You are right. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

and for Mens Tennis its Paire

so true bluetrip

@@colesmith7509 So true imcolesmithh

@@hihungryimcam actually

with ostapenko she was right tho

I guess I'll have a tough time playing doubles with her! Unless she's willing to keep her temper tantrums aside.

R u a sycho no?

🤣🤣🤣

Hahahah man you are the legend 😂

"like..like...the ball was out..like...it's my point...like.."

Almost: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bKmHosJ7r8m0j3U.html

There’s actually a match on KZfaq with Collins/putinseva vs ostapenko/pliskova. Sadly no drama tho :/

Oh I can imagine the tension with those 4

@Grujo Do you want to start a WW3?!

She's the most annoying & disgusting personality in the wta by a milestone, so stuck up & full of shit she makes me cringe everytime

i was thinking the same :D

Yeah, seriously. What an entitled b***h. Funny how all her instagram posts are all locked from anyone being able to comment. Must have got enough s**t from people calling her out on her behaviour. 🙄

I think she's a legit psycho.

She can‘t honestly compare to the two situations. It has to be impossible, to be that stupid

Dude I'm watching video on my phone in portrait mode without my glasses and knew that ball was in. And sure hard calls are hard, but in this sport, lines are thin and millimeters count. One could argue that the close calls are quite literally the only reason the linespeople are there in any professional capacity. So I get being more than a little annoyed for missing an easy call, (slow, high lob, long travel distance, hangtime on the order of seconds, nearly vertical trajectory on impact), let alone several in a row.

Because there aren't 100k tennis fans in the world

How then the r/tennis has 900k subscribers @JohnJackLynch 🧐🤔

Because he/she posts a video per trimester hahahaha and Idk how many copyright claims he/she gets but it reduces the video distribution

Agreed

in Linettes case i would say it was correct decision but in Kalinskaya case i would say it was the same time. So its probably hindrance and so replay the point

Yep, I agree on that.

@@luckyboyaq I'd argue it's virtually impossible for the call to hinder the player who's half volleying from the baseline. The time between the ball bounces and the player hits the ball is extremely short in that case, so there's really no way the call can affect the player.

@@Kordass126 Stop proving your idiocy. The can can very easily hinder a player. In this case a player got hindered, so replay of the point, you dumbass. Because of the call a player did volley. Who knows what kind of shot a player would have done if the call wouldn't have happened.

It's even more egregious in a case like Kalinskaya. It's virtually impossible for the call to affect your shot when you're half volleying from the baseline simply because time between the bounce and hitting the ball is extremely short. And yet she's arguing.

@@Kordass126 very true. Some players will try anything to steal the point. No sportsmanship

@@whitekeyboard14 Learn the rules, you peabrain. Kalinskaya was hindered. She made mistake, because of the call and according to the rules it's replay of the point, you clown. Kalinskaya was right. You clearly don't know the rules at all. If you think that short time equals no hindrance, then you are biggest idiot and biggest joke ever. Kalinskaya argued with umpire, because her shot got hindered. Learn tennis rules, before you write your bullshit.

@@Kordass126 It's still possible for a call to hinder your shot. Call in that short time period can completely change your shot, you clown. And Kalinskaya got hindered.

@@einarsd4 nope you’re wrong, half volley like that at baseline is very quick, it wouldn’t change how the player hit the ball.

hope they get married too

Collins and Paire v Ostapenko and Kyrgios would be a legendary mixed doubles. Prob wouldn't finish with all the arguments

@@jmcd31 I think they will even argue with their own partner

🙏💚

Yes it was. Totally different but at least in that first one even though she wasn't super close you just never know. As soon as you hear that out call everything stops and you don't try but had you not the out call, it's unlikely but possible she gets a racquet on it. I think unless it is totally impossible like she's on the other side of the court, if it's called out it's gotta be replayed at minimum. It sucks for the player who thinks they hit the winner but it's too grey otherwise

I wish the refs were better at explaining things. Often times they are correct but have little ability to specifically map out to the player why they are correct using minute details of situational rulings. If you return the ball in, your opponent can't win the point no matter what the result of the challenge is. If you don't return it, you leave it up to the judge to determine if you were going to get the ball.

🙏💚

Such acting impress you? Wow. Imagine Kvitova acting like that on court. Total trash behavior.

@@coldvoid I thought it was great lmao and I'm a fan of kvitova. I'd think it's funny with any player cause cmon damn. she is speaking what's on everyone's mind lol

​@@AnthonyHirschit was lovely. It's good to hear the players give the umpires a piece of their mind

She even asked for the manager

Collins and Putintseva are drama queens.

Watch ur mouth…ur talking about my gorgeous mami

I mean it’s just so obvious that collins would be one of these women that would call the cops on a black person for walking down the street in a gated neighbourhood. She’s the worst

@@Test-tc4cx lol wut

Yeah, but Yulia should shoud have received 3 Code Violations for Racket Abuse, instead of 1. The match would have ended sooner, hahahah

@@DiegoSilveira126 About the Codes for Racket Abuse - it’s a tough one to give ones the racket is not broken. I’m sure the umpire (Love Marija Cicak ❤️) gave Yulia a soft warning during one of the changeovers. Yulia kept on smashing the racket on the court, so the umpire, rightfully so, gave her a Code Violation It’s not the first one from Yulia, and surely not the last one 😅 Greetings and I hope you have an amazing day!

they did nothing wrong tho, they were just cheering for their country's player

@@DiegoSilveira126she should be given a ban for her unprofessionalism and bad attitude.

I liked it

Yulia Ignatchenko of Kazakhstan - she is a very very nice person as well as an excellent umpire. I was once a line judge on a match she umpired. The match was full of argument and she switched one of the team out because her line was getting heated. After the match, Yulia approached the line judge and told her "not your fault, I just wanted to defuse the situation". Believe me, that don't happen often.

Totally!! Agreeing with you on everything!

I've watched her play live too and man she has one of the longest service routines, so it's not surprising she'd get a warning. It made the match boring when she was serving.

In the French Open 2020 she blatantly cheated on set point against Mladenovic when the ball double bounced and she counted it as one so yeah yknow she's an obnoxious player

I don't know. Those ones are tricky. How can you really know if the call was late or not. Sometimes it's happening at the very same time as contact with the ball. I think unless it's very clearly late and could possibly not of affected the shot, it has to be a replay at minimum. As soon as you hear the out call or the start of it, you relax, don't put the full focus in the shot so it definitely can effect your shot

She’s such a Karen

Pretends she's such a know-it-all and being all condecending. So, the main umpire missed the call by a hair-width from easily 10m away. Big whoop, you got the point eventually, no need to criticise the umpire that much.

​@@Zlax94 what? Dude I'm watching video on my phone in portrait mode without my glasses and knew that ball was in. And sure hard calls are hard, but in this sport, lines are thin and millimeters count. One could argue that the close calls are quite literally the only reason the linespeople are there in any professional capacity. So I get being more than a little annoyed for missing an easy call, (slow, high lob, long travel distance, hangtime on the order of seconds, nearly vertical trajectory on impact), let alone several in a row.

@@DrEcho I'm just saying she's being too rude and condecending for no reason.

@@Zlax94 I hear you, and I agree the behavior was unnecessary. We expect players to take these things in stride, because the umps and linespeople are just human. But I mean after the 3rd consecutive time in her opponent's favor I don't think I can hold it against her for letting loose a few snide remarks. Especially ones as tame as the ones she ultimately chose.

Ostapenko and putintseva are funny. Collins and siegmund are just dumb Karen

I don't know bout that. Saw about 20 overturns and different rulings for same thing.

Correct, the minor events like Challenger can't have the same line calls advocacy. The law of averages has to be accepted at the end of the day.

This time she was right, though. The call came after Linette hit the ball.

@@Kordass126 I respectfully disagree. The "out" call was exactly when Linnette it the ball. (10:09) To me, it was not a late call. I think there should be a review systems for players for situations like this.

@@C_M_R There definitely should be a review system for situations like this, but in this case I really think the umpire is right. Set the playback speed to 0.25x and listen to what comes first: sound of racket hitting the ball or the 'out' call? For me it's 100% the racket hitting the ball by about 2-3 frames. But even if it came exactly at the moment of her hitting the ball, that's still not enough to replay the point, because the call can't affect her if she's already hitting the ball. The call would have to clearly happen before she hit the ball and that's definitely not the case.

@@C_M_R just push pause and play fast and you can hear you’re wrong

@@C_M_R It doesn’t matter whether the call was late or not. What matters is whether the call hindered Linette’s shot. In this case, it definitely did not. And, I’m not being funny, but I don’t see how review technology would be helpful when you two can replay this clip 1000x, yet you don’t agree on the right call.

Even if you're watching in 1080p at 24 frames per second, it's a high bouncing ball on the far side of the court. Very different trajectory than a ball with an oval mark. It's hard to prove without a second camera.

And justified as well. Rubbish fans.

The umpire is right. Plus you can see Collins stops before the call is even made, so she wasn't even making an attempt to get to that ball.

@@Kordass126 I get it but the umpire could explain the situation in a more respectable way imo, maybe I'm just complaining but the tone the umpire is using just sounds a bit too dismissive.

@@grizi1508 English is her second language so I think that`s the case here

No way. The call came after she hit the ball already. She was basically half volleying from the baseline. In a case like this, it's virtually impossible for the call to affect the player as they're hitting the ball immediately after it bounces.

That's Ostapenko's sexy mom.

It’s Ostapenko’s mother.

@@Gangrel1fan looking very nice!