I agree, I really liked that one. Jaws is good too. Here's the thing though - neither of the Blu-rays of those were bad either.

I picked that up but have not had a chance to see it all yet. I did preview it a bit and it looks good.

Even the superbit DVD of Lawrence of Arabia is stunning for a DVD. The blu ray is also spectacular.

I use this disc as my reference. I was dialing in my system and that opening shot of the city with the towers shoot fire made the sub rumbled. My upstairs neighbor came down to see what was going on and we ended up watching the whole film together.

I love Blade Runner but was disappointed they didn’t include all the other versions with the 4k. I like the commentary that decker gives.

Avatar: the Way of Water, absolutely beautiful film, terrible script

Ghoulies 2 is out on 4K, and Jaws 2. I'm still waiting for Shout Factory to put Garbage Pail Kids The Movie out on 4K, it's so bad but fun, but still painfully bad.

The Matrix was my first DVD, my first Blu-ray, and my first 4K. One of my forever favorite movies and an excellent picture and sound demo.

i saw a lot of guys hating on the matrix release over the years, something tint related iirc.

@adacPROKYON I mean, I don't have an og copy to compare to so maybe that's why.

@@adacPROKYON Opposite, the old matrix blu ray was incredibly inaccurate, the new release is much closer to the original film prints

Awesome! I loved it on 4K too!!

Great story. Amazing Picture

I’m ducking from Will Smith’s incoming slap!

😂​@@JeffRauseo

​@@JeffRauseo🤣🤣🤣🤣

I regret not going to see it in the cinema. I was put off by poor reviews but will there ever be another chance to see something in 120fps? Doubtful.

2001 was the first VHS I ever owned at the age of 11 in 1986, so I've grown up watching each successive format improve on it!

It’s so hard to do just 10! That one is also great

@@JeffRauseo i hear that. Very true lol

A Stunning Picture. Absolutely

Are you referring to the David Attenborough ones? I'm pretty sure Jeff way pre covid time has spotlighted them before which is why I got mine. I have Planet Earth 2, Blue Planet 2, Seven Worlds One Planet and Dynasties. The 2 issues is David himself ruining it with the guilt tripping climate change preachy stuff he sprinkles in after such an amazing presentation. Plus they're on the more pricey side of things on the format, BBC being greedy for sure. It's off putting because you could get a Boutique of a movie you know you love for a similar price point.

@@randallflagg7637 Yeah, those are what I meant. You just seldom hear them featured in any KZfaqrs’ “Films You Must Own” even though in my opinion they are some of the best looking ones in my collection. I pretty much have all of the ones issued on 4k. I thought about it while watching Frozen Planet II today.

@@dmichaelelkins1 My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

That’s the one! I have my tickets!

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

The Fugitive is a stunner

@@JeffRauseo yes it is. Such a good movie in general.

@@JeffRauseoomg Fugitive is a banger

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

Joker was specifically made with Dolby Vision in mind, definitely reference quality. I saw it twice in cinema and the home physical 4K release blows it out of the water imo. I only just recently watched my Top Gun Maverick, holy crap, looks and sounds phenomenal. The original in 4K also deserves a mention, another one that at times looks way more recently made than it is.

@@randallflagg7637 Joker is really great, it’s the most replayed 4K disc movie, because I love the scenes! It’s one of the reasons I bought Joker, I usually don’t buy 4K blu rays unless the movie has replay value and utilizes my big Sony 4K TV!

@@Markimark151 My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

@@randallflagg7637 My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

@@BlazetheCat-34079 dude, 4K is overall better when you have a home theater, some movies look better in 1080p because of the original master was recorded in that digital format, but big IMAX movies by Christopher Nolan who make outstanding 4K visuals are amazing! Please stop with that nonsense!

Agreed. My vote is that Aliens is the best 4K restoration EVER!

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

Such a good release. One of my favorites - but my only hesitation with including it here was that it’s not a super popular movie/wide appeal for new collectors.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

@@BlazetheCat-34079 a little too late on that my friend. I’ve owned 4K Blu rays for 7 years. I’ve owned Blu rays for than 10 years. I love them both. It comes down to preference. I don’t always enjoy the pricing in 4Ks I admit, but I enjoy them so much. Enjoy ur Blu rays tho :)

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

The HDTV Test KZfaq channel has a video analysing the HDR on blade runner 2049 and the movie basically doesn't have any HDR. You will always read comments on Reddit and KZfaq saying the BR 2049 picture is amazing and the HDR is great and the colors pop, this show people don't know what hdr is about.

BR2029 is absolutely fantastic.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

The version I have has all 3 cuts plus Hearts Of Darkness.

Yes it does thank god. redux is a downright chore to get through and the Final Cut also drags.

Ha ha, very good! I'd love a great restoration of Boorman's classic on 4K too.

I think, similarly to Napoleon and Killers of the Flower Moon, Argylle is unlikely to get a physical release because Apple TV+ is the exclusive streaming option to watch them at home as Apple Original Films.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.

Lemme guess, Amazon sale going for it right now? A review I read there swayed me, reckoning it does see a great upgrade. The price isn't bad for a "notable named" director. Mines still making its way to me.

" _My Fair Lady_ (1964) is a Technicolor film". Yes, but... that really doesn't mean anything. 'Technicolor' has several different meanings, depending on the timeline. It can refer to (1) an origination process; (2) it can refer to a printing process; and (3), it can simply refer to a film laboratory. And in reference to (1) & (2), there are two types of Technicolor: Technicolor Process No. IV: Three-Strip; and Technicolor Process No. V: Dye transfer prints from chromogenic negative ([most-likely] Eastman Color negative film). Since virtually no current-day BD's or 4K's are sourced from release prints, what matters in the world of Technicolor is (1) - the origination process - specifically the use of the Technicolor *3-Strip Camera* - and access to the three camera negatives (Red-Green-Blue). _The Red Shoes_ is a perfect example, as the 2009 restoration (from which the 4K release was mastered) utilized the OCN's as the source - for better or worse. So, to Jeff's point, the 'quality' of the color capture is different than what is achieved thru the use of Eastman Color Negative Film. And when HDR-grading is added to the 3-Strip negatives, the image as seen in the digital (4K) domain can really shine. As far as _My Fair Lady_ is concerned, that film was shot in 65mm, using Eastman Color Negative Film. "Color by Technicolor" in this case, actually has two meanings: It was the laboratory that both processed the negative and [originally] supplied the release prints. The 70mm release prints used Dye Coupler technology, and the 35mm reduction prints [were most-likely] Dye Transfer prints. The color 'quality' of the 35mm vs. the 70mm prints differs as one set used Dye Transfer technology rather than Dye Coupler technology - giving a different meaning to 'Color by Technicolor'. Realistically, the 35mm prints used Technicolor Process No. V, and the 70mm release prints were simply Eastman Color - loosely labeled as "Color by Technicolor", as the film laboratory of record. As for the 4K release of _My Fair Lady_ - according to Robert Harris, who did the original restoration work: " _Image is derived from 8K scans (down-razzed to 4K) from approximately 150 minutes of original 65mm negative and 21 minutes of 65mm black & white separation masters_ ". But at the end of the day, it's still Eastman Color.

@smsstuart I was just going off if the credits in the film, especially since if it were filmed in Eastmancolor, the credits would have stated as such; though some Eastmancolor films never credited the color process, which always confuses me. Eastmancolor seems to be the only process that did that in films; if a film were shot in Technicolor, Deluxe, Rank Film Laboratories, or Metrocolor, it was often credited. Eastmancolor would sometimes be credited, and sometimes not. As detailed as your reply is, I would just still rather say that My Fair Lady is a Technicolor film since the credits label it as such. If it said Prints by Technicolor, well then it would be apparent that it wasn't filmed in Technicolor.

​@@garrettbays6942 I didn't wish to add any confusion, and would agree with you, if the credit states: "Color by Technicolor" - then Technicolor it is; and as you stated.. _"...that My Fair Lady is a Technicolor film since the credits label it as such."_ I brought this up merely to clarify the process(es); and as you can see, there were many. You stated: _"if a film were shot in Technicolor, Deluxe, Rank Film Laboratories, or Metrocolor..."_ The only problem with that statement is - the only films *_shot_** in Technicolor* used the Technicolor 3-Strip camera, PERIOD; otherwise a film was 'shot' using Eastman Color, Fujicolor, [God forbid] Ansco Color, etc. film. Technicolor played fast and loose with its name following the retirement of the 3-Strip camera thanks to their continued use of Dye Transfer (IB) Printing and Eastman Kodak's development of the Eastman Monopack 35mm negative stock usable in regular, 35mm cameras. Following the era of the Technicolor 3-Strip Camera, in America, it was almost guaranteed Eastman Color Negative film was utilized for origination, and the laboratories (De Luxe, Metrocolor, Technicolor, [don't forget WarnerColor], DuArt, etc.), processed the negatives, per Eastman's specs., and produced release prints that 'may' have carried a particular *look* indicative of the film laboratory where the work was done.

@smsstuart You mentioned WarnerColor; I found out from Leonard Maltin that WarnerColor was just a trade name for Eastmancolor. For that matter, Ansco, after its color process was modified, would become Metrocolor. MGM used Eastmancolor for a few years after Ansco, and then when Ansco became Metrocolor, that was their primary color process, though they would use Technicolor for their 70mm epics like Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ (1959), King of Kings (1961), and Mutiny on the Bounty (1962). I noticed that Paramount would use Metrocolor quite a bit in the mid-'70s up until the early '80s.

​@@garrettbays6942 WarnerColor = Eastman Color - yes, it certainly was. I really don't know what film lab(s) they used to do their work, but a few of their WarnerColor films had titles reading: WarnerColor - Prints by Technicolor. (I presume those were dye transfer prints). The story I heard was Warner Bros. missed procuring the rights to the Hypergonar (anamorphic) lens from Henri Chrétien by one day - 2oth Century-Fox being the 'victors'. Jack Warner was pissed and went about coming up with another anamorphic system, using Zeiss-made anamorphic lenses - the system *WarnerSuperScope* - being identical in every way with what Fox [ultimately] settled on by the time _The Robe_ was released in September, 1953. But it was not to be. Following a war of words between Darryl Zanuck at Fox and Jack Warner, the WarnerSuperScope system was abandoned. Warners passed their Zeiss contract to Fox and the only film made with the Zeiss lenses, _The Command_ was Warner Bros. premiere engagement, but was released under the CinemaScope banner. Undoubtedly, Warner Bros. wanted a complete system they could call their own, but 2oth Century-Fox ended up with the _premiere_ anamorphic system, along with directional, 4-Track Magnetic Sound. Paramount developed VistaVision, and in 1954 MGM would begin work with a 'little' optics company - who was among many optical houses supplying much-needed anamorphic projection lenses to theatres - to develop a 70mm camera system to compete with Cinerama. The system was called _MGM Camera 65 _*_The Window of the World._* It would later be known as *Ultra Panavision 70.* It's a specialized business, with a lot of proprietary methods, many of which have been lost as those who 'made the magic happen' have died-off.

My friend, let me tell you something. 4K Blu-ray and 4K TV? Absolute garbage. 1080p Blu-ray and 1080p TV are the real deal. Sure, 4K might have more pixels, but when it comes to picture quality and overall experience, 1080p is the way to go. Sorry buddy, but 4K just isn't worth the hype. Keep it classic with 1080p. Trust me, you won't regret it.