*horny engineer

😁

Kanka hangi Universiteye bitirdin.

@@jjbb3148 ODTÜ İnşaat

I am an engineer and that line i never joke about math or sex pretty sums up my whole time is college

It's called arrogance lol and if a friend did that I'd say 'no, the other Drake equation' just to make him feel less smug.

@@develynseether4426 but you know not even deep down that he's right lol

Does Americans always eat this type of food for dinner.?

@@develynseether4426 it's no arrogance it's scientific data

I didn't like that scene. It is inconsistent that Sheldon smiles because he knew the equation and remembered it off the top of his head fluently. That is anyhow impressive for someone who has an IQ >180. I have about 120 and can easily do that with many equations and many sorts of stuff. I bet someone with a slightly worst memory can also do it. Probably the average person can do that. The equation isn't even difficult. It is very simple

Yeah it's almost as if he's an actor by profession.

@@aaronleperspicace1704 I'm not dumb, I know he's a plumber.

with the amount of rehearsals and readings they go through, you can do it too.

@@blackmass1082 You think I can do it? 😢

@@frankie2936 100%

Has anyone tried to implement the Wolowitz coefficient and verify its applicability?

​@pugazhenthi6868 Don't make me do the math......... your careless use of posed hypotheticals is endangering those of us with calculus knowledge, ADHD, and too much other stuff to do. Dam it man, don't you know how dangerous open-ended questions are!?! edit: fuckfuckfuck fine.

Alright. Lets do this. N = R*Fp*Ne*f1*fi*fc*L So he mentions (# of single women) and (who might find us attractive), and these are both an unknown constant for any area, and both statistical measures, so I'm assuming the premise here is to modify the drake equation to calculate these two constants to deliver some number N which is the number of women they can sleep with, which can GIVE us a probability of them running INTO based on # of women they manage to talk to in a night and the total population of women in L.A. Lets take a look at these factors. Fortunately for us the ORDER of the factors in the equation is intentionally set up to also be chronological for civilization developement. R* is the star formation in this galaxy, Lets call that "Females who are currently in L.A" for no other reason than it makes sense as a first premise. You could approximate this as half the population of L.A, transients not included simply because (the currently-present population - transient pop) is roughly going to be total pop anyway. fp is the fraction of stars with planets, this one is kind of a must, because star-based life seems incredibly unlikely. Lets reassign this one to "Fraction of Females who can, or would, go to a bar" ^ these can be calculated easily. Now the harder ones. Ne is the average number of life-sustainable planets in a solar system, which, I think should be best reinterpretted as "Women who are remotely available" because it describes the absolute basic conditions too, which excludes lesbians, happily married women, and women faithfully practicing a religion with a tenant of chastity. ^ You could probably calculate this fairly accurately based polling statistics which are available such as # of religious/married/lesbian women, and can be adjusted for Bisexuals, polled religious people who might violate this tenant, and the probability of an affair x married women #. At this point we've discovered # of single women. Now for the second part. f1 describes fraction of habitable planets that actually develop life. fi is the fraction of intelligent life. fc is the fraction of intelligent life that can send signals into space we could detect. These three factors are the nature of the women, i'd say f1 would be women who are actually interested at all. And at this point, the wolowitz coefficient comes into play to describe f1 and fc as average frequency of sexual partners and BMI squared, no i dont know why squared, but lets assume its correct, it is Wolowitz after all, im sure he knows. At the end you'd get "Fraction of women without a type * Negative frequency of sexual partners * BMI^2" This just leaves L, which, i dont have anything to put for it so im just gonna leave it out. This leaves us with: "Females who are currently in L.A" x "Women who are remotely available / female pop L.A" x "Average Fraction of women who'd be at a bar. aka. " x "Fraction of women who would pick up a guy" x " 1 / frequency of sexual partners in men/time" x "BMI^2" Notably, the radius of 40 miles is considerably larger than the entire L.A and connected cities area, so we can ignore this factor entirely. This should give 3.85million people / 2 - 1.925m From what i can find, about 15-25% = 500,000 * (Couldn't find any solid stat for this, but its somwhere in the range of like 25%) = 125,000 This one is ROUGH to figure out, but its not much, something like 10% of hookups so lets say only a third. 40k. BMI / frequency of sexual partners is the wolowitz coef that is confusing and odd to calculate, so im going to say its some adjustment to our figure thats turns 40k into 12k. .............................. That is BIZARRELY close.

does the coefficient change year to year or season to season based on changing levels of overall neediness such as in the holidays or valentines day since the actual equation is based on population. id say its int from 1 to day of the year of N dD times dress size squared

@@nickscope27 Good question! It is an interesting observation that the neediness changes from time to time. People have tried quite a lot to predict the neediness with limited success. I am wondering if higher values of the Wolowitz coefficient are preferred over lower values. Comments and suggestions are welcome!

came looking for this. no wonder kunar end up marrying a former miss india LMAO

I heard it as Knock 😬

Lock up your daughters we're gonna hit it and quit it was an underrated line

It’s one of those lines where just hearing it, you can guess Raj said it LOL

Derived from a line in himym I believe

and has no clue what to make of it

Yes and he is like "fascinating " . That is hilarious 🤣🤣

Maybe Penny was right & he reports his observations to his extraterrestrial overlords

What's funny is that I find myself in that position. I just like to observe humans and be fascinated by their ideas (or usually what I've encountered, idiocy).

I’m impressed

Im actually trying to reAd it as fast as sheldons

Respect bro😅

Tried, but failed... How does he do that???? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Holy shit I did it after 3 times! 🤘🎉💪

@bigworm281 But he gets to learn more physics.

@@shieldfaith1 past a certain point I'm pretty sure Jim Parsons doesn't digest what any of the facts he says actually means. Especially if he doesnt have the base knowledge required to understand it would be close to possible for him to learn from his lines. Kind of the problem with focusing on rote learning in schools. You just don't learn much

But he know what lines are at the right time

@@Roflmao6173 yeah ofcourse he doesn't learn bcos he is just an actor, saying he learns is too much right

@@Roflmao6173 first intelligent comment...

Fascinating! I never thought of this scene encompassing the heart of the show's personality. I will now perform an experiment by watching the show as if I were a first time viewer and take every detail in!

Peaches and Apollo literally what I did

Exactly, they really ruined the characters after season 6,

With all due respect to the wolowitz coefficient. "Dress size × Neediness ^2" makes more sense since Neediness has a higher impact on women hooking up with Howard than dress size does, I would think😂

Shouldn't it have been Neediness / Dress size ^ 2?

@@vijayjayaraman5990 no that would mean Wolowitz gets a lot of chicks with low dress sizes

@@Adrian-to3gq yes. isn't that what the coefficient represents?

@@vijayjayaraman5990 i'd assume not😂

Math*

so are you dead yet? are you some kind of cat that has more than one life?

I still do. I could do that easily if I got millions per season😂

​@@DirtyBobBojanglesthen go ahead and do It

@@hil449 earn millions? Give me half of Jim Parsons contract and I'll perform these lines twice as well.

Michael A yeah that one

Awesome

I wonder how many takes did that take. Lol. That was AMAZING!

I know 31 digits of pi and it wasn’t that hard probably just need to practice it for a few days

@@benwalker4305 weird flex but okay

mattricho he can’t cook and Leonard can’t cook. So he has takeout because that’s all he can probably afford.

What do you mean? Pizza, Thai food, and other take outs aren't unhealthy if you eat the correct portion.

He did try once, when he was trying to increase his longevity, so that he could live the time when men can transfer their consciousness and live as a machine forever......it ended in a disaster

@@blankb.2277 all he can afford? Look at the stuff he has, his laptop is over 1500$ for sure and not to mention his comics and collectibles, which all together would cost around 30000$ (even more if he has any retro special edition stuff)

Aleksandar Topic he probably prioritizes those things above his diet so in his mind he can’t afford it. I read in an article that he only makes about $40,000 a year.

the fact you came up with that similarity

Isnt that sad…

It's really sad that in order to reference a book, they have to make it a kids book or it'll go over their audience's head.

@@CruzeHoneyCut LEGEND

LEGEND

But they accuse Americans of being prudes.

bigbangbonanza iiii

Darth Poultry (love the name) But you do get nudity on regular TV.

Why?

bigbangbonanza no they didnt.

Nah, he is kinda strange.

He's strange

I will give it to him, that I can go for some goat line was gold

akanksha w he's proud and shy ha ha

Yes❤❤

IKR 😅

Physicists make a lot of money.

JBishop29 Well they definetly earn more than a normal job - of course they don’t get rich

Rational PoC bit racist to focus on a certain group of people

I’m guessing if they can afford a living space that big, they can afford take outs.

More than afford despite consuming take out consistently they are not obese!

Quit*

Jim Parsons was not out until Season 7 and then his voice and mannerisms changed dramatically.

also they retconned the living c rap outta sheldon s character.

Leave it to a filthy weJ to screw things up. 😎😒

69th like ! 😜

It's even funnier now they have cut up all the funnier parts and made them into an internet binge-able seratonin drip.

Fr

*I gave up after season 4…* Howard was always chasing chicks (and getting shot down), but then gets married. So, that wasn’t fun anymore. Raj could never talk when women were around. Then after he started drinking, he was talking to everyone, and that wasn’t fun anymore either. 😒

And 3

fundamental theorem of engineering

it's like we watched the same thing.

he's the best

The introvert part of there brain kicked in and they chickened out at the last minute.

Me either:

Lucas Gantioqui its *MATH* or sex

let's bounce bitches

***Maths

Sorry, no. It doesn't calculate a probability, but a number. Although you are closer than Sheldon himself!