She's indeed a true artist. Her perfectly made, laid-out lyrics is superb -- it inspired me to write some poems, etc.

exactly and she gets hate for no reason

She's more than very good, she's regarded by most industry insiders to be one of the greatest songwriters working in popular music today. Even more so after Folklore, Evermore and her third album of the year grammy.

almost as good as kanye

She gets hated because shes that great artist

Preach!!

PERIODTTT

to emphasize the last letter, usually "d" and "k"

YESSS

Every Vox video is, if you haven't noticed already

INESSA yeah true that

yes Taylor Swift's style video is definitely an out of this world video I've ever seen

omg an exo-l hi! 👋😁✨

smashups omg hi!!! 💜

@I exist yeah i saw too :'D

Spill

Right here 😂

I changed my favorite song a lot until I herd this like a year ago and it’s been my favorite ever since

Nuh uh

he didn't cheat thought because they were never together

@@kap_22 um yes they were. y'all should stop being in denial pls it's 2021

he cheated on her in april?

@@doombuggie2923 He did in April, but maybe they weren't official or that serious for each other, it just started for them, i guess.

He cheat and his fans are toxic

*writer/poet

@@alejandromangieri1495 but its the album that has Clean, which imo is better than all too well

red evermore and folklore are her best albums but 1989 is good and really good though

@@mothergothelisagirlboss5735 those albums are great for composition alone but I consider 1989 the best pop album she’s ever made because it’s everything a great pop album needs and she never had to compromise her sound for it. Every song is meticulously crafted down to the background vocals and ornamental vocal lines. Not to say the others weren’t done this way but you know she had something to prove with this album and it really shows. To me this was an album that both reiterated and clearly defined the force she was and is. I’m thinking about it more from a critical standpoint. As a singer/ musician myself and someone who’s spent many a years in music theory classes and songwriting classes etc. 1989 accomplished what Red tried to do

Ummm 189 years ago? How?

lover has this type of music!

1989>>>>>lover

Başak Bozdoğan no it’s rep=lover>>>>>>>>>>>1989

Hello Tay delusional

its hitting the top 10 because its catchy and thats it

i honestly dont even find it catchy, just some noise similar to every other pop song.

@@franta1014 💀💀

EXCITED FOR 1989 TAYLOR'S VERSION

Wait can someone explain? I don’t get it

@@mindyys8584 maybe it's about the fact how taylor's part has become his, like even though he had a brown eye he replaces it with taylor's blue one, making it the way taylor wants it

Wait.

I honestly don't get it. What's it referencing?

Brianna B a song by 1D

@Antoine Bilbord *Perfect sounds exactly like Style

@Antoine Bilbord i just realised that omg one year ago when i commented i clearly hadnt matured yet HAHAHAAH

And Folklore now hehe

And Evermore now hehe

I will come here later when she may release Woodvale

@@pranavig2340 steam fearless Taylor's version 👍👍👍

And midnights now hehe

One of the best pop song to ever walked on earth*

But the producers and Taylor didn't mean that ok. It's sounds all smart and everything but it makes zero sense. Question and answer theme...umm sir wuttt? That's one person's analysis of the song. I do that too with songs but not everyone had to agree with it right? Just bcz it's vox doesn't mean its correct

Bro can you please tell me how songs are made na d easy book to how I start learning music

No one comes close to Max Martin. I would give anything for those two to work together again.

+Alex R. she isn't though

+Sebastian Köhler Öberg ok

haha!

shes not

*You think that she'd have half her net worth without bleached blonde hair, red lipstick, make-up, heels and short skirts?* She's the epitome of how you can make millions flaunting your ass and making constant references to oral sex.

Wasn’t that summer the following year

It's just big in the US but the rest of the world still loves taylor

this!

True

Just checked it out. It is strange, not a whole lot of pop songs use a diatonic motion, and g minor is a pretty cool key.

Omg yes !!!!

Thats a good idea. Though marina isnt too popular, its okay for Vox to cherrypick particular indie songs and analyze them, cause theyre a research company and well.. its not the Grammy's that are gonna give good music any attention.

@Thurman Ulrich I wouldn't say it's worthless and pointless to discuss popular culture. These topics affect regular life, and we're just going to ignore them? By that logic, we might as well scrap all art, literature, cinema, etc, since they hold no inherent value. The problem with this video is that it's far too pretentious.

YES

Yes

Cornelius street

Afterglow is

Wildest Dreams too

please display what you listen to me, sir.

+napol3on is a nice guy I listen to anything that is good.

+mane games elaborate, please

It's not terrible but it is totally forgettable. It's not a masterpiece, a work of art, or anything like it. It's music constantly pumped out. It is pop music.

+Epcot lp (dawnqwerty) yeah i agree dude. most 2010s Pop is put on the radio for a month and they move on with the next hit single. Does anyone still remember all the words to Fancy? Fuck no. I wish the radio didn't exist, maybe 18 year olds and under wouldn't have shitty taste in that world.

i laughed so hard when i saw "who dat guy??"

Oh trust

Literally me too!

Omg samee since i watched this a year's ago😫😭

This is legit my favorite song, it reminds me of summer 2015 memories

is the chorus common? the melody just jumped a fifth higher in it's "internal" harmony(ignoring any chord underneath it). on top of the chords it plays the 9th and then "rests" a bit on the fifth. can you explain how you view this melody that shows you its simplicity?

I'm not saying the song is bad or even overly simplistic - It's a pop song. Pop songs are typically pretty simple and that's fine. I'm just saying it's a bit cringe-inducing to see a video "plumbing the depths" of... what... a 2/4 beat, or a 1, 4, 1, 4, 1, 4, 6 (ooooohhhh), 4 chord progression. I guess for the musically uneducated it's interesting but there is very little of any real substance here when compared to artists who actually make interesting music. And that's not me knocking TS - pop music is popular for a reason and that's fine, but let's not kid ourselves into thinking they're doing anything REALLY worth analyzing on a musical level.

Daniel King i don't see how a format or genre of music could dictate it's quality. i even love wagner - tristan&isolde prelude but unlike harmony, melody combines the rhythm (an underrated HUGE aspect of music) with the harmony and that makes it infinitely complex and unique. pop songs have such complex rhythmic patterns - modules - in the melody, but usually poor harmony, but this song is more sophisticated harmonically. you know you can "dress" a melody in all genres, including symphonic orchestrations if you really want to. i like to compose but the theory is almost worthless. not a single drop of useful rhythm and regarding harmony i only have one question. sing 2notes forming the forth interval (C then F). you'll hear that the F sounds like "home" - the root of the interval. it's inversion, the interval of fifth has the root in the lower tone. < it's THE way to tonicize a root. yet the root of intervals theory is far from complete. what is the root between A-C (a minor third interval)?

I'm not talking about quality, really - I'm talking about depth. Again, I'm not saying this is a bad song or TS is a bard artist. I'm saying it's not the kind of content that is really asking for analysis, hence why this particular analysis feels like it's reeeeaallllyyyy reaching. Like, I love the movie The Mummy, the 1999 one. It's campy action adventure/horror shlock and it does that really well. But does that movie, in any way, ask for a deep analysis diving into the subtext and themes? Of course not. It's just not there.

+Daniel King i've been researching on my own the rhythm aspect of music. for over a year or two now. its modular like the universe is, it's very natural, it relies on our animalic instinct (predator animal specifically, makes sense since they're the most evolved). even the beauty of music (or any beauty) depends on our social animal instinct of reproduction. not necessarily sexually 'cause you cant reproduce sexually with a lamborghini but you can pair up with it thinking the result will be more attractive. my point is that there's nothing spiritual about music. it only connects with the listener speaking about intelligence (rhythm) or level stability/energy (stabile/instabile harmonies. but again it's the rhythm of the chord changes that "tells the story"). the spirituality of it, like the human spirit (which religions refer to as God, with good scientific reason) is a "software" that runs only on human brains. a sort of supernatural virus/animal feeding on humans. but it needs "metacommunication" - theorising (people who only eat&sleep or are completely isolated don't contribute to the human "hive" spirit). so we can extract spiritual information even from a rock or one tone IF we analyze it. but the beauty of a chorus resides only on the contrast it brings next to the verse(or prechorus)(rhythmically or harmonically, or even instrumentally, or even changing the speed if we get creative with the theory), and internally if there's a phrase that contrasts with another. this is just attention grabbing just like i'm loosing my cat's attention if i make more than 3 identical moves to surprise her. its common that the 4 phrase (or member) contrasts and unwillingly generates the hook(the "we never go out of style x2" < member of the chorus).

Im asking myself the same. I love tay tay but this doesnt make any sense lol

my life summarized

Max Martin collaborated for this masterpiece. By now everyone knows that when Taylor works with someone she still fully contributes.

+Leave The World Behind yeah because there is soooo much to analysis in hits. WOW a pop song incorporates a chord that isn't the main 4? GENIUS!

Paschal Mwambene There is a ton more to analyse than they do in this video. If it was easy to make pop hits, then why don't everybody do it?

Leave The World Behind because not everyone can afford to pay for countless singer-songwriters and engineers who have several years of experience and training to regurgitate music which will become hits for the ever so predictable masses.

Paschal Mwambene If it was easy, then those engineers and songwriters wouldn't be as expensive, since there would be much more compoetition. Fact is that only very few people in this world can actually continuesly pull out hits time after time. Especially Max Martin and those swedish guys.

Leave The World Behind oh undoubtedly, but i'm just saying there isn't anything "deep" to analysis here. popular Pop music is just a formula which attaches itself to the current trend of the time to rocket itself into the mainstream. The way in which she was analysis the lyrics and music here was as if it was Bob Dylan. #ITSNOTTHATDEEP

:P

Joey28P David So!

***** k?

***** I should let you know that I am a major music connoisseur, no matter if you are talking about modern pop or 18. century classic, I have studied them extensively with the conclusion that there is no such thing as a piece of music with as many complex structures and different ways of interpreting than one of Taylor Swift's songs. Mozart, Beethoven and Bach don't even come close to the fidelity, plasticity and incredible genius, with which Taylor composes her songs. Please get your uneducated head out of your ass and stop attacking anything that is new and popular, old is not always better than new. Yours faithfully, main administrator of the #1 Taylor Swift fan club forum in the whole of Sweden, Greg Hunter. Here is my proof: i.imgur.com/ySKdhzQ.jpg

***** Glad you got a kick out of it, spent more time on it than I should have lol.

Not at all

She will be forgotten in 8 years tops

@@googleisillukinati8071 forgotten? Srlsy? In 8 years? Lol people wont forget her, unless we all go extinct after eight years

@@googleisillukinati8071well this didn’t age well at ALL

@@googleisillukinati8071 probably not now ...

I think Lavender Haze filled the Style role really nicely while still feeling so different

Joshua James Cortez oh no why aren’t you into her anymore??

Same..

@@yao9598 maybe, they grew up...

cai li probably radio, stores playing it, blah blah blah