I might be mistaken, but as I recall, old stem cells have limited viability. Do your own research.

I have an idea to fix the heart problem. But the only way I see it is by combining mechanical parts from the heart and combine them with stem cells muscles that can mimic heart muscles. And if that is possible, we may replace dead hearts for good with artificial parts combined with stem cells muscles that will be grown on those mechanical parts that will only serve as a cage for stem cells muscles.

No need to thank them they are paid more than enough for their jobs. Sitting on millions by ripping poor patients

definitivly interesting but since most hart patients are already pretty old, long term effects are not as important

I could be mistaken, but I believe that the needed stem cells that have the most impact for regenerative use must be Embryonic stem cells; the Christian Right have the legal HOLD on the use of fetal stem cells. Please do your own research to determine current status.

@@bellakrinkle9381That’s not why!

You are correct. However, many complex and severe diseases are both genetic and environmental. In essence, they are multi-factorial. Recent advances and research shows that both genetic and preventative medicine is equally responsible, so it is illogical to conclude that this will only benefit very few people. Examples of complex diseases are diabetes and cancer. While preventative medicine is a strongly supported case with lots of evidence, something that should be emphasized with great importance, the genetic and cellular factors are the other side of the coin. Together, you need both to effectively diagnose, treat, and prevent heart disease. For patients who are genetically healthy, if environmental factors prompt them to have increased risk in heart disease, then therapies alluded to by Dr. Murray will come into play. However, if patients are observed to have genetic dispositions that are associated with greater risk of heart disease, then preventative medicine (such as eating healthy and getting proper exercise) is not fully sufficient. However, gene therapy (replacing bad genetic markers associated with disease with the healthy genetic components) is on the rise. By knowing the genetics of what makes heart disease greater in risk, we are able to treat it so that preventive medicine may be fully effective--and thus, truly preventative. His contributions are not only an example of innovative and pioneering work on understanding and translating biomedical science, but also helping us fulfill the other side of the coin that is necessary for truly combating heart disease.

Tim N thanks for your response! The story the doctor shared about his mother summarized her life as a “healthy” woman who was active and full of life. Then one day, she had an event that in essence signaled the beginning of the end of her life. She had no knowledge of her CAC score. He doesn’t describe what dietary practices that she followed that was the precursor of the event. I thinks it’s awesome that his research developed a technology that can help many people after a cardiac event. My point of emphasis is that let’s provide the body with what it needs and then see how long it can sustain vibrance, productivity and longevity. We already know there’s a pandemic occurrence of diabetes not only in this country but around the world. Whether it’s insulin resistance, pre-diabetes or type II, people are addicted to refined carbs. The health of the individual begins to breakdown from there. There is too much scientific evidence now in the main stream that contradicts the guidelines of nutrition outlined in the early 90’s. Cause and effect or more accurately......action and result. If interested and aren’t already familiar, Jeffrey Dach has a ton of great info on prevention and reversal of heart disease.

That's an odd comment. Good for you

Scar tissue are dead tissues so they will be digested by furiously growing stem cells

That is an interesting question.

Tom Renegade feminist's videos. Tell me more

You didn't understand the process. We can today take any cell from the body and reprogram it to return it to a stem cell state

Black Vito - Moneyology & Philosophy they cant make you more creative so that you dont name yourself black vito

@@sandrovtg3521 Does that make you feel better? I hope it does. My Positivety can't be weaken by insults😊..

Black Vito - Moneyology & Philosophy hey man i dont say insults for self esteem. I just thought it was funny. Ok bye

Actually by XXII century I believe that should be doable.

While that may be true, what do you propose?

How would you do it?

It's benefiting science. Because of things like that, somebody in your family might just live if they have a serious illness.

DET

Unless you're the first human test subject, for whom it will probably be free. And if it actually works it stands a chance of becoming more affordable over time. Like 400000 😁

Phil Urbaniak more like 450000😀

You want cheap medical treatments? Vote for people who support government funded research in universities, university hospitals and research institutes. When discoveries are funded by private capital don't be surprised by capitalists milking the market.

And your life is worth how much to you?

Andrew Jones it's not about worth, it's about how much can you afford

Probably, nowadays most of the stem cells are taken from placentas left from new births.

Would you choose not to be treated if they said they would need to get the cells from embryos?

As I understand it, stem cells are derived from fertilized eggs, in which the cells have not yet differentiated. They're generally leftovers from in vitro fertilization, and would be discarded if not used this way. The donors must give permission for their fertilized eggs to be used, rather than destroyed.

With new meat

Al Green

did you even watch it? he's been working on this for ~20 years

I guess it was me...who was first to click but bad network..😁😁

Came in here wondering how long it'd take for one of these. Not that long, apparently... :/

Matt Gallagher why anything wrong with it ?

@@MattGallagherComposer hello matt

Religion has been a barrier to scientific work for centuries. We are seeing the dying of religion and a society that has embraced science.

Yeah well, in the meantime...sign me up for this treatment! lol

Now that makes sense! Thanks, Majd

That's only in your case... That was too easy 😄

the brain has neuroplasticity

@@sadiaahmed6115 in your case, emphasis on "plastic"...

@@YooTooobJeff The damaged axons still form new pathways whereas heart muscles do not have a mechanism to recover.

@@sadiaahmed6115 that's because, in the large scheme of things, when your heart's done, you're done... Nothing is supposed to go out before the heart...