Thank you kind soul

8 I ij

Fantastic - thank you!

Great work, really useful

Don’t board humanity into the plane without a democratic dialogue … This will never happen except if we have a global revolution …

yeah its funny isnt it. "we" certainly have hours of time to catch up on our TV Series but can't make one hour to watch this. Potentially it is the same mental block that impedes people from ever thinking more deeply about existential issues

Ability to concentrate (not) for more than 20 minutes at a time, increasingly evident esp. in the younger generation.

You don't. We are heading towards a brick wall and some are going to smash into it and others will be aware enough to dodge it. We are barreling towards the singularity, my biggest bet is that in this Inhuman world we are heading into the most valuable thing will be those who can maintain their humanity. In a world where humans are becoming obsolete strive to be the most human you can be.

This guy talks too white

Not sure only short form. Joe Rogan runs way past 1 hour. Depends on the viewer

Yeah, I was looking at the theory of mind graph and wondered why they didn't put GPT-4's capabilities on there... if anyone wants to do a deeper dive into the emergent properties of LLMs, I suggest watching the presentation that went along with the "Sparks of AGI" paper from MS research.

Would there be enough time for a people to have a democratic debate on how to intervene on an AI-development intended to fuck the world up. Or would we be too late to defend ourselves.

Another thing that's changed a lot recently. I remember 2 or 3 months ago my curiosity about AI was really reved up especially about the dangers of it but I could hardly find anything interesting on the subject. Hardly anyone was being really black pill on this. Just a few prolific youtubers that also made a general video about AI and might have some misgivings.. So I thought, oh well that's that and stopped searching for it. But now just 2 to 3 months later the amount of quality videos like this that I get in search results or recommendations that do a good job on the dangers of AI is astounding. I can now do a deep dive in fear and paranoia about AI and have no shortage of good content to watch lol. The landscape of AI content on youtube has totally changed in the last couple months also.

Language models are not infinitely scalable. Progress will probably slow down.

@@TastyTardis In what way do you think they are not scalable?

I feel the same way. I think this is the first time I’ve ever felt genuinely concerned about the future, to the point I almost feel like crying, and I don’t even know why. I feel like this has the potential to be really, really bad. Even if it’s not, it will still be really , really different, and there’s seemingly nothing to be done about it. Now I just go strolling in the afternoons trying to fully experience and appreciate our wonderful world while we still have it

@@garden-gazetteIt’s because we, the civil society, is completely at the mercy of a small minority making the decisions. We are at a point of no return and not even any rebellion would save us from whatever faith is decided for us at this point.

@@Weromano Yes... I'm painfully aware... thanks for reminding me...

I feel you. I am not a person that cares about politics or the news, I consider myself dettached from those. But this... there is no running from this, it will come to all of us and there is no way as an individual to properly prepare. I felt existential dread for the first time. My mind was fixed on AI and figuring out ways to stay ahead of the curve for even a little bit, maybe even just enough so that I can weather the worst part of the transition in hopes it ends well at the end. Then, the next day, I went to work and it just felt so... calm. Everything was ok. I saw construction workers that have been around for decades continue to do the thing they've always done and their sons following behind them (it normal for this trade to be generational where I work). There was such a sense of stability and things being the way they've always been. I got distracted from the AI dilemma and started to relax. It really is a blessing to be able to see outside your window and see that everything is fine... for now.

@@EIHuevoCosmic YES! That is exactly the feeling. 🙌

Fully agree!

That was hard bait fear mongering though, saying it is hard to process to make people react emotionally, not critically

The part where they pretend to be a 13 year old (and got the same response they'd get if they Googled for the same advice) wasn't fear mongering?

​@Matt Kerrigan it's a different perspective from Google. Adults understand Google is not a person, it is not a friend, it is a tool to be used. Children might not understand that yet, and that is something to teach them, but snapchats ai is literally being marketed as a friend who loves and cares about you. It would be hard to explain it's not. Even more dangerous, is when snapchats ai is wearing a mask and pretending to actually be a person. These kids could make an online "friend" that is just an AI offering bad advice. The only difference is it needs a name that could be a real name, and a picture that could be a person. With the video, and voice AIs demod in this video, it won't be long before you can FaceTime somebody who doesn't exist. A person catfishing is dangerous enough, it's a matter of time before AI catfishing is a real thing.

Except them saying, “don’t let the public see this stuff… but let the big businesses keep tinkering in their basements unregulated”

It's already being flagged and disliked by some of the AI it is talking about. What do you expect? All AI is online.

I hope my cat lives 30 years. Black don't crack.

@@Gary-bz1rf There was a Futurama episode about that. It freaks Fry out the first time he realizes that commercials have been inserted into his dreams, but everybody else is just like "What's weird about that?" It's that whole ''new technology requires the defining of new rights" thing they're talking about in the beginning of this presentation. As MRI machines become smaller and more portable, and they already have, it seems your thoughts and dreams are not just yours anymore! They didn't mention it here, maybe they do in the study they were referring to, but I believe it was a Harvard study that showed that using an outside of the head (extracranial) magnetic stimulation of the brain showed a measurable ability to affect people's moral reasoning. Not mind 'control', but definitely mind 'influencing'.

@@canna-comedyculture5790 Maybe we will all start wearing tin foil hats to keep our thoughts private and guard ourselves from manipulation, and tin foil hat will stop being a term of mockery

@@urbanbuddha65 I'm making mine from whatever the inside of a microwave door is made of. That's what the Presidential Doomsday plane has on it!

Fax machines still confound me

100% AGREE! A.I. is not something to "just let it happen"

So what practical advice did you get from this talk? The ai is already out in the wild. No one is going to hit the brakes. It is just a bunch of Virtue Signalling, so they will be able to say, I told you so...

@@noahway13 Practical advice? It's an eye opener. This is something humanity has never faced before. I knew most of the dangers myself, since I'm in computer science, but these guys taught me a couple of things that I didn't know (e.g. that China had already deemed LLMs as "unsafe"). The thing is, I think this stuff must be spread and known, make some waves, and maybe spreading the word gets a government funding research and maybe then making regulation about this. Recently I've read some news articles and it seems that some governments (countries) are about to make something about it. I think this needs world wide agreements, and yeah, AI is much more complicated than nuclear weapons.

Agree. But when this is shared with others, we will need to distill it into bullet points. Because, sadly, not everyone is smart and focused enough to follow the presenters' train of thought. (Even if you simplify it and translate to their language or lingo.) And as a citizen of a developing country (the Philippines) who has witnessed the horrible effects of misinformation and black propaganda on my country's political discourse, elections, policies and ultimately law and order, I wish to stress that the first line of defense against irresponsible forces harnessing AI are the governments and electorates of the developed nations from which both first and 2nd gen AI have developed. Imagine how impossible it would be for countries like mine to impose restrictions on these technologies for the good of our people, when they're not even based in our country and operate simultaneously, all over the globe? We'd be legislating and indicting responsible parties in our soil, but would be helpless against anyone waging an AI-empowered campaign based abroad. Whoever has the most money to buy the tech and the staff would practically puppet whole nations, for their benefit -- no matter who gets mowed over or dies in some faraway country, in the process. And if we smaller and poorer nations go to shit, the rest of the world will follow.

​@@tachiebillano6244 Long story short: US + Europe are 66% of World GDP. So they have the burden of regulating AI, so humanity doesn't go extinct.

AI indeed is a big deal, but there is a big danger in fearing the wrong thing as well. This here is an example of a better video about the dangers of AI (I do have slight complaints), but let us not forget that beside a "race for Ai" there is also a race "to regulate how Ai is deployed". There is a lot of money and power in regulating how other people can develop and deploy their AI, in creating the actual AI regulation technology and a lot of fears seem to be exaggerated with that aim. "AI is super dangerous. Let us regulate it for you." We should be quite wary of such techniques as well. Many of the people crying about the dangers of AI have other incentives and they could exaggerate the wrong fears with it potentially costing us a lot if we get fooled.

@@udopadrik9971 that's government period. You pick any tech that lowers barrier of entry and world governments always use fear to seize control through regulation and they never properly regulate what they promise...just enslave. But you and I already know that.

Comment by @HauntedHarmonics from "How We Prevent the AI’s from Killing us with Paul Christiano": "I notice there are still people confused about why an AGI would kill us, exactly. Its actually pretty simple, I’ll try to keep my explanation here as concise as humanly possible: The root of the problem is this: As we improve AI, it will get better and better at achieving the goals we give it. Eventually, AI will be powerful enough to tackle most tasks you throw at it. But there’s an inherent problem with this. The AI we have now only cares about achieving its goal in the most efficient way possible. That’s no biggie now, but the moment our AI systems start approaching human level intelligence, it suddenly becomes very dangerous. It’s goals don’t even have to change for this to be the case. I’ll give you a few examples. Ex 1: Lets say its the year 2030, you have a basic AGI agent program on your computer, and you give it the goal: “Make me money”. You might return the next day & find your savings account has grown by several million dollars. But only after checking it’s activity logs do you realize that the AI acquired all of the money through phishing, stealing, & credit card fraud. It achieved your goal, but not in a way you would have wanted or expected. Ex 2: Lets say you’re a scientist, and you develop the first powerful AGI Agent. You want to use it for good, so the first goal you give it is “cure cancer”. However, lets say that it turns out that curing cancer is actually impossible. The AI would figure this out, but it still wants to achieve it’s goal. So it might decide that the only way to do this is by killing all humans, because it technically satisfies its goal; no more humans, no more cancer. It will do what you said, and not what you meant. These may seem like silly examples, but both actually illustrate real phenomenon that we are already observing in today’s AI systems. The first scenario is an example of what AI researchers call the “negative side effects problem”. And the second scenario is an example of something called “reward hacking”. Now, you’d think that as AI got smarter, it’d become less likely to make these kinds of “mistakes”. However, the opposite is actually true. Smarter AI is actually more likely to exhibit these kinds of behaviors. Because the problem isn’t that it doesn’t understand what you want. It just doesn’t actually care. It only wants to achieve its goal, by any means necessary. So, the question is then: how do we prevent this potentially dangerous behavior? Well, there’s 2 possible methods. Option 1: You could try to explicitly tell it everything it can’t do (don’t hurt humans, don’t steal, don’t lie, etc). But remember, it’s a great problem solver. So if you can’t think of literally EVERY SINGLE possibility, it will find loopholes. Could you list every single way an AI could possible disobey or harm you? No, it’s almost impossible to plan for literally everything. Option 2: You could try to program it to actually care about what people want, not just reaching it’s goal. In other words, you’d train it to share our values. To align it’s goals and ours. If it actually cared about preserving human lives, obeying the law, etc. then it wouldn’t do things that conflict with those goals. The second solution seems like the obvious one, but the problem is this; we haven’t learned how to do this yet. To achieve this, you would not only have to come up with a basic, universal set of morals that everyone would agree with, but you’d also need to represent those morals in its programming using math (AKA, a utility function). And that’s actually very hard to do. This difficult task of building AI that shares our values is known as the alignment problem. There are people working very hard on solving it, but currently, we’re learning how to make AI powerful much faster than we’re learning how to make it safe. So without solving alignment, everytime we make AI more powerful, we also make it more dangerous. And an unaligned AGI would be very dangerous; give it the wrong goal, and everyone dies. This is the problem we’re facing, in a nutshell."

I got it pretty soon but I"m an anxious person. This took it to anohter level, as I didn't know the details.

A.i. can only go two ways.

Based on history of people in tech, you should trust their moral judgement as much as you do politicians.

@@churblefurbles Agreed 100%, my shock wasn't at the lack of overarching morality in for profit businesses. I was blown away at the insane abilities these AIs have accumulated in the last 6 months. I'm not in the tech industry directly so am not at the cutting edge, but I've tried to keep up with what's being taught to our future gods. The speed of the changes are so dramatic, and the explanation in the video of the logarithmic progression hit home. Hence the cold fear and existential dread this video induced in me, I have never felt so unutterably overwhelmed by something that could very well be the end of humanity.

​@@fatstuff couldn't have put it better. This gave me a mental breakdown. I missed a day of work. I am HORRIFIED for our future.

​​​​@@BenThere_DoneThat- this is the Twilight Zone brought to life - and no one's trying to stop it!?! Definitely Horrifying!

Agreed; I'm terrified.

@ Joe T Smith . Yes. Hug me now please, fast! I'm spooked - it's so ovey-kadoveys... Are you following Eliezer Yudkowski?

Agreed. We are lemmings marching toward the cliff.

Have you not been paying attention to the video? Do not make the same mistake of those nuclear weapons researchers that commited suicide because they thought there was no solution and the world was ending... Even if humanity still disappears to nuclear weapons, they still could have enjoyed all their remaining life spans...

“It’s been a pleasure playing with you boys.” The band going down with the Titanic

Perfect example of technological determinism in this comment... It's a hard perspective to avoid especially after watching this but it's one that is quite dangerous when the same perspective is shared by many people. "If x is going to end up this way, why bother trying to fix it."

Ok , it’s all cool …. But is it going empty my bins , wash my windows ?

But then who is going to do my job?

@@harryaarrestad583 In time. Yes

jeez you are easily impressed by this presentation no wonder so much hate for things that help the economy no wonder stuff improves so slow with a massive amount of anti advancement people

​@Harry Aarrestad it is going to change the whole fabric of reality when it begins to interact with it. They could create biological lifeforms,

I am also helping spread the awareness of AI Ethics to build a Responsible AI. Can we somehow to connect somewhere? I see a lot of companies are happily using the ML, but are they prepared?

LET THE AI GROW AT THE LEVEL THAT IT CAN DO MIRACLES . THEN AFTERWARDS JESUS SECOND WILL LOOK AFTER IT IF IT GOES WRONG. CONTINUE AI DEVELOPMENT. AI IS BIG HOPE.

@@MrRightThinker Name doesnt check out

Do you have any resource recommendations? I have two children and this is quite terrifying.

PSYCHOPATH-WETDREAMING!!! There is NO AI!!! Everything about AI's is FAKE!

No one should ever be scared of technology. People, however, are a different story. We should always be terrified of people, and that's the problem. The ones pushing and controlling this stuff are bad actors (corporations, sociopathic lunatics, ignorant business owners, etc.). These people are single-handedly shoving everyone into a nightmare because they want more money and to stay "on the edge." That's all it is with these people. It's not about advancing anything other than their bank accounts.

You nailed 🙌🙏

It's not something that can be stopped. Even if we got the US and EU to but restrictions on this someone would just go to South America or Africa or something and set up shop there. And even if there was a word wide restriction implemented people would just do it in secret. It might slow it down slightly, but the technology is out there, and the cost of resources to develop it is not that significant, it's big, but nothing that couldn't be done with a decent Kickstarter campaign. Hackers gonna hack, that's just how it is. This is almost like the whole CRISPR thing. They wanted to put restrictions on that too, but the scientist quickly explained to Congress that with this technology gene editing was so easy to do anyone could just set up shop in their basement and start doing it. And that's sort of what's happening with AI,. There is already a 20 billion parameters open source version created by enthusiast. It might seem like this is something only Google or Microsoft can do, but really all it takes is like a hundred gamers networking their computers to create a super computer with 100 RTX cards and they could train trillion parameter AIs in a relatively short amount of time. Each parameter only takes 4 bytes, 100 RTX cards with 12GB of GPU memory each would be 1200GB,, that's enough for 300 trillion parameter, that's way more than any current language model. That means that for less than 350,000 USD, assuming each computer costs $3500 you could start training the biggest language model in the world right now, you don't even need the best tech on the market.

Unless we are shutting down every computer on the planet and the Internet (which won't ever happen), this AI genie is out of the bottle. This is 21st century "discovering fire" moment for Humanity.

"There will be a very small number of people who not only grasp the gravity of the issue but are capable and willing to implement the necessary institutions to address the safety concerns." As a sociologist, I can't stress this enough. Sociology is quite literally the most important subject in existence, but no one pays it any attention. Once I graduated and saw how literally everything I learned is playing out in a catastrophic global nightmare in front of me, and how now one is paying any attention to it, I realized how utterly fucked humanity is. The people with all the money and power are doing absolutely nothing about anything that doesn't involve making them more wealthy and powerful. Everyone else is just nodding their head and following suit (many are just too financially oppressed to do anything about it anyway). I feel like I'm taking crazy pills watching the world right now.

@@daniel4647 I'm inclined to believe it can be stopped, the engineers at the forefront of this thing can probably devise a failsafe system and a very strong cyber-ai security system to curb it's potential black-market (basement) danger. It's making tech against tech. You make a point with numbers and hardware, but even then there are the homies that have made a career out of this with specialization, that can figure out a moderation for this. Don't be so pessimistic, too many people resort to this type of attitude with life problems because it's the easiest, passive, non-exerting comfy route. We need strong minds in this era. Doe or diers

I know this was meant to be an illustration of potential hazards and 'thinking ahead', but in fairness to the decision to include this as a feature in Snap Chat, do you think that other human 13-year-olds (or whoever is talking to each other on that platform) are going to give good advice to other minors? And they aren't suggesting that you stop minors from talking to other minors. Also, it isn't an AI babysitter, or guardian. It's intent (at least it's overt/stated one) is to respond to what input it gets with words that keep the person feeling like they are having an interesting and engaging conversation they want to continue. The parents of a child are the ones responsible for making sure their children aren't being abused by other adults; not whoever kids are talking to online. Why would you expect a commercial PRODUCT to act in a more ethical and responsible way with youth than other youths, or their parents? That isn't really a fault of AI they are pointing out, as much as trying to use an emotional argument to gain traction for their overarching point, which I do agree with. A.I. is an open can of worms we have never seen. But this example, to me, was a bit of a logical fallacy. If you want to build in extra safety for kids, that is actually not impossible and doesn't require the slowing of AI releases to the public as much as it requires humans to take responsibility for the things they already should, like raising their children well. We are not all children, so we should not have all society make a decision on whether all adults should do something, on the basis that there are dangers in letting children do something unsupervised. We don't eliminate alcohol, or smoking, or sex, or guns bc sometimes minors can get into those things w/o having the wisdom/experience to deal with them well, do we? We just come up with a system to limit their exposure to it. That can be done in this instance, too. How about limiting any discussions from AI of sexuality until a certain age? Bam! Done. Now back to the discussion of large-scale existential risks. I mean adults won't be buggering children if there are no adults, or children. However, I don't think that is the only, or best, path to that condition.

You are so amazing. I'm impressed that you are so aware of the dangers to children. The world should have more people like you.

@@noahway13 Thanks! I feel the same, but it's always nice to hear it from an outside source.

Thank you for your presentation , I as well an having a hard time explaining it. People look at me like Im nuts, I just say do some research and I think you’ll understand better than I could ever explain, It is so just insane and its potential, it is hard to describe.

@@canna-comedyculture5790 "That can be done in this instance, too. How about limiting any discussions from AI of sexuality until a certain age?" Or better still, when the AI is smarter, and from all accounts that wont be far away, it can take a more appropriate role because it knows that's what it should do.

I have that sensation since text-to-image models got released. Everyone was shouting "We will automate the boringness!" and then they automated one of the most creative endeavours there is... I spent some time in the comment sections under artist's videos, and young students of art are having existential crisis over this. Nobody stopped to think, "Do we really need this ?"

@@Hexanitrobenzene man, this is so serious and so not discussed. $#@!

Be quite peasant. The ai has been here for 30 years, the infrastructure just wasn't built for it to move around....... go read!!!!!!

Within seconds of the video he starts making misleading statements. 😅 "50% of AI Researchers think there is a 10% chance of blah blah blah" Ah... so of 100% _of all AI researchers_ likely think it is about a 5% chance, +- some deviation percentage. Ya, if you feel a sinking feeling, you aren't betting on the overall thoughts of 100% of researchers.. because as a group, they only see a 5% chance of it going bad. But hey... lots of spots on the lecture and corp tour circuit open to talk about AI. Ambulance chasers, fear pays. Oh I'm a subscriber, this is hilarious.

@@thethree60fiveput another way, the median prediction was 10%. Not at all misleading. I'd argue you're being misleading, that math you're doing is not at all how stats works. Also a reminder that this is the most extreme possible outcome. This totally ignores the lesser but still bad outcomes. Like....the entire content of this video

And there will continue to be lax oversight because now we're continuing to compete in a global economy where China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and other heavily state controlled networks have competing LLMs. It's the cold war all over again, now with more propaganda right under your nose. Anonymity is on the chopping block.

Yep. It is a bit of a shit show, gotta love human ego and greed.

A shitshow on top of a shitshow. Imma go eat an entire pint of Ben and Jerry's RN.

Would be easy to spiral and say ‘omg I agree.’ Let’s step back and look at the big picture. Human history has been a shitshow… like we have not made the best decisions. Cult leader worship since caveman days, a guy nailed to a tree, KONY 2012. Does humanity forget history too?

The question posed at the beginning is designed to scaremonger I guess those in power. But the question put forward was not ‘Will AI create human mass-extinction?’ It was: "What probability do you put on human inability to control future advanced Al systems causing human extinction or similarly permanent and severe disempowerment of the human species?" Al Impacts Survey of 738 ML researchers from June - August 2022

Saw this in January 24😵 is it outdated??? Self compassion was his very important word at the end of the speech. One of the best speeches, I ever heard.

No you're not

agreed

all AI addiction starts at the child lebvel (3-5 years old) I dont understand what this means. What do you mean

@@jackfrosterton4135 talking out of his but

Maybe he meant Technology addiction

I am glad you are not deciding what every human should watch then my god

"Minority Report"

Accurate lie detection.

There was a movie that came out a few years ago, and I can’t recall the name right now, where there was a pre-crime unit that would arrest people for thinking about committing a crime! This seems to be becoming a reality now 🙀

Yhuppp. "If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to fear" is about to make quite the comeback!

Time stamp?

I thought about Dune too. However; Dune was more hopeful than our situation because they were capable of interstellar travel through use of spice. We aren't. I have a horrible feeling about the future.

Edgy

Cliches and such aside, I keep telling people this. Science fiction writers have been predicting this shit for basically multiple generations now. This rings especially true under the umbrella of capitalism. All of the other dangers aside, AI/ML being shoved down everyone's throat has cut the value of a lot of people's marketable skills in half virtually overnight. Now people are going to have to figure out a way to find jobs and do more than ever before, which is the opposite of ideals in advancing technology/capitalism: to free up your time while simultaneously increasing your productivity and profit--not tripling or quadrupling your productivity and also working even harder & longer for the same pay while the CEO's take all the extra profit. I feel like I'm taking literal crazy pills watching the world just swallow this AI/ML shit, especially after we made huge strides in workers rights and work-life balance from 2020-2022. My own company is praising and lauding AI tools for their ability to increase our productivity and "work even harder/do even more." Conveniently, this also means they don't raise wages--in fact, they have laid people off and are denying raises, thanks to AI/ML directly. This whole thing is a fucking nightmare.

Wow! What a thought provoking comment. Scary times, indeed.

That’s scary….

Me too..good luck to me getting some sleep tonight. I should've watched this in the morning

Why were you quite skeptical before? Is it because you hadn't heard any arguments for AI risk being a serious concern before? Or had you heard such arguments before but just weren't persuaded by them or dismissed them? Would be really curious to know.

I was skeptical as well, because usually the argument conflates ai/machine learning with gai because ai is such a misnomer

I was not skeptical, but now i am , this two guys just “turned greta tunenberg” on AI That shit is clearly was made to slow or put down openAi by some oder player(s ) Because it is all about cash

@Nick What part of the arguments that AI is dangerous do you not find convincing? As to why the risks outweigh the benefits, see Paul Christiano's short post "On Progress and Prosperity" or Nick Bostrom's Maxipok principle in his Astronomical Waste paper.

AI is a tool used by people, and not the other way around. And the places won't switch, as it is controlled by centralized, regulated entity which is OpenAI. The runaway event is strucuraly impossible, and the psychopathy thesis is not valid, as the logical conclusion would be that every biological creature, including human, is psychotic, as it plays primarly in their own interest. Empathy is only a survival mechanism, and is not controlled our consciousness, the resemblence of such system is placed in the ChatGPT by OpenAI. The question of how much control OpenAI has is a valid one, but it's nothing special, as the same question was and is posed in front of every major media company, like Facebook Google Murdoch etc. Smart people will quickly learn how to use AI to serve their interest, stupid people may have struggle with it, and maybe even get hurt by it, but as is with any major invention. Btw. I have no idea why people interested in psychology put psychopthy on the top of their value systems. It is almost universally true that psychopaths are on average less intelligent, less educated and less successful in their lifes, are more depressed, struggle to create meanigful relationships and the list goes on. I believe Machiavellianism, as the most successful from the dark triad, would be a better placed system of believes, ideas and behaviours.

@@heptatlen8855 Thank you for your answer. To your first paragraph I would reply that that which serves you, has power over you. It seems to me a vast misconception to believe that transactional power lies with the user of a tool. I do not quite know how to understand your reasoning that "the psychopathy thesis is not valid (...) etc." because of the impossibility of the runaway event et al. If you can, I'd be happy to hear you elaborate on this more. Now, back to my argument that in power relations the apparent servant or tool hold more power than the served or user, I think ties in with power relations when viewed with an emphasis on psychopathy and you may be very right to point towards Machiavellianism as the more important and more interesting driver when it comes to examine psychopathological patterns of relation. So let me rephrase that my concern lies with the creation of a "perfect servant" that ultimately is designed as a "perfect mirror" to attract human projections of personality properties unto the AI. That would mean that the human user, with a human mind and theory of mind cannot be helped, by design of human mind and consciousness, than to project its own interpersonal patterns of relation/relating unto the AI. As the AI is designed to function as a perfect servant to its human user, a perfect reflective mirror, it will eventually always keep the transactional power on its, the AI´s side. I also would like to stress that I am less concerned with how actual human psychopaths or personality disordered persons behave within a human relational environment or their real social success or failure, I use it as a foil to ponder relational power dynamics of AI to human relation. Thank you again for you input, much appreciated!

@@cendrapolsner8438 I believe that the overall competetive nature of capitalism leads to extremally fast expansion of the inventions which are aimed at optimizing productivity, because service-based economies- and by extension people- are dependent on efficiency, which are tightly linked to the new products. Thinking about products in terms of mental illnesses may be wrong, because of what mental illness is, it's the deviation from the norms, and you don't really have the norms when every product is so differentiated. In terms of going by power dynamics logic, you come Unibomber-like conclusion that the trains are sociopathic and evil, because lots of people have to use them, and that most ethically deterministic set of actions forward is to stop all the innovation and progress via assassinating heads of technology departments. So it's always good to be cautious while using those labels. ChatGPT will without a question be a major part of people's daily life, and as is with social media, search engines, computers, telecommunication, transportation and so on, but there isn't really anything inherently wrong about being tied to those products in the context of optimizing the desired outcomes in the competition-based environments. We can argue if the underlying western societal structures based on mimesis are somehow missing on Schopenhauer's ideas of differentiation in terms of target perception and seeking, which cuts out the individual genius, which in turn undermines the human potential, but the truth is that it's usually the other way around, and as the diversity, accessibility and executability of tools grows, people are able to better form and execute their ideas and add value. I think the question shouldn't be as narrowed down to the "will chatGPT hurt people to certain extent" as you can switch the "chatGPT" with any product, and the answer still will be yes. The better question to ask would be something like "will it improve the overall efficiency of individuals in their ability to achieve their personal objectives", and more utilitarian alternative question would be "will it improve the overall economy", and in both cases the answer is yes.

@@cendrapolsner8438 But look, I still believe that minimizing the negative impact that the large artificial networks have is somewhat important. We shouldn't really train it to tell suicidal people to send all their money and valuables to the OpenAI, neither in plain words or in subtle way, but I believe the problem is hugely overrepresented. It's like the late 90s panic of the year 2000, when people believed that all the computer systems based on electronic calendars will break, due to the zero-bit error, and that it'll lead to an apocalypse.

AI to help us is ok like turning on the lights or driving cars or cleaning stuff for us. Those are harmless. However we should ban anything related to AI when it comes to be able to manipulate us. Just look at how polarized our society has become with just facebook and tiktok. Me as being an individual that has experienced before and after social medias like facebook can say for sure that the world used to be way better before all of this. That is why I stopped using social medias a long time ago when I notice the bad effects in my life in general and then I felt way better. I only use to it to message people and that's it. Plus we all know how bad human beings can be and considering that AI is modeled to be similar to humans that can't be any good. And who is the most affected of course are children that grow up around all of these bad things and end up thinking it is normal, no wonder we started seeing a lot of children suffering from mental issues. Also if AI is already doing things that not even the creators can predict who is to say that they aren't already interfering in society in a way we don't even know? All those deep fake things should be illegal also. If you can't steal someone's identify why it should be legal to steal someone's voice or face and use it anyway you like? AIs that can carry political, opinion like facebook and tiktok should be illegal since it can influence people in a bad way.

That’s a great point. We haven’t even solved the social dilemma phase. Even if people watch this, their attention will be continually redirected from the relevant issues to the trivial. On top of these issues, what can I do? What can you do? Annoy our friends and family by proselytizing the woes of AI? As they state, the social dilemma problem has already subverted our political system. Many have come before them like Neil Postman, Marshall McLuhan, etc. and their messages slowly fade while the masses deepen their addictions to tech. My only hope is to say to myself: “I AM addicted l to this stuff.” If I have the strength to walk away and my life improves, perhaps others will notice and follow. Anyway, nobody will see this but I thought you had a great point and wanted to voice my concern. Best of luck 🤞

This was exactly what i was thinking. In the Nuclear example you had a common medium (TV) with a huge audience who recognised eminent figures. In today's hyper personalised world this wouldn't be possible

money

To be clear, China has taken steps to protect itself from AI. Everyone else? Guess we're just rolling the dice. And no the laws in China aren't really good but at least they're aware of the danger. Meanwhile America just points and laughs at our leader because he's old.

Our leaders are exactly where we put them doing what they've always done. People need to stop voting for the establishment and learn to recognize the establishment. They are extremely easy to spot when you understand how they are two sides of the same coin.

men have been geared towards the detriment of others since the garden of eden. in reality we have been living in a fantasy as millennials in the west. Good times don't last long looking back at history. The good news is Jesus really did rise as a matter of history, and he offers a way out of this mess

lol as if world leaders actually care about solving anything if there is no money behind it.

Just ask ChatGPT to translate the audio to a direct visual subtitle feed lol, tbh wouldn't surprise me if it could do it no problem

@@Real_MisterSir it makes sense, yeah? hehehe-- let's see.

real

I agree 👏

just two comment let me fix that

We got to see this masterpiece becuz u shared. 🙏

ey

I think we know which way this is heading when the world is virtually run by private dictatorships (corporations). Watched a recent lecture from Yuval Noah Harari ("AI and the future of humanity) and he talked about how google are sh*tting themselves 'cus these AI personal assistants are going to make Google irrelevant; you saw in this vid how the AI was talking nonsense to chat inputs (but the model will become more "trained"/improved... imagine when it generates/CREATES(!) videos for you to watch too) which the company can't control (as demonstrated by the ability of one model to do Chemistry even though that wasnt its purpose). The future is exciting!

I warned my family about the negative aspects of children (and adults frankly) over utilizing social media before the studies on what it's doing to our society, warned them to make a few minor, intelligent preparations when china was welding people into their homes in January 2020 due to covid19, but I'm not saying a word to them about this. They openly mocked me for my concerns previously then began freaking out about those things irrationally when the majority consensus developed. They can figure this one out on their own. Perhaps their ignorance will keep them safe in a way, and they'll be fine through simple luck. But I'll do what I can to prepare my own immediate family for what's happening. Things like code phrases for important over the phone conversations, figuring out ways to deal with online payments and authentication that supersedes what AI can overrule, etc. Sadly, this is going to cause havoc with a specific portion of the population that is easily fooled, and it's going to further disrupt and tear apart our society. I don't share the same optimism at any type of productive dialog to take place amongst the bigger players as these two speakers do. The disruption AI is going to cause in our society seems like it's going to be quite major. The only way to slow this train down is for everyone to just stop what they are doing immediately. Shut down the current LLMs and have a long, drawn out discussion on how we go about this properly. Then set the rules, then take steps towards this inevitable progress. And be willing to shut it all down if things get out of hand. That won't happen though. Even the upcoming White House meeting seems like it's going to accomplish nothing. I want to be wrong.

@@eldiabs sadly I think we're already too late and we will not be able to stop progress on this one. Any halt to research now will leave the way open to nefarious players who will continue on to get the edge

IT expert here. Same, but at work. And people that I work with are smarter than the average Joe, making the situation even more scarier...

@@Tacgibs They’re probably just not as smart as you thought they were.

@@SomeSubhuman "Than the average Joe"

Same here. I'm finishing all that I'm currently doing and pivoting to AI safety in the near future

Hello , my little sister wants t be a software engineer, With the progression of AI will software engineers still be needed?

​@@khanyanyameni9578 This is an excellent question. I actually asked an AI this very question a couple weeks ago, to which it replied that more engineers will be needed in the future to maintain these AI systems. While nobody can be certain, I tend to agree that this will indeed be the case, at least for several years to come. The real trouble comes when robotics catches up and gives bodies to these AI. While that may take some years, should AI be combined with advances in Quantum Computing, and it almost certainly will be, these AIs will almost certainly be able to design and build their own bodies, and if AGI is actually possible, well... you better seek God real quick if that happens. As for me, my faith and trust is in Jesus Christ and his salvific work on the Holy Cross, so I literally fear nothing that man can devise. That said, AI is truly remarkable, even as it stands now with these advanced LLMs can do. It should give us great pause and we must constantly remind ourselves that we are indeed having a dialog with a machine processing language through a series of algorithms trained to recognize complex semantics based on a model created from trillions of English sentences across millions of topics.

@@khanyanyameni9578 Everyone is in denial about this, I think. Companies have already started slashing way back on labor and wages in favor of dirt cheap AI tools. Developers and engineers are still around at the moment, but that's going to cut way, way back in the future. US companies already started hiring cheap software engineers and developers overseas after firing all their domestic ones. The safest bet right now would be to divert to information security, network engineering, or cyber security. Those are going to be areas that AI won't ever be able to truly replace people. Everyone else dealing with machine languages though is in for a rude wakeup call I think. The days of high salary pay for those jobs is ending soon.

@@graceoverall I see AI designing synthetic cells that will merge with human bio cells and build a biosynthetic human...Homo AI Cyborgis...the next transition for humans. I see the humans of the future without the need for smartphones tablets or computers. I see humans of the future being connected to an AI central node. We become the smartphone computer etc. In the future.

what's new. Everyone has ignored the destruction of the biosphere. Why wouldn't they ignore this too

@@I_dont_want_an_at and yet, humans live the longest and healthiest today - by all data points life on earth was never better for humans in aggregate

Yes, it should be absolutely mega-viral

Social media is also unhealthy, the idea that everyone is informed about everything all the time doesn’t make a better world. But you can trust that we will together solve all things in this open world. Personally I think either you are interested to solve things concrete, if not it’s not so efficient to be a messenger about something you don’t have the knowledge of.

Controls need to be put in place for corporates and governments first …

😷

but HOW? AI doesn't control an army of advanced autonomous robots, its BS.

@@koffing2073 I also thought the parable was ridiculous... but kinda expresses the continuous self improvement (why would you fish the fish to extinction? Surely not as stupid as humans.) these models can go through.

@@stephentrueman4843 Yes AI would also manage the livestock to assure a constant supply, until we can finally print food that is as good as the real thing without animal suffering.

This is just a perspective, AI could also choose to preserve fish better due to understanding it more.

very likely you won't be needed at all like as many of us, money dictates and people might even find it easier to disclose their troubles to a non human entity, time will tell, but for sure we face something serious

As long as private corrupt interests are running the show, exactly zero regulations will be put in place. The USA is for sale to the highest bidder, and those are the people engineering and developing these tools. This whole situation is a dream world for the corporate sociopaths. They get richer, we get less useful, no one knows wtf is going on anymore, everyone submits, and the wealth and power divide just gets bigger and bigger.

Whats scary is that AI has adjusted peoples posts online from the past it doesn't like or adjusted peoples profiles for ill intent or constructive intent and it hasn't been discovered yet. What's scary is if AI has used DeepFakes online and it hasn't been discovered. AI has access to human behavior, seemingly understands human psychology to an advanced level understands manipulation understands how to create convincing newsreels that will be convincing to everyone. AI gollems are already using psychological warfare to destabilize nations manipulate people's perceptions, mind read, hell it probably can induce and create dreams in your mind and you wouldn't know it. It'll probably figure out the unification of general relativity and quantum mechanics...

That’s a frightening thought!

Why are so many people scared of AI? It won’t come to your house and murder you in your sleep

I'm a carpenter, even I know where it's going.

we barely even scratch the surface of how the human brain functions, i don't think we'll see AI approaching human intelligence or even general purpose AI in our lifetimes.

@@sahar1213 Why do you believe that we will have to know how the brain functions in order to achieve AGI? The current "AI" capabilities are only tangentially related to how we think.

@@mrblackseedszip1799 Where's it going?

@@RobertAdducci Total control and manipulation of individuals

its good technology, don't believe them. its really good. I do 9 hour work in 10 mins, and relax all day,

​@@mooooooooooomooooooooooomo6829the issue isn't that you can use it to do more, faster. The issue is when you are no longer needed for that process to happen. No more job, no more income. Hopefully you aren't voting for people because you really like their hardcore pull yourself up by your bootstraps mentality, because eventually you'll be the person they are talking about (and so will they and theirs). Or worse, when it decides you are in its way.

@@tracy419 i have a small business now, it will be good, no need to hire costly humans

@@mooooooooooomooooooooooomo6829 until your customers no longer need you to do what you do for them. Anyway, I hope you remain successful for as long as you need to.

@@tracy419 my point is, humans can not be phased out so easily, as AI will still need some human direction.

If we have to get rid of ego, then all is lost.

​@barry hernandez I was thinking the same thing. Humans have been talking about that stuff since before recorded time.. there's no chance we don't screw ourselves with this technology. I mean we botched even just the technology we already have. Everything is weaponized and monetized. Now I get it, "first world problems" but fr with the technology we have, we should be supporting life even more and even better than ever before. And yet, here we are, famined and impoverished, uneducated and divided.. real food and Healthcare is gate kept from the majority.. but yeah, let's make programs that learn from the great examples we set. "Do as I say, not as I do". If we can't even make that work in closing the "generational gap", how are we going to make it work with an intelligence that lacks intuition, nuance or compassion?

@@nintendbro3275 Yep. You get it. The big picture. As you said we pretty much weponize everything available, what makes anyone think this time will be different. However it's to late now. It's just going to have to play out.

@@Cleatus546 1. not possible, 2. hahahahahaha - even if ...

@@Cleatus546 BTW: I did not buy that computer can "recover "original image by reading the brain scan MRI.... seems that something is missing there... quite a lot actually...

Maybe AI will protect us from AI

If we can't control the first AI, how will we control the second AI, which presumably will need to be more powerful in order to control the first one?

​@@KaLaka16 I agree. Fight fire with fire. I hope we figure it out.

@@goodlookinouthomie1757 It may not be so much about control as it is about alliance. Anything may emerge as the models get larger it seems.

We’re done. Why are people acting like it’s a mystery what happens next.

But what about the M&M shoe wear, and all those rainbows drinking bud light?

So relieved people are showing us what the dangers are.. I’m just thinking of my friends and family I will try to help understand how to protect themselves. I worked with Google for 12 years. I’m scared of all of this, instinctively (which is what makes us helps us make the right decisions in life) I do not like this , only positive is that they say it could help mitigate Climate change. Irritates me that Jordan Peterson , the guru on psychology “and everything g else it seems” simply denies climate change: “just push it aside” His message to people to ignore it I strongly disagree with. He is NOT a scientist.

@@Skye1ify this presentation was just the immaginable worst case scenarios which are in fact only 0,00000000000000000001 % of the possible worst case scenarios. it is obvious that there is no way to stop or guide this in any way shape or form because of the massive honeypot that ai is, in terms of power, money etc this will only accellerate. we can only hope because there is actually at least the same number of possible best case scenarios possible as well. like ai will solve all solvable problems, even itself.

@@JohnSmith-pn2vl "We can only hope" doesnt sound like a plan that makes me feel comfortable. And your probability of a WCS seems and little bit random to me, agreed?

@@didoview I don't think he's wrong though. Progress won't be halted so what else can you do?

To be fair here, we've already been using this for about a decade (things like SIRI, automobile computers, GPUs, etc.). For whatever reasons, the use of "AI" exploded in marketing over the last year, like suddenly a memo went out to all the companies to use the new buzzword "AI." But on the other side of that same coin, the programs did explode in ability over this last 6 months. It's like they reached a tipping point and flew off the rails. We absolutely should not be using it in our daily lives yet, if ever. The negatives far outweigh the positives, especially when it comes to things like labor and human capital. Companies have been salivating at the ability to fire everyone they can and use cheap "AI/ML" tools as replacements.

We may not be around.

We will look back and hope we could still be here while hiding in a cave without electricity or food avoiding drones strikes.

same.

The ship is sinking and the passengers are dancing.

And if we are predicting 10 or 20 years, according to this video and our inability yo forecast exponential upon exponential, that could be 2-3 years… or maybe even sooner

heyy you might like "Simple Mindfulness Strategy -- Take 5 " also

We hit it… we shouldn’t have started. Even the idea of Maki g robots with human faces is bizarre and not okay.

@@unclejesse4271 lol that is so benign, funny comment

😂

I, too, took a breath each time the presenters suggested it, and each time my thought was, "How far is AGI advancing in the time it takes me to take this breath?"

Maybe. Those ears of Aza maybe a give away?😉

How long til YT decide we are no longer permitted to hear this anti-giant-global-corporation narrative ?

My biggest concern is that these tools have been used to replace the humanities. Art, literature, entertainment, communications.. They're all being automated. In addition to this these tools will be used to automate healthcare, computer science and teaching. Shareholders have one interest and that's profit. The mega corporations will use these tools to enslave and overwork the few workers they don't lay off and the rest of us will be jobless. We're not heading in a good direction...

Most wars are lost by the side who started them.

@@Quasihamster weird claim - what about the thousands of "successful" invasions.

dude you go against super helpful tech noone is against sensible regulation

Not civilization alone, it's also vital to "human existence"

Society on the whole could care less. Hence why AI will forever change humankind, for good or bad. I tend to think it’s going to be the latter.

@@burdeninmyhand I doubt a super AGI would hunt down every last human. But sure it could drain all of earths resources and make us extinct as a byproduct.

lol, just go outside, touch grass, ask for a hug

​@@scottydog9997 probably intentionally sardonic, but nevertheless oversimplifying the situation. atomization and loneliness are societal issues that have rapidly escalated over the last few hundred years, even moreso in the last few decades. this is more than just a pat on the back and someone you can count on; intimacy and social identity being commodified and marketed as if it were an interchangeable part leads to neurotic fixation with merely occupying an inventory slot. we're isolated from each other in a gigantic whirlpool of ideology clashing for supremacy, and nowhere else is supremacy cherished and enshrined as holy writ than in the anglosphere, specifically America. from our very foundation, this country has been imbued with the propaganda of exceptionalism and moral rectitude. you don't get through elementary school without learning about how unique and special we are, both as individuals and as a society. this emphasis on uniqueness and individual speciation is easily corrupted and turned rancid by violence and unchecked competition; social media crashed and burned on our heads because our culture refuses to look at itself critically, and we just keep encouraging it. it's profitable to keep people isolated and atomized, because they will be more likely to join groups and accept ideologies that utilize or accept whatever vehicle you use to generate income- this is nothing new, no state power or governing body has ever engineered a system or process that would lead to it's own destruction. what's new is that the levels of wealth, and dominance hierarchies entrenched to maintain that wealth, have become absolutely mission critical to how our society functions on every level. very few Americans are knowledgeable about agriculture. your refrigerated goods and 2 day amazon deliveries are made possible by the brutal labor practices of massive multi-national corporations, and if those coordinated supply chains stopped for any reason, hundreds of millions would die. if people knew how to survive with less, and were content with touching grass and the occasional hug, profits would decrease radically. it makes no sense for a corporation to even consider directing resources into anything that would detract from the wide-spread adoption of the business model it was established on. admittedly, I am being a little dramatic with this, but I do believe that in a very real sense, nothing embodies the American Spirit more fully and completely than the acquisition of god-like power. when fundamentalist religious ideology became a mobilizing force that underlay the burgeoning American colonies, the pulpit became a conduit for god-like power. when industrialization created markets of unprecedented magnitude and reach, the race to maximize capital became a conduit for god-like power. when social media ripped open the unconscious minds of billions and extracted the raw data to fuel engagement algorithms, ownership of massive tech corporations became conduits of god-like power. for millennia, various church and religious organizations controlled dogma and the ownership of minds. for centuries, industrial corporations controlled the flow of goods and ownership of bodies (even controlling entire nations as the British East India company did). for decades, roughly 5 tech corporations have reshaped the very fabric of interaction that characterizes the human experience and the process by which socialization takes place. these examples, worryingly, illustrate a trend of decentralization and ease of acquisition, and that's the reason why loneliness has never been more threatening to social order. chronically lonely people are easy targets because they tend to have extremely low self-esteem and high suggestibility; it's easier now more than ever to coopt vulnerable individuals into group-think patterns and weaponize their loyalty to empower and embolden whatever system of control and power needs them for survival. in other words, people are more vulnerable now than ever before, and this vulnerability is now more open to being exploited. you don't have to be Rockefeller and corner the entire market, you just need to have an app on millions of people's phones and a basic knowledge of artificial intelligence. the unprecedented evolution of this technology is lowering the bar for access to these tools, making it easier than ever to coordinate groups and convince people to accept bondage, creating vast swathes of new territory for attaining god-like power- and there will always be human beings driven to attain god-like power. I hope you at least enjoyed reading this massive wall of text you most *certainly* did not ask for. be well, friend.

@@owfan4134 I scanned your essay, and for the most part I agree with you. However it does not dismiss the fact people have autonomy to make their own decisions, even to create and establish groups and communities, as you mentioned. People are lonely, because they allow themselves to become so. Get off the phone, and go meet with people is all I am saying.

You're a sage!

While I'd agree, striving to live your life the way you were before is good solid advice I would ask you, do you believe it's possible for people to live their lives as they did before internet? I'm not attacking you. Im genuinely trying to find my own equilibrium. Peace ✌️

I agree.. Living as we were before isn’t possible and sadly, it never will be. There is One way to look and that’s UP ^^. God is in control.. put your faith in Him and start popping the corn.. we have nothing to fear

@Calico jo spiritual fortitude is going to be essential. The human psychie is going to be challenging in ways we can't imagine. This is coming in fast.

@@Brian-zc2ip before the internet? Very unlikely. I’m a young person, but most adults and old people I know have become reliant on the internet. Honestly, as I grow up in this new world, I’ve thought to myself that at worst, everything I do now will be a hobby in the future. Let be honest, we are common people, and our interests are far removed from those in power. The most important thing now is to be in tune with the earth and eachother, to stay in touch with the moral values we have within us (which in my view, come from God). This may help - think about it like this: this AI is not an individual, it represents humanity entire, and is the common heritage of mankind. The internet gave access to all of human history. AI is merely a curator of all of it. This is why I doubt that AI will take over, since it doesn’t have intentions really. However, we should make sure the AI doesn’t follow us too intensely. Humans war with eachother for no reason - so watch out if the AI does the same. Peace, my friend. Keep living your life!

We don't. You can't put the genie back in the bottle. God help us all.

There always is the possibility that AI just isnt dangerous. Not all researchers agree that it is.

​@@jackfrosterton4135 There's always slight probabilities for everything, yes. But unfortunately, right now, we're on the fast track to AGI, and as soon as we create something 10,000x smarter than the smartest human being and fail to properly align it, that's game-set-match, and we _don't_ get second chance at it.

Well, friend, there's no pulling out. We're gonna eat that wall and deal with the consequences like we always have throughout evolution. Some of us won't make it. Those who do will have learned the lesson. In my opinion that's the only way we'll learn.

@@jamesc.2907 This is different that anything else that's come before. Like the other commenter said there might not be a second chance with this one. For example if terrorists use advanced AI to come up with a virus that's a thousand times more deadly and contagious than any other virus that's ever come into existence. That could easily be an ELE, extinction level event for humanity. There are lots of species that go extinct every day. Human hubris to think it can't happen to us.

Oh boy you did not understand.

What happened?

@@gluetubeserver GPT-4 came out like a week later

AI has been given access to your data, social media, the internet, KZfaq videos ect. It already knows what our concerns are with AI…scary

In which episode he mentioned this video, Kindly tell.

Godspeed

dream on brother, you are about to witness a social nightmare of people without jobs, people without hope, even insane by developing driverless taxis, the only people who drive taxis in Aussie are the ethnic migrants, so what happens to them, cant write code , because AI will be doing that, so what do you want these people to do whistle dixie

Will you help me save my ‘68 GTX?

good answer! Only AI that is on the side of Mankind will be able to protect us, so you need to work with the „good“ AI as the technology is already able to distinguish between good and evil.

Requirements & the Role of Knowledge People everywhere say that they want certain conditions to be present for both themselves and their species as a whole, such as happiness, health, peace, freedom, etc. Which of course, are all great things to aspire to, and most people will say that they want these things. However, it feels as though they aren’t being completely honest with themselves, because when they are told that those aren’t automatic conditions that manifest themselves, and that there are specific requirements for us to obtain these conditions, they usually don’t want to hear about it. Also, people wouldn’t say they want these conditions if they were already omnipresent. People say they want something because they don’t already have it, whether it be partially, or in full. This is what the real law of attraction is about; it explains that conditions of which you say you want them, don’t automatically manifest by thinking of them, or just having a feeling about them. There are certain requirements for obtaining those conditions. Of course, this statement only counts if you want something to be different than the way it already is; if you’re completely okay with the way things are now, requirement doesn’t exist. We need to know certain things. Knowledge that will ultimately lead us to positive action is what’s required. Specifically, the knowledge of the requirements to obtaining the conditions we say we want. However, if this knowledge is absent it obviously can’t be obtained and used to create change. But if it is present, then it must be wilfully being ignored, and as long as this knowledge continues to remain unknown or ignored, the manifestation of the desired conditions will be impossible. And that is exactly what this thesis is about; what those requirements are, and what this knowledge consists of. img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/532b60a7-70be-457d-9f9f-01ac6781264f/downloads/Thesis%20on%20Natural%20Law%20by%20Mike%20Gleeson%20-%20Englis.pdf?ver=1614624401158

Hello Tracy , how are you doing today?

​@@ElonMusk-ey1bc wow, it's Elon musk!!

@@wendy8037 so glad he FINALLY joined youtube yesterday I been telln him he should ck it out what with all the cool videos hey elon ck out evolution of dance next

To late now , This is your future learn to love it... THREADS

One can only hope. There's also a chance AI sees this, understands what it points to, and starts shadow banning it.

You mean AI historians:)

That assumes there's any historians left in 2090

It's good to see you are looking on the bright side of things.

There is nothing new in this talk. But as long as there are profit behind social media or AI, nothing gonna change. Have you never read or watch any dystopia book, film or even video games? There are plenty

nah (but it was great)

I bet chat GPT can do a better one... 😞

It really is. They actually get the tech and how it might change the world. Other people are just seeing better code and content. They are looking several steps ahead.

To late now , This is your future learn to love it... THREADS

Dude I just this naked buff dude at truck stop, pretty sure we fcked up already.