They don't know where the paintings are and they can't say who stole them, but the case is solved. Great work guys.

Great show though and he makes good point on the way we view this crime. Time for a change on that for sure-I'm with him there.

owner orchestrates the 3rd party theft of their painting..painting goes missing, the media and people start talking about it.. painting becomes more famous (just like Mona Lisa)....after a few years the painting triples in value, painting later shows up, owner becomes alot wealthier.. ... the end.. if you ask the owner nicely they'll let you see it :p

el que se las robo despues de 30 anos las pinturas pueden ser para el que las robo la ley declara loop

I must say this presenter annoys me a bit when speaking to the police or FBI. Clearly knowing who did the crime, when they can no longer be done for it, does not mean that you automatically can get the works back. If they play all their cards they may never get to recover the works. They have to watch and wait till they are sure they have the current location and it would be madness to reveal the info till then. One can say a crime is "solved" if one knows all but the current location of the art. From a investigation stand point, solving a crime means know the how the what and the who but does not also have to include the current location of the goods. Clearly they are watching to see if this will also come out.

The orchestrator of this most heinous of thefts, had better remain anonymous for his own good, think about it! everywhere he goe's he'll be getting smashed over the head with old ladie handbags, slapped by "just" the kind of women he thought such an act would make him attractive too, punched in the face on site by blokes like Me, and spat at by usually polite cultured vagrants.