Going off of "Imperial Brothers", by Ian Hughes and "Failure of Empire", by Noel Linski it's actually not a sure thing that part of the deal was that the Goths would surrender their arms. Valens' strategic ambition was to use the Goths as soldiers in the upcoming Persian war, an unavoidable war that was made obvious from the Armenian satellite war. Had he disarmed the Goths, he would have had to rearm them with his own stocks. With the Gothic families settling the Danube area, he could trust that the Gothic men would not raise a revolt with their own arms, for fear of their families being killed in retaliation. This was exactly the kind of deal Theodosius arrived at in 382. He had bottled up the Goths in Greece after 4 years of maneuvering and could have destroyed them, though not without risk; instead, he went with the only strategically viable solution: Use the Goths as soldiers and farmers. Valens appears to have wanted this as well, especially since his brother had regularly pulled troops from the east for his campaigns in the west and had taken direct control of Macedonia, one of the main recruiting grounds in the east. Valens is the only eastern emperor to ever not have direct control over Macedonia, and it repeatedly stung. Valens could also trust Gothic leadership. Fritigern had actively aided Valens in his attempt to avenge himself upon the Goths who had honored the Constantine treaty when Procopius (Nephew of Julian) launched his mutiny. Valens knew this man, had worked with him in the Gothic war, and clearly trusted him to ensure the Goths would behave once inside Roman territory. It should also be noted that Valens did not personally want to wage "one great, final battle". He was aware of his PR problem, having never been accepted by the Roman people (especially in Constantinople) as a legitimate emperor; he would only ever be a random, nobody farmer and undistinguished soldier turned emperor by the fortunes of his older brother. I have read that Valens was pushed to direct military action by his generals, who were interested in the glory of battle VS the strategic health of the army long-term. In Armenia, Valens did not seek glorious battles even when his reign could have used them. Valens appears to have hoped to strike fear in the Goths on August 9 with a drawn up army and negotiate from a position of strength. He left Adrianople without his baggage train, knowing where the Goths were located. If this was supposed to be an all-out slugging match, he would have brought everything with him for the big fight. He did not do this, a very telling move. Valens let Fritigern, a trusted factional leader, bring his people into Roman territory to alleviate a terrible manpower problem. Destroying the Goths in a battle would not have served Valens' strategic interests and would have jeopardized his own position for the impending war against the Sassanids. This would explain why he "wasted" so much time negotiating with the Goths as his army deployed; yes, he could have rushed the Gothic camp but even losing a few thousand men would have badly stung for an impending, all out war against Persia. It's not just my one opinion that he doesn't appear to have been interested in a fight, and in fact Valens loses control of his army with the skirmishing forces drawing everyone into the fateful battle. I'm curious as to what source you have that says he terminated negotiations and ordered the advance of the main line; I do not recall reading that. I read that negotiations were still in progress when battle erupted without his input. Additionally, the story of Valens being burned alive is a reoccurring literary device for Roman emperors who persecuted Christians (or later on, the wrong kinds of Christians) as with Decius' body being stripped naked and eaten by animals. It's a literary fable (like how Roman step mothers are always evil, murderous harpies), and in reality Valens was probably swallowed up in the dusts of battle; we know that his body was never found. Valens simply made an enemy of lots of Christians, because he persecuted those who didn't subscribe to his personal faith: Homoean Christianity, a compromise sect that was one of four major sects of Christianity at the time. Arian Christianity was the dominant sect in the east, making Valens a minority. Finally, just some small details: the west did not govern from Rome, like your map implies. Ever since Gallienus, the west ruled from Milan (with the exception of Maximian and Maxentius seizing Italy briefly), so your map could reflect that in the future. I promise I don't hate your video, lol. I just think it's important to distinguish small but important details that can shift the narrative. I actually recently unsubscribed from Weird History, because they claimed that it was the Huns in 376 who took part in the battle of Adrianople.

One minor addon to the final sentence: The reason the eastern romans shifted to a predominantly cavalery force had little to do with the goths. It was a response to the constant wars with the Persians/Sassanids who made that change a matter of survival for the romans And when the arabs would later show up this process would speed up even faster because the romans got crushed basically every time they meet the arabs in open battle. They basically switched to gurellia warfare at that point trying to use ambush tactics while most standart roman soldiers were poorly equipped and all the money went into the cavalary. Also the eastern romans were,after losing 2/3 of their territory, basically constantly to broke to field a proper infantery army anyway and only Constantinople could fund the cavalry forces. The gothic influence on the eastern roman army isnt that great and compared to the cold war/hot war superpower situation the eastern romans had going on at their eastern border for their entire existance with persians, sassanids, arabs and later turks it is of minor influence. At least thats how I remember it from the really good "history of byzantium" podcast :)

Didn't realize Rome fought in the Austrian-Prussia war 🤔 Episode 6 of this series through me for a bit of a loop 😁

Really nice summation of this battle, well done.

Absolutely FANTASTIC!! More videos about ancient Greece and Rome please!!

Thank you for all tour hardwork and dedication in bringing these videos together. Huge fan of roman history and it always make my day to see a video of it!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

It wasn't Rome's worst defeat since Cannae. The Romans had a similarly devastating defeat against the same Goths at the Battle of Abrittus in 251.

This is a great channel, your presentations are absolutely amazing... I cant believe I get to watch these for free... THANK YOU!!!!

Excellent work here Sir and your Team

Great video as always!

Yes! I love your ancient history videos

Fantastic work! Thanks.

Thank you for your time and hard work and dedication towards these videos. We always appreciate your hard work and dedication. I love your videos. Love from Sri Lanka ❤️🔥. Battle of Adrianople one of the decisive battles in roman history. It made the pathway to goths to enter the stroy. Brillaint video. ❤️🔥

Valens really should've taken that suggestion to use hit-n-run tactics against the Goths. Nice video.

Fantastic video and battle.

just like always another high quality history video

Allot thanks for sharing this wonderful and remarkable introduction of historical coverage of Visigoth penetrating and ravaging the danob regions . Thank you for the (house of history) channel

Well done! This was a more comprehensive video on this battle than others ive seen. Valens blew it! Constantine would have never put his army in a strategic disadvantage. Caesar would have known more about his opponent with proper scouting. Valens knew better and should have waited for Gratian. But wanted to score a quick knock out victory after hearing of his Emperor Nephews successes. Valens also lost control of his forces by letting them engage without proper instructions from officers. It reminds one of Crassus debacle in the east against the Parthians. Just like Crassus Valens let his taste for glory cloud sound military judgement.

Fantastic video

I remember reading accounts of this battle in my 3rd year Latin class back in the 1970s

Thankyou for your commitment making these videos. It was to be the shape of things to come for the Western Roman Empire... many more boy emperors to come.

Great video

Thank you

What I hate about this battle is that the loss was 100% avoidable. It should have been an easy win.

Yes! My favorite era

This is kind of funny that the river of Dnieper is shown on the map having all reservoirs created by modern hydroelectric stations :)

Do one on Cotez and the conquest of the Myans

Very Nice video

Valentinian, I think you mean - but excellent piece on this key battle - I agree with others, totally winnable for the Romans

Great Video! When is the next episode of the German/Austrian War coming out?

The massacre at Teutoburg Forest was an equally ignomonious defeat of the Romans in 9 AD

Any videos on Persia please

What about the battle of Edessa? This was also a crushing defeat of the Romans

If I may comment on the title, Arausio was even worse than Cannae, but Hadrianople probably more consequential than both

Fritigern in norwegian translates to free the tiger

comment for the algorithm. I liked when you'd cut to yourself talking in your earlier videos, it felt more human. any reason why you stopped that?

Did anyone see the resemblance with the current situation in Europe?

not to be that one guy, but the name of Vlaens older brother was Valentinian (Valentinianus) not Valentian

Really good stuff, but I think you said relentless too many times. I like ancient battles the most

why you say byzantine when you speak for the eastern part;

Worst since Cannae? What about Teutoburgerwald or Carrhae?

"Prince Pricurios of Iberia" Which Iberia? Kingdom of Iberia in Caucasus of Iberian Peninsula?

These people whom annihilated the Romans were afraid of the Huns.. ..imagine the battles of the Goths and the Huns :xx

I am Albanian but my Y haplogroup is a rare one here of Gothic origin 😬 My ancestors :)

The battle was so epic, the emperor died, and the battle was a catastrophy for the roman army... To say it in gothic: Ik wilja haban gafridon in aiwins-I will have peace for ever... What did goths look like? The musicgroup Ainbusk or Eric Gadd from Gotland /Gutland give a good image....

7:27 arrival of the orcs

The teutoburg forest was pretty bad.

Battle of Carrhae: Excuse me?!!!

Rome 😢

No more pax Romana for this united Rome for long.

Gothic Pride!

For a super power Rome sure did lose a lot of big battles.

valens just innocently demanded they surrender any means of defense AND their young sons? like what lol, not much of a choice

The visigoths would rule over all the Iberian peninsula a few centuries later until 711.

justice was done against the roman slave traders

"Worst defeat since Cannae"!? Are you not supposed to be historians? Look up Arausio, which was Rome's worst defeat period- including Cannae.

Why do these channels keep using the term Byzantine come on it's 2023 you should know better by now. Great video regardless.

Can you make videos on Muslim generals

At this late stage the Roman army was only a shadow of its former self . The embracing of Christianity and allowing non Romans to join the army was the death knell of the Roman Empire .

crassus was worse

This is not the best source for this battle.

Invicta made a better video on this…

Ι was always perplexed by this battle . Was roman infantry the same lvl as prior ages? The battle the assault on the german wall by Augustus

Gallerius,Grațian and other emporius was dacians ,they ruled from the Rome.They make forum,status and gives imperiali edicts.Gallerius admite în Edictus from MILAN eguality of Cristyans religios.And Constantinus I to Niceea change the religios of entire romans Empire.Now roman catolic and ortodox was together till 1054,when papa Leon decide to solve problems with greek influences în Eastman roman imperium.The churce was devided till today.😅😅😅

Are you kidding. Rome was almost constantly at war. You got to loose a few battles. No one wins all the time.

I dont really get it Why u like telling history about roman defeat How about roman victory, Victory over parthian for example

''Worst Defeat Since Cannae'' Forget about the Persians who are constantly defeating the Romans ? Julian failed expedition into Persia put the empire in its knees and forced them to sign a humiliaty treaty; the random tribes are nothing compared to Persia; Rome true enemy.

This series of events shows the strain that mass immigration causes. History repeats

Huns from China? Ffs

battle of Ctesiphon please

These "Goths" were actually Getae, essentially a Slavic people.

Considering every fresco mosaic depictions of what Roman’s actually looked like we continue to see barbarian version of roman society. Accuracy matters greatly

This channel Have no idee about history or îs promoting false information! The goths nord of danube wore only guest , that area for 3000 years got ocupied by the Dacians that split in 3 kindoms (Walahia, Moldavia and Transilvania) that createf the modern sau Romania! We Have more then 1000 historical proff that this was the mojority population from 1000 BC at least, but this channel îs desinforming every day!