the history of this tank with present times.
@BrianWMay
@BrianWMay 2 жыл бұрын
Brilliant presentation, thank you.
@Alte.Kameraden
@Alte.Kameraden 6 жыл бұрын
13:09 OMG it's a Decepticon! (look at the forward tank driving down the street)
@cringothebot276
@cringothebot276 6 жыл бұрын
*Erika begins playing*
@alexandrebriard9175
@alexandrebriard9175 6 жыл бұрын
*Panzerlied intensifies*
@martinroner5688
@martinroner5688 5 жыл бұрын
fellow GuP fans? :D i gotta say, Erwin takes the cake, Stug life. but the best scene was Miho and Maho cooperating to take down the centurion
@Valorhammer
@Valorhammer 5 жыл бұрын
UND DAS HEIßE! EEEERIKA!
@connor9856
@connor9856 5 жыл бұрын
Martin Rößner fellow man of culture
@TheNostorian
@TheNostorian 4 жыл бұрын
Boem boem boem.... ERICA!!
@friscokid66
@friscokid66 4 жыл бұрын
Can't say how it rides, but that thing looks so incredibly beautiful.
@exact1044
@exact1044 5 жыл бұрын
Terrific commentary and information, thank you
@miroBGgsi
@miroBGgsi 4 жыл бұрын
Nobody: Wargaming: Is this tank made of paper ?
@nickryan6787
@nickryan6787 4 жыл бұрын
Thank god the armour is buffed in wot blitz
@killerriot22
@killerriot22 4 жыл бұрын
@@nickryan6787 it's played and modeled correctly 1:1 armor and firepower wise in War Thunder.... but their (Gaijin's) way of gameplay balance facing this beast is up-teir. So you almost always face cold war-era armor. Because nothing else is feasible from long/medium and even shorter distances.
@DragLProductions
@DragLProductions 4 жыл бұрын
It's buffed next patch tho
@nickryan6787
@nickryan6787 4 жыл бұрын
@@killerriot22 no I mean that Tiger II's armour is so crappy in wot blitz (before update 6.7) and it is still crappy wot. So I don't think that it would be balanced if Tiger II is given to fight to the cold war era armour. It would be more feasible if you said that the Tiger II is given to fight with other tanks weaker tanks from WW2 with its crappy armory. This would eliminates the option to buff the armour. You statement is the opposite?
@RedAssassin274
@RedAssassin274 3 жыл бұрын
@@killerriot22 unless you're 6.3 US or below lol
@ItsAGorillaStudios
@ItsAGorillaStudios 6 жыл бұрын
13:09 I think the British Armed Forces need to sweep for Decepticon infiltration
@Alte.Kameraden
@Alte.Kameraden 6 жыл бұрын
made me laugh. I noticed it as well.
@Haunted_milk
@Haunted_milk 5 жыл бұрын
yep
@allgood6760
@allgood6760 Жыл бұрын
Awesome mate!... my Dad was deafened by a Tiger 2.. thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
@kerryfoster1
@kerryfoster1 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Can't wait to visit again. Not been there for over 20 years. ☺
@karlheerwagen2972
@karlheerwagen2972 5 жыл бұрын
Well i remember changing the wikipedia article because it says "Porscheturret" and "Henschelturret" and then they reset it... Yeah dear Wikipedia hobby historians i dont think so...
@westonharby165
@westonharby165 4 жыл бұрын
It's correct now
@sskuk1095
@sskuk1095 3 жыл бұрын
"You could build nine Sherman tanks for the cost of one Tiger 2" I'd still take the Tiger!
@majungasaurusaaaa
@majungasaurusaaaa 3 жыл бұрын
And then have the rest of 8 of them bypass you, fall into your rear, encircle your forces while you're trying to chase that 1.
@MrPancake777
@MrPancake777 3 жыл бұрын
For looks sure. But for practicality I’d take the 9 Shermans any day.
@marcinmisiek768
@marcinmisiek768 3 жыл бұрын
1 Tiger II in a museum is cooler than 9 shermans in a museum. Asides from that, we know that numbers ultimately matter in war. I think in the Stug III video Stugs used to cost ~80,000 Reichmarks, meaning you could make about 10 stugs (well, probably less as the price of a late war stug like everything else increased) for the cost of a Tiger II, and we know which tank performed better for cost.
@davogeorge4525
@davogeorge4525 3 жыл бұрын
@@majungasaurusaaaa I didn't know tank battles happened at 20 meters
@majungasaurusaaaa
@majungasaurusaaaa 3 жыл бұрын
@@davogeorge4525 They could at did. There was one incident of a Greyhound armored car destroying a King Tiger with its 37mm at roughly that range.
@robertascii5498
@robertascii5498 4 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video. Thanks!
@inclusivemodeldesigns16
@inclusivemodeldesigns16 5 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait to get this build started!
@HerbertAckermans
@HerbertAckermans 5 жыл бұрын
Right, lets point out the errors in this overview of history: 1: Discussions of putting an 8,8 cm Flak 41 (L/71) gun in a turret began as early as 21 June 1941 2: There was NO competition between Henschel and Porsche for the Tiger contract. Both companies had contracts for 100 Tiger tanks, but, Porsche's design failed with their engine design of the Typ 100 gasoline engines. The whole petrol-electric drive system was NOT the problem. 3: Porsche was asked to work with Krupp towards a Tiger with a long gun, because simply, they were not involved with Tiger production at the time, due to their contracts for 100 Tiger having been canceled. Henschel had presented a design, little more than a Tiger Ausf. E with sloping armor, VK 4502(H), which was quickly rejected. Porsche's design, in essence, was exactly the same approach, take the VK 4501(P) design, slap on sloping armour and mount the new turret with the longer 88 mm gun. 4: The roadwheels were first identical to those as used on the Tiger Ausf. E, rubber rimmed, with 4 wheels per axle. It wasn't until homologation with the Panther II was demanded that the new steel wheels, designed for the Panther II, had to be incorporated into Henschel's design. 5: the whole "copper shortage" myth is just that, a myth, based on nothing. The Panzerjäger Tiger (P) used the exact same petrol-electric drive as designed by Porsche, only the Porsche Typ 101 engines were replaced by Maybach HL 120 ones, nothing else was changed. The copper shortage was NOT an issue. Even the Maus would use large quantities of copper and be still under development at this time. There is no base for the claim copper shortage was an issue here. The reason Porsche VK 45.02(P) design was rejected was again their unreliable petrol engines. 6: Regarding Tiger Ausf. B Fgst. Nr. V2, the Tank Museum is so lucky to have that one there, they took out the engine and shoe-horned it into Tiger Ausf. E 131.... 7: Kudos for the attention to the whole turret by Porsche and/or Henschel myth 8: Shot trap was not a reason for the redesign of the turret. The simple reason for redesigning the turret was economical. The original design was too complicated, including bend armour at the front and turret side (for the cupola), which resulted in a number of front plates cracking during bending. 9: First unit to receive the Tiger Ausf. B is s.Pz.Kp. 316 (Fkl) a unit that would be using the Tiger Ausf. B to radio-control demolition vehicles, such as the Borgward B IV. 10: Monetary cost of a Tiger Ausf. B needs to be offset to what it could do on the battlefield. Even during the last fighting in Berlin, the Tiger Ausf. B proved itself to be an outstanding tank, with several instances where single Tiger Ausf. B were capable of fending off attacks by multiple T-34 as well as IS tanks and their infantry, while still remaining in operational condition afterward. If one were to look up the experience of Karl-Heinz Turk, his experience using even his immobilized Tiger Ausf. B at the Potsdammer Platz to repell multiple Russian attacks attests to the value the Tiger Ausf. B signifies.
@Orcawhale1
@Orcawhale1 Жыл бұрын
Source?
@dirkbonesteel
@dirkbonesteel 6 жыл бұрын
Love the long format. Miss cranky guy but wonderful video
@MrDgwphotos
@MrDgwphotos 6 жыл бұрын
I suspect this is outside of David Fletcher's expertise. He seems to focus mostly on the WW2 British tanks and other allied tanks.
@theotv5522
@theotv5522 3 жыл бұрын
"I told mama we'll be seeing elephants, tigers, panthers. She thought I was visting Moscow zoo"
@neilholmes8200
@neilholmes8200 2 жыл бұрын
I love how they built a tank that was able to take out tanks at huge distances... And then sent them into battle against lightly armed paratroopers in the narrow streets around Oosterbeek and Elst where a few were knocked out by spring loaded, hand held, anti tank weapons.
@johnbrennan8611
@johnbrennan8611 2 жыл бұрын
6:50 I had always heard they asked to have the turret redesigned because the area at the front of the turret under the main gun acted like a shell trap, where when you hit it because it was rounded it would deflect the shell into the top of the chassis.
@originunknown3209
@originunknown3209 3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant presentation!!!! Very informative thankyou!
@michaelthelen4840
@michaelthelen4840 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent documentation with facts I did not know!
@LordGeorgeRodney
@LordGeorgeRodney 6 жыл бұрын
Uh. My day has started well - a new tank chat vid!
@markelalagoz8481
@markelalagoz8481 6 жыл бұрын
Admiral George Rodney bcdchx
@tando6266
@tando6266 4 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in the Shop " Not bad paint job, Ill show him a not bad paint job, I spent 2 bloody weeks just sourcing the green, and there he goes............." Great work lads.
Tank Chats #77 Jagdtiger | The Tank Museum
21:23
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
See Inside King Tiger | Tank Chats Reloaded
21:38
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
Help Herobrine Escape From Spike
00:28
Garri Creative
Рет қаралды 56 МЛН
Спаси её волосы🙏🏻
00:40
БРУНО
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН
Tank Chats #41 Sherman Firefly | The Tank Museum
8:32
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 828 М.
Radical or Ridiculous? | T-14 Armata | Tank Chats #171
20:00
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: Panther. Part 1
14:57
World of Tanks - Official Channel
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Wittmann's Tiger Rampage | Villers-Bocage, June 1944
17:54
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 170 М.
1 Tiger Tank vs 50 T-34s - A True Story
5:04
Mark Felton Productions
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
The King Tiger Really Suffers :(
16:51
Spookston
Рет қаралды 615 М.
Tank Chats #106 | Panzer IV | The Tank Museum
26:59
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
See Inside Panther | Tank Chats Reloaded
21:53
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 379 М.
Inside The Chieftain's Hatch: Panther II
22:21
World of Tanks - Official Channel
Рет қаралды 543 М.
Evolution of The  Churchill Tank | "No Damn Good"?
24:11
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 360 М.