Fun fact, they actually never called themselves "Mughals" but Gurkaniya, a term which evokes their connection as sons in law to Genghis Khan
@itacom2199 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I didn't know
@The.Nasty. Жыл бұрын
Any relation to the elite military group called the Gurkhas?
@murodillafatkhullaev9782 Жыл бұрын
It makes sense!!! Bc the word “Ko’ragon” or “Ko’ragoniy” was very popular during Tumirid dynasty. It referred them being the son-in-laws of the reigning clan (royal) Borjigids and also referred them to be from the sister clan Barlos.
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
@@murodillafatkhullaev9782 Baburids, Indo-Timurids, or Gurkanids would be better English namings for the so called Mughal misnomer
@deleted-something Жыл бұрын
Interesting
@Hallows4 Жыл бұрын
Babur means "tiger", so that image on the sword was a great touch. For anyone interested in the story of the dynasty, I highly recommend "Empire of the Moghul" by Alex Rutherford.
@little_swallow Жыл бұрын
I'm currently reading it, it's so beautifully written!
@Hallows4 Жыл бұрын
@@little_swallow I read the first three volumes years ago but interest petered out after that. Now own all six and am starting from the beginning.
@little_swallow Жыл бұрын
@@Hallows4 it can be a little heavy on the information side, same for me. I'm on the 3rd vol currently.
@Hallows4 Жыл бұрын
@@little_swallow The biggest obstacle for me is typically remembering all of the characters names, since many of them can sound similar.
@anirudh177 Жыл бұрын
Fiction? vhy vould you recommend fiction for learning about Mughal history? I'll never understand vhy people think historical fiction is an appropriate source for history. check Michael Fisher's "A Short History of the Mughal Empire", Majumdar's "History and Culture of the Indian People - Volume 07: The Mughul Empire" and J.F Richards' "The New Cambridge History of India, Volume 1, Part 5: The Mughal Empire" for single volume books on the Mughal empire. I can reccommend more books if anyone vants.
@theWZZA Жыл бұрын
“Look back over the past, with its changing empires that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future too.” ― Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
@alexd832 Жыл бұрын
@Angry Austrian Painter wow, be careful with your logo, many people wouldn't see this as sarcasm
@theWZZA Жыл бұрын
@@alexd832 It's all intentional
@dickcheese8628 Жыл бұрын
Cool that you posted this, I just started Meditations.
@timmy-wj2hc Жыл бұрын
The entire 🌎 is hoping for the end of the terroristic and psycopathic US empire.
@alexd832 Жыл бұрын
@Angry Austrian Painter yeah and your username is totally accidental....
@DB-me7ol Жыл бұрын
As someone from Uttarakhand, traveling to the plains opens up a whole different world. It is not as peaceful and serene as the hills with their many temples and forests but is still very impressive.
@AryanSharma-qj4eu Жыл бұрын
Fun fact, akhbar used to travel to uttrakhand temples too. Like hanol temple
@DB-me7ol Жыл бұрын
Oh thanks I didn’t know that!
@jonasdavies1806 Жыл бұрын
Fun Fact, there are plains in Uttarakhand Too, even most of the population of Uttarakhand lives in plains. I have lived there for about 6 months there in the towns of Southern Uttarakhand and even learnt some slang in the local dialect, next time I would like to visit Kumaon and Garawal too. Also I made two of my best friends for life there.
@DB-me7ol Жыл бұрын
@@jonasdavies1806 Yes certainly. Uttarakhand has the most diverse geoforms. I was referring to the plains of UP, the Delhi area, etc where there is a more significant Mughal and Islamic architectural influence.
@jonasdavies1806 Жыл бұрын
@@DB-me7ol where are you from In Uttarakhand? And also do you know these dialects like Kumaoni or Garawali?
@cgt3704 Жыл бұрын
You missed the fact that near the end of Aurangzeb's reign, the Mughal state did one huge mistake: decided to limit rights for the majority non-muslim people, even trying to implement the Jiziya tax during the crisis. Obviously, the hindus and the sikhs were furious and so they rebelled, with one of them being the Maratha Empire, which by the start of 19th century, fontrolled most of the sub-continent. And there was also many invasions by the persians and afghans which resulted in the sack of Delhi by the iranian emperor, Nader Shah (aka the Napoleon of Iran)
@sagarbhadva1118 Жыл бұрын
Lmao it's ted what else do you expect
@imaysin97 Жыл бұрын
Marathas controlling most of subcontinent.....😆
@kanishkkun Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@smn9966 Жыл бұрын
Factual inaccuracy: 1. Aurangzeb's imposition didn't result into instant rebellion. Infact during that time,mughal empire were at its largest. 2. Maratha Empire "control"ing vast majority of India is a misleading statement. They were puppets of the British East India Company. EIC started their control in India in 1757. Within 50 years, there was no independent unaffected ruler in India.
@tariqkhanPathanKabuliwala Жыл бұрын
whatsapp university 😂
@Blurrybob Жыл бұрын
I'm from Uzbekistan, Babur's original homeland. I was named after him actually
@gobimurugesan2411 Жыл бұрын
U added Russian name?
@Blurrybob Жыл бұрын
@@gobimurugesan2411 actually, people in most post-Soviet countries have surnames ending with and . That's a legacy from our former Russian overlords
@Wisdom-i1v Жыл бұрын
Your ancestors committed innumerable crimes in my homeland...Babur is just remembered as a barbaric central Asian turkic invader
@Wisdom-i1v Жыл бұрын
@@gobimurugesan2411 of course no wonder the russians deislamized them , made them enjoy pork and wine...look at the ones in Afghanistan, the hazaras ...same central Asian Muslims or turks just across the border....but the culture is completely opposite there..as they weren't under Russian influence...
@Barnil_JN Жыл бұрын
So your name BlurryBob is derived from Babur?
@zu-tangclan8113 Жыл бұрын
I wish they taught us this type of history in high school, but according to American schools “world history” is only limited to European history.
@krishnagopalsrivastava2084 Жыл бұрын
And in India, it's mostly limited to Indian history or modern (20th century) 'world' I.e. European history.
@derangedlunatic9191 Жыл бұрын
@@krishnagopalsrivastava2084 there is so little time in school so they had to make the best of it. the Indian history couldn't be avoided, but they still glossed over some history, like that of south India which was never under Mughal rule. the French revolution was a key point so it can't be avoided either. The first and second world war did change the world a lot even though its definitely an overstatement to call the military efforts of just Europe a world war. As for Italian, Russian and German history that we were taught, I don't remember even paying attention to the classes. I am assuming German an Russian history had to do with world war but I can't remember what the significance of the Italian unification was. asides from that we were taught about the old trading and a bit about the Indus valley civilization and Indian independence were repeated a few times. we really don't have enough room for much else. maybe the neighbours of Mughals and the old republic of Rome and the independence of America or how India affected some neighbouring civilizations like Sri Lanka could be added.
@Baraz_Red Жыл бұрын
Same in Canada. Anything east of Europe is not taught. The Byzantine Empire, though it lasted nearly 1000 years, was Christian, and close to Europe, is barely known by many modern Westerners. Our cultures from Europe were dominated by the Catholic Church, which tends to want to ignore the whole Byzantine empire which was not under their pope. But your comment makes me realize we also do not teach much about anything East.
@umang3227 Жыл бұрын
@@derangedlunatic9191 "Call the military efforts of just Europe a world war" I can understand that the war was started and centred around Europe but excuse me 2.5 million indians gave "effort" in that war. It's definitely part of Indian History
@gothicfan52 Жыл бұрын
@@derangedlunatic9191 " call the military efforts of just Europe a world war." Europe controlled most of the world, the only continent untouched by war was south america. And I struggle to see how Japan's conquests of many asian countries was european. Whatever education system you're under, it clearly failed you
@krishnagopalsrivastava2084 Жыл бұрын
" Subha Ke Takht Nasheen, Sham ko mujrim tehre. Hum ne pal bhar mein naseebo'n ko badalte dekha hai" (In the morning I was enthroned, In the evening I was reduced to a prisoner. I have seen destiny turn in the fraction of a second) . This heart-rendering couplet by the last Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar not only summarizes the individual downfall of an Emperor , but also the end of a great dynasty. This illustrates how empires rise and fall and glory which seems eternal, fades in a second.
@ratanlalbhattacharjee1125 Жыл бұрын
"Great dynasty" lol good joke😂
@krishnagopalsrivastava2084 Жыл бұрын
@@ratanlalbhattacharjee1125 so what was it then?
@anirudh177 Жыл бұрын
@@ratanlalbhattacharjee1125 I mean the Mughals vere one of the fev dynasties along vith the Mauryans that managed to conquer most of India, only the Guptas and the Maratha come close other than these, it's a pretty impressive feat.
@anirudh177 Жыл бұрын
Bahadur shah Zafar vas King of Delhi in his entire reign, the EIC reduced titular authority in 1835.
@BarlasofIndus Жыл бұрын
@@ratanlalbhattacharjee1125 There wasn't a Greater Dynasty to rule over the Subcontinent except the Mughals. And we're talking about Great in all proportions. Territories,wealth, administration, consolidation,politics etc
@durdanatabassum6057 Жыл бұрын
Wealth and prosperity never stays, it comes and goes, and comes again, India is proof of that.
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
💔
@mrbloodyhyphen-5657 Жыл бұрын
Yeah it is very hard to maintain it when there is another country constantly stealing the resources of your country
@jobz9150 Жыл бұрын
Still waiting for it to come again...
@durdanatabassum6057 Жыл бұрын
@@jobz9150 The wait won't be long, a century or two maybe... What's that compared to the entirety of human civilization?
@cinema6444 Жыл бұрын
it was always there in india untill the colonisation.
@aaronTGP_3756 Жыл бұрын
One of the key events in the Fall was the brutal sack of Delhi by the Turkic conqueror Nader Shah in 1739. The Peacock Throne was even taken (and later destroyed after Nader's death).
@Nomadicenjoyerplus Жыл бұрын
Nader was such a gigachad but he weakened Muslim and Turkic world too
@user-pakshibhithi10 Жыл бұрын
Wasn't Nader Shah Persian?
@aaronTGP_3756 Жыл бұрын
@@user-pakshibhithi10 Nader Shah was a Turkoman from the Afshar tribe.
@user-pakshibhithi10 Жыл бұрын
@@aaronTGP_3756 So, was he a Persianised Turk?
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
@@user-pakshibhithi10 No he was simply an ethnic Turk who ruled Iran, Nader Shah spoke two Turkic languages ; Chagatai and his mother tongue Oghuz Turkic
@jasonspreyer6009 Жыл бұрын
I like how Ted-Ed talks about the history of every empires
@debarpanroy3785 Жыл бұрын
Akabr married also his own mother. Jahangir shan jahan married his own daughter 😮 Akbar take jajiya (Tax) from non-Muslims. Or converted into islam. Mughals ban diwali festival. 😂 Mughals killed lot of sikh gurus. Mughal totally know without Rajputs ,they cant rule south india . Mughals destroyed india. Mughals and Britishers make india poor. Mughalas are reasons for partition. Mughal emperor persecuted sikhs and brahmans 😅.
@rishikeshshingte2908 Жыл бұрын
In this case tho its hilariously wrong with the video. A rare Ted-Ed L
@meikhochakre3309 Жыл бұрын
@@rishikeshshingte2908 wrong as in factually wrong or incomplete info. What do you expect from compiling 200+ years into a 5 min video? Some info are bound to be omitted
@rishikeshshingte2908 Жыл бұрын
@@meikhochakre3309 Factually wrong. Just because its a 5 mins video doesn't mean wrong info can be given. Ted-Ed themselves have other 5 mins videos where information is properly presented despite the time limit
@meikhochakre3309 Жыл бұрын
@@rishikeshshingte2908 Point out the part where it's wrong then
@dilnuratoleutaeva4674 Жыл бұрын
The interesting thing is that a lot of Turkic words are identical to the Indian language. I know all languages have a root, but this connection of Indo-Central Asia is very surprising.
@rbran Жыл бұрын
I’d want to say that’s because of the influence of the Persian language on Turkish, which is related to Hindi in a similar way English is related to Italian
@husseinzaid2092 Жыл бұрын
@@rbran English has nothing to do with italian
@rbran Жыл бұрын
@@husseinzaid2092 Germanic Languages (like English and German) and Romance Languages (like Italian, Spanish, French) may not be extremely extremely similar. However, they both descend as branches of the Indo-European language family and do actually share a lot of common features. Additionally, there has been a lot of intermixing between the languages due to invasion and trade, making them share various words. This is the same thing that has occurred with Hindi and Farsi, as they are both Indo-European languages, though not under the same branch. They also have this intermixing due to proximity, invasion, and trade over hundreds of years.
@harithameyyappan5570 Жыл бұрын
which Indian language though?
@rbran Жыл бұрын
@@harithameyyappan5570 Hindi is what I’m mostly thinkinhf
@hannyagargola8059 Жыл бұрын
The other religions: intellectual debates 🍻 👌🏻🍷 Portuguese Jesuit: No debate, only convert 😤 📖✝️
@vult07 Жыл бұрын
Hinduism, Judaism, Zoroastrianism are religions based on blood and geography. The only missionary religions are: Islam, Christianity, and Buddhism. Akbar was already a Muslim and video does not mention any Buddhist. So yeah, Christians believe in conversion through debate (ideally)
@chinmaydesai863 Жыл бұрын
Not really the actual historical interactions are very interactive and coloured
@Abk3676 ай бұрын
Why shouldn't they be disappointed? They literally traveled to another part of the world to preach something they fully believed in .it wasn't an easy journey traveling from Europe to India. Many die in the sea or from diseases like malaria and cholera(just look at the mortality rates of Europeans in india during that time ) once they land .it was their lives mission and goal to preach and spread the message of christ .besides it wasn't the way its portrayed here .while they were disappointed that akbar wouldn't convert, they actively took part in the discussions .these discussions weren't always pleasant the other groups too fiercely defended their positions and bitterly argued over whose religion was the greatest .it became so bad that akbar had to stop these discussions completely in 1582 AD
@user-vt6td9hp3g11 күн бұрын
As opposed to Muslims and Hindus who still murder those who don't believe in their religion.
@anmolagrawal53584 күн бұрын
@@Abk367 Either way that's entirely on them as they endeavored on that journey of their own free will.
@mamamiaherewegoagain6959 Жыл бұрын
Being a descendant of both genghis khan and tamerlane is crazy
@navneetparmar3632 Жыл бұрын
How? They have lot of bastards its not like they were in real family or even in close circle they were kicked out from uzbekistan actually
@mamamiaherewegoagain6959 Жыл бұрын
@@navneetparmar3632 I just meant the coincidence of it all. That babur established an empire himself, just like his (very far) ancestors.
@navneetparmar3632 Жыл бұрын
@@mamamiaherewegoagain6959 naah it was not empire at babur time actually even after his death his son humayun was kicked out and forced to take refuge under hindu and persian rulers by sher shah suri and after 15 years when sher shah died without successor mughals re estaiblished theselves with help of others , only capable ruler was akbar although he was puppet ruler and was lucky that he had loyal caretaker who didnt overthrown him anyway akbar made mughals empire thats my point and later its demise was done by aurangjeb who presecuted majority hindus too much that mughal empire was uprooted by hindu maratha empire this 5 minute video cant explain everything
@SafiullahJahBakht Жыл бұрын
@@navneetparmar3632Babur was literally the legitimate son of Timurid Emir and Genghisid Princess
@asahama817311 ай бұрын
Even taimur himself was cousin of genghis khan 😂
@nenenindonu Жыл бұрын
Ottoman gunpowder aid to Timurid prince Babur was a turning point which enabled his conquest of Northern India paving way for the rise of the Mughal Empire
@ayujmenda5035 Жыл бұрын
Yes that is true. but the usage of musket was rarely used but canons were highly used to destroy Infantry and cavalry
@kumosi9437 Жыл бұрын
What u mean aid. He owned them all
@exspresstelekom6699 Жыл бұрын
@@kumosi9437Nope.An Ottoman officer named Mustafa Ramin appointed by the Ottoman Sultan helped the Babur.
@sabtaingopinath9652 Жыл бұрын
@@exspresstelekom6699cannot find this Ramin guy anywhere?... Any sources or references?
@abduvohidodiljonov9365 Жыл бұрын
It was better to defend his country with that aid. I mean he should have won Shayboniyxon who was leader of uzbeks.
@shortedits2227 Жыл бұрын
It is still amazing to learn about Central Asia's underrated history while they had great empires and conquerors
@sairahameed5515 Жыл бұрын
@@lordvold9486but Akbar was Uzbek
@Drizzle_18 Жыл бұрын
@@sairahameed5515 Afghan
@maqsoodakram7916 Жыл бұрын
@@lordvold9486it has nothing to do with india,its central asian and muslim history
@ignatiuscianci4440 Жыл бұрын
all gunpowder empires namely ottomans, safavids and mughals have central asian nomad turkic origin. bur only ottomans were able to maintain their origin.
@Khushi_R9 Жыл бұрын
not great bruh they were literally invaders who originated from Central Asia to destroy temples and all cultural heritage to force Islam
@mafiaintheevening Жыл бұрын
I am from Central Asia and it’s interesting to learn about its historical connection with India
@sacidaniel8263 Жыл бұрын
most of it its fake
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
it's all lie here
@orziqulovburhoniddin8564 Жыл бұрын
@@sacidaniel8263saying who expert?😂😂😂😂
@orziqulovburhoniddin8564 Жыл бұрын
@@ankitsoni9275saying who an expert of history 😂😂
@thethirdchannel3887 Жыл бұрын
@@ankitsoni9275 ah yes indian propaganda book fed indian kids
@patrickblanchette4337 Жыл бұрын
I surprised they didn’t mention the reign of Akbar’s father, Humayun (it would have been a hilarious side note).
@BarlasofIndus Жыл бұрын
You mean his start of reign, or the brief interruption by suri empire or the fact that he died due to injury while falling from stairs of his astronomy tower?
@patrickblanchette4337 Жыл бұрын
@@BarlasofIndus All of the above (I really liked Jack Rackam’s video on him😆).
@dark_panther78 Жыл бұрын
he was a clown duh
@kerron9793 Жыл бұрын
I wish ted did a video on Sher Shah Suri. One of the greatest administrators of his time, who also defeated Humayun and briefly took control of Mughal Empire.
@spacemann1425 Жыл бұрын
He didn't have a reign. His "reign" was a failure, and he almost went back to the Timurid Empire.
@Random9_ Жыл бұрын
In india we learnt the Mughal Empire for a year in class 9. Very nicely put in this short video
@luckywolf8171 Жыл бұрын
Remember the amount of names we had to stuff into our heads for class 4?
@Random9_ Жыл бұрын
@@luckywolf8171 well looking back at it all, school days were so great. Surely better than adulting:p
@abiaaryan9801 Жыл бұрын
Well I am a student of class 9 and there is not a single mention Mughals in the history book instead it is full of European history . Pls correct it , we study about mughals mainly in class 7 . Peace✌️
@thedictator1454 Жыл бұрын
@@luckywolf8171 class 4th was the best history ever
@debarpanroy3785 Жыл бұрын
Akabr married also his own mother. Jahangir shan jahan married his own daughter 😮 Akbar take jajiya (Tax) from non-Muslims. Or converted into islam. Mughals ban diwali festival. 😂 Mughals killed lot of sikh gurus. Mughal totally know without Rajputs ,they cant rule south india . Mughals destroyed india. Mughals and Britishers make india poor. Mughalas are reasons for partition. Mughal emperor persecuted sikhs and brahmans 😅.
@Sirrajj Жыл бұрын
Mughals nowadays have become a sensitive topic in India, they're used for votebank politics, because they were Muslim rulers and majority of India is Hindu
@arpanmandal7244 Жыл бұрын
Muslim should have left for Pakistan just. Want ambedkar wanted
@sabtaingopinath9652 Жыл бұрын
@@arpanmandal7244Muslims will rule u again.. It is inevitable
@indahbudiani47735 ай бұрын
@@arpanmandal7244 That's Not Very Nice
@arpanmandal72445 ай бұрын
@@indahbudiani4773 indian constitution maker wanted total population exchange. All muslim to Pakistan and all other minorities to india . He said muslim don't have loyalty towards their host countries.
@netninja600018 күн бұрын
@@arpanmandal7244 what about hindus there
@thl205 Жыл бұрын
People often overlook that the British Empire followed a series of other competing & warring empires who tried to conquer India.
@karthika560 Жыл бұрын
By the time British arrived Most of India was consolidated by the Marathas. The Mughals king in Delhi was essentially a puppet. Aurangazeb was defeated in a war of attrition by the Marathas. He spent the last decades of his life in Deccan
@shramanadasdutta3006 Жыл бұрын
Conquering and colonising is different though. Even though the mughals did bad things, as did all other kings ever, they lived in this country and their decents are here with us to live though the consequences of their ancestors actions. Colonisers however, stole our stuff and left to enrich their families and their own countries with our resources. Hastings and Mountbattens' children or followers are not in india anymore. They are enjoying the wealth their ancestors stole in the comfort of England.
@Barnil_JN Жыл бұрын
@@shramanadasdutta3006 Karma will pay back. It always does and will continue to do so 'til the end of time. Don't worry. :)
@sagnikchatterjee2946 Жыл бұрын
@@shramanadasdutta3006 excuse me but Mughals also colonized Bharat . Read Baburnama for reference.
@shramanadasdutta3006 Жыл бұрын
@@sagnikchatterjee2946 my comment just explained the difference between conquering and colonising. Mughals conquered, British colonised.
@nikhil518 Жыл бұрын
Mughal Empire was a great empire, under its rule India prospered. You should've mentioned the Marathas, who played a huge role in tumbling down the mughals. Huge battles for domination of subcontinent were fought in what came to be known as Mughal-Maratha war, in which Marathas won against the Mighty Mughals. By 1757 they reached delhi, and by 1758 reached peshawar. The Mughal empire was split into regional kingdoms, with the Nizam of Hyderabad, Nawab of Oudh and Nawab of Bengal quick to assert the nominal independence of their lands. And then the British east India company's conquests of India started from battle of Plassey fought against Nawab of Bengal who was assisted by French and French east India company. The British victory was made possible by the defection of Mir Jafar, who was Nawab Siraj-ud-Daulah's commander in chief.
@ClashwithImb Жыл бұрын
The fact that you have a DP of Shri Ram Respect to you as a Muslim Mughals and Marathas were mighty forces of India who fought against the Brits But the traitors who are with us even today continue dividing hs
@karthika560 Жыл бұрын
Yes it was a great Empire but India didnt prosper under the mughals. Infact while empires wealth increased India’s share of world gdp declined under them because of high taxation and most of it was spent on vanity projects and not public works. You dont them constructing canals or roads unlike the cholas did in south india Their empire resembled mauryan empire under asoka which collapsed swiftly after his death.
@nikhil518 Жыл бұрын
@@karthika560 I see where you're coming from. In reference to Cholas, I agree that they were really great administrators and infrastructure development of the scale which cholas did was a rare sight in history of humanity, one might claim they were akin to Romans. That being said, I mentioned India prospered under Mughal Empire, cause that is what India has always been, a prosperous land both culturally and economically. Mughals, although they didn't push Infrastructure projects like other kingdoms of India, Like Guptas or Mauryas, yet under them the prosperity didn't vanish. In that sense I said under their rule India prospered, that is also the reason why I never said "they were the only empire in human history which build India and without Mughals India was barren and poor", and I can never say this cause this statement is utterly wrong. Hope you get my point.
@nikhil518 Жыл бұрын
@@karthika560 and they did develop art and culture, Maintained and managed a huge territory, paved a way to an amazing cuisine and, as you mentioned, carried out many vanity projects across the nation. It was a shame how most of them were not tolerant, and marginalisation of Hindus also came with aforementioned positives. That being said, Some of them (sadly, only about a couple of them) really tried to bridge the gap between Hindus and Muslims. The thought was there but alas, Hindu-Muslim Harmony didn't last.
@karthika560 Жыл бұрын
@@nikhil518 Under Mughals Indians became much poorer. Europeans grew richer during the same time. People are equating treasury growth with prosperity. Actually, Mughals were less babaric than turkish conquerers but if you read sources even akbar wasnt religiously tolerant.
@vedanshmudotiya Жыл бұрын
You should make a video about Chola Dynasty
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
they will never do it ,it is baised channel unsubscribe goto abhijeet chawala
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
@@Coolguy-or8ex it an age of "war of ai" stay safe from fake news & be careful whom u follow. go to abhijeet chawala for history lessons
@desi_bhai_ Жыл бұрын
@@ankitsoni9275 as much as i support the truth that mughals had done atrocities in india, chadwa straightup lies when he wants to.
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
@@desi_bhai_ 🥺
@anirudhkashyapanirudh9584 Жыл бұрын
Chola empire was very small and insignificant, it never went up to the extent of the mughals or even the Mauryans for that case so just keep aside your propaganda, the channel is a well reputed one unlike G0di media 😃
@ANIKETSONAWANE Жыл бұрын
Please do one in Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj ❤
@mohdsuhail95866 ай бұрын
Accha
@GhGh-sj4wb5 ай бұрын
He clown and he never defeated Aranguzib😂😂
@ibrahim-sf9od4 ай бұрын
bro what did you do ?? that you guys praise him soo much for??? he just looted a pileged other tribes go learn real history not from whatsapp university.
@ANIKETSONAWANE4 ай бұрын
@@ibrahim-sf9odThats some Madarsa chhaap quality meme knowledge u got. Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj established maratha empire against immense odds.
@AK-tf3fc4 ай бұрын
@@GhGh-sj4wblol😂
@arakachukwunweike7259 Жыл бұрын
Do Benin Empire next. The world needs to know of other ancient civilizations in Africa asides Egypt 😅
@THEONLYOBA Жыл бұрын
Oyo empire too
@scarletkingdom2359 Жыл бұрын
They already did kush and Ethiopia
@arakachukwunweike7259 Жыл бұрын
@@scarletkingdom2359 Agreed. But their focus is still relatively the same region of Africa.
@scarletkingdom2359 Жыл бұрын
@@arakachukwunweike7259 I believe they also did mali
@Random13Guy Жыл бұрын
Yeah I'd love to know more about Africa
@warrior43 Жыл бұрын
I am from comilla city of Bangladesh 🇧🇩 and the area where I live name is "Mughaltuli" means "Mughal locality". There is a Mughal architectural mosque near my house.
@tanveer3384 Жыл бұрын
Love from burichong 🇧🇩
@BarlasofIndus Жыл бұрын
As a Gurkani belonging to one of the 6 last remaining traditional families(mine is in north Punjab, Pakistan), I say thanks. We are often confused here,We have no large community and live in friendship and alliance of our historical allies and neighbours ,Ghakkars,and Yuarics
@khushi2003.8 ай бұрын
And you're proud of that?
@PANDITDADDY-kq9uf6 ай бұрын
Bengalese have no relation with Mughals, you're proud of the fact that your ancestors failed to protect your land
@satreobreo933 ай бұрын
@@khushi2003.Looks like pajjet got a problem
@Hoops_Fan Жыл бұрын
At the height of their power (under Aurangzeb), the Mughals ruled a vast empire comprising the land between present day Pakistan in the west to Bangladesh in the east. From Jammu and Kashmir in the north to Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh in the south.
@_bakihanma Жыл бұрын
you know only one part of the story😂
@mrphoenix6671 Жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb most intolerant and brutal ruler. He led to downfall of empire.
@_bakihanma Жыл бұрын
@@mrphoenix6671 i hope you know who is the reason behinf his downfall
@BarlasofIndus Жыл бұрын
@@mrphoenix6671Sikhs,Afridis,Blioals,Dutch,French,Seperatist Nawabs,Succession crisis led to the empire being cracked
@G_singh4211 ай бұрын
@@BarlasofIndusSikhs were the ones that defeated both Mughals and afghans
@sherzodshaymatov26755 ай бұрын
Babur was the Great Turkish leader who had original roots in Central Asia (modern Uzbekistan). So those claiming him as a mughal are absolutely wrong.
@Qoral-ef5rz5 ай бұрын
They were Turco-Mongols. They descend from the Barlas Mongols, who were later culturally Turkified.
@sherzodshaymatov26755 ай бұрын
The Amir Temur was a representative of Barlas tribe which consisted of locally residing people in The Central Asia before the Arrival of Chingiskhan
@GhGh-sj4wb4 ай бұрын
Turkish-Mongolic
@Dara-ci2pv Жыл бұрын
Conversion from company rule to colonial rule broke me
@japkaransingh8218 Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on Sikh Empire…. The Reign of Maharaja(great king) Ranjit Singh!
@grapeshott Жыл бұрын
Sadly after Ranjit Singh, the leaders turned out to be useless. Otherwise Sikh Empire was powerful. Well, it's the ultimate result of absolute monarchies...
@subhanhasan990tsikfm Жыл бұрын
Mahraja Ranjit singh was very inspired by Akbar, he even commisioned painted book of Ain i Akbari
@williamcunninghammorrison3894 Жыл бұрын
@@subhanhasan990tsikfmnice joke 😂
@anirudhkashyapanirudh9584 Жыл бұрын
@@williamcunninghammorrison3894 everything that doesn't suits your agenda is propaganda! Bunch of foolish multitudes 😅
@hindugramsci Жыл бұрын
@@subhanhasan990tsikfm and his son Sher Singh b3head3d Ahmad Shah Barelvi at the Battle of Balakot which now is used as a wahabi training ground for militants.
@puneetmishra4726 Жыл бұрын
The tiger reflection from Babur's sword because his name is the Farsi word for tiger, subtle details like that is why I absolutely love TED
@subhanhasan990tsikfm Жыл бұрын
Not just Mahabharata, Akbar also commisioned miniature paintings of Ramayana, Harivamsa, and translations of Yoga-Vasishta. His descendants who were of mixed Rajput and Mughal lineage (especially Shah Jahan who was 3/4 Rajput) even commissioned translations from Sanskrit into Braj Bhasha at times, instead of courtly Persian. Shah Jahan even ordered a copy of 1000 braj bhasha poems for his dhrupad singers, the name was SahasRas, originally penned by a poet of the Gwalior Court. However the last main mughal, Aurangzeb wasn't this appreciative of Indian culture (despite having indian ancestry), and was a religious fanatic. Aurangzeb usurped the throne from his Elder brother Dara Shikoh, who is known for penning a book "meeting of the two seas" or "majma ul bahrain" which explores the commonalities of Hinduism and Islam
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
Prashant real id se aa
@sayakchoudhury9711 Жыл бұрын
Dara Shikho was definitely a very interesting character, but what I understand that he was not a very good administrator.
@Inside.Frame1 Жыл бұрын
India's representation of Aurangzeb in history books is not the full truth. Aurangzeb employed more Hindus in his administration than any of the previous rulers. I recommend you to read about him from neutral sources.
@debarpanroy3785 Жыл бұрын
Akabr married also his own mother. Jahangir shan jahan married his own daughter 😮 Akbar take jajiya (Tax) from non-Muslims. Or converted into islam. Mughals ban diwali festival. 😂 Mughals killed lot of sikh gurus. Mughal totally know without Rajputs ,they cant rule south india . Mughals destroyed india. Mughals and Britishers make india poor. Mughalas are reasons for partition. Mughal emperor persecuted sikhs and brahmans 😅.
@subhanhasan990tsikfm Жыл бұрын
@@sayakchoudhury9711 interesting, what makes you say that though?
@rurururu015 ай бұрын
The maratha empire was actually the one who defeated Mughals in many ways and caused their central rule to weaken, this ofc later on was added by the East India company
@Qoral-ef5rz5 ай бұрын
I would say the blame goes mostly to Nader Shah, who sacked Delhi and looted the Mughal treasury right after they were beginning to recover from years of civil war. If the Iranians (and later Afghans) had minded their own business, it's reasonable to assume that the Mughals (or some other Muslim noble) could have consolidated power and formed a state. But alas, their greed for plunder has resulted in the Muslims being pushed to the peripheries of India (i.e. Pakistan and Bangladesh).
@GhGh-sj4wb4 ай бұрын
The ones who truly defeated the Mughal Empire were the British in 1847. They were the ones who ended their empire, and the weakest of them was Nader Shah of Persia when he defeated them and entered Delhi. Marathas were not even an empire, and Ahmad Shah of Afghanistan crushed them, and the British crushed them later.
@1.1kSubChallengeWithoutAnyVid Жыл бұрын
They say punctual is good but being early in KZfaq is sad as there are no comments to read
@sdsdsdsdsdsdsdsdsdsd Жыл бұрын
get a life
@Djsmms2 ай бұрын
Your 999 subscriber
@kanhaibhatt913 Жыл бұрын
The Maratha empire brough an end to the Turko Moghuls, not the British. After Aurangzebs death the Maratha expansion began and they took over large parts of India, sacked Delhi and installed a puppet Moghul on the throne. By 1720 the Turko Moghuls shrank to a size smaller than todays' Rajasthan. Western historians have very methodically undermentioned this fact.
@saurabhkutwal544 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@Pratik792 Жыл бұрын
It's all ignorance and bigotry bro. They call themselves TED-ED. But we know our history and we are proud!
@fasihussaini8554 Жыл бұрын
lol no nobody who is unbiased says that
@random_stuff507 Жыл бұрын
History isn't read from only one souce. Try reading it from multiple sources to get the whole picture. You're basing your whole take on modern Indian sources which are rewriting history as they see fit without even giving proper sources. Read the history written in that era
@Barnil_JN Жыл бұрын
@@random_stuff507 Sources?? Like what? Fake sources made up by the Britishers to defame Indian Society? BBC, CNN Sources? We don't need made-up Sources. What we need are Sources that are actually true with proof and logic. Sad thing is proof can be changed, truth can't be but the proof could be changed.
@spongekun4246 Жыл бұрын
it's fascinating how the most powerful empire at a time was defeated 17 times by a small kingdom in the northeastern part of India, THE AHOM EMPIRE!
@007dalal Жыл бұрын
17 times is overstatement. Mughals had their moments. And fighting mughals was constly for Ahoms as they were easily defeated by British later on ANd it will be good if u check the name of Mughal general at sarrianghat
@rajashashankgutta4334 Жыл бұрын
Mughals were hardly an unbeatable force. Even Ahmednagar defeated them several times
@ahnafabdullah5307 Жыл бұрын
@@rajashashankgutta4334 yep, there was so much infighting, and the Mughal Army was so spread out fighting Persian and Afghan and Marathas etc. it was just that they undisputedly controlled the de facto capital of India: Delhi, and that they were the wealthiest.
@smn9966 Жыл бұрын
Lol. They were mere skirmishes. If Ahom were so powerful why couldn’t they take lands from Bengal presidency.
@smn9966 Жыл бұрын
@@rajashashankgutta4334 rajputs who constantly got defeated by mughals : wait whot
@Psd863 Жыл бұрын
Disappointed at the lack of mention of the Sikhs and Marathis who were both instrumental in the decline of Mughal power. It's like talking about the decline of the European empires without mentioning the countless wars for independence of their colonial states.
@Fahim_Istiyak_Refat5 ай бұрын
They were the puppet of the EIC.
@steveb76003 ай бұрын
They pretty much pretended that the Moghuls did India a favor by attacking it. Like they "opened port cities to trade", like the Indians didn't know how to trade before they were conquered?
@abdullajonrasulov1156 Жыл бұрын
Babur was born in the city of Andijan, which is now part of modern-day Uzbekistan
@abdullajonrasulov1156 Жыл бұрын
@Spiritual Seeker No, I do not
@user-uj2tk2tv3z Жыл бұрын
@@abdullajonrasulov1156 Mughals have nothing to do with Uzbekistan It's not your history They didn't do anything for Uzbekistan and they didn't cared about your small eyes
@ujwal5926 Жыл бұрын
@@BlessedFamily5He was Uzbeki born in Andijan
@abdullajonrasulov1156 Жыл бұрын
@@BlessedFamily5 Andijan, Uzbekistan
@umardjonyuldashov5868 Жыл бұрын
Bobur was born in Andijan, current Uzbekistan.
@yogensawant22866 ай бұрын
Wow, interesting to see the downfall of Mughals being explained without the role of Marathas in it. When the Mughal empire seemed to be at its peak, a 19 year old boy, Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj started plotting its downfall from a relatively very small city of Pune. From his birth in 1630, within the next 77 years, the Marathas, had Aurangzeb crying to see the Mughal empire crumble in front of his eyes while he was lying on his deathbed. The real cause of decline of Mughals lay here, and also in other fights given by Sikhs, Ahoms and Kings like Maharaj Chatrasaal.
@LastNameName-jr8hx Жыл бұрын
Turko-mogolic people, we were conquerors and great warriors. The nomadic people from Central Asia conquered India, China, Anatoly and Big Chunks of Europe.We need to remember, who we are and remember our great history.
@ganeshareddy686 Жыл бұрын
Awesome work Ted ed I loved it excellent animation and good information hope you can do it to other Indian empires like Chola Pandyas and Vijayanagar too
@AceCreation1 Жыл бұрын
r u from Tamil nadu??..
@ganeshareddy686 Жыл бұрын
@@AceCreation1 nope from Telengana
@AceCreation1 Жыл бұрын
@@ganeshareddy686 Kk
@ganeshareddy686 Жыл бұрын
@@AceCreation1 and where are you from bro
@AceCreation1 Жыл бұрын
@@ganeshareddy686 Tamil nadu , Salem
@MihikChaudhari10 ай бұрын
Conveniently skipped over Aurangzeb
@itacom2199 Жыл бұрын
How is it possible that the best videos only come out when I am trying to study? 😂😂😂
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
Lol so true
@papazataklaattiranimam Жыл бұрын
The descendants of Timur who ruled in India called themselves Chaghtai Turks and looked down upon the Mughals or Mongols as half - barbarians . Rise and Fall of the Mughal Empire, Vol 1., Ram Prasad Tripathi Central Book Depot, 1960 p.1
@kumosi9437 Жыл бұрын
Chaghtai is literally the name of 4th son of Genghis khan bruh. You turks have some serious problem with your government brainwashing yall with way too biased information.
@islammehmeov2334 Жыл бұрын
Well if you think like that the OTTOMAN look down upon the TURKS as half- barbarians
@Nomadicenjoyerplus Жыл бұрын
@@islammehmeov2334 The ruling class didn’t, only some devshirmes
@Nomadicenjoyerplus Жыл бұрын
@@islammehmeov2334 Babur Shah himself insulted Mongols a lot lol, Ottoman rulers were proud to be an Oghuz/Turkoman/Turk that’s why they claimed Oghuz Khan ancestry
@islammehmeov2334 Жыл бұрын
@@Nomadicenjoyerplus LoL no the OTTOMAN EMPIRE wes insulted wen europeans were referring to them as TURKS LoL
@Snowman_44 Жыл бұрын
The amount of times I've read the word Mughal in my books...
@ahnafabdullah5307 Жыл бұрын
same bro same
@kumosi9437 Жыл бұрын
And it literally means Mongols.
@observing..3036 Жыл бұрын
?
@GoingToAFuneral Жыл бұрын
@@observing..3036 there was so much Mughal history documented in indian history books that some people are literally saying they had to remove some of the Mighal history
@kedarmeow Жыл бұрын
@@GoingToAFuneral yes I'm From India & we had 50% book for Mughals which covered only 300 years of history. While remained 50% book covered 800 years of history in non detailed fashion. Mughals were just part of Indian history. There were many Kingdoms before & after them.
@anubratabit3027 Жыл бұрын
Quite a good timing for the video, considering the fact the Central Government had recently decided to omit mention of Mughals in the history syllabus.
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
Some piece of sh!ts say that, mughals took tax from non-muslims. Lmao,😆😂🤣 Why dont they talk about the fact that, Aurangzeb took zakat tax from Muslims? Why Don't they mention the fact thay, total tax given by muslims were more than, that of non-muslims. They just know how to hate, not learn.
@kedarmeow Жыл бұрын
Mention was reduced & not Omitted. India is much more than Mughals. Mughals doesn't mean Indian history. Mughals were just part of Indian history.
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@kedarmeow Mughals means India, India Means Mughal. People Don't want to see mandirs or masjids, they want to see, India, what did your other empires did, except building Mandirs? Ashoka forcefully made hindus convert to Buddhism. Thats the only good thing that he did.
@commentnahipadhaikar2339 Жыл бұрын
@@LionsHeart3.1.3 Most senseless comment ever made be like:
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@commentnahipadhaikar2339 Most senseless people reading a comment be like:
@JesusMartinez-rr2ry Жыл бұрын
I am so jealous that they had a pool full of lemonade. It would be really nice to have one of my own. But it's best advised to wear swim goggles before diving in.
@l.n.3372 Жыл бұрын
I wonder how lemonade was made back then, as opposed to more modern recipes.
@DarkMage2k Жыл бұрын
@@l.n.3372 lemon and water as usual, maybe the royalty mixed rose petals and stuff
@l.n.3372 Жыл бұрын
@@DarkMage2k I doubt they used as much sugar as modern days tho.
@abdulazizyakubjonov7277 Жыл бұрын
Babur was a great general, poet, people-loving ruler. he was from a place called Andijan in present-day Uzbekistan. Babur is the great ancestor of our Uzbeks. We are proud to be compatriots with Babur as our ancestor
@boburzod Жыл бұрын
hindlarga yoqmaydi Bobur ham uning avlodlari ham :)
@abdulazizyakubjonov7277 Жыл бұрын
@@boburzod bu muhimmas Bobur va uning avlodlari Hind xalqiga qanday ijobiy o‘zgarishlarni olib kelganini tarix biladi bir guruh hindlarga yoqish yoqmasligi ikkilamchi masala
@arpanmandal7244 Жыл бұрын
@@abdulazizyakubjonov7277 😂😂 they bought nothing to indian society now mughal ancestors lives in slum of Kolkata
@user-cq8hw3ni7g Жыл бұрын
You have to learn when did he became people loving. Are you ignoring the mother's, sister and old people that were killed in his invasions? Entire punjab was blood filled . Please my friend just because he came from where you live doesn't mean he was kind hearted . If I come and kill your family and take your land and after 400 years someone say I was kind hearted ? . He himself wrote in baburnama that after coming to India and seeing its people that these people can't be controlled by violence nor his old ancestors ideology . He recognized his mistake and changed his heart . Read baburnama .
@user-cq8hw3ni7g Жыл бұрын
@@abdulazizyakubjonov7277 if I kill your family , is it secondary issue for you? If there was any good in babur that only came after coming in india . Read baburnama !
@vishwamithra3390 Жыл бұрын
LoooL potraying mughals as good people, nice one Stephanie. Nice one.
@shubhnamdeo2865 Жыл бұрын
@@SA50166NOW I disagree. They wanted to set up their own empire. And they had every right to do so as Aurangzeb imprisoned his own father, tortured and murdered all his brothers, and showed extreme disrespect to his predecessors by reintroducing religious intolerance, kicking the Rajputs out of the Empire and his court, and destroying countless temples. And this my friend, is something truly worth fighting against.
@raazirazz42166 ай бұрын
There are many good sulthans in mughal rulers such as Akbar The Great.
@raazirazz42166 ай бұрын
There are many good sulthans in mughal rulers such as Akbar The Great.
@Zuddso2 ай бұрын
@@shubhnamdeo2865why they didn't set up their empire in central asia then? They conquered and were looters is it so difficult for u to digest? They were no better than British
@shubhnamdeo28652 ай бұрын
@@Zuddso It's been a full year and the guy I replied to deleted his reply. What empire are we talking about again?
@realeyes81994 ай бұрын
Wow you just skipped Aurangzeb's rule which was one of the longest(48 yrs compared to Akbar's 49 yrs rule) and also the role of Marathas and Sikhs in bringing down Mughal empire entirely.
@llamalover1719 Жыл бұрын
Ted Ed coming in clutch just in time for my AP world history exam
@sauravsuresh6388 Жыл бұрын
Lesser known facts: Even after the empire crumbled to Agra and Delhi, many Indian princely states such as Wodeyars, Arcot, Travancore etc payed tribute to Mughal Empire, they sent letters to the Emperor whenever there's a succession. Having the acknowledgement of Mughals was a matter of legitimacy to these rulers. Raja Ram Mohan Roy visited England as an ambassador of the Mughal Court. In 1700, when most part of the country was ruled by Mughals, India had a 24.4 per cent world GDP share, higher than entire Europe's 23.3 percent.
@dilsere1775 Жыл бұрын
And more than 33% of the world before mughals came.. Samjhe mughals ke najayaj aulaad???
@sauravsuresh6388 Жыл бұрын
@@dilsere1775 whatsApp historian spotted!
@abhishekagrahari8667 Жыл бұрын
@@sauravsuresh6388 still better than bagal ke madrsa paidias😂😂
@shauryagupta4981 Жыл бұрын
@@dilsere1775 Europe of industrialising at that time of courses there percentage would increase that 33% figure wasn't even there at the time of babur it was about 600 -700years back when there was Delhi sultanate etc many things changed over this period you can't blame mughuls for it
@dilsere1775 Жыл бұрын
@@abhishekagrahari8667 bhai mughalo ke najayaj aulaad bhare pade hain 🤣🤣
@Storming360 Жыл бұрын
NurJahan, what a name! Light of the world.
@youtubeuser1946 Жыл бұрын
سلام!
@Storming360 Жыл бұрын
@@youtubeuser1946 سلام
@youtubeuser1946 Жыл бұрын
@@Storming360 Are you Persian?
@Storming360 Жыл бұрын
@@youtubeuser1946 yap
@youtubeuser1946 Жыл бұрын
@@Storming360 در ایران می مانی؟
@sonviktv6 ай бұрын
TED-Eds videos are so engaging thanks to the animation and creativity
@AnotherGradus Жыл бұрын
Always nice to see the brilliant creator behind Rags Animations handling the visuals again.
@RagsAnimations Жыл бұрын
Hey thanks! Im so glad you enjoyed the video! I really enjoyed working on this!
@hostile_user Жыл бұрын
@@RagsAnimations you make these animation s?
@RagsAnimations Жыл бұрын
@@hostile_user yep!
@42PalaceOfWisdom42 Жыл бұрын
@@RagsAnimations I really like the animation. The symbol for the BEIC has me wondering though. Isn't this the flag of the fictional East India Trading Company (EITC) created for the Disney film? afaik BEIC never used this, not super sure though
@cerarobert1989 Жыл бұрын
Nostalgia. I read about Mughals when I was in school. Thank you Ted ed for covering Indian history and animation is pretty good too. 🥰.
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
its all lie here
@senseisky Жыл бұрын
That's not 'Indian history' It's just a small part of Indian history that caused the destruction of the whole well established and developed country... (Not to mention the million of people that faced genocide each and everyday) the total people who died throughout their rule will bamboozle you if you do some research. And on top of that they fkin used the country & it's knowledge and used the destroyed monuments to just make a few new monuments The destruction caused will make your blood boil coz of how much is lost... Like imagine Angkor Wat level of stuff destroyed here n there
@hostile_user Жыл бұрын
@@senseisky a WhatsApp University topper here!
@1DontKnowMan Жыл бұрын
@@hostile_user you mean yourself
@hostile_user Жыл бұрын
@@1DontKnowMan you also know who i mean.
@HassanKohs-ky5dq5 ай бұрын
I love India from Iraq. They are kind and very skilled in the arts. Thank you for giving advice on how to fix some technical problems.
@prateeksharma67064 ай бұрын
Love to iraq hope god gives stability and prosperity to iraq
@worthit5064 Жыл бұрын
Well , as Indian , I appreciate the current Good days and we can learn a lot from our history. How our cities got looted and burned to ground under greedy leaders in past. Then european killed millions of people in India but that what makes us not only powerful but humble too. I hope India grow more and more for goodwill of Peoples.
@srikanthsv79 Жыл бұрын
India didn't exist before 1947 so whoever conquered ruled, nothing wrong in that
@worthit5064 Жыл бұрын
@@srikanthsv79 actually it does , we even had Govt. of India , Reserve bank of India , Indian railways , Indian cricket team and whatnot.
@srikanthsv79 Жыл бұрын
@@worthit5064 by British Empire & not Republic of India. It was british, mughals, marathas etc etc or a bunch of seperate kingdom's like Hoysalas, Nizams, vijanagara etc but India didn't exist
@devient626 Жыл бұрын
@@srikanthsv79 even bible mentioned india 2000 years befre , inda was seen as a wealthy subcontinent ( sone ki chidya)
@worthit5064 Жыл бұрын
@@srikanthsv79 India got its independence on 1947 not discovered or formed !! Although it's tough to say when India turned into India from separate kingdoms. India units many times with different names and later collapsed but the Mauryan Empire was the first one who almost united the all subcontinent.
@Mehssii_editz4 ай бұрын
Fun fact:I am a mughal and mughal still exist in Pakistan and known as Mirza
@randomclips55403 ай бұрын
Besides mirzas there are also many non specified people who have mughal blood
@Nomadicenjoyerplus Жыл бұрын
The Mughals (1526-1858) lost control of India in the 1700s, but many of the local rulers who replaced them were also Turks, at least until the British took over. Chase, K. (2003). Conclusion. In Firearms: A Global History to 1700 (pp. 197-210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
@Pinicle_of_evolution Жыл бұрын
Turks? The Marathas controlled India after defeating the sand barbarians, u can keep lying to yourself tho
@user-uj2tk2tv3z Жыл бұрын
This is fake and anyone with basic knowledge knows that There was not even a single Turkic empire in india after Mughals and even Mughals are mixed people not Turkic
@Nomadicenjoyerplus Жыл бұрын
@@user-uj2tk2tv3z 🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓🤓
@anuraganand3874 Жыл бұрын
This is like my ncert book, From praising mughal, and tajmahal to Directly going to its downfall without mentioning, Maratha Empire, Chattrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Peshwa Baji Rao , Rajput empire, Ajit Singh , Jat rulers.. Thank you Ted
@shivendraupadhyay8415 Жыл бұрын
Dude you have to get one thing in your mind, Maratha's played a role in ending Mughal Empire, but their role was minimal, As a person who studied in Maharasthra State Board, and read several books regarding Mughals and Marathas, I can Mughals fell because of the internal struggles in the Royal family. After Aurangzeb died, Mughal empire descended into Chaos, this is why Ghuri and Marathas launched invasion of Mughal territories. They didn't end the mughal empire, they used the problems in Mughal Empire to their advantage. People in the subcontinent are always confused amongst Rise of Marathas and fall of Mughals it happened simultaneously, and had a lot in common, but saying that Marathas "ended" Mughal empire is incorrect. Defeating someone and using their problems to your own advantage are two different things. This is like saying Gandhiji was the key factor to gain independence, which is totally not the cas, his role in the independence struggle was minimal, similarly Marathas role in ending Mughal rule was minimal.
@prasadalc Жыл бұрын
Read the title of the Video properly
@mastikitrain2844 Жыл бұрын
(Almost) The whole syllabus of Class - 8 History, India in 5 minutes.
@AjaySingh-hp6eh Жыл бұрын
@04:20 Bengal was the wealthiest province when British Colonials took over, and when they left, Bengal was so poor they had to face famine and millions of innocent people died of hunger. Strange.
@shahir1395 Жыл бұрын
being one from the Bengal, I can confirm that we are now one of the poorest regions of the world. They took everything from us and we let them. The unfortunate thing is we didn't learn from history.
@benjamindo8142 Жыл бұрын
its estimated the mughal empire had equivalent to 22 trillion dollars in todays currency. they were the richest nation in the world at the time. & the british essentially stole majority of indias wealth
@shahir1395 Жыл бұрын
@@benjamindo8142 yes. but we let them. we still haven't learnt from what truly is nothing but a tragedy. we are still starving to this day. many nations had way smaller tragedies than ours but learnt from it and got better. we made babies instead. one of the reasons why famine never leaves us alone.
@sachinpotdar77983 ай бұрын
@@shahir1395you become clowns of arab turkic invaders calling them your heroes now you will be destroyed because of them
@mayanksingh0044 Жыл бұрын
as an Indian myself, Getting colonised was bad and mughals were no better. To the death of Aurangzeb or Mahummad shah Rangeela last powerful rulers of mughals, I would say Good RIddance to both of them.
@banerjeehome5913 Жыл бұрын
Comparing the horrors of the British Raj with the relative harmony and prosperity under the Mughals? Are you sure you don't learn your history from BJP's WhatsApp University? 😂
@AntiAnglo-Saxon Жыл бұрын
@@banerjeehome5913 What's to be proud of slavery and islamic conversions while Hindus were openly slaughtered? The last 400 years in particular have been disastrous for India.
@banerjeehome5913 Жыл бұрын
@@AntiAnglo-Saxon Are you saying Hindus were slaves under Mughal rule? LOL. You definitely didn't study actual history, only BJP propaganda. Go and read NCERT books first. Stop spewing the nonsense filled in your head here.
@HIFLY01 Жыл бұрын
What about a history of the British empire? From the Roman colonization to the end of their influence?
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
You forgot one of the main points, in the late 1600s and early 1700s, the Marathas conquered a lot of Mughal territory and dominated India.
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
@Mughal_Nationalist Of course your name is Mughal Nationalist 😂
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
@Mughal_Nationalist You literally got your PHD from WhatsApp university
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
@Mughal_Nationalist Sorry, the Marathas erased the Mughal out of the map in the mid 1700s (1758) not the early 1700s
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
@Mughal_Nationalist They were the only small muslim genocidal states remaining, when the Marathas conquered the entire Nation. The Mughals were 1000x worse than the Britishers.
@shreyanhistory Жыл бұрын
@Mughal_Nationalist .....but the Marathas owned basically all of India
@arjunps6776 Жыл бұрын
320 years of Delhi Sultanate, 180 years of Mughals and 190 years of British. India 🇮🇳 is finally ruled by Indians since 75 years. Long live the Republic of India. 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@vishrutkrishna8469 Жыл бұрын
Ye sab ghulami ke saal the?
@theawesomeman9821 Жыл бұрын
the Delhi Sultanate were Indians
@syedkhursand4951 Жыл бұрын
@@theawesomeman9821later Mughals were too
@sagnikchatterjee2946 Жыл бұрын
@@theawesomeman9821 Not at all.
@sagnikchatterjee2946 Жыл бұрын
@@syedkhursand4951 LMAO no
@srinathsrikanth9211 Жыл бұрын
Do one on the chola or the pandyan empire of south india pls!!!
@kelvinstuart Жыл бұрын
yessss. South Indian history is impressive. I prefer it over the Maratha Paratha Empire
@khosrowanushirwan7591 Жыл бұрын
@@kelvinstuart what is paratha Empire?
@hostile_user Жыл бұрын
Lmao Paratha empire
@abednadir599711 ай бұрын
Dont forget Vijayanagara,Rashtrakutas,Chalukyas,Hoysalas,Kadambas.....equally important south Indian kingdoms
@nipunwanjale6533 Жыл бұрын
Bring more videos on -: Who were the Marathas! 🚩🧡
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
Shree Shree Aurangzeb🚩🔥 Har Har Aurangzeb 🚩🔥 Chuhaji Mutraj ki Hai Hai🚩
@AryanSingh-kt5rx Жыл бұрын
@@LionsHeart3.1.3 aurangzeb bekaar tha baaki theek thak they babur badhiya sa tha bas akbar mahan tha
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@AryanSingh-kt5rx Aurangzeb hindu hota to, aj, Mandir sea jiada, India mea Aurangzeb ka Murti hota! 😆😂🤣. Lik kea le lea.
@debarpanroy3785 Жыл бұрын
Akabr married also his own mother. Jahangir shan jahan married his own daughter 😮 Akbar take jajiya (Tax) from non-Muslims. Or converted into islam. Mughals ban diwali festival. 😂 Mughals killed lot of sikh gurus. Mughal totally know without Rajputs ,they cant rule south india . Mughals destroyed india. Mughals and Britishers make india poor. Mughalas are reasons for partition. Mughal emperor persecuted sikhs and brahmans 😅.
@mayanksinghfartiyal52906 ай бұрын
Its a joke that Mughals bought Architecture to India. Just check out the Architecture from where they came from it was not even comparable whether it be Central asia or west asia
@parinditabhattacharyya175 Жыл бұрын
They built magnificent architecture by destroying Hindu Temples #true_fact
@hindugramsci Жыл бұрын
Since TedEd has clearly attempted to paint a romanticised portrait of one of the most consequential phase of the Middle-Eastern Islamic Colonization of India, the Mughal Era, I try to put things into perspective by portraying the other side which according to historian Will Durant was the most brutal period of human history. 1.) The so called Peasant friendly rich Mughals is nothing short of embarrassing. Francois Bernier, the European traveller and royal physician during Shah Jahan, described the deplorable economic conditions of the populace who often absconded their homes to live in the forests as the Mughal tax collectors took everything that they could for the royal coffers while the peasantry lived in abject poverty. Bernier described India as a land where the aristocracy was extremely wealthy while the people were hardly able to survive. Bernier's descriptions even influenced Karl Marx who propounded his idea of Asiatic mode of production where the oriental empires confiscated the entire surplus produce of the peasants leaving them with nothing. The Mughal wealth was accumulated on the toiling backs of native Hindu peasantry. 2.) The fiction of religious tolerant Mughals is absolutely preposterous. Mughals destroyed Hindu temples in thousands including some of the most sacred ones in Ayodhya and Benaras. Even the first mosque of Delhi was built with the ruins of 27 Hindu and Jain temples. Aurangzeb banned the public display of hindu festivals and reimposed the jaziya tax that the mohemmadan law prescribes for infidels in an islamic state. While Akbar was slightly better than the other evils, he was not at all a hero for the Islamic scholars of the age such as Sirhindi who was the first to propound the distinct nature of the two races of Hindus and Mohemmadans. No wonder in present day Pakistan, while Akbar is ridiculed for his somewhat tolerant attitude; Aurangzeb is hailed as a hero and champion of Islam. 3.) The seeds sown by Sirhindi soon germinated when another tall Islamic Scholar by the name Shah Waliuallah Dehalwi witnessed the gradual decline of the Mughal state after Aurangzeb. Haunted by the fact that state power was now being shifted to the hands of Hindu Marathas, he wrote letters to Ahmad Shah Abdali to invade India and raise the Islamic flag high. Dehalwi studied hadith with Abdul Wahab, the founder of Wahabism, at hejaz and hence became the founding father of the Wahabi movement in India which aimed at reestablishing the Islamic state in India which ultimately culminated in the partition of India and the forming of Pakistan. Pop culture and Bollywood may try whatever it can, these facts about the dark ages of Islamic Colonization will stand firm.
@hindugramsci Жыл бұрын
13 likes and zero accusations and abuses? Lol didn't expect this.
@arkoguha888 Жыл бұрын
I understand you had a lot to unpack. But humayun bare minimum deserved a mention And Aurangzeb's tyranny was ultimately what began the downfall
@BarlasofIndus Жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb was the only one that was the best at holding the empire. The empire slowly started losing hold when numerous small rebellions broke out during Arungzeb's son's short rule, and the rebellion slowly turned greater and greater
@anirudh177 Жыл бұрын
@@BarlasofIndus I'll politely disagree, the primary cause of Mughal decline vere structural and institutional issues that began appearing in the reign of shah jahan and Aurangzeb, both of vhom failed to rectify it, this in turn vould lead to administrative and economic degradation during the later years of Aurangzeb, and continue after him, Alamgir also vorsened the crisis vith unnecessary campaigning that proved fruitless in the end, and his diplomatic mishaps and mismanagement of religious tensions also contributed as factors, this combined vith hostile entities staging invasions and uprisings marked the beginning of the decline.
@gobimurugesan2411 Жыл бұрын
All kings are just dictators.
@fubukishirou5023 Жыл бұрын
@@BarlasofIndus And why do you think these rebellions arose ? Because of the tyranny of Aurangzeb
@ClashwithImb Жыл бұрын
Aurangzeb was best
@signitainment1181 Жыл бұрын
You should cover the maratha empire with same dedication
@kelvinstuart Жыл бұрын
no
@kelvinstuart Жыл бұрын
no one cares about Maratha Paratha
@stealth9758 Жыл бұрын
@@kelvinstuart you certainly do for spamming in every comment reply.
@ahnafabdullah5307 Жыл бұрын
I don't think it was comparable to Mughal Empire at its height. You could compare it to the Delhi Sultunate. What would be better would be a video on the Maurya Empire or the Gupta Empire!
@chendu2215 Жыл бұрын
Bro this is not WhatsApp uni its TEDed ☠️
@dhandanakasinu8420 Жыл бұрын
This is like saying Christopher Columbus discovering America was the Greatest thing to happen to the American Natives because it brought trade and prosperity to the region.
@007dalal Жыл бұрын
Apples and oranges. Native Americans didnt reach at ny high position Name one Native American parallel of Man Singh
@notfunny3397 Жыл бұрын
@@007dalal not OP, and not trying to prove your point (or OPs point) But the Mayans, though somewhat barbaric by our standards, were advanced enough to create calendars and complex writing systems Aztecs were also pretty impressive Christopher Columbus brought nothing but death and disease to the west P.s. I'm not Caucasian or native American
@ahnafabdullah5307 Жыл бұрын
I would respectfully disagree. Just look at how many Native Americans live in America today and how many Indians live in India today. At the same time, i would also like to clarify that i am in no way defending the atrocities committed by Emperor's like Aurangzeb towards some Indian People.
@vult07 Жыл бұрын
Yes, Europeans literally did bring wealth and prosperity to Americas 😂
@notfunny3397 Жыл бұрын
@@vult07 for themselves, not the natives
@Khakshanhere64 ай бұрын
The pronounciation of Aurangzeb was beautiful, I almost had to replay it
@anamtahoney6192 Жыл бұрын
Huge history explained in such a precise manner...very beautifully explained.... excellent...✨
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
its all lie here
@grapeshott Жыл бұрын
@@ankitsoni9275 Ted Ed has a long reputation of being accurate. You don't worry.
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
@@grapeshott 😅 oh yes because it follows European historians and always tries to hide truth
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
@@GOOD_FARMER do you agree that " little knowledge is dangerous " they could have make it 20+ min but they don't do that . subjects like history are sensitive ted ed should not have done this & for ur knowledge it's not the first time.
@derangedlunatic9191 Жыл бұрын
@@ankitsoni9275 they talked about the key points while avoiding some controversial topic to ensure an unbiased outcome. if you want to spread the said controversial topic, you should look at some biased channels.
@tanishk2576 Жыл бұрын
Chola Dynasty Maratha Empire >> mughal empie😂
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
L
@GeoBlits Жыл бұрын
ok bro but like why are you typing this in this video?
@lilishipper174 Жыл бұрын
Inrevelant, next!
@thethirdchannel3887 Жыл бұрын
Autistic indian kids be like
@007dalal Жыл бұрын
MAratha Empire? It was barely an empire. It was confedracy for most of the time .
@serpentphoenix Жыл бұрын
All in all they were brutal dictators and conquerers.
@jonathanmark237911 ай бұрын
most sane hindu nationalist
@gurunaathsivakumar53411 күн бұрын
Say this when they were true
@Pratik792 Жыл бұрын
“The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history” - Will Durant (American historian) Thank you Ted-ed for glorifying the thirst for power, genocidal invasions, destroying cultures, forced conversions and death. If not for the valor of Local leaders like the great Shivaji, the mighty Marathas and Maharana Pratap, Hinduism, the oldest religion as we know it, would have become extinct in it's own birthplace. Why won't you stop glorifying the victor's history and shed some light on the impossible feat achieved by these noble men to protect and fight for their motherland, despite the impossible odds? 'Swaraj (self-rule) is my birthright and I shall have it' - Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj
@xxdricxxx3466 Жыл бұрын
Clowns like you know to cherry pick opinions for your agendas. The Khilji dynasty defended India from the brutal mongols, the weak hindu rulers who already faced defeat in front of ghazni and ghori, would've had most of the country slaughtered in the hands of the mongols if they were the rulers. The entire culture of India would've gotten extinct at their hands.
@sandeepshekhar451 Жыл бұрын
@@xxdricxxx3466 justifying invader is great wow so this way you said thanks britisher that they invade portuguese is far worst that why i thanks britishers
@xxdricxxx3466 Жыл бұрын
@@sandeepshekhar451 Do you have any knowledge about how mongols used to fight wars and their methods?and you are comparing them to british and portugese, this is not just lack of historical knowledge but also lack of common sense. And now you are comparing muslim rulers to britishers, where britishers looted India but muslim mughal rulers made India prosper.your argument does not make sense.
@fahmad7194 Жыл бұрын
Had the Mughals invested in industry rather than the glorious architectural wonders of the world, they might just still be in power
@jonathanmark237911 ай бұрын
agreed they were not visionary.
@silentbyte1969 ай бұрын
Yes it is true, Bengal was at the cusp of Proto-Industrialization, but its as if no one realized the potential of Industrialization over there.
@davidmckown3590 Жыл бұрын
4:14 That is Not the flag of the British East India Company. That symbol comes from The Pirates of the Caribbean movies.
@toshi7573 Жыл бұрын
It is so so sad that from this year all the history textbooks taught in schools and colleges all over India will be omitting the Mughal Rein. This ted ed video brought light to it. Thank you Ted ed
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
Exactly, thanks Ted
@grapeshott Жыл бұрын
People don't really remember their NCERT history books after one year. They sleep through history classes. Only when they are adults they suddenly become politically agitated about only ncert history books(not science, maths anyway). Don't worry. Ncert books changes are temporary. And I don't think this BJP will stay in majority govt for more than 2029 anyway.
@TawhidCodex Жыл бұрын
@@grapeshott 🙂🙂
@ankitsoni9275 Жыл бұрын
plzz u join Jaipur dialogue u need to know the real history
@quizvita2370 Жыл бұрын
Get the facts correct first. It is only one chapter which being eliminated from class 12th History NCERT, which describes about the Mughal Court. The book already carries 2 other chapters which throw light on Mughals, which aren't going anywhere. Moreover class 7th NCERT has ample of stuff on the Mughal Empire. There is literally nothing that students would be missing.
@SolinoOruki Жыл бұрын
A lot of fun facts in the comments. Here's another one: The boss-lady at 3:20, Nur Jahan, her name means "the light of the world".
@ApooLLo23 Жыл бұрын
The Mughals became tyrant and cruel under Aurangzeb's rule he was very cruel in his ways towards his subjects. The Marathas broke their confidence, power & pride and bought an end to their tyrant rule. Between the period after Mughals and before East India Company the Maratha Empire ruled the Indian subcontinent for over 100-150 years, but there is no mention of this in any modern history books and it's truely sad how such a crucial era is just neglected and forgotten in history. Writing this comment just to educate all the folks. Nice work by TED-Ed. Huge fan of their work.
@user-premasai9993 ай бұрын
You should make a video about the Vijayanagar Empire of India!
@junglee-bee Жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff you wont find in Indian education system anymore
@runajain5773 Жыл бұрын
It just reduced not remove so it does create burden in student
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@runajain5773 Shree Shree Aurangzeb🚩🔥 Har Har Aurangzeb 🚩🔥 Chuhaji Mutraj ki Hai Hai🚩
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@runajain5773You piece of sh!ts say that, mughals took tax from non-muslims. Lmao,😆😂🤣 Why dont you talk about the fact that, Aurangzeb took zakat tax from Muslims? Why Don't you mention the fact thay, total tax given by muslims were more than, that of non-muslims. You just know how to hate, not learn.
@Barnil_JN Жыл бұрын
🤓 Actually bud... they have multiple books for those Barbarians dedicated to teach (& brainwash) students in India.
@Barnil_JN Жыл бұрын
And to mention it's going on after independence to this very moment, or for 77 years continuously. The Happy news is (for me and I don't know what kind of news it is for you) that Mughal History will be reduced from school books and the Holy scriptures of Hinduism will be added in books (which I don't prefer much because I have studied the books and it says something important).
@nikhilreddy8744 Жыл бұрын
I am Indian I was history student the vedio is all of lies it's ah wrong information.
@thehunterwr4666 Жыл бұрын
Even I'm Pakistani and yes
@user-jk8vh3cw2x Жыл бұрын
they didn’t mention how the briish beheaded the sons of the last ruler and put there heads in a cooking pot and mucked him
@vladtheimpaler5454 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂😂something i like about british now
@shokhsifar90174 ай бұрын
Bobur was born Fergana in Uzbekistan 🇺🇿 he is generation of Amir Temur
@jiminsjams01 Жыл бұрын
As a Pakistani i remember learning about the Mughal empire throughout 6th and 7th standard and i still don't remember anything this video gave me nostalgia 😭😂
@anirudhkashyapanirudh9584 Жыл бұрын
We Indians too learned about the mughal dynasty in our history books of 7th and 9th standard. Being from an ICSE school, we used to have videos played on big screens for better understanding and skillful remembering. Those old days, AHH I miss them so much!🥰
@GoingToAFuneral Жыл бұрын
@@anirudhkashyapanirudh9584 yeah my dad comes from a long loong loooooong lineage of Indian parents during the Mughal empire
@jiminsjams01 Жыл бұрын
@@anirudhkashyapanirudh9584 good for you i hated history in school and usually cried during my history lessons 😭
@LionsHeart3.1.3 Жыл бұрын
@@jiminsjams01 History is fun, but govt. Wants to make it political weapon so it gets boring.
@user-cq8hw3ni7g Жыл бұрын
My gf is from pak too
@govindsharma7738 Жыл бұрын
Its pathetic that this video does not show the reality of Hindu life under Mughal rule. He tortured, forcibly converted, and ruled with fear and division. Anyone who was not muslim was considered untrustworthy and he and his soldiers killed and graped Hindus.
@ZafarIqbal-bz3jh Жыл бұрын
They don't show lies
@govindsharma7738 Жыл бұрын
@@ZafarIqbal-bz3jhwould a real Muslim give out the Mahabharata? He would be considered a kafir from your own books
@azaanhm Жыл бұрын
the comments section ought to be equally interesting 👀🍿🍿🍿
@abhijitpanda524 Жыл бұрын
The way she ignored about Autangzeb ( The most cruel Mughal ) to whitewash the Horrors of Mughal era 👏👏👏
@PPD-40 Жыл бұрын
It is a 5-minute video, what do you expect? Also the name of the builder of Taj Mahal wasn't even spoken in the video and it was mostly about Akbar
@abhijitpanda524 Жыл бұрын
@@PPD-40 At least I can gurantee that Aurangzeb deserved more time than JAHANGIR'S WIFE. If you still can't see it. Than I am sorry for you.
@007dalal Жыл бұрын
@@abhijitpanda524 Why?
@PPD-40 Жыл бұрын
@@abhijitpanda524 yep he definitely did, so did Shah Jahan instead of Jahangir
@kelvinstuart Жыл бұрын
keep crying
@maharishinayak4884 Жыл бұрын
So we aren't gonna talk about the atrocities committed by Mughals???
@doraemo4024 ай бұрын
Sourc????
@MadristaSisam3 ай бұрын
Every empire has done that. Stop trying to make one empire look bad because of religious reasons
@nachiketkejriwal9433 Жыл бұрын
they devoted so much time in the video to tell about akbar but when aurangzeb came they just told about his death and not his atrocities. Why?
@gobimurugesan2411 Жыл бұрын
Because even a school going kid knows all kings are just dictators.
@_im_stupid_ Жыл бұрын
Because they are over exaggerated
@mohammedhassanakbari6722 Жыл бұрын
The Real Cause of the Percipitation of the Decline of the Mughal Empire was Aurangzeb's Forcefull Implementation of Islam Upon all of the Countries Citizens, Though Muslims Were in a Minority, This Led to a Great Deal of Friction & Multiple Rebellions & Uprisings Across the Land, Thereby a Great Deal of Wealth & Energy Was Spent in Putting Down the Rebellions Across the Country. Also a Key Point to Note is that in the South the Shia Qutub Shahi Kingdoms Were a Regional Power, They Kept the Marrathas & Other Forces in Check & Under Controll, Once Aurangzeb Subjugated these Kingdoms, in the Resulting Power Vaccum in the Aftermath Provided Ideal Conditions 4 the Rise of the Marrathas, Thereby Making Them Formidable Enough to Challenge Mughal Might, Power & Authority on a Regular & Sustained Prolonged Basis. Aurangzeb Adopted a Rigid Puritanical Approach in Departure 4m the Inclusive Policies of his Predecessor's - Key Events of his Reign as a Result of the Pro-Extremist Approach was the Attempted Forcefull Conversion of Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur, and his Killing 4 Refusal to Convert to Islam as well as the Execution of Prominent Shia Jurist Qazi Nurullah Shustri at the Behest of Bigoted Clowns & Toadies Like Ahmad Sirhandi(Aleyhim-ul-Laan) & his Accomplices.
@mohammedhassanakbari6722 Жыл бұрын
So in Short Aurangzeb's Extremism Prooved to Costly 4 the Long Term Survival & Sustainability of the Empire.
@himanshuvinaykumarvishwaka9299 Жыл бұрын
Mughals destroyed Indian temples. Aurangzeb imposed a religious tax called Jaziya on all non-Muslims in his kingdom. Mughal empire. Fall of the Mughals Empire Reason- Rise of Maratha Empire ( Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj 🚩)
@NordicPolestar Жыл бұрын
That's the right wing nationalists version of the cooked up story. Mughals were overthrow by the British. Read real history. The British literally founded this country and United it and gave it a name. India.
@islammehmeov2334 Жыл бұрын
And then come the British and then the fun stuff happened one of them is the British Raj)
@vladtheimpaler5454 Жыл бұрын
@@islammehmeov2334 just like central asia had fun stuff coming called the Russian empire and then the soviet Union
@islammehmeov2334 Жыл бұрын
@@vladtheimpaler5454 just as the GYPSY PEOPLE had fun under TURKS roll)
@arpanmandal7244 Жыл бұрын
@@islammehmeov2334 muslim deserve Chechen treatment everywhere. Russia did gret things