Good choice!

yeah I got fit into T100 by my swing coach and I said no lol went t200 4i-PW and then added a t100 PW bent to 48*. I love them. It feels like I'm cheating, they go so far and are so forgiving.

Any concerns with the backplate falling off?

Correct!

yeah.. i just bought a set and i went 5- gap instead the strong lofts are such an annoying way to make it seem like the iron goes further

@@40Mprxdigyyeah that’s what they all do now. They want these crazy distance claims, but in reality every club is playing atleast down 1. The new qi irons have a 28 degree 7 iron. 20 years ago that was in between a 5 and 6 iron. I’d love to compare a traditional 7 iron like 34 degrees to one of these new 7 irons and see the difference in launch and landing angle as well as height. If the numbers are roughly the same then sure call it a 7, but if all the numbers line up with a traditional 6 iron, than it’s a bunch of marketing bs

@@40Mprxdigy Yes and no. There's more to it than that...with the low CG your should be getting higher launch, higher peak height and better landing angle. That was the biggest thing for me. But on top of that, you're hitting a club that is shorter in length for every distance...which should give you a small measure of better control.

@@atamagashock The new stronger lofted irons - by in large stick to the same club length as traditional sets. So yes 8 is the old 7 - but you're getting the distance out of a club that is shorter which should give you at least a little bit more control. With the tungsten weighting providing both forgiveness and moving the CG down - you get more consistent distance, as well as higher launch and peak height numbers. I went into the T200's out of a traditionally lofted set of Mizuno JPX 921 Tours. It's early days, but so far my numbers are so much better with the T200's.

It's such a personal thing...enjoy those 790's they're great clubs. I found that the T200's performed much better for me than the P790 when i did my fitting session. And I went with the T200's.

very well put. they're both great irons, it really is a personal thing.

They’re both good options

Get a fitting with both - try the Mizuno Pro 245 as well....there's some others in the mix too - Srixon ZX5....certainly others as well. A fitting will try a few shaft options with each to try and get you into the best launch conditions.

Get a fitting I was looking at pings but decided to try them all ended up with t200 for my swing it was the best

@@motive7475 I did and ended up getting Mizuno pro 243

100%!

The goal of golf is to shoot the lowest score - not how a club feels when you hit it right on the screws. 99% of golfers don't find the sweet spot on a blade often enough in a round to make that feeling of flushing a blade override the fact that they're shooting in the 90's or 100's. I was playing a set of Mizuno JPX 921 Tour irons - they aren't blades, but they are a forged player's iron. The difference in feeling when I middle one of those to one of my T200's is very small.... there's a difference, but it isn't worth giving up better launch conditions and more consistent distance control on off center hits since I'm not one of these guys that has a wear pattern the size of a quarter in the middle of the clubface.

A bit, you’re right. But not compared to other HB irons I’ve tested. Think titleist is more of a unicorn iron in that regard

Slightly. T200 feels even more so

quite a lot of clubs now have a screw or something of sorts in the clubhead