Hey, it's been a long time. I'll check it, thank you.

I just didn't get if his description and presentation of what should have been observed against the footage of his P1000 is meant to show what globe habitat should have seen or it is related by him to the impossible trajectory of the Moon. Anyway, his P1000 shows reality and the way, he understands it, is bit of 2D. Never forget perspective.

@@SergeiMaltsev He's been tracking the sun & moon's path from a fixed camera every day. During the eclipse, the object that obscured the moon did not move along the expected trajectory. It came from the wrong angle and traversed the sun along the wrong angle of motion. I think it's quite curious, and I think his method is sound. But I could be wrong. :)

@@OrphanRed Thanks for the reply. If you rewatched the video, you would see that he demonstrates what is predicted by the "time and date".com. And it was predicted exactly as his P1000 camera recorded during the eclips. His stationary camera (not P1000) on the wall of the house was showing approximate trajectories of the Sun and the Moon weeks prior to the eclips time and during the eclips. Due to this camera characteristics and cloudy sky we do not see clear picture of the eclipse. This is about cameras and what was shot by them. Now, I have stated in my previous comment that his understanding of the Sun and the Moon movement across and over the earth is a bit 2D. The Moon and the Sun may not only be going from left to right when we observe them but also away and towards us and up and down in respect of each other. The complex movement of these two lights and perspective of our vision need to be considered when trying to understand the picture of eclipse. It is not along the same trajectory line only.

@@SergeiMaltsev Oh, I see! Yes, that makes sense.