Among best points was "selection of members of ECI shud be same like those of Lokpal, CBI director etc to bring more transparency and accuracy".

The best news channel for debate show. Right information , No non sense info , and silently one listen when other speak.

Sir please invite those person also who dissent with EC otherwise it will not be meaningful debate.....

when ECI worked against the govt- 1.ensured book release of 'rafale scam' 2. stopped pm modi movie,web series of modi 3. gave clean chit to rahul gandhi ..etc ..in all these incident ECI become good but once they didn't favor opposition ECI has been ridiculed..

Agnihothri sir well said.but discussion is not useful where recent issues like lavasa, a EC told he dont want to attend poll panel discussions anymore as his dessent is not recorded in giving cleanchits to modi and shah

The last point given by Ashok Tondon is not fair. If a candidate is wrong then he deserves to be behind bars not in the parliament. ECI has to implement Art. 324 more strongly otherwise democracy will weaken.

Nice to listen j sai deepak jee.

Disagreement should be there in every debate otherwise it will be biased like this debate.. I like the point that was raised by the MR.Agnihotri that appointment of the Commissioners should not be done by govt directly rather than by proper system.

I'm here 'cause jai is here📍👉 👍

opposition has failed in this election ,they are damaging the image of india..successful conduct of 900 mn voters election is itself a huge thing and must be applauded.

The best channel. On.which I can trust... Really superb discussion

J sai Deepak - Gold standard !

Sai Deepak will be the next top legal luminary of India...

Election Commission: - Judicial, administrative, regulatory body. - Constitutional institution played exceptional role in conducting elections throughout India in a country such vast & diverse. - 91 cr electorate, 10 lakh polling booth, 11 mn polling personnel - Praise from foreign media - EC treated at par with SC Judge. - Reforms: from single member to multi member. - absolute neutrality - talk of the world. They have continuously strived for higher standards and made the electoral process more peaceful, transparent, inclusive, participative. - From ballot box to EVM to VVPAT - rigging violence. - Social media platforms: 900 posts taken down. - enforcement against money power - campaign bans in Bengal. - Electoral process is a time bound process & they looked at each complaint in a objective manner. Concerns: - Political scrutiny over every elections: Low quality of discourse . VVPAT - 33%, 50% -> 100%: unreasonable demands by political parties. - Constitutional bodies used in as political tool in atrocious manner. CEC is at par with SC judge. - SS dhanoa , TN Shesan Case: Article 324 - insulted from any political pressure - function within democracy but pull or push from any political party. baseless allegations on its integrity - Freedom of Speech 19(1) & restrictions under 19(2) - talking of national security - construed as violation of Election code of conduct but clean chit to PM Steps can be taken: - Vesting of some power to EC for contempt: constitution marker - must be deterrent. motivation of these request & baseless allegations must be judged. - Constitutional backing to MCC. - relook at the way EC are appointed: may be by collegium or like a committee (for CBI or Lokpal) - Extend the status of SC judge to other two EC's - Political maturity - We cannot just reform the EC without expecting any change from political class. We need to preserve & protect the constitutional bodies to earn public trust & for that every stakeholder has to be held accountable. Political class have to be onboard with EC reforms and only then we can aim for much seamless electoral process

u deserve to be the best news channel

I just came to listen j sai deepak .

For this new RSTV "The right stand is the right stand".

Is Amit Shah holding a gun to your heads while debating or what? 3 people argued that opposition is at fault to question the EC's biasness towards 'Modiji'. Another fact is that dissent opinion was not a part of judgement. Nobody even spoke on it. We clearly saw communally polarising speeches of our honourable PM and his pithoo Amit Shah. Also, EC waited 2 days for Modiji to complete his campaign before putting a ban in bengal. This debate was very poor and meaningless. Seems like how Modiji institutionalised corruption through electoral bonds, Rajya Sabha TV is institutionalising Modi Bhaktism through one sided debates. Please remember most of your audience are future IAS officers of our country and it cannot be a platform for Bhaktism. Vaishnavites, Shivaites and now Modites in 2019

Good points but seemed to be too much biased!!! Everyone in the panel seemed to be too much appreciative of Election commision of India.... These people should know what is public discourse

No diversity of opinion in the panel.

Agree with Agnihotri sir

Independence and transperancy are very important for maintenance of standards of constitutional bodies

I felt like a contradictory side rather say the other side of coin is missing in this debate..and it's tilted onto one side only😇

Rahul calling PM as chor without any profe and banning movie,namo tv i dont see BJP outraised.opposition is totally disconnected from people...

Agnihotri ji points are valid In the past ,Advani ji and some other political leaders have stressed for bipartisan selection panel for chief election commissioner and other election commissioners Similarly the removal process of cec should be extended to other election commissioner to ensure independence and impartiality

For a strong democracy an strong Opposition needed for constructive criticism but sadly the Congress of today has become personal property of one family which discarded the contribution of non Gandhi Family leaders like PVNR,Shastri and Patel. Also Congress has nothing new to offer to aspirational India than giving out doles like NYAY,a relic of Fabian Socialism.. Congress must introspect within and shed of its character of being fiefdom of Gandhis and good leaders should be promoted

Awesome biased debate.... Frank I always appreciate u but can understand ur compulsion....

Opposition specially Italianghandi is desparate. She knows her son will lose. So her attitude is Bhhar me jaaye ye desh, Bharatbarsh, Bhar me jaaye democracy,my son should win. She has made it personal, but obviously no one has the guts to tell. If you speak out your job and life is at risk.

What an amazing, To the point and mature Discussion this is, some very good points were presented by Mr. J Sai Deepak.

EC is hacked

I have always been a fan of Rajya sabha TV. I watch the debates and learn many things from experts from your shows. But here I would like to emphasize that this is a political problem, the complaints being raised by political parties mainly from the opposition. U should have invited their representative for discussion if at all you have chosen a highly controversial topic. You could have let them make their point. And experts would have answered them. Secondly it appeared from the whole debate that dissenting voices have no place in the Rajya sabha TV. So sad indeed. Please upheld the values of the house of the elders. If the RS TV can't broadcast govt criticism please stay away from such debates. My humble request therefore is please avoid such topics.

J Sai Deepak always best suggestion

Sai deepak is just a genius

Excellent

J SAl Deepak... 😎

My fellow viewers, as per my understanding, we should take away the following ideas from this edition: 1) We must appreciate India's electoral mechanism. It take efforts from million of administrative and security personals to conduct free and fair elections in such a diverse environment and that to at a large scale. Eg- Points made by Mr. Rout. 2) We must be aware of the constitutional fundamentals. And only then we should make our view regarding any Constitutional institution. Eg- Article 19(1) and 19(2) point made by Mr. Tandon. 3) At last, there must be fruitful debates on further ensuring independency and transparency in ECI. But lets also keep in mind that we cannot expect everything from ECI to do, there are responsibilities on part of other stakeholders like political parties also.

Very very comprehensive discussion.....

Frank sir, Please make a video on narcotics & heroines and its illegal trade ,adverse effect on india and recent news.

The opposition complained to the EC even if Modi drew a long breath. What can the commission do but to turn it down. Then the oppos cry EC partiality.

Pranab मुखर्जी said something more... Don't show just one side of the glass🍸....

Takeaway from this debate is Politicians(every one including present ruling party when they r in opposition do same) using gold standard constitutional institution as scapegoat​ just bcse they have certain restrictions on speech , As j Sai Deepak said we need contempt code those who malign without any proof. ECI done thier best to the ability for fair election .we have to also understand that there will be some delay of decision on voilation of MCC by ECI which are unintentional ,bcse of diversity,complexity,geographical constrain they have to look into whole of India not just one particular party concern.

The statements from the opposition are baseless are being made after seeing the exit poll results.

Even former president pranam mukharji changes their statement within 24 hr, he is still in politics.. opportunistic politician must be control 2-3 political party stop rest..they became buisness party and involved in curruption game

J sai😘

At times J Sai Deepak feels that whatever is written is gospel.This is not true.

You can question the appointment but not the integrity of institutions.

India's enemies disliked I guess

What a channel...!

This is gold

Can anybody list the committees mentioned by j sai deepak ji.

Can anyone tell me the daily showtimes of RStv?

Fantastic argument Sai Deepak Sir....

Ohhh my god... 😊😊The respected ashok tondon is hugely biased ..is unofficial spokesperson of BJP RSS .whenever he comes to AIR I just change the channel..plz don't invite him as a guest RSTV

nice debate

👍

This is a completely one sided panel, dissenting views should be presented rather than 4 people saying the same thing in different manner

Only V K Agnihotri talked great while others only talked rubbish

Are yaar hindi me kyu nhi aate h zyada interview

Descent Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa is known to be close to P Chithambaram, who brought Ashok to MHA in 2009. Reportedly her wife appointed as director of a company on same year and now she is director in 12 companies. ---Pgurus

Actually his intension to join BJP So his lauding to EC. My view is that as the national institution it need to maintain its reputation but present it degrading it's position in world phenomenon

Government channels shouldn't discuss about political issues, there is no one to present a contradicting view.

I dont think supreme court interfare in every independent agency,even we knew supreme court have court fixer...

Log in to www.scorhigh.com for rstv summary.

There should be an article in the constitution of india that deals with defamation of Narendra Modi by any means attracting death penalty.. 🔏🔏🔏🤔😕

sai deepak ji non sense.know what happening

Still dont like d bearded Frank...we want the old Frank back...clean shaven n formal... :)