The reason people hate it because of the worst optimization on pc and the graphics are not even up to the mark if a gtx 1660 super rtzx 2060, 3050, gtx 1080 cant run this game on high 60 fps their is something wrong with it

I played 10 hours, practically every door that the player enters into an environment, whether external or internal, has loading, it looks exactly like Skyrim in 2011, meaning there has been almost no technical evolution in the engine. This game is nothing like Skyrim, it's more like a Fallout 4 DLC in space, but with worse physics and worse AI. Andromeda is terrible too, but its better then Starloading: Fallout 4 DLC. Wasted money.

@@bilal6865 theres a lot of reasons, why people hate it, the poor optmization for PC is just one of the reasons... but theres plenty others, like the space flight mechanics of the game, that is dumb compared with other games of the genre, by the way, the comparison with Andromeda was pretty accurate, because Andromeda was trying to copy the randonly generated planets like NMS did, the diference is that Bioware realize that all they could do was exactly what Starfield did, just some big worthless tiles and dumb space combat like Starfield so they simply decided to scrap it and simplify. Altought combat in Andromeda was the best of the entire franchise, the story suffered most with this, even tough the story in Andromeda was still great than it is in Starfield, and Andromeda story is the worst of the whole franchise (sometimes i get the impression that Andrormeda was supposed to be a prequel about the First Contact War, is mostly a feeling that somehow Bioware got the script for the FCW and decide to changed to make it 600 years in the future of ME trilogy in a completely different galaxy), and yet, it is still better than Starfield story, at least has a far more interesting lore on it. Also combat in Starfield was even compared with combat in Fallout 4 and it didn't hold up, is even worst when it is compared with games like Cyberpunk 2077 combat, wich, may not be the most awesome combat of all ( i prefer much more the approch of Borderlands 3 on combat), you can't deny that CP77 is clearly the winner in this regard, wich makes the combat in Starfield outdated with a jetpack, and by the way, combat in Andromeda is superb, is basically the only great thing about the game, but yeah. Exploration in Starfield sucks! Seriously, anyone defending the exploration in this game is nuts... i been playing No Man's Sky recently and i tell you, theres CAVES bigger and more interesting than all tiles of Starfield combined, and this are just caves, in NMS you can LITERALLY explore all the whole damn planets your ship can touch on the ground, and did i also mentioned that you can explore planets on vehicles in NMS, you can even use a mech to explore caves if you wish! How is exploration in Starfield? You have to land on a tile after some loadscreens and cutscenes, then run for minutes in the direction of a marker, yeah... Starfield feels great, isn't?

No, i hate starfied 😾

it's bad bro

I liked Ryder better than the strict, over-heroized Shepard, Ryder was more human. also liked the fem voice actress more

Ryder was wooden and cringe.

i keep shitting on it

The dialogue is so bad that it drug the experience as a whole down, but I still really enjoyed Andromeda. The combat is really fun and while most of the crafting systems are broken, it was really fun researching new weapons

Not saying the voice actors were bad, just the writing of the dialogue

when it was first released it was horrible.

@@jebes909090 but these it's not.

I lose interest in playing with too many puzzlelocks

Andromeda was a slap in the face to any real ME fans. Starfield is FAR superior

@@OGbrundle Actually, real ME fans see Andromeda for what it is. Wasted potential. Good premise with good ideas, but badly written and poorly executed. And you can't deny that Andromeda has some of, if not the best, gameplay in the series.

Bruh I get why pc players are angey but you ps5 guys don't even have the game

Games honestly fine, especially if you try and get immersed and enjoy the new take on combat.

well it was bad for a mass effect game imo

lol

Nope its still shit, starfield way better in every way

yep me too

Do it. I’ve been playing it for a while. Tryna immerse myself as a “mercenary” kind of Ryder. Using the maverick set basically. Honestly feels great. Always love when sci fi games has mercenary looking sets as apposed to only soldier and space gear.

Lool i was thinking the same hahahhaah

ahahahahahahahah

He released Starfield for modders ;)

No

R u dumb?

No. No it's not

Andrômeda is 100x better indeed The gameplay is really good and it feels good to play despite the flaws, starfield has no good gameplay mechanics at all, game is stuck in 2009 with all the jank Storywise andrômeda is not perfect, but has some good moments and quests Starfield on the other hand has one of the most horrible and boring stories I have ever seen And he'll andrômeda looks better as well with a better art design, starfield has empty maps with rocks and looks like dog crap, and it runs like shit

@@sadarumhogai9337 As a big Mass Effect fan, I will wholeheartedly disagree with every single thing you just said. Andromeda was awful. The worst, most one dimensional characters, terrible excuse for a plot or lack thereof, even after they "fixed" it the characters still look like Shrek, it was boring AF, and the combat just turned in to Gears Of War (which I personally despise). One of the best descriptions I've seen is that Mass Effect 1-3 was an epic space opera, and Andromeda is the Marvel spin off. Starfield to me feels like what Mass Effect SHOULD have evolved in to, in fact the similarities between the two are unignorable. Also, I still don't get how anybody is surprised or shocked at what Starfield is, they were pretty damn transparent before it released, people want it to be something it's not. My main complaint with Starfield is that it is very PG in comparison to all of Bethesda's other titles.

Yes ME cover system was great. Yes Mass Effect design was so cool from the start, ME3 multiplayer coop was really funny, and it's still played today.

What you want to play is Me2 with graphical overhaul 😂

not a bad idea@@Turanic1

Man, if by beating Starfield you mean doing the main mission, then you haven't played Starfield seriously and you don't even know what the game is worth. Sorry if I sound too aggressive, but even Skyrim's main mission was a little boring and what made the game spectacular were all the other missions and the exploratory nature that the game offered. The same thing happens with Starfield! That's why I'm as addicted to this game as I was (and still am) to Skyrim (over 4000 hours of gameplay!). In fact, it seems to me that many of the big KZfaqrs and other critics who reviewed this game only played the main mission and little else, and therefore left with a not very good impression of the game. Time will tell whether or not I'm right.

@@letsplayskyrimle9391 Crimson fleet totally worth it, Ryujin is Okaysh story, Vanguard is also Okay , but at 130h Starfield got me bored , will leave Free planets for 2nd pkaythrough or sth

@@Turanic1 Explore the planets! Use the scanner!

No Man's Sky also have first person view, EVEN to vehicles, so i much prefer NMS, over this two, but if i have to pick one it would be Andromeda, wich i already have it, and i even moded to have first person view (altough this also screw the beauty and hair mods i also downloaded for Sarah Ryder... Overal Andromeda is a better game, it just doesn't reach the same hights than the OG ME trilogy, Starfield completely sucks in my opinion, i came from the space sim genre and to me, Starfield looks pathetic.

Honestly after the sysdef vs crimson fleet mission i got bored.

just play x4 or elite dangerous or whatever space sim (even old poor tomorrow war) and meet the fact: space travel in starfield is decoration witout anything behind

I prefer Andromeda combat system and the fact it's a real RPG. Starfield isn't an RPG at all. You can use all weapons. The only difference is that you can play a moral character or a criminal one and that'it. An engineer in Mass Effect uses rifles and pistols and can damage robotic enemies. An engineer in Starfield is like a soldier or an assassin: you can use stealth as much as heavy weapons or rifles and pistols, no difference. Starfield is pretty but it's not a RPG game. Oh, I forgot how much idiotic is the AI with your companions always coming in my line of fire and getting hurt or blocking my way while I'm looting. I don't like that Andromeda main missions are interminable, really very very long but it's a BioWare habit

@@efxnews4776 NMS with ugly cartoon graphic and dumb mass asteroids if you fly out of the orbit.

Again? Let him be dead

@@LaburnumAnagyroides Her

Fallout NV is actually an Obsidian game... no surprise it is the best from the post Interplay age.

L

Right now, I'm 98,4 hours into the game and I can tell you that you still don't even have the slightest idea what the game is! It's a game that takes a long time to discover and understand how it works. Don't worry about doing the main mission, it's not a priority. Discover the game by completing other missions and exploring the planets. On the surface of the planets, turn on the scanner and start exploring. Planet Jemison alone has perhaps more things to explore than all of Skyrim. And I know what I'm talking about, because I have 4200 hours in Skyrim! Seeing if I can surpass 100 hours on Starfield today!

but the detail is amazing

its triple F game

Its cost like AAA+ game, its need AAAAAAA+ PC...

Both starfield and Andromeda are garbage games in isolation. Huge waste of money and time. Simple as. And it has nothing to do wanting to play as shepard.

Didn’t really do well there now did it bud

not in the slightest. Im glad I didnt buy the game and was just being sarcastic@@Kurimazdaripper

@zzzolll Thank you so much! I'm glad you liked it, comments like this feels like a glass of fresh water for me! :)

Sony pny I beat Andromeda and I love starfield. Have you ever played a Bethesda game before . I'm talking before fallout 4.

If you want non boring Starfield just join Crimson fleet 😂

i dont know what are u talking about but i played morrowind oblivion skyrim and now trashfield have you even been on this world when morrowind came out ?:P and im always playing on pc @@ghostrider2698 Just WOW people cant be objective these times , i just said my own opinion about this game is trash there are many OLD GAMES better with graphic and story without glitch than this game if u like it then ok have fun but in my opinion you are blind , bethesda doing always bad work and modders fixing their games

не ожидал что можно выпустить игру унылее чем андромеда (на самом деле ожидал)

It has a better script than Starfield

it still has a better story than starfield lmao. people call it a failure because they keep comparing it to the epic story of commander Shepard's journey to thwart galactic annihilation. If you keep comparing it to the OG trilogy, of course it's not as good. But on its own, it's definitely got a better story and side-quests than many game out there.

Funny guy lol

​@@captainkirk9691what's funny? It's the truth.

@@skullkraken_resurrected9857 Sry my face is tired.

​@@captainkirk9691yep it's true mr blind

​@@captainkirk9691Starfields faces look worse, and they only had to work with humans, MEA had alien species.

With almost zero consequences hahahha

i dont see any consequences. it delivers the same, even better experience as his father Skyrim, a goty Winner. @@tinotrivino

Gta 5 no se ve como starfield y es del 2013

It literally is. It’s using the engine that was created in 2006.

Yet many 2023 games can't pull of the details and psychics with so many items as Starfield because the engines can't handle it. Bethesda made different choices to prioritize.

@@MuscledRMH Honestly Bethesda games’ janky physics is nothing to boast about 😂 not to mention they were already outdated a decade ago.

@@MuscledRMH The vegetation looks awful, though. Just looking at the trees, Far Cry 2 (2008) and Crysis (2007) did that already better. Especially the interaction of the leafs with light. Lighting in Starfield looks also quite flat tbh. Certainly some years behind a lot of other games. Look at Far Cry Primal or Dying Light which came out in 2016. Way better lighting models in those games. Another game from that year is Homefront The Revolution. For all the issues it had at launch (some similar to Starfield like frame rate and some wonky physics here and there), the visuals were pretty impressive. The dynamic lighting model and weather model were pretty impressive. Really atmospheric. Especially in night scenes they did a spectacular job. It really feels like it's dark and there's a nice contrast between lighted areas and dark areas. Not like in many games, where you just get a washed out colour scheme with a blue hue to it. NPC models... well, there Starfield doesn't look that spectacular either. Neither in their texturing, animations, or facial expressions, if I'm honest. The ai also looks quite brain-dead, but I guess that's just a symptom that a lot of open world games have these days. Even Ubisoft (with all their open world games) managed to downgrade ai in every Far Cry title. With Far Cry 2 having by far the best ai of all Far Cry games... Some things in Starfield are nicely upgraded, though, like the materials model and how it interacts with things like lighting and fluids. And texture quality looks solid for the most part from what I can tell (character models excluded). It certainly looks more consistent and cohesive than Fallout 4 (truth be told, that was a pretty big issue with Fallout 4, so good that at least that has been fixed).

"I don't care about it so it means nobody else cares" lol, the salt in your comment is off the charts

Oh the physics in Starfield is great... and i could just remember throwing a grenade into a bunch of civilians and they just drop dead in the place... when in a game like Cyberpunk 2077, if you throw a grenade into a crawded area at least the civilians will be sent flying, is even better whe you throw at enemies, because then things get messy and gory, do Starfield has gore? Oh sorry, just ragdoll physics and poorly executed...

@@efxnews4776 Do you mean that game with the worst launch on history that took 3 years to get fixed while still missing promised features?

@@Cyberk_dont worry he wont even talk about that lmao

@@Cyberk_ yes that same game that just launched a dlc that is already crushing you bethesda trash. And by the way a fkg SPACE GAME this days that doesn't even have seamless transitions from space / planets IS trash, Hello Games can do it, and eve a turkish guy did this in his INDIE GAME that he is making SOLO called Spacebourne 2. So yeah, Starfield is trash either as an rpg and looter shoter becouse Cyberpunk is BETTER than Starfield in this regard or either as a space sim because even INDIE games can do BETTER than Bethesda.

@@efxnews4776 Oh ok, so you just copy and pasted the "seemless" criticism when they never mentioned it to be seemless, unlike CDPR filling their mouths of crap lmao. Ok, CP2077 wins in transitions, graphics, combat, story, decisions and... water physics?. However SF beats from day 1 in character/ship/weapon customization, building, jobs, resource management, replayability, world and NPC interactivity, working crime system (at release :D), contraband, enemy variety, home owning, companions' romance, random encounters, points of interest, backgrounds/traits, side activities, crafting and every other physics aspect than water. SF is practically Oblivion and F3 with improvements, and as rpg elements concern, Cyberpunk can't hope to win against those, but the best thing you all (ponies) got is "muh 3 secs loading screen 😭". And nice DLC btw, it just took 3 years, again. Just wait for Starfield to get there and launch DLCs like far harbor and shivering isles again.

а на планете не показали БЕГОТНЮ в то время как в андромеде есть тачка

@@karlvareze8337 причем тут транспорт, если речь идёт о графике

@@vprok94 ну космос в старфилде с кабины оч так себе

@@karlvareze8337 просто в видео сравнивают карту в старфилде с видом из кабины в Андромеде, как-то это не честно

@@vprok94 чел, пойми, андромеда это откровенно плохая игра, и любой фанат саги про шепарда тебе это подтвердит. то что ее сравнивают со старфилдом это уже показатель унылости старфилда, и сблев от биотварей судя по всему выигрывает с разгромным счетом

My impression while playing Andromeda is that it wasn't supposed to be the way it is, we knew the game was scrapped at some point due to problems with the randomly generated planets, but i believe there was also some changes in the script of the game... if you notice the pattern of the story in Andromeda, is almost like this game was supposed to be a prequel about the FIrst Contact war, and someone changed the script to add the other races into the game, alongside the plot of the Andromeda, but all the rest seems to be made of something else... In my opinion it would be a much better game if Bioware did a prequel game about the FCW, humans start to explore the galaxy and all of suddenly we meet with the turians in not friendly terms, and the a war just broke out. Some folks would be mad about, but it would be most likely a Halo: Reach situation, while the game is good, but the fans get mad about the fact that Master Chief wasn't the star of the game.

@@efxnews4776 (Using the translator) Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!Congratulations on the comment friend! After my revolt with Starfield, I decided to revisit Mass Andromeda and, honestly... playing it as a space game, it's interesting, it has different planets, different races and even conflicts between humans themselves. Look man... Mass Andromeda could be so many things. As soon as you arrived on a planet and dominated an area, after installing the base, it could become a Red Alert 2 and you could fortify, protect and create an army to facilitate the conquest of the planet. He understands? Imagine how many hours of gameplay we would have just to dominate a planet. And of course... the game had to avoid getting boring while keeping the story interesting. I think everything bad about Mass Andromeda could have been EA's order and so Bio was forced to make such a soulless game! Are the guys so stupid, that they thought they could just add the asari, the krogan, the turians and the game would become Mass Effect? Now we hope the new Mass Effect is good! Thank you for the conversation, good luck!

You did not play the game.

@maddyaurora Yes. I show a cutscene then I show the gameplay about how you can't take off your helmet on that planet. The cutscene helps to understand the situation. This is the only reason it's there.

pc master race here: starfield is sh**

I know right lmao they showed a cutscene for oxygen part

man shut up!i have nasa pc ! mods in and still a bad game!just acept the game is not good enough

@@ghostrider2698love the fact that some of them have never played the starfield or are pretending and have biased opinions cause “yOuTuBEr sAiD it bAd” so I think its bad

​@@reasonjefferey4644fr 😂

Anyone who played No Man's Sky knows that Starfield sucks both in gameplay as with the story, and NMS doesn't even have a great story to begin with, but at least didn't COPY the ending of another game and guess wich game Starfield copied the ending? Yep, NMS... Andromeda AT least has the legendary ME lore to back it up, Starfield doesn't even have a SINGLE ALIEN RACE, to even say it has a decent lore! Also Andromeda has a far superior COMBAT and more engaging characters than your crappy Bethesda game. Not even going to go to the fact that Starfield is a wanna be NMS while trying to be a modern Mass Effect game in terms of story and failing horribly in both!

lol no. Starfield's story, in typical Bethesda fashion, is quite literally the opposite of what a BioWare RPG should be like. It's dull and boring. Maybe in terms of exploration, Starfield is what Andromeda was supposed to be, but in terms of story, I'll take Mass Effect Andromeda any day.

Andromeda is like Starfield should have been and wanted to be, sadly. Starfield is just a gigantic sandbox in the space, not an RPG game. It's not bad and it's funny to arrange ships and outposts, there are many things to do but the combat system is not even half good as Andromeda's