i noticed this as well. i can't exactly remember where I saw it before, but I have seen it multiple times, particularly in people who are somewhat older, and very learned. Richard Dawkins sometimes does this. Also David Attenborough I think. I used to wonder why they did it, and then I realised that it's simply because they have said this information so many times before, and know what they are talking about so well, that they barely need to acces memory and information from their brain. it is already all there. Think about if someone asked you to explain who their parents were, and their names. Most people would have no trouble at all in saying this without looking around. You don't need to because the information is right there and has been used so many times that it is not necessary to retrieve it (and therefore look around). I hope this helped!

Lol except ur using the scientific method to study it

“Science hasn’t got all the answers even though we wouldn’t last a moment without it” * is what you mean

Many prefer not to discuss such things primarily for social concerns. ALSO, deep, clear thought might necessitate an alteration of a libg-held, and therefore, very comfortable belief system. Many refuse to change a belief even in the face of exceptional reason to do so.

Yeah, You're right, Mozart 'saw' the whole composition in 'the room' space, but need lots of time to write it dawn. Also Tesla could 'see' aparatus in 'the air' and even tune and balance them, his helper right beside him, did'n see anything, This is Intuitive Impulses/glimpses. Also familiar with morphic resonnance, so if You are on vawe-lenght, or experienced, pre-destinated, it will come mostly or often un-expected. Just short told.

The whole point of Universities !!! Well.... what they should be...not what they are....

haha

wow! really???

In Kazakhstan too😁🇧🇷🇰🇿

Same in Romania 🔆👍

*I really hope telepathy is and has been real... life would be so easy and great. My true love would be my true love - I’d never doubt. I’d know the truth. Hopefully, teleportation is real too.*

Teach me, plaese

whos name am i thinking of now?

in most institutions they haven't talked about this stuff ever .... since the 70s and even earlier when research was showing the effects time and time again. i don't think it's political correctness at play. i think there are other motives--the information is very powerful.

extraterrestrial16

I see that Susan Gerbic's flying monkey squad are trolling this. I think it would be better to close comments on these topics because easily three quarters of the comments will carry false assertions. Kellyanne Conway level "alternative facts".

Well, when I took psychology class, I talked about my experiences which are very obvious, but the teacher said, "but it is not scientifically proven, could be coincidence" That's how they deny and make us believe in Sciencism.

I'm very interested in what Rupert Sheldrake has to say, but coincidence aka blind chance is a factor which must be taken into account during experiments. Cannot blame science for it, any more than you can blame science for Gravity: but people like you probably dont believe in that either. But if some people want to argue that (for example) the Big Bang is a big lie they should be able to do so without ridicule and censorship, as long as they provide evidence and data to support their views.

Roger That would explain my constant headaches.

I'm bilingual, so I was reading this comment and trying to make something out of it when I realized this wasn't English or any other language I've been studying hehhehehe

Another painter agrees.

That illustrates the problem with HD television, you can't put enough pancake makeup on to hide your flaws from the damned camera.

You have to observe without accepting or resisting. Can you do that for one day ? That’s the real challenge.

Listen to Rufus May, made a great documentary called the doctor who hears voices.

The problem is rarely absence of evidence or conclusive data. The problem is rather the politics in academia: research grants, careers and egos of self proclaimed "experts" determine what's "scientific fact" and what not. History has shown many times that these things are hardly changing. BTW: there isn't such a thing as "supernatural", only natural. Imagine you'd show an iPhone to somebody 200 years ago... Many phenomena are real but simply not understood with the existing paradigm.

Johny Piston good point. I wonder...

I believe we contemplate on life in order to bring ourselves into a better state of being. That is, we like to ponder on the meaning of existence to make it comfortable for ourselves, and I see nothing wrong with this. The 'purpose' of it is itself, like the reason we listen to music or play games. While there are underlying benefits to most if not all activities that are fun, the reason we do them is only for the fun. Now what is fun for? This is a philosophical matter, because it could be argued that we do things that are fun to aid our survival and progression, which is what I mean when I say underlying benefits, but since that is more of an unconscious result and we have fun just because we can it is rather irrelevant in regards to this topic. I also think a lot of it is to ease the minds of others. Since our minds may be interconnected it would make sense for us to have questions pop up that need answering because it is rather like somebody asking you about it in person. So here's an example. I may sit at home and think about why war exists, ponder an answer and let it go. That could have been somebody elses thought (the question) coming in, me answering it and upon release providing them the answer, which they would feel they came up with themselves. So essentially, we're always communicating with one another, which is why it is a great thing for all of us to contemplate on ourselves, our purpose for one another and all of those lovely juicy matters that can create such beauty and wonder for us :) I hope this made sense, it's a peculiar subject, yet completely everyday

It's the intent, I guess, that does it! :-)

easily explain...you as a observer only register the "hits"...that is a classical fallacy mate....

@@nickolasgaspar9660 still though, the fact that there is hits must mean something

shinilla luks - You're right. Direct experience cannot be explained by or reduced to secondary phenomena. It's just the starting point of our exploration of what might be possible or analyses of what might be consistent. Enjoy! Cheers!

shinilla First prove that you have a soul, whatever that means to you.

Myles Lawless - What's you criteria of proof? What's your criteria of existence? What can you comprehend?

shinilla luks - Our souls do go on forever.

Myles Lawless... Sam Parnia's AWARE study... Now, would you provide a "proof" that you have any "experience" at all... whatever that may mean to you.

@@virvisquevir3320 he wants a materalistic proof of souls lol. How is that even possible? Hes to stupid to think for himself and outside the box,

Same but for me it's by the planet Saturn's electromagnetic field

lol

Russ Tul - Yes, of course. Brain is just a condensed part of the field, like a train station or a cloverleaf intersection of highways.

Yes and here is why and Rupert is one of the few scientists in the world today to actually write about the medical findings of the later Dr. John Lorber. Lorber found over 100 people who were born with no brains but who functioned normally. This may sound incredible to those brainwashed by Materialist Reductionism but Lorber documented the cases. Another scientist to write about Lorber's research was the polymath Gerhard Wassermann This is what he wrote in his book Shadow Matter about Lorber's research he also quotes Lorber directly enjoy: “There are large numbers of reported cases where much of the normally present ordinary matter brain is congenitally absent, although this, apparently does not affect mental functions. If, as I have assumed, mental functions are vested in the Shadow Matter brain, which could have developed normally, being guided in its development by the residual parts of the ordinary matter brain. Consistent with this J. Lorber (1981,‘The disposable Cortex, ‘ Psychology Today vol 15, p. 126) wrote": “I have now studied more than 100 people who are among the most severe hydrocephalic cases, using a CAT scan [ a computerized brain scanning technique], formal intelligence test, and detailed neurological assessments. The majority show normal physical development as well as good intelligence. Among them are several with IQs of 130 or more who are doing splendidly at school. Some of the adults have university degrees, others are members of executive committees, one is a senior nurse, and most are in gainful occupations. They hear and see well. One young man has a first-class honours degree in mathematics at a university, despite the fact that some 95% of the cranial areas that normally accommodate the hemisphere are filled with fluid. Instead of the normal 4.5cm thickness of brain tissue between the ventricles and the surface of the cerebral cortex, he has a layer measuring a millimeter or two.” I was first alerted to Lorber's research coming across this article many years ago and you can actually see using google people's brain scans who are afflicted by this condition! perdurabo10.tripod.com/themindofjamesdonahue/id1202.html