The venerable George Carlin said it best; "...The planet will be fine...the people are fucked..."

I’ve fixed it! Tax the sun.

It was just as hot, if not hotter during 1930s. Ice started melting 15,000 years ago according to science. Common sense indicates the longer ice melts, the less of it there is. Less ice means less cold being produced which leads to warmer temperatures. Problem is there is no money to be made saying that

Science has determined that there is a food that immediately and permanently erases the need for physical intimacy in women. That food is : wedding cake

are we helping the planet warm? i say yes. can we stop the planet from warming? nope. it is a natural cycle.

So nature can do something on her own?!What a surprise!

I don't suppose the recording of temperature's having shifted away from the countryside to cities that continue to get bigger would have anything to do with the supposed temperature increases being recorded, It also helps that the starting date for references happens to be at the lowest temperature of a mini ice age in 1884 Oh and just a bit of info they have removed the earlier temperatures reading so you can't validate it anymore, how convenient. I wonder what we will do when we destroy the Oxygen creating plants by starving them of their Co2.

Two books for people suffering from climate anxiety: "Unsettled" by Stephen Koonin, and "Climate Uncertainty and Risk" by Judith Curry.

People need to take a geology class. It explains a lot about our planets history and how drastic temperature and magnetic shifts occured.

In 1800 there were 1 billion humans living on this planet, in 2024 there are 8.1 billion. It’s warmer now because there are 7 billion more people farting 💨

I'm glad to hear the truth, not not government BS. ❤ I've known this for years. I've been studying it. Also, space weather and the weak shields are in play here.

When do we start measuring? The 1800s? Then we have warmed a little. Mideval Warm period? Then we have cooled by 4 degrees. The Roman Warm Period was even warmer than that. Go back to the dinosaurs, and CO2 was 2000ppm, and they had forests pole to pole.

I’ve wondered about this for a long time. Usually science proposes a theory, and then tests it with control groups and test groups. We can’t do that with the climate. If we can’t, how can we tell if climate is changing because of natural cycles or man-made pollution? I think the natural cycles tend to be underplayed, because they can’t be used to call for strict government controls over the population.

In the 1970s when I was in GRADE SCHOOL I (and everyone else) was taught about the ICE AGES that have been melting for eons, long before man could have factored in to it at all... Sooooo...

Its the RATE OF CHANGE, of "normal Phenomena" hat has increased by human behavior, Article is misleading

The 4pm almost daily occurring storms in Waco Texas are extremely rare now but as a kid I worked at a gas station and seen it almost daily! Now young people in that area have never heard of it because it's typically just high pressure system baking the area most of the summer like a pressure cooker and it takes a big cold front or a hurricane coming inland to break up the high pressure system in the summer. The sky to the west use to get very dark close to 4pm then there would be dumping rain that would cool everything down. I don't live there any longer but family told me for years it's pretty much gone still and rarely rains now unless something dramatic happens like a hurricane or the fall strong cold fronts.

I'd say mans part is mostly due to deforestation

Why no one ever considers the temperature of earth's core as a factor for global warming ? ... (through conduction and convection) It is known that nuclear fission also occurs in earth's core.

If we did not have a huge industrial complex and maybe 5bn motor vehicles on the road daily around the world I could possibly believe this explanation, but basically this is a sophisticated attempt to really “pull our plonkers “!

Venus is 480 degrees celsius and theres no humans there.

Stop cutting down all the trees down and Not replacing them.

I suggest the following readings: "Climate Change - 2014 - De Larminat" "Solving the Climate Puzzle The Sun’s Surprising Role" - Javier Vinós "FORCE MAJEURE The Sun’s Role in Climate Change" Henrik Svensmark Sun's role is often grossly (and conveniently) underestimated because most of the times its radiative forcing is considered a direct effect of variations in energy intensity, while it is likely the case that the Sun acts as a control mechanism of other phenomena.

Plant more firewood and wait for the forest fires.

its obvious the earth goes through cycles it and always will as long as the sun is there and i highly doubt theres anything will ever be able to do about it, people just capitalize on the fools that believe there lies

I like it warm. So too does most life. In recorded history, the two periods of warmer temps resulted in a better standard of living for most humans. More plants results in more animals which results in more food. As Seven of Nine said, "We will adapt." On the flip side, ice ages are NOT good for life.

Water vapor is the number one biggest greenhouse gas by a huge margin...so what we really need is an evaporation tax. If that sounds stupid, just remember that carbon taxes are ironically 97% dumber than an evaporation tax.

The earth will continue to evolve and recycle regardless of human beings effect on earth, we'll be a blip in time in the distant future.

The warming may not be the fault of humans, but the destruction of earth's forests, ocean and other ecosystems stops the planet from dealing with the changes in the best way possible for us. It's not the change, but the rate of change that stops organisms from being able to adapt, and human activity is making the changes more abrupt and adding additional stresses.

Reducing waste that pollutes the ocean is a good start. Landfills currently should hold garbage and other biodegradable material. The other non-recylables like most plastics should be better contained for long term while cost effective recycling technology is developed. Other hazardous industrial waste should be treated like nuclear waste.

The latest studies show that since the last ice age, more or less 20,000 years ago, the global temperature has slowly increased to the level prior to the industrial age. With the onset of the industrial age, the temperature has spiked considerably and shows no sign of abating - that increase is directly laid at the feet of human interactions brought on by that age as nothing based on nature alone is significantly different than before that time. You can play all the games one likes, but that is how it is...

Wait a minute, that's not what Al Gore told us. Should he give back the Oscar?

Sometimes it is perhaps forgotten that the reduction of air, water and soil pollution alone are good reasons to take exactly the same measures that have been proposed to slow down global warming.

This title is a real CLICKBAIT !!

All that matters, is global warming happening, yes or no. Most agree it is. The cause is irrelevant. The impact on humans could be catastrophic. All that matters is what we can do about it. How do we adapt as a civilization. Some people feel a natural cause is an excuse to do nothing. This could be a big mistake.

We aren't causing it, but we're certainly accelerating it. By the time anything serious happens, humans will be extinct lol

Nice try, but no cigar. Bernays would be fascinated by how much PR ( propaganda ) has evolved, but he was dealing with a less sophisticated audience with his " torches of freedom. The title was a crude hook, as those that have seen through the " it's you, it's CO2, Oil will make us boil " have spent many hours comparing the conflicting arguments, and the evidence of their own eyes and ears ( much to the party's disfavour, denying this being their final and most important command ) . Anyway, I digress ! Here's my narrative :- Recalling my time as a self identified Green, it was a pleasant identity to have. Other Greens were generally pleasant, nice people, and inoffensive. We had this common belief that we really cared, felt a responsibility and were prepared to make sacrifices for a greater good. But therein lay the danger. We didn't regard ourselves as sanctimonious, but behind the facade of our niceness lurked a sanctimonious hubris, in that we regarded people other than ourselves as ignorant and in need of saving. It began with a love of nature, not a bad thing to have, a dislike of pollution, desolation, and contamination. But contaminated we were, we took the CO2 global warming, climate crisis narrative, hook, line and sinker, with little question, or examination ! Yes the people selling the idea buried us in data, but we didn't choose to examine, or challenge them, we were the chosen, who were out to save the planet. How many have rewatched Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth ? The first time I watched it I took it as truth, it spurred me on, confirming my belief and reinforcing my self image. Well it didn't stand the test of time, much like Greta's tweets, it's an embarrassment, the crisis failed to emerge. CVD ! Thank you CVD for opening my eyes. You revealed yourself for what you are, ambitious totalitarian, authoritarian, Malthusians, who hate humanity ! There they all were, the philanthro capitalists who sold me “ Oil will make us boil “ pushing by every means bar physically holding me down, to put an experimental gene therapy into my body, into all our bodies ! You let the mask drop, and as a consequence, I rigorously examined everything you had ever told me and found it wanting ! There is always more than one way to approach a problem, so why not employ all of them ? The problem in your eyes is us, the useless eaters, so how do you reduce our numbers ? Well if you can get them to hate themselves, which a generation or more clearly does ! Get them to identify as a blight on the planet ? And then they might just volunteer, go quietly ? Slowly poisoned by novel “foods”, novel pharmaceuticals, particles sprayed into the air, starving as the politicians who claim to represent them attack the food supply, through austerity because the oil that fuels our prosperity is reduced and removed, or better still casualties to avoidable wars. Well you misunderstood this former Green ! Yes I love nature, and I love the planet, but I love humanity too. And as for you Malthusians ? You are the problem seeking a solution, and people are starting to realise, so you’d better finish building your bunkers soon !

You're asking the wrong question. By tying global warming to human activity, you create a 'them vs us' mindset, allowing 'them' who disagree to argue that it is 'natural' and simply ignore the problem. Of course this is preposterous ... because 'natural' does not mean benign. And of course it is 'mostly' human caused, but rather than blaming each other, we should all concentrate on mitigations and solutions we can all live with. For example, rather than demonizing oil companies, we should hold our noses and work to help them transition to sustainable, yet profitable alternatives. In the case of a volcanoes and asteroids, which are 'clearly' natural, and definitely not our fault ... we'd all want to find a solution. Global warming should be seen exactly the same way. It doesn't make any difference if it is our fault or a natural cycle ... we still need to figure out what is causing the problem, find a solution, and fix it, because our very existence depends upon getting this done.

Or tax the sunlight to fix it

How do we adapt?

- We live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago - I have an explanation regarding the cause of the climate change and global warming, it is the travel of the universe to the deep past since May 10, 2010. Each day starting May 10, 2010 takes us 1000 years to the past of the universe. Today July 03, 2024 the position of our universe is the same as it was 5 million and 168 thousand years ago. On october 13, 2026 the position of our universe will be at the point 6 million years in the past. On june 04, 2051 the position of our universe will be at the point 15 million years in the past. On june 28, 2092 the position of our universe will be at the point 30 million years in the past. On april 02, 2147 the position of our universe will be at the point 50 million years in the past. The result is that the universe is heading back to the point where it started and today we live in the same climate as it was 5 million years ago. Mohamed BOUHAMIDA, teacher of mathematics and a researcher in number theory. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kKyIhaqXsquylZ8.html

Somehow this video managed to piss off both proponents and opponents of AGW theory. Well done sir, well done. 😂

Considering all other planets in the solar system are going through environmental changes similar to the Earth, it's more likely to believe that there are external forces at play. Correlation does not equal Causation. Also, not a single model has ever been completed that took into account all environmental aspects, synchronicities, and perturbations. They all omit one or more critical datasets to suit the benefactor of the study. Now, if we talk about ecosystem destruction, the chemicals in our water, the land killed by pesticides, the waste we've allowed due to greed, then I'm all for saying that Humans caused all of that, but in no way have we changed the climate, and even if we had an impact it would be quite small compared to other larger factors, like the SUN and the fact that the Earths' protective magnetic field is collapsing, which allows more solar radiation to enter our atmosphere, causing more storms, adverse weather, change in climate patterns, polar vortices, atmospheric rivers, and pretty much everything else we've been experiencing. Climate alarmists have been around since the science has been invented, and they've all been wrong.

Not a bad presentation.At least some of the many factors influencing earth’s atmosphere were discussed, but the interaction between all of these factors are handled in a way that might lead one to conclude that each one was an individual contributor, and there was no potentially complicated interaction between them all. Maybe that was outside of the scope of this particular short piece.Possibly a discussion of the “greenhouse effect” and the contribution of various gases at various concentrations could be done at a different time. If you have a working knowledge of physics, you can further understand the “greenhouse effect “by referring to a paper written about 120 years ago by Max Planck and Karl Swarz child in their study of black body radiation. The greenhouse effect is discussed and the relative contributions of the various greenhouse components is discussed in detail. If you’re able to study this, you will find that CO2’s contribution to warming is logarithmic and much more limited than hypothesized by The current catastrophic anthropogenic CO2 mediated climate change narrative.

Do we make things hotter ? Maybe but are we the primary cause ? I don’t think so. It’s just life and the world is fine. We can always keep trying to do better and we should but the world will last longer than us of that I’m sure. As I’m sure the world is warming on its own. It’s human arrogance to assume what happens in the world begins and ends with us alone.

Humanity is responsible for the changing climate. So.one would think we could just stop it from happening. But, we won't...too much money on the table. There will never be a time when we value anything over money. Glad to be an older person.

What is the percentage of the amount of gases we release into the atmosphere vs the amount of gases present into our atmosphere?

Tell yourself that all you want. whether it’s our fault or not It’s still happening and we still have to deal with it. These things are not mutually exclusive.

Not the fault of humans (i.e “not the fault of oil companies”. They can’t deny it anymore, so now they had already come up with this!

THANK YOU!!!

We would be warming after the last ice age, but the rate rate is exponentially faster since the introduction of emissions. Do the math.

The Earth's distance from the Sun determines the Earth's temperature. Our planet is a living breathing entity full of life. We the human race can observe what our planet does to control climate and assist it in its task.

I feel fortunate to be living in an era of increasing temperature. It certainly beats being cold. Look back again at the last 6 interglacial periods and count your blessings.

Undeniably, both natural and human influences are at play. The key, is both the actual changes, and the rate of those changes. The greatest disadvantage that the majority of people have, is that the individual human lifetime is not even a proverbial wink of an eye, compared to the geological time-scale. A mini example of this is Mount Etna. We know from what are actually recent eruptions that there have been catastrophic events, yet the 6 million humans living close, are largely oblivious to this.

Human beings are sadly underinformed.

I didn't think you mentioned anything about the 5 atomic bombs worth of heat equivalent to Hiroshima and nakasaki that human civilization adds to the atmosphere per second? Maybe I missed that.

I know this is slightly off-topic but what about the di-polarity shift that happens every so often where the magnetic poles of earth's top and bottom spheres shift and thus reverse? The catastrophe of being open to solar flares (radiation from space that the magnetic poles shift away from earth's surface) would heat up the planet quite a bit.

History shows life on earth does better during warm periods. Plant life does better with more CO2. Better to accept the extra warmth and work to mitigate any negative effects on infrastructure.

What If a Super-Earth replaced Mars and a Sub-Earth replaced Venus

Hope it does California coast is 3 degrees colder than normal and my garden needs more heat.

I think we can positively affect anything we choose to. We just need information that we can use to develop methods and means by which we can take action. However, 10,000 years is a fairly miniscule sample. Im pretty sure we can delve back more than 2 million years and see more of the picture. Undeniably, we do contribute to climate change and changes in everything else on the planet. We need to be cautious and judicious. We also need to be reasonable and patient. We are working on solutions and we need more data to make more accurate predictions for how well and enduring our efforts will be. We also need to develop solutions for scaling things back when we need to. I'm hopeful for the future. 😊

Has any one researched or considered the effects man is having on the earth's magnetic field, with all our power grids and now with all the electric vehicles and equipment society is now using and will increase the use of over the next several years (till we find a problem with that). If I'm not mistaken the majority of which is concentrated in the northern hemisphere. Could it not cause an imbalance to the geomagnetic field of some form.?

You are out of date, warming stopped 18 years ago , we are currently in a Maunder minimum, with low solar activity thats why we are experiencing long cold winters and cool wet summers , despite the fiddled data coming from NOAA and the British Met office , low solar activity allows cosmic rays to penetrate our atmosphere which helps cloud formation and in the last 2 years we have had plenty of cloud cover and as I look out my window today the 3rd of July there is a thick blanket of cloud cover .You should also note that yes we are in a warm period of earth's cycle but its the coldest warm period for 18,000 years and the warm periods since then have been steadily decreasing . The earth is due in the next 2,000 years for another glaciation and the climate trend is for cooling with possibly another mini ice age in between. There is no published evidence that co2 , a minor greenhouse gas has any effect on climate or temperature change. The main GHG which no one talks about is water vapour which is about 2% of the atmosphere. C02 is about 0.04% , of which 97% comes from earth's natural sources . Less than 3% comes from human activity

I wonder if there have been any studies that add in all the physical human and animal bodies that generate heat, or add in the heat generate from the physical machines not the gases but the heat generated from machines operating. How much heat does all the roads and buildings add into the enviroment?

Well, no actual research is cited and no quantitative data being presented.

Dark matter phase transitions could be a primary climate driver. If the solar system passes through an area of higher liquid dark matter content the planets cores would all receive more heat due to increased phase transitions thus heating the earth from the inside out. Heating of the planet from the inside out would result in : Increased ground temperatures Increased sea temperatures Increased nighttime temperatures Increased seismic activity Increased earthquakes We are currently passing through the S1 dark Matter stream which, as it is going the opposite direction around the galaxy was described as a dark matter hurricane. From spring to fall the earth is downstream from the sun. And from July to December the earth is traveling with the S1 stream June-July 2020 Earth Mercury Venus Mars Jupiter Saturn conjunctions. This means that the earth passed through several consecutive dark matter streams July 2020 Siberian heatwave and Antarctica temperature spike Jan 9 2022 Venus Earth conjunction this resulted in an increase in the amount of dark matter leaving the sun and Venus March 18 2022 Concordia Station spiked 39 C degrees due to unusual air patterns near Australia North Pole regions hit 30C above normal May 2022 mars crosses the dark matter stream to Saturn May 4, 2022 a 4.7 magnitude Marsquake occurs due to tectonic activity. March 26 2024 the Parker Solar Probe began its lap around the sun on April 4 it came out on the other side of the sun to start back towards Venus. In between it was actually inside of the Alfven Limit which is where I believe the surface of the dark matter sphere that surrounds the sun lies. This would be the equivalent of a speed boat sending a wake towards the earth. April 11 mercury and earth are in an inferior conjunction which would also send a bit of extra dark matter in earths direction. Mid June 2024 multiple heat waves. Venus atmospheric temperatures from 2009-2017 also were higher after conjunctions and the atmospheric wind speeds have increased by 33% probably due to the increase in incoming dark matter. Venus atmospheric temperatures from 2009-2017 also were higher after conjunctions Venus atmospheric tsunami If the dark matter spin off to the sun happens every 5 days on average and coincides with the wave facing the sun it may be proof of dark matter. During conjunctions if the tsunami is facing earth we get an extra surge of dark matter heading to the earth which also affects the time it takes for the tsunami to circle Venus. The gravity well fills up and dumps back to the sun but if it fills faster due to a conjunction it can spill toward the earth resulting in higher temperatures about 60 days later. The streams of liquid dark matter are constantly overflowing the suns dark matter sphere which extends to the Alfven radius. This distance varies dependant on how much dark matter reaches the point at which it vaporizes. (Velocity/gravity/temperature) NASA issued a climate change warning for Mars after Mariner 9 Neptune has been heating up since 2018 Venus data pds-atmospheres.nmsu.edu/Venus/akatsuki.html

Extremely well done! Five 🌟 Stars. Crystal in Canada 🇨🇦

actually we are in for another ice age.

No worries, Earths had an average temperature over 20° hotter than today, a few hundred million years ago

We're probably responsible for 10% but it could be that helios is pissed off at our disrespect for the creator !

You know the U.N. would not lie to us.

it *IS* our fault! CO2-level has increased by over 50% and methane (CH4) has massively increased, compared to pre-industrial times (even N2O is a factor)

I been saying the solar cycle plays way more of a point in it then we do

Oil does not come from fossils.

Nothing…that a massive super volcano caldera explosion could not handle.

we did this for sure. Once we have totally messed things up the planet will bounce back. The trees will come back and perhaps new animals will begin. Humans are going to decline. Sadly this appears to be our future

What are about the co2 content ?

Nobody dares to mention this but can the earth sustain eight billions inhabitants, causing serious intensive usage of resources, without repercussions?

What? The need to add a human touch to the environment is necessary

Continue doing this kind of reporting until heatwave temperatures is 60c globally and sea meter rise at least a meter. Then wonder if internet will even still exist.

Won’t be long before an asteroid hits us. I wanna be at ground zero for that show

Relax…fresh water from the melting ice will eventually halt oceanic circulation and vuela…now I’m too cold ..

As you stated, we have contributed to and possibly accelerated it but it was already happening and would be happening without us. How much we contribute is also a question as while we accelerate it, the question is by how much and when alarmists make predictions that fail or state things then proven false, how can we know to trust our own judgment. Examine using lithium batteries with all their weaknesses catching fire, exploding, vulnerability to cold, the materials they're made from being relatively rare and then all that energy that will be needed to power them up requiring massive levels of solar panels, wind turbines and other energy sources that aren't able to provide for the needs we will have so that some level of fossil fuels will be needed to guarantee we'll have the energy we need. Nuclear is an option but then we don't want a Chernyobl of what happened in Japan happening more regularly because we vastly increase the number of nuclear facilities and we still haven't even figured out the best way to deal with the waste from the ones we have. Solar panels are made from some of the deadliest materials on the planet and wind turbines chop up our birds and tend to explode so they're unsafe and don't tell me they don't chop up birds as we'll have these damn things all over the place and then our governments will start admitting it was true all along. And what about the trade offs as when the ice thaws, that's more land for us to settle on and, in fact, many of these areas were ice free just a thousand years ago and as the ice melts we are finding proof of human settlements there. More than that, the Viking invasions were made necessary by the northlands they lived on experiencing the Little Ice Age that the climate change alarmists refuse to speak about where their lands began to freeze over because the Winters grew longer and more severe. The people who gave us the theory of Global Warming also largely turned against it because of how it was being exploited to manipulate people. They told us first about Global Cooling and how man made pollution was causing it. They also said that if we reduced pollution that it would naturally begin to warm again because the end of the Little Ice Age was causing the planet to warm before we entered the period of the World Wars where man made pollution exploded to all time highs. And isn't it funny that as environmentalists began winning their battles by the early to mid 1970s that this is when we saw temperatures begin to rise again... exactly as the founders of the Global Cooling/Global Warming theories told us would happen. And the reason they turned against Global Warming was how politicians and special interests with no idea what they were talking about were making the science look ignorant and the people who believed in it look like fools. Yes, Global Warming was happening and it still is but human activity was never "causing" it as these idiots claimed, it was accelerating it as you and the founders of the theory claimed. It was happening anyway and had man made pollution during the World War period not risen so high that it blocked the suns rays from reaching the planet as they should have, the warming period would have continued unabated. The reality is we will run out of fossil fuels one day so we need to create alternative energy sources. But we also need to learn to evolve to the changing planet instead of doing what we're doing trying to change the planet instead. Talking about drilling into volcanoes and so forth are insane and yet, some alarmists are trying to get world governments to do just that. We evolved our current way of living during a colder time and what's needed now is evolving more for a warmer climate which we're not doing. We say sea levels will rise and we'll lose coastlands... life migrates and the new unfrozen lands will be where it migrates to. And then we have Antarctice which, as it thaws out, will be habitable for life again where we've only know a relatively dead continent devoid of most life when we know it was was covered by it. Then we have other revelations such as how during the age of dinosaurs it was up to 20 degrees warmer and there was more carbon in the atmosphere yet they fearmongered about 2% rising of temperatures would burn the planet to a crisp. Truth is that America's corn fields produce more oxygen than all the worlds rainforests combined and where Europe condemns the America's for our environmental problems such as how we cut forests, the US has more trees now than when Columbus arrived and if environmentalists would just step back, we could make the entire Southwest bloom like much of California that was desert until humans brought water there to make them bloom in the 19th century no less. Flooding in the East and drought in the West... geez, sounds like we need a national water pipeline to remove excess water from the regions that flood to the regions experiencing drought and those pipelines could be rigged to generate energy from the water flowing through them. People concerned about the environment rarely educate themselves and they listen to reactionaries rather than thinkers as we have the ability to deal with these things by acting as stewards of the world if only we let intellects willing to admit what's wrong and then to address it as global warming only started increasing again when the environmentalists began winning their battles and pollution, even for an almost threefold increase in human populations, is actually less in many areas now than in 1970. It's a good thing to care and be concerned, but you cannot just blindly support people with political and financial reasons to push climate change because they will mislead you. And when intellectuals think they know something and the science is firm, if they're wrong it can take a century for all of them to die off so new scientists can replace them. How long did it take for science to accept that birds were avian dinosaurs and dinosaurs had feathers when we had the proof as far back as the 19th century? It got rooted that birds were not dinos but a form of reptile and fossil evidence proving they had feathers was actually hidden from us. Only the internet and the fact scientists who knew the truth could bypass the scientific establishment finally got these facts accepted as truth by bringing their evidence straight to us.

Were as I do agree with global warming being more natural than Man made, I can't stop thinking about all the A bombs that were tested in the stratosphere back in the 50s, Why don't anyone mention them when it comes to global warming? I am a simple person and don't know much, so please prove me wrong on this

For all who want to stop climate change ... Get a one-way ticket to the moon. That is the only place Im aware of where the climate does not change.

I concur. But we are trashing the place.

I learned this in Junior High school.

Our heat comes from the sun.

global warming tax's & etc... while there is poor people around, the rich will continue to be unaffected...

it's not about opinion. Calculating the effect suffices. the additional greenhouse gases are solely responsible. The earth would slightly cool because of the milancovic cycles. That's very well understood and would be reflected by measurements right now, if only we didn't release the stored carbon from millions of years.

Click bait title: spoiler alert: Warming is pretty much all the fault of humans. That aside, Note: * All the research on natural explanations for climate warming get nearly no funding compared to research proving (not really debating) human caused global warming. * Tonga Eruption Blasted Unprecedented Amount of Water Into Stratosphere. So volcanoes can also push water (the biggest green house gas) into the atmosphere * The Oceans hold 1000 times the solar energy held on earth than the atmosphere and land. OF COURSE oceans impact the climate, but are nearly totally ignored by climate research. If the oceans warmed or cooled by .0015 C, that would mean as much as the 1.5 C we claim the climate has warmed. And we have no data to measure the "global temperature" of the oceans. * Stomata proxies do not average Temperature/CO2 levels the same way that ice cores, ocean sediments do. Tree ring data is very unreliable (there are many reasons rings are smaller or larger other than temperatures and CO2 levels. Even within the same tree). Stomata proxies show spikes in temperature and CO2 levels that the other proxies do not, but compare with current observations. Note that climate science almost totally ignores Stomata proxies. All in all, the video is pretty much a propaganda piece, down playing what we know about natural warming and playing up climate models to support a anthropological global warming (AGW) theory that in fact has no data to support it.

The biggest problem with this article is that the Permian heat spike happened 55 million years ago and has yet to be repeated. The current ice age started a few million years ago.

There are just 8 billion of us (and counting) eager to feast on this blue ball in space. It was life itself that created the oxygen rich atmosphere we breath, the fossil fuels we use. That took millions of years. We’re consuming, harvesting and destroying the limited resources in a blink of the eye. Thus changing the atmosphere and inducting climate change. Our impact is huge. Let’s face the truth!

Yeah it will. Cabal has been setting fires and it's summer time

We had the little ice age and the maunder minimum and then the planets temperature starts to rise. The industrial revolution started at the end of the maunder minimum. Man made global warming is insignificant to NATURAL patterns. Don't worry about it.

Insane Curiosity, You got a D on your report card.

Does it matter if we are at fault or are we going exterminate people to lower the temperatures. If we do the rich should be the first to go as they contribute the most pollution and they have the biggest carbon footprint. But that won’t happen. So let’s just adapt like we have in the past .

What effects does man have on the natural climate control by putting out all the fires caused by lightning strikes, which could potentially burn for weeks, months or longer. Would that not also warm up then cool the planet. We have sped up the inevitable but we need to adapt not blame. For with out the industrial revolution (which goes back to the first blacksmith) our existence, knowledge and technology would not be possible

The reversal of the earths poles effects the global temperature.

Greed will kill us

We keep hearing abouy how humam activity is.mainly responsible, But it isn't cars or any individual. The reality is we need to shift the reponsibility back to the corperations. Becaude they are the manufacturer's. But manufactuers want to blame individuals. So, as a group we can buy less things. Make our own supplies and drive less, but it is such a drop in the bucket of what is really being manufactuered for governments.