It would be better to make a decisive leap into the AGI to help those people in need.

“AI that learns after deployment” 😳

Don’t believe the hype. Most of the “progress” that is being reported is marketing and the real practically applicable projects are few and far between.

​@@dekev7503wrong. while there is hype, there is plenty of scientific evidence showing the advanced capabilities of ai and how far it can go in a short while. this is not like anything we've seen before

🤞

She went over the demo with locating an object in differently environments though. Either way, this is a short Ted talk and cannot be faulted for not covering every detail

How are you going to entrust the future of our species to anyone that doesn't look happy? She had the conviction of someone reading from a script. English isn't her first language but still, it was bad.

Lol. Lets be real. No one besides a few people knows about her in Romania.

I think only people who helped her to achieve her goals can say that.

Revolutionary Work. TY D.R.

Revolutionary Visionary Daniela Rus I thank you.

@stephanieellison7834 word yo

Russia likes all this, too… 😳

What about this terrifies you?

@@SecretEyeSpot what could this be… hm… can t think of anything

My mind is blown as well. I'm reevaluating my career priorities.

@@SecretEyeSpot the potential for misuse

My wife Eve is perfect

Rus is comparing apples to oranges, taking some cheap shots at systems like ChatGPT. Her system isn't better; it's better for specific tasks. If a robot is taking a philosophy class, having a more efficient understanding of the physical world won't be much help. But maybe this approach can inspire improvements in natural language processing. Who knows.

I, Robot* iRobot is a vacuum maker.

Irobot combined with ghost in the shell with the new cybernetics coming out from nuralink

Maybe you get a n offer to be uploaded to the digital world so you can live forever and just discard your body all together?

Very true

I’m sure the majority of people will understand that robots arent as advanced yet to think exactly the way a human can. More understanding less anger

Don't anthropomorphize machines...

​@@XxZeldaxXXxLinkxXyou do realize that ingl group/out group bias is the main cause behind many... many wars ect throughout human history Don't you?

​@@XxZeldaxXXxLinkxXI thought about this occurring, the possibility A world ending one, I "solved" it with synthesis

This. Would we expect charity from corporations? Unless the robot is a public service we can expect the helpers will (first) be reserved for the super rich and ultra wealthy.

There is no competition. Robot no drink, no sleep, no distractions of any kind from goal.

@@raoultesla2292 And no salary.

Openai is busy with building chips that are specifically for this. So that will stop the biggest issues you mention here

@@Johanneslol11 She mentioned her team is doing something different from the LLM's such as those from OpenAI.

gpt4 thinks: Daniela Rus's TED talk on liquid neural networks introduces a groundbreaking concept where neural networks are not fixed in hardware but exist in a fluid medium, allowing dynamic reconfiguration. However, in her presentation, the scalability of these networks and their energy efficiency compared to traditional, fixed neural networks were not directly addressed. Scalability: Liquid neural networks, being in the nascent stages of development, primarily demonstrate feasibility with smaller models. The transition from a small network of neurons to a large-scale network poses significant challenges. These include maintaining stability and reliability of the network connections within a fluid environment and managing the complexity that comes with larger network sizes. Energy Efficiency: Liquid neural networks could potentially offer improvements in energy efficiency over traditional neural networks. Traditional networks often require a substantial amount of power for operation and cooling, especially as they scale up. In contrast, liquid neural networks, depending on their physical and chemical properties, might utilize less energy due to their adaptive and potentially simpler cooling needs. However, concrete data on their energy consumption compared to solid-state networks is yet to be clearly established.

@@MikeHodgkinson yeah but its not openai so people wont care unfortunately

No way possible that the military doesn't already have it.

I think the robot named Sophia already have been granted citizenship in the UAE.

@@bloodust7356 yeah, its symbolic...but there is a difference when you are also a recognized individuum with all rights and duties.

Also know as "embodied AI".

There's a wife joke In there somewhere, but I'm too scared to look for It.😉

😂@@_Daio_

انت ذكيه نعم الآله عبد و خادم وليس الإنسان كثر الجدل بسبب يريدوا احتكار الذكاء الاصطناعي لا أكثر عندما فشلوا في الكونجرس بدؤا يستخدموا أدوات و أساليب المخابرات الاعلاميه و التظليل ويستغلوا الحربين غزه و اوكرانيا

You are smart Yes God is a slave and servant Not human There is a lot of controversy because they want to monopolize artificial intelligence and nothing more When they failed in Congress They began to use the tools and methods of media intelligence and shadowing They exploit the wars in Gaza and Ukraine

@importantname This! All this talk about robots doing all the jobs and living in abundance. How about we start with the simple chores? Yeah having to go to work can be a drain, but it’s the house chores and maintenance that really drain you. Those 6-8 hours after work could be used on family, hobbies, or education all while robo-maid 1.0 keeps things in order at home. You could take the kids out and send a text to your robot telling them to have dinner ready in an hour. This would revolutionize the human experience all on its own. Regardless of breakthroughs in economics science and health.

LOL they will have cameras and record the event in HDTV !!

Hardware issue, solvable in theory.

It is possible to solve complex problems using machines that can perform faster than any bio-organic being in the world. The speed of processing information by photons in your brain is limited only by the constraints of biology and environment, not by physics. However, machines in the future will have limitations based on physics.

Tesla fsd runs locally and it drives vehicles in real time. The computer is the size of a PlayStation. No reason why a robot couldn’t pull inference locally and fast speeds

Sorry, you're wrong.... A robot is hardware, you can deploy a model on it and give it memory just like any computer, if I can use LLMs on my laptop, pretty sure robots will have no issues.

Or not. The risks of gene editing are an order of magnitude greater. Maybe let's focus on actually understanding our body and genes before we leapfrog to editing them?

@@NeorecnamorceN We know already a lot and we improve plants and animals for a long time There is also gene editing what isn't transferable to the children So there are no risks You're just scared Also gene editing is already common to cure humans So why not finally improve us

@@e.v.k.3632 There's a lot wrong there that I just don't have the energy or interest to get into so I'll just say this, there is an order of magnitude difference between modifying a single problematic gene and modifying enough of our genetic code to exact any kind of specific change to our physiological system in part or in whole.

Does it have a happy ending?

@stephanieellison7834 I think money itself is the problem. Once AI takes over and do these jobs we have no need for money anymore. It'll be better for us when things can be provided for all. But that would only work if we could teach AI some empathy. Without empathy there's not much to live for anyway as things won't matter then. And I am interested in what goals AI would have with its high intellect.

You won't put an AGI into a house robot but it'd still need some degree of generality to accomplish real life tasks

hopefully this sparks someones ideas... we need more than mac, windows and linux, its time for ai to join the game of OS i also think this AI OS could be the core of service robots

current AI is absolutely not textbased only, models are trained and deployed on all kind of inputs, from text, images, and numerical numbers to visual interaction data, real time camera input, RNA, the list is endless. Anything you can convert, interpret, encode or tokenise into numbers eventually is usable.

*For now i would say but its learning quickly in some aspects like music creation, video creation, company agents and a few more that text base will be phased out within 10 years then you have tiny hints that there's much more advanced AIs but are currently being withheld from the public as they pose a significant danger to our current economy or latest security measures*

Embodied AGI. Liquid neurons will enhance this to become reality.

Dope is all we will have left to do.

The point of ai is to learn from itself essentially the same thing

yeah you tell 'em, einstein 🙄

@stephanieellison7834 nah man.. im not reading all that

They already have AIs that have been trained on huge numbers of simulated dogfights. They are better than any human pilot at piloting a jet fighter. What country wouldn't deploy that technology in war?

@stephanieellison7834 The text raises several speculative and unsubstantiated claims: - It provides no credible evidence that governments or corporations have a secret plans to deliberately cause mass starvation or "extinction" of the population through lack of jobs or income. Major policy decisions are usually public and gradual, not secretive or catastrophic. - The assertions about declines in farming production or changes in robot usage away from the public are not backed up by any data or sources. Broad societal changes usually have multiple interconnected causes, not secretive plots. - Questioning the rationale for farmland purchase in Maine on the basis of chemical levels far below safety thresholds, with no other context or evidence, amounts to an unsupported conspiracy theory. - Predicting violent reactions from other countries based on this hypothetical scenario is highly speculative fearmongering without factual basis. - Overall the text presents a dystopian population control narrative as proven fact without credible evidence. Conspiracy theories typically ignore alternative explanations and lack consideration of societal complexities. In summary, while job disruption from AI is a serious issue warranting discussion, the text's claims appear to be unfounded speculation rather than supported analysis. A more measured, evidence-based approach would be needed to evaluate impacts and policy solutions regarding AI and employment on such a large societal scale. The tone and lack of sources undermine its credibility.

@stephanieellison7834 Here are some of the logical fallacies contained in the text: Conspiracy theory - It asserts secret plans by governments/corporations without evidence, ignores simpler explanations, and lacks consideration of challenges of coordinating such a vast conspiracy. Slippery slope - Suggests modest actions like farmland purchase will inevitably lead to the totalitarian control scenario depicted. No evidence more gradual changes are impossible. Hasty generalization - Questions one state's land purchase to make broad claims about national policy and societal changes without adequate sampling or analysis. False causality - Implies job losses from AI will directly cause starvation without jobs/incomes, rather than multiple social factors influencing employment, welfare, technology adaptation etc. Strawman - Portrays opponents' views/policies pejoratively as intentionally designed for "passive killing" or "extinction" rather than more nuanced policy debates. Undistributed middle - Assumes specific impacts like starvation and high job losses from one cause (AI) without ruling out other possible contributing factors. Appeal to fear - Uses speculative scenarios of violence and social unrest to argue its point rather than substantive evidence or reasoned policy analysis. Anecdotal evidence - Relies on isolated examples like the land purchase rather than comprehensive data to make sweeping conclusions. So in several ways, the arguments violate principles of logical reasoning through fallacious assumptions, causal oversimplification, lack of evidence, and manipulation of emotions. This undermines the credibility and objective evaluation of its dire claims.

I think AI shouldn't be used in wars, but I'm against war in general...

Good point. This scifi movies were created with help from excellent scientists, so both robots and future tech scenarios are VERY realistic. Same with other topics, like chimeras. Motives are always dual/several. One is to form your opinion/brain of what to accept. Today, sci-fi is reality, and what is presented from politicians and media is only the top layer. We all should dig a little deeper, and speak out with what is not ok, and there’s a lot. Live your life with your eyes open, so you can say to your kid that you did all you could for her/him to stay human, have a home and a job.

Quantum computers work differently. You won’t see an AI built by quantum computers any time soon.